Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 4 Interrogation.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

They’re not just in the Bill of Rights

Advertisements

From Crime to Doing Time What Courts Do

Chapter 14, Section 3 THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED

CJ305: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Welcome to Unit 6! Instructor: K. Austin Zimmer, J.D. Make sure you adjust your speakers and audio settings.

THE MAGISTRATE… THE JUVENILE…THE STATEMENT KEEPING IT LEGAL Kameron D. Johnson E:mail Presented by Ursula Hall, Judge,

Miranda Warning Law Enforcement I.

Trial Procedures. Pleadings – papers filed with the beginning of a trial – establish the issues the court is being asked to decided Spell out allegations.

Chapter Eleven – Confessions and Admissions: Miranda v. Arizona Rolando V. del Carmen.

AJ 104 Chapter 14 Self-Incrimination.

The Investigation Phase Criminal Law and Procedure.

Vivek Barbhaiya and John Coriasco

Do you know your civil rights?

Miranda Rights 5th Amendment

Miranda v. Arizona.

BY: KATIE LOSINIECKI Miranda v. Arizona. Facts Ernesto Miranda was arrested in 1966 for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old woman After being interrogated.

Miranda vs. Arizona 1966.

Criminal Procedure for the Criminal Justice Professional 11 th Edition John N. Ferdico Henry F. Fradella Christopher Totten Prepared by Tony Wolusky Interrogations,

Plain View Doctrine 1.Item is positioned easily in an officer’s sight. 2.Officer is legally in a position to notice. 3.The discovery of the item is inadvertent.

1 Book Cover Here Chapter 10 INTERROGATION OF SUSPECTS AND HOSTILE WITNESSES Guidelines and Procedures Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing.

“ Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Criminal Evidence Chapter Seven: Confessions and the 5 th Amendment This multimedia product and its contents are protected.

SUMMARY RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. Why would anyone be accused of or charged with a crime if they are not guilty? Discuss with talk partner? QUESTION.

Miranda v. Arizona. Facts of the Case Police arrest Ernesto Miranda after the victim identifies him in lineup Police interrogate Miranda for two hours.

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 2 Delinquency Overview.

{ Criminal Trial Procedure What happens when the police arrest a criminal suspect?

Rights When Arrested Objective 2.01 Recognize types of courts. Business Law.

Chapter 2 Interrogation and Forensic Reporting

Arrests and Miranda. 2 Copyright and Terms of Service Copyright © Texas Education Agency, These materials are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as.

Miranda Warnings and The Bill of Rights P.S. 2 Summarizing Activity.

Criminal Justice Today CHAPTER Criminal Justice Today, 13th Edition Frank Schmalleger Copyright © 2015, © 2013 by Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

An Overview of The Mapp, Gideon, Escobedo, and Miranda cases. Copyright 2010; The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC; By Atty. Brendon G. Basiga.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved. PENNSYLVANIA v. BRUDER 488 U.S. 9 (1988) Case Brief.

Chapter 1 The Pursuit of Justice Unit #1 Notes Packet.

1 Bakersfield College Criminal Justice Charles Feer, JD, MPA Miranda.

Miranda v Arizona Rights of the Accused. Citations 384 U.S. 436 (1966) oDocket # 759 oArgued February 28, 1966 o Decider June 13, 1966.

Important Court Cases THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW! Important Cases Marbury v. Madison (1803) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Brown.

Chapter 22 Rights of the Accused. A. Protections 1.Nothing can protect you against being accused of a crime 2.5 th, 6 th and 8 th Amendments help protect.

CJ © 2011 Cengage Learning Chapter 7 Police and the Constitution: The Rules of Law Enforcement.

Ashley Nine March 25, 2010 Period 7.  Poor living immigrant from Mexico living in Arizona.  He was charged with rape and kidnapping.  He was arrested.

CJ210: Interrogation: Purpose, Guidelines, Procedures, and the Miranda Ruling Unit 6 Seminar.

SELF-INCRIMINATION “No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself[.]” The 5 th Amendment “I plead the Fifth!”

Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda 1966 Charged & convicted of kidnapping, rape, and armed robbery charges second trial, with his confession excluded.

Busted! Judith A. Schechter Lexington School for the Deaf.

Arrests and Miranda.  Right to a grand jury  Protection against double jeopardy  Protection against self-incrimination  Right to due process  Custody.

The 5th 6th and 7th Amendments Zone Andrew Kwak..……….Mehek Desai Lena Gavenas………….Sharon Bae Benny Feldmann……..Mariela Carrillo.

CJ210: Interrogation: Purpose, Guidelines, Procedures, and the Miranda Ruling Unit 6 Seminar: Miranda, Interrogation, Interviews, and other.

CJ305 Criminal Evidence Welcome to our Seminar!!! (We will begin shortly) Tonight – Unit 6 (Chapter 8 – Admissions & Confessions)

 Online Miranda quiz Online Miranda quiz. The constitutional implications of custodial interrogation.

Essential Questions: What rights are guaranteed to all Americans who are accused of crimes?

Looking at Miranda Your Right to Remain Silent

Part 4 Continuums for Special Populations. Chapter 17 Disability.

Supreme Court Cases on Self Incrimination Sarah Claypoole.

Miranda V. Arizona By: Elise Kloppenburg. Facts of the Case Phoenix, Arizona 1963 Ernesto Miranda, 23 years old Arrested in his home Taken to the police.

Supreme Court Cases of the 60s. Mapp v. Ohio, 1961 What happened? - illegal search of home found “obscene materials”. Mapp was convicted. Brought to court.

Miranda Warnings. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. Objective Students.

The Warren Court and judicial activism “The biggest damn fool mistake I ever made”, Dwight D. Eisenhower on Earl Warren, quoted in 1977 Chief Justice,

Judicial Change The Warren and Burger Court. Earl Warren.

Tracing Our Rights

The Judicial System What Courts Do and Crime. Stages of Criminal Justice.

Know Your Rights Santa Teresa High School Intro to LPSCS.

Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.

The University of Adelaide, School of Computer Science

Miranda v. Arizona (1966).

Miranda Warnings.

Entry Into the System Arrests and Miranda.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.

Ch. 3-2 The Fifth Amendment Right to Remain Silent

AMENDMENTS U.S. Bill Of Rights.

Ap u.s. government & politics

Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 4 Interrogation

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Interrogation  Interrogation is the formal questioning of suspects while they are in custody  Strict rules govern interrogation  Interrogation is the formal questioning of suspects while they are in custody  Strict rules govern interrogation

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Miranda v. Arizona  This landmark interrogation case established rules for interrogation of criminal suspects  It gave rise to “Miranda warnings”  This landmark interrogation case established rules for interrogation of criminal suspects  It gave rise to “Miranda warnings”

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Miranda Warnings  You have the right to remain silent  Anything you say can and will be used against you in court  You have the right to an attorney  If you can’t afford an attorney, the state will appoint one for you at state’s expense  You have the right to remain silent  Anything you say can and will be used against you in court  You have the right to an attorney  If you can’t afford an attorney, the state will appoint one for you at state’s expense

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Juveniles and Miranda  Initially Miranda applied only to adults  Miranda now applies to juveniles as well; however, juveniles receive no special consideration  Initially Miranda applied only to adults  Miranda now applies to juveniles as well; however, juveniles receive no special consideration

Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Challenges to Interrogations  Was suspect in custody?  Did suspect request presence of adult?  Did suspect waive Miranda rights?  Was waiver valid?  Did suspect invoke Miranda?  Was suspect in custody?  Did suspect request presence of adult?  Did suspect waive Miranda rights?  Was waiver valid?  Did suspect invoke Miranda?