Forecasting changes in water quality and aquatic biodiversity in response to future bioenergy landscapes in the Arkansas-White-Red River basin Peter E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
Advertisements

SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi and Atchafalaya River Basins (MARB) Dale Robertson, Richard Alexander, and David Saad U.S. Geological Survey USGS/USEPA.
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
An open source version of the Nonpoint-Source Pollution and Erosion Comparison Tool Climate Tools Café Webinar Dave Eslinger, Ph.D. 3 May, 2012.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Defining Land Management in the Wisconsin River Basin Adam Freihoefer Wisconsin Department of Natural.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Watershed Impacts Bob Broz - University of Missouri Roberta Dow - Michigan State University Eleanor Burkett - University of Minnesota.
Contaminant Source and Watershed Characterization Data Needs Gregory McIsaac, Robert Howarth, and Richard B. Alexander Univ. of Illinois Cornell Univ.
CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN (CMRB) LTAR USDA-ARS Columbia Missouri Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology into Practice A training session.
Land Use Change and Its Effect on Water Quality: A Watershed Level BASINS-SWAT Model in West Georgia Gandhi Raj Bhattarai Diane Hite Upton Hatch Prepared.
Linking watershed characteristics and land use to lake water quality using GIS presented by Brian Block ESR Limnology instructed by Dr. Mark Sytsma.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
Applications of GIS to River Management: Recent developments in the Great Lakes Basin M. J. Wiley & M. Omair School of Natural Resources and Environment.
Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER. General facts: Third largest drainage basin in the World The Mississippi drains 1/3 of USA and a small part of Canada. Second longest.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Sustainability Overview Laura McCann, on behalf of Alison Goss Eng U.S. Department of Energy Office of Biomass Program February 23, 2010.
ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M E N T A L D E.
Predicting Sediment and Phosphorus Delivery with a Geographic Information System and a Computer Model M.S. Richardson and A. Roa-Espinosa; Dane County.
Sediment Retention model
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Washburne HWR203The University of Arizona Watersheds Reading: –Discussion: issues facing Arizona’s rivers Lecture: – How you identify a watershed – Why.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer & Provider.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Cathy, Phil, Keith, Calvin, Manoj, and Todd Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University 2011 The Potential for Agricultural Land.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
Invest Nutrient Retention model Yonas Ghile.
Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
Watersheds What is a watershed? 93 watersheds in Ohio.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
SWAT Modeling for Subwatershed Prioritization Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: N. Pai, M. Daniels, and M. Leh 2010 Non Point Source Project.
Relating Surface Water Nutrients in the Pacific Northwest to Watershed Attributes Using the USGS SPARROW Model Daniel Wise, Hydrologist US Geological Survey.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
October 12, 2015 Iowa State University Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Water Quality.
Modeling of Critical Areas for DRP Runoff and Targeting Strategies
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
Impacts of Riparian Ecosystems on Water Quality in the Western Upper Suwannee River Watershed Richard Lowrance, George Vellidis, David Bosch, Joe Sheridan,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (703) NHD Flow and Velocity Project Greg Schwarz, Reston,
Effect of Potential Future Climate Change on Cost-Effective Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction Strategies in the UMRB Manoj Jha, Philip Gassman, Gene.
Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge.
Watersheds. Key Terms 1.Watershed 2.Drainage basin 3.Floodplain 4.Deposition 5.Runoff/storm water runoff 6.Point-source pollution 7.Nonpoint-source pollution.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Forecasting Water Quality and Aquatic Biodiversity Henriette Jager Latha.
Virtual Watershed NSF Biocomplexity in the Environment Program Christopher Lant (Geography) PI Steven Kraft, Jeff Beaulieu (Agr. Economics) John.
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
 Decreasing Nutrient Runoff from Iowa Farms to Improve Water Quality Everywhere from Local Sources in Iowa to the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
GIS M ETHODOLOGY Swearing Creek Watershed Restoration Plan 8/26/2015 Piedmont Triad Regional Council.
Ellen Cooter1, Limei Ran1, Verel Benson2, Dongmei Yang3,
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
Applying an agroecosystem model to inform integrated assessments of climate change mitigation opportunities AM Thomson, RC Izaurralde, GP Kyle, X Zhang,
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Karl Williard and Jon Schoonover Department of Forestry
Presentation transcript:

Forecasting changes in water quality and aquatic biodiversity in response to future bioenergy landscapes in the Arkansas-White-Red River basin Peter E. Schweizer, Henriette I. Jager, and Latha M. Baskaran April 8, US-IALE 25 th Anniversary Symposium Athens, Georgia USA

OUTLINE Context and assumptions Hypotheses Data sources Study area Modeling approach Results Limitations Implications and future direction

Sustainability Humans change landscapes Bioenergy industry and public concerns Aspects of sustainability – Long-term profitability of bioenergy production (switchgrass yield) – Long-term water quality – Aquatic biodiversity Products Bioenergy Clean rivers

Arkansas River Red River Drainages North Canadian River Upper White River & Black River Canadian River Lower Arkansas Cimarron River TX NM LA CO AR KS OK MO 642,000 km HUC-8 Tributary to Mississippi River Gulf of Mexico TX NM LA CO AR KS OK MO The Arkansas-White-Red River (AWR) basin

Grasslands, pasture and hay45 % Forest21 % Agriculture 15 % Future energy landscape(s) LULC where ? water quality fish biodiversity EISA 2007

Assumptions switchgrass as bioenergy crop limited to existing agriculture and pasture land total area of cultivated land static Hypotheses Where switchgrass replaces agriculture nutrients in streams decrease perennial crops decrease sediment loads increase in fish diversity

METHODS : conceptual approach Existing landscape Watershed characteristics Land cover (CDL & NLCD) Slope and elevation Soils Stream layers Projected landscape (POLYSYS) Projected water quality (SWAT) SWAT Discharge Water quality Species richness model (Native fish species) Projected species richness Changes in water quality Changes in fish richness

POLYSYS Agro-economic model Land change projections –% area agriculture replaced by switchgrassSWAT Basin-scale hydrologic model Integrates land change –Project water quality –Stream discharge –Sediment loads –Nutrient levels Tools

Data sources CDL and NLCD land cover STATSGO soils USGS elevation and slope NHDplus streamsand watershed boundaries NatureServe fish and mussel data

SWAT modeling model run Alamo switchgrass Tiles Calibration Agricultural watershed Forest watershed Nash-Sutcliffe > 0.75 Validation: discharge, nutrients and sediment load

Fish species richness in the AWR Precipitation Elevation Regional biodiversity Number of native fish species per HUC-8 76 – 100 > 100

Modeling current fish species richness R 2 adj. = 0.86 Stratified data 70/30, by subregion Poisson regression with log-link function Number Species discharge number of dams elevation sediment concentration number upstream HUC percent water nitrate nitrogen total phosphorus N Species = exp( flow – dams – elevation – 0.04 sediments) p < 0.001

POLYSYS Landscape 2030 Conversion to switchgrass (9.7%) 60 % from pasture 28 % from wheat 4 % from soybean 4 % from sorghum 3 % from corn Economic regions - Upper Midwest - Lower Midwest

RESULTS : changes in stream discharge

TX NM LA CO AR KS OK MO Sediment loads

Total phosphorus

TX NM LA CO AR KS OK MO NO3-nitrogen concentrations

Changes in fish species richness in the AWR

SWAT projections for bioenergy scenarios Discharge overall decrease - increase where replacing intensive agriculture - decrease where pasture/hay is replaced Sediment load overall decrease - increase from former pasture/hay? Nitrate nitrogen increase where pasture/hay is replaced - less input than from corn Total phosphorus overall decrease (correlated with sediment loads) Fish diversity benefits in former agro-intensive areas - suggested decreases where replacing pasture/hay

LIMITATIONS Replications with alternate transition scenarios needed Multiple scenarios for % replacement needed Spatial resolution at county scale Spatial context important, current scenarios are not spatially explicit Biotic data 0/1 FUTURE DIRECTION Include spatial context (buffer zones, conservation practice, BMP’s) Include upland varieties Species traits and empirical data for biotic component

U.S. Department of Energy ORNL Laboratory directed Research and Development Acknowledgements Bob Perlack and Craig Brandt (POLYSYS) Oak Ridge Associate Universities (ORAU) ORISE ProgramContacts