Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation –Indianapolis, IN Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PHOTOSafe Newport News
Advertisements

Traffic Crash Characteristics for Jackson Area Transportation Study Wayne State University Transportation Research Group November 26, 2007.
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
Safety at Signalized Intersections. Signalized Intersections FHWA Safety Focus Areas 2.
Connected Vehicles AASHTO Annual Meeting | October 17, 2013 | Denver, CO Mike Cammisa Director, Safety Association of Global Automakers.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #7.
Red-Light Running. 2 Traffic Signals Red-Light Running 3 Intersection Fatalities There were 8,657 intersection fatalities in 2007.
Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer AAA Michigan Road Improvement Demonstration Program Economic Analyses Presented By: Jeff Bagdade Traffic Engineer.
Traffic Engineering Teaching Kids the ABC’s of Traffic Engineering The Chattanooga School Outreach Program.
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
Red Light Photo Enforcement & Crime Scene Investigation William Fisher Photo Safety Program.
Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems Initiative May 2005, ITS America Annual Meeting Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office U.S. Department.
Module Use research and appropriate methods for selecting effective countermeasures and targeting diverse cultural and geographic populations. Countermeasure.
8-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS The Tools – Traffic Signals – Session #8.
Safety and Design National Technical Services Team 1 Systematic Approach to Intersection Safety May 11, st Annual Missouri Traffic and Safety Conference.
Rural ITS Safety Solutions (RITSS) 2010 ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, TX May 4, ITS America Annual Meeting Houston, TX May 4, 2010 Marthand.
Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) ISYM 540 Current Topics in Information System Management Anas Hardan.
The Red-Light Running Problem: Traffic crashes are among the most significant causes of preventable death and injury in North America. Red-light running.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
IDAHO’S CRASH PROBLEM & PROGRAMS. Mission - Zero traffic deaths on Idaho roads Fewer than 200 annual traffic deaths by 2012 Goals.
Introductory presentation on the SAHER Program
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Patrick Hasson Federal Highway Administration Midwestern Resource Center Engineering Safer Intersections.
9-1 LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Exercise C – Session #9.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
September 25, 2013 Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety Research, Development and Test Overview of V2I Safety Applications.
Vulnerable road users: Pedestrians & Motorcycle and bicycle riders.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Potential Fairfax County Photo Red Light Program Board Transportation Committee December 10, 2013.
Institute of Transportation Engineers Presentation on Automated Enforcement.
Transportation Research Board Agency Update Barbara Hilger DeLucia August 6, 2002.
1 Red Light Camera Update Presented by Public Works Department Traffic Engineering Division Board of County Commissioners January 25, 2011.
June 23, 2006 Asset Management A Tool to Save Lives, Time, and $$$
Intersection Safety Case Study Summary FHWA-SA Red-Light Running: All-Red Clearance Intervals and Larger Signal Lenses A Michigan Success Story.
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Engineering our Highways for Older Drivers in Minnesota
Public Safety Committee September 28, 2015 David O. Brown Chief Of Police Pedestrian Safety.
Evaluation of Law Enforcement Presence on Changing Drivers’ Behaviors – Red Light Running International Traffic Records Forum July 2003.
1 CEE 763 Fall 2011 Topic 3 – Safety Management Process – Other Steps CEE 763.
Evaluation of Automated Camera Enforcement on Red Light Running Violations by Time into the Red Phase Nicole Oneyear and Shauna Hallmark.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Small Cost – Big Impact: Lessons in Low-Cost Safety Improvements Gustave Scheerbaum, PE Complete Streets Safety Engineer ARLE Grant Programs Manager City.
US 421 Centerline Rumble Strips in Chatham Co. Renee B. Roach, P.E. and Al Grandy May 2, 2007.
OSHA Guidelines for Employers to Reduce Motor Vehicle Crashes
Red light Enforcement Enforcement lights A simple tool for safer highways. Prepared by Lieutenant Steven Burch (ret.) Clearwater Police Department.
LOW COST SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Practitioner Workshop Introduction – Session #1.
Evaluation of the Safety Effects of Red-Light Cameras Sponsored by FHWA’s ITS Joint Programs Office Conducted by BMI and Battelle.
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
IDS Project Update on Human Factors and Simulation (Geometry Completed)
2010 NASDA Supervisory Enumerator Workshop ~ Workplace Safety ~ Robin Dannels The Hartford, Washington DC Regional Office April 27, 2010.
Road Safety Audits Road School, 2011 Rick Drumm, P.E. Safety Engineer Federal Highway Administration.
City of Hampton Intersection Safety Initiative Automated Red light Enforcement Program.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Innovation ◊ Integrity ◊ Accountability ◊ Commitment to Excellence ◊ Teamwork Item 6A: Ordinance 922 December 18, 2007.
Presentation Notes:  Purpose  Educate the audience on the benefits of implementing automated traffic enforcement technology  Audience  Government officials.
Traffic Records Forum 2016 August 9, 2016 Kelvin R. Santiago-Chaparro
us 30 and SR 603 – Ashland county September 7, PUBLIC meeting
Crash Analysis of Lincoln Way and Dakota Ave. Ames, IA
CTDOT Traffic Safety Engineering
Robert James Schneider, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
2010 NASDA Supervisory Enumerator Workshop ~ Workplace Safety ~
Mike Schagrin ITS Joint Program Office
School of Civil Engineering
Partners in Highway Safety
Presentation transcript:

Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation –Indianapolis, IN Presented by: Daniel E. Shamo, P.E. Senior ITS Engineer URS Corporation –Indianapolis, IN A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH for solving the RED LIGHT RUNNING PROBLEM

The RLR Epidemic! Annual Statistics… 168,000 injured 854 fatalities Economic loss of $14 billion Source: NHTSA 2004, FHWA 2003 Statistics Annual Statistics… 168,000 injured 854 fatalities Economic loss of $14 billion Source: NHTSA 2004, FHWA 2003 Statistics

RLR Underlying Causes Driver Behavior Inattentiveness (44%) Intentional violations (33%) Confusion (15%) Vehicle problem/environmental condition (6%) Source: FHWA unpublished study by BMI Driver Behavior Inattentiveness (44%) Intentional violations (33%) Confusion (15%) Vehicle problem/environmental condition (6%) Source: FHWA unpublished study by BMI

RLR Underlying Causes (cont’d) Intersection Characteristics Poor traffic signal indication visibility Inadequate intersection capacity Downhill approaches Sight obstructions Intersection Characteristics Poor traffic signal indication visibility Inadequate intersection capacity Downhill approaches Sight obstructions

RLR Underlying Causes (cont’d) Traffic Signal Timing Issues “Unpredictable” traffic signal indications Improper change intervals (yellow, red) Poor signal progression Traffic Signal Timing Issues “Unpredictable” traffic signal indications Improper change intervals (yellow, red) Poor signal progression

NHTSA and FHWA “… support a comprehensive approach to intersection safety that incorporates engineering, education, and enforcement countermeasures to prevent red light running and improve intersection safety.” - Red Light Systems Operational Guidelines, FHWA, January 2005 “… support a comprehensive approach to intersection safety that incorporates engineering, education, and enforcement countermeasures to prevent red light running and improve intersection safety.” - Red Light Systems Operational Guidelines, FHWA, January 2005

The Automated Enforcement Remedy Violations Detected Using Cameras Images recorded Vehicle information processed Tickets issued in the mail

Automated Enforcement Issues Very unpopular due to privacy concerns Car owner gets ticket, not offender Equipment is specialized and expensive Often seen as a revenue stream Requires legislation Overlooks potential engineering solutions Increases rear end collisions Very unpopular due to privacy concerns Car owner gets ticket, not offender Equipment is specialized and expensive Often seen as a revenue stream Requires legislation Overlooks potential engineering solutions Increases rear end collisions

A Comprehensive Approach Identify candidate intersections Install low cost RLR monitors Measure existing compliance rates Seek site-specific engineering solutions Evaluate countermeasures

A Comprehensive Approach (Cont'd) Conduct selective human enforcement Periodically monitor compliance Use automated enforcement as last resort If problem is not resolved, or engineering solutions are too costly then…

Benefits of the Comprehensive Approach No video is recorded Tickets in the mail are a last resort Equipment is lower cost Does not require legislation No video is recorded Tickets in the mail are a last resort Equipment is lower cost Does not require legislation

Benefits of the Comprehensive Approach Easier to install Countermeasures can be evaluated quickly Enhances traditional enforcement resources Easier to install Countermeasures can be evaluated quickly Enhances traditional enforcement resources

‘Comprehensive Approach’ Goals To reduce right angle collisions To improve red light compliance To increase enforcement effectiveness To develop a performance measure To reduce right angle collisions To improve red light compliance To increase enforcement effectiveness To develop a performance measure

Engineering Solutions General Categories: 1.Signal visibility/conspicuity 2.Signal timing/coordination 3.Sight distances 4.Other traffic control devices 5.Improved driver expectancies General Categories: 1.Signal visibility/conspicuity 2.Signal timing/coordination 3.Sight distances 4.Other traffic control devices 5.Improved driver expectancies

Engineering Solutions Improving signal visibility  Number of signal heads  Placement of signal heads Improving signal visibility  Number of signal heads  Placement of signal heads

Engineering Solutions Improving signal conspicuity  LED lenses  Backplates  Red redundancy Improving signal conspicuity  LED lenses  Backplates  Red redundancy

Engineering Solutions Improve signal timing/coordination  Signal optimization  Signal cycle length  Yellow change interval  Red clearance interval Improve signal timing/coordination  Signal optimization  Signal cycle length  Yellow change interval  Red clearance interval

Engineering Solutions Improve other traffic control devices  Advanced warning flasher  Rumble strips Improve other traffic control devices  Advanced warning flasher  Rumble strips

Engineering Solutions Improve driver expectancies  Remove unwarranted traffic signals  Eliminate night flashing mode  All -Way Red Flash for malfunction mode  Improve pavement surface condition Improve driver expectancies  Remove unwarranted traffic signals  Eliminate night flashing mode  All -Way Red Flash for malfunction mode  Improve pavement surface condition

Summary of the Comprehensive Approach 1. Install RLR monitoring equipment 2. Focus on root causes 3. Implement countermeasures 4. Monitor RLR compliance after changes 5. Selective enforcement with media campaign 6. Implement automated enforcement (a last resort if nothing else works) 1. Install RLR monitoring equipment 2. Focus on root causes 3. Implement countermeasures 4. Monitor RLR compliance after changes 5. Selective enforcement with media campaign 6. Implement automated enforcement (a last resort if nothing else works)

Potential Research Concepts Investigate ‘Depth of Red’ correlation with crash rates Develop crash prediction tools Develop user-friendly in-vehicle equipment to enhance enforcement efforts Use RLR studies to optimize clearance intervals Move towards self programming signal controller Investigate ‘Depth of Red’ correlation with crash rates Develop crash prediction tools Develop user-friendly in-vehicle equipment to enhance enforcement efforts Use RLR studies to optimize clearance intervals Move towards self programming signal controller

Sample Scheduling Report for Local Police (Selective Enforcement Program)

For More Information, Contact… Dan Shamo, PE URS Corporation One Indiana Square, Suite 2100 Indianapolis, IN (317) Dan Shamo, PE URS Corporation One Indiana Square, Suite 2100 Indianapolis, IN (317)