Mentoring: Proven Strategies for Success: Session 5: Evaluation and Tool 04/24/14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Scottish Learning and Teaching Strategies Support Group Academy Scotland - Enhancement and Engagement 24 May 2007.
Advertisements

Theology and Religious Studies Looking Outwards A workshop on knowledge transfer as a strategy for learning and assessment in the TRS curriculum.
A New Model for the Assessment and Evaluation of Student Learning in a University Teacher Education Program: The Role of the Regis Gate System Suzanne.
Teaching and Mentoring Students Lori A. Clarke University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
New Faculty: Self- Assessment Tools Positioning Yourself as a Scholar.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
THE CBA ASSESSMENT CULTURE SURVEY The most important reason for the emphasis on assessment in the college is to meet AACSB and CSU requirements.
An Excellent Proposal is a Good Idea, Well Expressed, With A Clear Indication of Methods for Pursuing the Idea, Evaluating the Findings, and Making Them.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
WASC Accreditation Process DUE Managers Meeting December 2, 2009 Sharon Salinger and Judy Shoemaker.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
 Please sign in.  You must register for the course to receive PAC.  PAC is valuable for advancing on the salary schedule.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Measuring for Success Module Nine Instructions:
Partner List. 1 Minute Discussion Find out what you have in common with your partner. Microsoft, 2011.
5. How to Amass Evidence (Evaluation) of Change and its Effects? How does assessment drive transformative change in the classroom, at the department level,
Université d’Ottawa / University of Ottawa Theory and Practice of Undergraduate Teaching ESG 5300 September 14, 2004.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Integrating Diversity into.
Career Development AMA Nicola Jones Museums & Galleries Officer Sefton MBC.
Preparing for an Academic Career
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Tips for Early Career Success in Research, Teaching, and Service Jim Martin, Jeff Smith, Thomas Vojta presentation to UMR Freshman Faculty Forum 7 November.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Statutory Induction Arrangements for Newly Qualified Teachers.
Creating a S.I.M.P.L.E. & Comprehensive Assessment Plan for Residence Life and Housing Dr. Mike Fulford Emory University Student Affairs Assessment Conference.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
XING WAN The Compleat Academic A Career Guide. Agenda Starting a Career as a PhD candidate  Different from master and undergraduate  Job options Teaching.
19/9/2005 Promotion and Tenure: Suggestions for Success Kimberly W. Anderson Professor Chemical and Materials Engineering.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
SACS Coordinators Meeting Academic Units Wednesday, October 31, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.
Performing Engineering Research at Non-Ph.D. Granting Institutions Eric Larson Agnieszka Miguel Seattle University.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
PROMOTION & TENURE 2015 – P&T Timetable (during sixth year) School Director and faculty member discuss Fall 2015 possibility for promotion and evaluation.
Measuring for Success Module Nine. Reflecting on the Previous Session What was most useful? What progress have you made? Any comments or questions?
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
REPORT OF THE NAGMS COUNCIL MORE DIVISION WORKING GROUP Charge to the Group The National Advisory General Medical Sciences (NAGMS) Council MORE Division.
Promotion guide Understanding the tracks Librarian – tenure and non-tenure tracks Clinicians and Researchers - tenure and two non-tenure tracks –Tenure.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #3 June 17, 2014  CV and Summary Statements (feedback)  Review Teaching Statement of Endeavors and Supporting.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Teaching the Writing Process. n Students learn to use the writing process as they write compositions in literature focus units and theme cycles and as.
Tips for Early Career Success in Our Academic World Scott Grasman (Engineering Management and Systems Engineering) and Elvan Akin (Mathematics and Statistics)
Overview of Policies and Procedures University of Missouri-Kansas City.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Planning MATHEMATICS Years 1 to 10.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Career Sustainability Survey of KL2 Programs: Preliminary Results
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Thinking with Technology Course Module 4
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Accreditation – it’s for all of us!
Considerations in Engineering
Enhancing Accountability Alabama’s Colleges and Universities
Faculty Workshop on Promotion and Tenure
Implementing Equitable Services Requirements
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
February 21-22, 2018.
Early Career Participation in Professional Societies: Service with Benefits Jean Bahr UW - Madison.
Preston & Wingham Primary Schools Federation
Engaging Faculty in Enhancing and Supporting
Writing about Teaching for Tenure and Promotion
University of the Incarnate Word
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Tenure and CUNY Matt Brim and Shelly Eversley FFPP Academic Directors.
Presentation transcript:

Mentoring: Proven Strategies for Success: Session 5: Evaluation and Tool 04/24/14

Assessment of Mentoring “Assessment is the process through which we gather evidence about the claims we are making with regard to student learning and the process/delivery of mentoring in order to inform and support improvement” (Campbell, 2008)

Please take a few minutes submit: If you could, What evidence would you want to gather from your mentoring experience? Who will you inform? Prompt

WHAT research learning is to occur? WHERE might it be learned? By WHEN should it be learned? *This process can also inform the kinds of evidence that need to be gathered for appropriate assessment. Gather Evidence Mapping the Experience (Maki, 2004)*

The Mentoring Contract can inform what evidence should be collected Creating an contract

– examples: Contract Application

Questions?

Collaboration with Mentee

Should Undergraduate Mentees be Included as Co-authors? What are the determining factors? The amount of effort and time in collecting data Originality/novel ideas Writing of manuscript

Reasons to Publish with Undergraduates 1. You likely got your career start by doing undergraduate research. 2.Authoring with undergraduates creates a multitude of opportunities for students to learn about and discuss ethics. 3.Students who publish as undergraduates tend to be more competitive for professional schools, and institutions often track or assess the number of graduates who go on for higher degrees.

Reasons to Publish with Undergraduates 4.Publishing with undergraduates serves as clear evidence of broader impacts that funding agencies require. 5. Publications with undergraduate authors that indicate a sustainable research program may be viewed as positive by tenure and promotion committees, especially at PUIs. Teaching Resource, Vol. 2

Recommended Strategies for Writing and Publishing with Undergraduates Have students save each draft by date. Have students keep logs of their writing efforts. Treat independent research as a course with a syllabus and agenda. Involve students in the writing process. Mention your student’s efforts in front of one of your colleagues.

Choosing a Student Mentee as Co- author Is the student genuinely interested in the topic? Is the student willing to put sufficient time and effort? What is the student’s background? Prior experience Educational background Future goals Ensuring a good fit

Ultimately, the graduate student and his collaborator met with the advisor, and they came to the solution that both the student and the advisor would be co- first-authors, with the collaborator as last author.