The InterPlanetary Superhighway and the Development of Space

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Downs 4 th Grade Science Solar System Review The Planets & Other Objects in Space.
Advertisements

Minor Members of the Solar System
Orbital Mechanics Mike Rodning 27 April Introduction Survey of interesting celestial mechanical phenomena and techniques Types of Earth Orbits Coriolis.
15th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Copper Mountain, Colorado Low Energy Interplanetary Transfers Using the Halo Orbit Hopping Method with STK/Astrogator.
Low Energy Transfer Applications MWL - 1 JPL 2004 Summer Workshop on Advanced Topics in Astrodynamics Shoot the Moon Shadowing Unstable.
22 April 2002 Shane Ross Surrey Astrodynamics Workshop Lunar Orbit LL 1 Lunar Orbit Halo Orbit at Lunar L 1 Lunar Gateway Module Control & Dynamical Systems.
Planets of the Solar System The Moon and Other Bodies
Unt4: asteroid part 2. Comets Comet Ikeya-Seki in the dawn sky in 1965.
Dynamics of an Occulter Based Planet Finding Telescope Egemen Kolemen, N. Jeremy Kasdin Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Eng., Princeton University B.
Structure & Formation of the Solar System
The Interplanetary Transport Network: Space Transportation Architecture for the 21st Century 5 May 2004 Shane Ross Everhart Lecture Series Control & Dynamical.
Dynamics of the young Solar system Kleomenis Tsiganis Dept. of Physics - A.U.Th. Collaborators: Alessandro Morbidelli (OCA) Hal Levison (SwRI) Rodney Gomes.
Asteroid Tour Trajectory D. Hyland Nov 21, Voyage Concepts We sketch potential trajectories for our deep space vessel: –Initial voyage from LEO.
University of Paderborn Applied Mathematics Michael Dellnitz Albert Seifried Applied Mathematics University of Paderborn Energetically efficient formation.
8/6/2002 AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specilaist Conference JPL Caltech Lunar Orbit Lunar Sample Return via.
COMETS, KUIPER BELT AND SOLAR SYSTEM DYNAMICS Silvia Protopapa & Elias Roussos Lectures on “Origins of Solar Systems” February 13-15, 2006 Part I: Solar.
Lecture 31: The Family of the Sun Astronomy 161 – Winter 2004.
Lesson 8a Moons, Asteroids and Rings. Europa These interactions also keep Europa in a slight elliptical orbit as well. But since Europa is farther from.
Activity 2: Tracking the Planets
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. The Solar System. © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Now known: Solar system has 166 moons, one star, eight planets (added.
Comparative Planetology I: Our Solar System
UNIT NINE: Matter and Motion in the Universe  Chapter 26 The Solar System  Chapter 27 Stars  Chapter 28 Exploring the Universe.
Mercury Closest to the sun Covered in craters No atmosphere No moons
STRAND #1 – EARLY ASTRONOMY 1. Name the scientist that said the sun was the center of the solar system (and not the Earth) AND name the scientist that.
 A star and all of the objects that travel in orbit around it  The area of space that is influenced by the gravity of a star  Our solar system is just.
Stars and the Solar System. Appearance (Phases) of the Moon during a month.
Low Energy Transfer Applications MWL - 1 JPL 2004 Summer Workshop on Advanced Topics in Astrodynamics Low Energy Transfers in the.
Two Interesting (to me!) Topics Neither topic is in Goldstein. Taken from the undergraduate text by Marion & Thornton. Topic 1: Orbital or Space Dynamics.
Small Bodies of the Solar System Pluto, Comets, Asteroids, Meteors and Zodiacal Light.
Solar System. MILKY WAY 200 billion stars Diameter LY Height at center LY Solar System is LY from center.
Earth, as viewed by the Voyager spacecraft. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 7.1 Studying the Solar System Our goals for learning:  What does the solar.
Midterm 1 Review Please swipe your student ID for attendance tracking, and pick up your assigned transmitter.
The Solar System Chapter 6 COPY DOWN THE LEARNING GOALS ON PG SKIP 5 LINES BETWEEN EACH!
Big Bang theory Parts of our solar system Planet characteristics Galaxies Constellations Nebulas.
Other Solar System Bodies Moons Asteroids Comets Meteors and Meteorites.
A Survey of the Solar System. Geocentric vs. Heliocentric.
Our Solar system YouTube - The Known Universe by AMNH.
1962 First close-up view of Venus via Mariner 2.
The Planets and the Solar System
Space Vocabulary Rotation Revolution Planets Asteroids.
Presented to Kepler Pre-Launch Educator Workshop January 31, 2009 Shari Asplund Discovery and New Frontiers Programs Education and Public Outreach Manager.
Space Mission Design: Interplanetary Super Highway Hyerim Kim Jan. 12 th st SPACE Retreat.
The Earth and Other Planets
Low Energy Transfer Applications MWL - 1 JPL 2004 Summer Workshop on Advanced Topics in Astrodynamics New Mission Concepts & Orbits.
Formation Flight, Dynamics Josep Masdemont UPC 10/19/00JMS- 1 Formation Flight, Dynamics Josep Masdemont, UPC.
The luminous celestial body around which Earth and other planets revolve and receive heat and light! Sun.
Earth and Space Our Solar System Our solar system is made up of: Sun Eight planets Their moons Asteroids Comets Meteoroids.
The Solar System. According to Aug 24, 06 Resolution the Solar System is composed of: – Eight planets with their moons – Three dwarf planets with their.
The Sun & The Solar System. Structure of the Sun The Sun has layers which can be compared to the Earth’s core, mantle, crust, and atmosphere All of these.
EARTH IN SPACE. DAY AND NIGHT The Earth completes one rotation on its axis every 24 hours. The rotation of the Earth on its axis is responsible for day.
Late Work Due 12/20/13 Remember ain’t no butts about it! Sticking your head in the sand won’t make the deadlines go away 11 Days Remain.
Space Sixth Grade SOL 6.8. Questions you must be able to answer 1. Describe the planets and their relative positions from the sun. 2. Compare the characteristics.
University of Colorado Boulder ASEN 6008 Interplanetary Mission Design Spring 2015 Kate Davis Tisserand Plots 1.
Lunar Sample Return via the Interplanetary Supherhighway
JIMO Team MeetingJune 17, 2004 Europa Orbiter Study Update Rodney L. Anderson Martin W. Lo.
The Solar System Chapter 29 Review.
FLY-BY ME TO THE MOON LESSONS LEARNED ON CLOSE ENCOUNTERS Ettore Perozzi Deimos Space 1.
The Planets Ali Nork. Planetary Revolution Planets revolve counterclockwise around Sun Planets revolve counterclockwise around Sun Planets revolve on.
The Planets SPACE. Learning Goals  To be able to describe the planets of our solar system.
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Space and Solar System Word wall. NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration the federal agency that that deals with aeronautical research and.
Tour of the Solar System
Set Oriented Numerical Methods for the
THE SOLAR SYSTEM.
5 lectures, beginning Autumn 2007
Solar System.
Studying Space.
Mrs. Niki Midyett 4th Grade Science.
& Other Objects in Space
1.1.1a and 1.1.1b ORIGIN OF THE EARTH’S MOTION BASED ON THE ORIGIN OF THE GALAXY AND SOLAR SYSTEM.
Presentation transcript:

The InterPlanetary Superhighway and the Development of Space ASI Futuristic Space Technologies 5/2002 Martin.Lo @ jpl.nasa.gov Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institue of Technology

Trajectory Is a Key Space Technology Golden Age of Trajectory Technology Just Around Corner Trajectory Is a Mission-Enabling, Intellectual Technology Not All Technology Is Hardware! Space H/W Technology and Trajectory MUST Develop Side by Side Like “Rail Road Tracks” for the Train Example: Ion Engines Have Been Around a Long Time, Their Use Have Been Limited by the Lack of ‘Low Thrust’ Trajectory Design Tools The Fundamental Problem of Transport in the Solar System 1. What is the problem of transport in the Solar System? 2. Why is this problem “fundamental” ? Why is this so important? What is the significance of this problem ? This is a critical “foundational” problem underlying several fundamental scientific and engineering questions with critidcal impact on the development of space. 3. Why study the dynamics of the Solar System when your main goal is to develop space, to enable new missions? 4. A Leverage Technology

Outline The InterPlanetary Superhighway (IPS) A New Paradigm for the Solar System Low Energy Orbits for Space Missions The Fundamental Problem of Transport in the Solar System 1. What is the problem of transport in the Solar System? 2. Why is this problem “fundamental” ? Why is this so important? What is the significance of this problem ? This is a critical “foundational” problem underlying several fundamental scientific and engineering questions with critidcal impact on the development of space. 3. Why study the dynamics of the Solar System when your main goal is to develop space, to enable new missions? 4. A Leverage Technology

How It All Began: ISEE3/ICE Goddard Space Flight Center How It All Began: ISEE3/ICE GSFC: FARQUHAR, Dunham, Folta, et al Courtesy of D. Folta, GSFC

Current Libration Missions Goddard Space Flight Center Current Libration Missions z WIND SOHO ACE MAP GENESIS NGST Courtesy of D. Folta, GSFC

Lagrange Points in Earth’s Neighborhood Every 3 Body System Has 5 Fixed Points Called Lagrange Points Earth-Moon-S/C: LL1, LL2, … LL5 Sun-Earth-S/C: EL1, EL2, … They Generate the InterPlanetary Superhighway

Orbital Zoology Near the Lagrange Points X S: Sun Region J: Jupiter Region X: Exterior Region (Outside Jupiter’s Orbit) S J Four Families of Orbits, Conley [1968], McGehee [1969], Ref. Paper Periodic Orbit (Planar Lyapunov) Spiral Asymptotic Orbit (Stable Manifold Pictured) Transit Orbits (MUST PASS THRU LYAPUNOV ORBIT) Non-Transit Orbits (May Transit After Several Revolutions)

Generated by Stable & Unstable Manifolds of Unstable Libration Orbits Unstable Periodic Orbits Generate the Tubes Portals to the Tubes The Tubes Govern Transport Transport Must Occur Thru Tubes Systematically Map Out Orbit Space Green Tube = Stable Manifold: Orbits Approach the L1 Periodic Orbit, No DV Needed Red Tube = Unstable Manifold: Orbits Leave the L1 Periodic Orbit Planet MWL - 11

Halo Orbit Transfer and Insertion Via The InterPlanetary Superhighway

Genesis Mission: Uses L1, L2 Heteroclinic Behavior to Collect & Return Solar Wind Samples to Earth UTTR 84 x 30 km

Nominal Trajectory NO Deterministic DV! 13 8 1, 15, 16 2 3 4 6 7 9 11 14 -1 -0.5 0.5 1 -2 -1.5 1.5 1 Launch 01/07/01 2 TCM-1 01/07/01 3 TCM-2 01/14/01 4 TCM-3 01/21/01 5 TCM-4 04/13/01 6 Halo Orbit Insertion (TCM-5) 04/23/01 7 Begin Science Phase 04/30/01 8 End Science Phase 03/22/03 9 Halo Orbit Departure (TCM-6) 04/01/03 10 TCM-7 04/15/03 11 TCM-8 06/10/03 12 TCM-9 07/20/03 13 TCM-10 08/09/03 14 TCM-11 08/18/03 15 Entry 08/19/03 16 Backup Entry 09/07/03 To Sun lunar orbit halo parking orbit (option) L+30d Return Transfer Recovery Science 5 10 12 Y Axis, in millions of kilometers: X = Sun-Earth Line, positive anti-sun Y = (Z) x (X) Z = Ecliptic Normal X View from N. Ecliptic (Z-axis) Z View from Anti-Earth Velocity (-Y-axis) View from Anti-Sun (X-axis) 3

Genesis Mission Design Collaboration Martin Lo JPL Genesis Mission Design Manager Kathleen Howell Purdue University Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Brian Barden JPL, Purdue University Roby Wilson JPL, Purdue University

Numerical Exploration by Hand Pioneer Work: Numerical Exploration by Hand JPL Lagrange Group

Dynamical Systems Automation Lunar Orbit L1 L2 Halo Orbit Portal Earth New Paradigm: Dynamical Systems Automation JPL Lagrange Group

Why Dynamical Systems Theory? Traditional Approach Requires First Hand Numerical Knowledge of Phase Space Each Trajectory Must Be Computed Manually (VERY SLOW) Cannot Perform Extensive Parametric Study or Montecarlo Simulation Optimization Difficult, Nearly Impossible Dynamical Systems Theory Provides S/W Automatic Generation of Trajectories S/W Automatically Maps Out Phase Space Structures Near Optimum Trajectory Automatable Parametric Studies & Montecarlo Simulations ISEE3/ICE Orbit Genesis Unstable Manifold

LTool Reduced Genesis End-to-End Orbit Design from 8-12 Weeks to 1 Day We Did It! 2

LTool Supported Genesis Launch Delay Genesis Launch Delayed from 2/01 to 8/01 LTool Enabled Designers to Replan Genesis Mission in 1 Week Without LTool, Genesis Would Require Costly Additional Delay LTool and Dynamical Systems Contributed Significantly to Genesis’ Successful Launch on 8/8/2001. ISEE3/ICE Orbit Genesis Unstable Manifold

JPL LTool Team Martin Lo Section 312 Task Manager Dr. Larry Romans Section 335 Cognizant S/W Engineer (Marthematica Developer) Dr. George Hockney Section 367 S/W Architecture & Sys Engineer Dr. Brian Barden Section 312 Trajectory Design & Algorithms Min-Kun Chung Section 312 Astrodynamics Tools James Evans Section 368 Infrastructure S/W, Visualization Tools

InterPlanetary Superhighway: Many Different Types of Orbital Motions JPL Lagrange Group Lunar Orbit L1 L2 Halo Orbit Portal Earth Earth Flyby & Capture Genesis Earth Return Via L2 Hiten Lunar Capture Lunar Flyby Escape to SIRTF Earth Trailer Orbits

Tunneling Through Phase Space Via IPS Cross Section of Tube Intersection Partitions Global Behavior Yellow Region Tunnels Through from X Through J to S Regions Green Circle: J to S Region, Red Circle: X to J Region Genesis-Type Trajectory Between L2 and L1 Halo Orbits (Heteroclinic)

Construction of Rapid Transition Manifold Intersections Computed Via Poincare Sections Reduce Dimension by 1, Tube Becomes Circle Intersections Provide Transit Orbits from L2 to L1 2

Construction of Capture Orbits Manifold Intersections Computed Via Poincare Sections Reduce Dimension by 1, Tube Becomes Circle 2

Construction of Heteroclinic Orbits Manifold Intersections Computed Via Poincare Sections Reduce Dimension by 1, Tube Becomes Circle Green Circle Leaves J to S Region Red Circle Enters J from X Region Intersections Provide Transit Orbits from L2 to L1 2

Heteroclinic-Homoclinic Chain in Jupiter’s InterPlanetary Superhighway 2:3 to 3:2 Resonance Transport, No Energy Transfer Needed Source of Chaotic Motion in the Solar System 2:3 Resonance Hilda 3:2 Resonance

Genesis’ Homoclinic-Heteroclinic Chain Genesis Shadows Heteroclinic Cycle, Moon Plays Role (Bell et al.) SIRTF, SIM-Type Heliocentric Orbits Related to Homoclinic Orbits 2

Theorem to Temporary Capture by Design The Existence of Homoclinic and Heteroclinic Cycles Implies We Can Choose An Infinite Sequence of Integers, Doubly Indexed, N(i ,j) , i = Sun, L1, Jupiter, L2, Xsun; j = 1, 2, 3, … N(i ,j) = Number of Revolutions Around Body(I), Called an ITINERARY THEOREM: There Exist an Orbit Which Realizes N(i ,j). Based on Conley-Moser’s Theorem on Symbolic Dynamics Voila! TEMPORARY CAPTURE BY DESIGN Sun N1 L1 N2 Jupiter N3 L2 N4 Xsun N5

Orbit with Itinerary (X,J;S,J,X) Using Symbolic Dynamics Technique to Realize Complex Itinerary Capture Around Jupiter Multiple Revolutions (Specifiable) Note (2:3) to (3:2) Resonance Transition

Foundation Dynamics Work Wang Sang Koon Caltech Martin Lo JPL, Principal Investigator Jerrold Marsden Caltech Control and Dynamical Systems Department Shane Ross Caltech

Old Paradigm of the Solar System Copernican Model: Isolated Conic Orbits New Paradigm of the Solar System InterPlanetary Superhighway Connects All The Fundamental Problem of Transport in the Solar System 1. What is the problem of transport in the Solar System? 2. Why is this problem “fundamental” ? Why is this so important? What is the significance of this problem ? This is a critical “foundational” problem underlying several fundamental scientific and engineering questions with critidcal impact on the development of space. 3. Why study the dynamics of the Solar System when your main goal is to develop space, to enable new missions? 4. A Leverage Technology

IPS a New Pardigm of the Solar System InterPlanetary Superhighway Connects Entire Solar System Instead of Planets In Isolated Separate Conic Orbits Solar System Is An Organic and Integrated Whole Where Each Part Is Communicating with One Another Governs Transport and Morphology of Materials Shape Morphology of Rings and Belts Contributes to Theory of Motions of Comets, Asteroids, Dust Governs Planetary Impacts from Asteroids and Comets ShoemakerLevy9 Follwed Jupiter IPS to Final Impacts Genesis Trajectory Is an Impact Trajectory 1% of Near Earth Objects In Energy Regime of Genesis Trajectory, Considered Most Danerous This Theory Contributes to Understanding of our Origins

Examples from Nature: Comet Oterma Theme: Use Natural Dynamics to Optimize DV for Space Missions: Genesis 6 m/s Det. DV Jupiter Family Comets (2:3) to (3:2) Free Resonance Transition Temporary Capture L1, L2 as Gate Keeper What Is Source of Chaotic Dynamics? 2

L1, L2 Manifolds and Comet Orbits L1, L2 Manifolds Have (2:3) to (3:2) Resonance Transitions Manifolds Match Oterma’s Orbit Well Also Matches Gehrels3 Orbits Temporary Capture Near Halo Orbit L1, L2 Manifolds Are DNA of This Dynamics Need to Study Invariant Manifold Sturcture 2

Comet Oterma Shadows Jupiter’s Heteroclinic-Homoclinic Cycles

Mapping the Orbit Space Using Poincare Sections . Orbits Poincare Map .

Poincare Section of Jupiter’s IPS 3:2 Hilda Asteroid Group 4AU 2:1 Kirkwood Gap 2.1 AU

Asteroid Belt Stucture Induced by IPS Poincare Section from Single Orbit Leaving Jupiter L1 Each Dot Is a Rev Around the Sun Spirals Towards Inner Solar System Eccentricity Grows Indistiguishable from Ordinary Conic Orbits Controls Asteroid Belt Structures Controls Dust Transport and Morphology Intimate Connection with Low Thrust Trajectory Design 2:1 Mars Crosser 3:2 Stable Arg Perihelin ECC = .5 2.1 AU 4 AU Eccentricity ECC = .05 Semi-Major Axis

IPS ExoZodi Dust Signatures for Planet Detection Earth’s Zodi Dust Ring Simulated WIth Lagrange Point Dynamics Only Gravity, No PR Drag S: Sun Region, Earth: Planet Region, X: Exterior Region May Provide Planetary Signatures for Exo-Planet Detection S EARTH X

IPS and Transport in the Solar System Poincare Section of the InterPlanetary Superhighway Legend  L1 IPS Orbits  L2 IPS Orbits  Comets  Asteroids  Kuiper Belt Object

Discovery of InterPlanetary Superhighway Martin Lo JPL Genesis Mission Design Manager Shane Ross Caltech Control and Dynamical Systems

Around the Solar System in 80K Days Kuiper Belt Object (KBO) FREE Spiral Orbit Transfer of KBO to Asteroid Belt Produced by LTool Using IPS Origin of Jupiter Comets Replenish Asteroid Belt Escape from Solar System Less Than 1 Pluto Year Scales for Jupiter and Saturn Satellite Systems Suggests New Low Thrust Algorithm Jupiter Saturn ~Uranus (fictitious mass) ~Neptune (fictitious mass)

From AU to au: Comets & Atomic Physics Uncanny Similarity of Transport Theory in 3 Body Problem Rydberg Atom In Cross Fields Chemical Transition State Theory Atomic Halo Orbit Nucleus Atomic L1 Jupiter Comet’s Potential Energy Surface Comet L1 , L2 Atomic Potential Energy Surface Jupiter

Mars Meteorite Build Instruments & S/C Lunar L1 Station Transfer S/C from L1 to Earth-L2 LIO (Libration Oribit) Service S/C at Earth L2 LIO from Lunar L1 Gateway Hub

Asteroid Transport Rate Near Mars* Charles Jaffe West Virgina University Shane Ross Caltech David Farelly Utah State University Martin Lo JPL Jerrold Marsden Caltech Turgay Uzer Georgia Tech * To appear in “Physical Review Letters” (7/1/02)

SL9 Impact Via Jovian IPS

River of Life: Astrobiology

1% Near Earth Objects Have IPS Energies Armageddon Or Opportunity?

IPS and Development of Life: Exobiology InterPlanetary Superhighway Brought Life Building Material from Comets and Asteroids to Earth InetrPlanetary Superhighway May Have Brought the Asteroid Killing the Dinosaurs Via a Genesis-Like Orbit Presence of Abundant Iridium Implies Slow Impact Velocity Conjectured by Mike Mueller et al (Nemesis Star) InterPlnaetary Superhighway Theory Can Provide Critical Transport Rates for Astrobiology How Rates Determine Formation of Life on a Planet Can Rates Be Obtained from ExoZodi Signatures to Find Potential Life Bearing ExoPlanets?

RESCUE MISSION 911: Hiten, HAC Discover, June 1999

Dynamics of Hiten Lunar Capture Orbits

Designing a Lunar Capture Orbit A CROSS SECTION OF THE SUN-EARTH AND EARTH-MOON IPS PARTITIONS THE ORBITAL DESIGN SPACE INTO CLASSES TRAJECTORIES FROM SUN-EARTH EXTERIOR REGION TRAJECTORIES FROM SUN-EARTH INTERIOR REGION TO EARTH-MOON INTERIOR REGION CONTAINS ALL EARTH TO LUNAR CAPTURE ORBITS ON ENERGY SUFACE

Construction of Capture Orbits Moon Manifold Intersections Computed Via Poincare Sections Reduce Dimension by 1, Tube Becomes Circle 2

Ballistic Lunar Capture Shadowing Unstable Manifold of Earth L2 Lyapunov Orbit Shadowing Stable Manifold of Earth L2 Lyapunov Orbit to Leave Earth Earth Lunar Orbit 36 m/s Maneuver to Transfer to Stable Manifold of Moon L2 Lyapunov Orbit Ballistic Lunar Capture Hiten-Like Low Energy Transfer & Ballistic Lunar Capture Shoot the Moon Shoot the Moon MWL - 14

Shoot the Moon: Lunar Capture Wang Sang Koon Caltech Martin Lo JPL, Principal Investigator Jerrold Marsden Caltech Control and Dynamical Systems Department Shane Ross Caltech

TPF in Formation Flight Near L2 To Sun & Earth TPF Formation

TPF in SIRTF/SIM-Like Heliocentric Orbit TPF Formation

First Formation Flight Design Around L2 For the Terrestrial Planet Finder Mission (TPF) Min Kun Chung JPL Gerard Gomez Barcelona University Martin Lo JPL, TPF Mission Design Lead Josep Masdemont Polytechnic University of Catalunya Ken Museth Caltech Computer Graphics Group Larry Romans JPL

Problem: Human Service to Libration Missions ISSUE: 3 Months Transfers to EL2 Too Long for Humans Short Transfers Too Difficult Infrastructure Too Expensive TPF @Earth L2 STA-103 astronauts replaced gyros needed for orientation of the Hubble Space Telescope. JSC

Solution: Human Servicing at Lunar L1 Gatewy Build Instruments & S/C Lunar L1 Gateway for EL2 Service S/C at Earth L2 from Lunar L1 Gateway Module EARTH EARTH L2 HALO ORBIT MOON LUNAR L1 HALO ORBIT LUNAR L2 HALO ORBIT LUNAR L1 GATEWAY

Lunar L1 to Earth L2 Transfer Build Instruments & S/C Lunar L1 Station Transfer S/C from L1 to Earth-L2 LIO (Libration Oribit) Service S/C at Earth L2 LIO from Lunar L1 Gateway Hub . L1 Lunar L2 Earth L2 Lunar Rotating Frame Earth Rotating Frame Lunar

Lunar L1 Gateway Human Servicing Mission Concept Development and Design Martin Lo JPL, Principal Investigator Initial Trajectory Design (2D, Coupled RTBP Model) Shane Ross Caltech Detailed Trajectory Design (3D, Full Ephemeris Model) Min Kun Chung JPL Animation Cici Koenig Caltech Graphics Group Alan Barr Caltech Graphics Group

Transport Between the Jovian Moons Transport Between Jovian Moons Transport Between the Jovian Moons Cross Section of Manifolds Plotted in {a, e} Elements L1 Manifold of Europa Intersects L2 Manifold of Ganymede, etc. Provide Transport Between Moons May Require DV Much Lower than Hohmann

Petit Grand Tour of Jovian Moons Mission Concept Flexible Itinerary, Visit Jovian Moons in Any Order User Low Energy Transfer, Capture, Impact Near Circular Orbits Reduce Jupiter Radiation Proof of Concept Point Design Using the Interplanetary Superhighway 25 Day Transfer from Ganymede to Europa Requires DV of 1452 m/s! Compare to Hohmann Transfer of 2822 m/s! Free Capture by Europa for 4 Orbits (More Possible) Tour Also Available for Saturn’s Moons Applicable to Europa/Titan Orbiter, Lander, & Other Outer Planets Missions

New Frontier: Petit Grand Tour? New Computation by Shane Ross Serial Visits to Galilean Moons, Final Europa Capture Total DV ~ 20 m/s! 1500 Days Time of Flight

Petit Grand Tour Wang Sang Koon Caltech Martin Lo JPL, Principal Investigator Jerrold Marsden Caltech Control and Dynamical Systems Department Shane Ross Caltech

New Approach to Low Thrust Orbits To Design Low Thrust Orbits, You Must Understand IPS Computed from Single Orbit Leaving Europa L2 Each Dot Is a Rev Around Jupiter Spirals Towards Europa Eccentricity Grows Full of Useful Unstable Orbits Similar to L1/L2 Halo’s More Tubes! Indistiguishable from Conic Orbits New Low Thrust Trajectory Design Use This Transition as First Guess Europa’s IPS

Low Thrust Orbit Naturally Uses IPS! Low Thrust Transfer to Mars Via Lunar L1 to L2 Transfer Courtesy of G. Whiffen Computed by MYSTIC

Low Thrust to Lunar Gateway L1 Halo Orbit Low Thrust Trajectory Courtesy of G. Whiffen, Computed by MYSTIC Halo Orbit Computed by LTool

IPS Technology Road Map Three Steps: Discover, Understand, Apply Map the InterPlanetary Superhighway First Step in Discovery and Exploration Like “Human GENOME”, “Star Catalogs”, Rand McNally Maps Integrate Orbital Dynamics Theories IPS Orbits Continuous Thrust Orbits Conics Orbits Develop New Mission Concepts The Fundamental Problem of Transport in the Solar System 1. What is the problem of transport in the Solar System? 2. Why is this problem “fundamental” ? Why is this so important? What is the significance of this problem ? This is a critical “foundational” problem underlying several fundamental scientific and engineering questions with critidcal impact on the development of space. 3. Why study the dynamics of the Solar System when your main goal is to develop space, to enable new missions? 4. A Leverage Technology

References Barden, Howell, Formation Flying in the Vicinity of Libration Point Orbits, AAS 98-169, Monterey, CA, 2/98 Barden, Howell, Dynamical Issues Associated with Relative Configurations of Multiple Spacecraft Near the Sun-Earth/Moon L1 Point, AAS 99-450, Girdwood, Alaska, 8/99 Gomez, Masdemon, Simo, Lissajous Orbits Around Halo Orbits, AAS 97-106, Huntsville, Alabama, 2/97 Howell, Barden, Lo, Applications of Dynamical Systems Theory to Trajectory Design for a Libration Point Mission, JAS 45(2), April 1997, 161-178 Howell, Marchand, Lo, The Temporary Capture of Short-Period Jupiter Family Comets from the Perspective of Dynamical Systems, AAS 00-155, Clearwater, FL, 1/2000 Koon, Lo, Marsden, Ross, Heteroclinic Connections between Lyapunov Orbits and Resonance Transitions in Celestial Mechanics, to appear in Chaos

References Koon, Lo, Marsden, Ross, The Genesis Trajectory and Heteroclinic Connections, AAS99-451, Girdwood, Alaska, August, 1999 Koon, Lo, Marsden, Ross, Shoot the Moon, AAS00-166, Clearwater, Florida, January, 2000 Lo, The InterPlanetary Superhighway and the Origins Program, IEEE Aerospace2002 Conference, Big Sky, MT, February, 2002 Lo et al., Genesis Mission Design, AIAA 98-4468, Boston, MA, August, 1998 Serban, Koon, Lo, Marsden, Petzold, Ross, Wilson, Halo Orbit Correction Maneuvers Using Optimal Control, submitted to Automatica, April, 2000 Scheeres, Vinh, Dynamis and Control of Relative Motion in an Unstable Orbit, AIAA Paper 2000-4135, August, 2000