Table 1. Cluster 1 Patients Attaining Treatment Levels % Patients Attaining Treatment Levels 24 Weeks64 Weeks E/S + N † E/S † N†N† E/S + N † E/S † Cluster.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time to Distant Metastases (ITT) Cumulative incidence of distant metastases (ITT) Adapted from Jones et al. SABCS 2008, abstract /477169/465253/454771/ /4146.
Advertisements

New (U.S.) Lipid Guidelines (The Good and Bad) Robert A. Vogel, MD Clinical Professor of Medicine University of Colorado Denver Disclosures: National Coordinator.
Task Force on Diabetes and CVD (ESC and EASD) European Heart Journal 2007;28:
1 Outcome evaluation of health promotion/life style change Wei-Chu Chie.
Background  Hypertrigliceridaemia is common in patients with HIV, especially those taking protease inhibitors (PIs) or with lipodystrophy.  Although,
Lipid Disorders and Management in Diabetes
Sampling u Randomization u Stratification u Proportional u Clusters u Systematic u Purposive.
Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group University of Oxford UK.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project: Coronary Event Rates in CARE and LIPID Patients.
CE-1 CRESTOR ® Clinical Development Efficacy James W. Blasetto, MD, MPH Senior Director, Clinical Research.
THE LIPID PANEL What are we missing? Robert St. Amant, MD, FAAFP Diplomate, American Board of Clinical Lipidology Baton Rouge General Medical Director,
ONLINE SUPPLEMENT Infantile cases of sitosterolaemia with novel mutations in the ABCG5 gene: Extreme hypercholesterolaemia is exacerbated by breastfeeding.
Effect of Hypertension and Dyslipidemia on glycemic control among Type 2 Diabetes patients in Thailand Dr. Mya Thandar Dr.PH. Batch 5 1.
VOYAGER An indiVidual patient data meta- analysis Of statin therapY in At risk Groups: Effects of Rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin Please see.
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge The Clinical Significance of LDL-Cholesterol: No Longer a Hypothesis? John J.P. Kastelein,
Rotavirus vaccine coverage among a 2010 birth cohort and risk factors for partial or no coverage, Washington State 2010 K. Stigi, C. DeBolt, K. Lofy Washington.
PPAR  activation & lipid metabolism. Diabetic dyslipidaemia Lipid profiles and hyperinsulinaemia in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients Niskanen.
RATES AND RISK Daniel E. Ford, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Introduction to Clinical Research July 12, 2010.
Haffner SM, Alexander CM, Cook TJ, Boccuzzi SJ, Musliner TA, Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J, Pyorala K for the 4S Group Reduced Coronary Events in Simvastatin-Treated.
Long-term mortality after acute stroke  Stroke is a leading cause of mortality: 6 million fatal events annually worldwide.  Mainly affects elderly, but.
BluntPenetrating Placebo rFVIIa Patients (%) n=20 n=8 n=9 n=4 P=0.03 P=0.068 Adapted from Rizoli S. Canadian Anesthesiologists’
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ALLHAT Major Outcomes in Moderately.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
The Research Question Clinical Effectiveness of Collaborative Care Management For Depression Over Time Garrison, GM; Angstman, KB; O’Connor S; Williams.
WEEK 1 You have 10 seconds to name…
Hsia J et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57: Baseline Characteristics by Treatment Group and Attained LDL-C Hsia J et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction And Death from Cardiovascular Causes Alternative Interpretations of the Evidence George A.
X Treatment population Control population 0 Examples: Drug vs. Placebo, Drugs vs. Surgery, New Tx vs. Standard Tx  Let X = decrease (–) in cholesterol.
Dallas 2015 TFQO: Koen Monsieurs 372 EVREV 1: Koen Monsieurs 372 EVREV 2: Ahamed Idris 349 Taskforce: BLS BLS366 Chest Compression Depth (adults)
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) Nissen SE et al. JAMA.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Lipid Profile, Plasma Apolipoproteins, and Risk of.
The Influence of Pravastatin and Atorvastatin on Markers of Oxidative Stress in Hypercholesterolemic Humans Bonnie Ky, MD,* Anne Burke, MD,* Sotirios Tsimikas,
○ South Asians (SAs) have high rates of CHD which are not entirely explained by traditional CVD risk factors. ○ The association of a family history of.
Презентацию подготовила Хайруллина Ч.А. Муслюмовская гимназия Подготовка к части С ЕГЭ.
Results: Characteristics of the study participants according to specialty.
Copyright © 2006 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Supplemental Figure S1 (A) (B) Any Statin ↓Randomisation
When Using DOPPS Slides
Copyright © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Beta coefficient (95% CI)
The Role of Radical Prostatectomy and Radiotherapy in Treatment of Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Urol Int 2017;99:
Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Age and Cardiovascular Risk Attributable to Apolipoprotein B, Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol or Non‐High‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol by Allan.
Oxford Niacin Trial.
This talk will follow the topical structure suggested by the ABP:
Gerald - P&R Chapter 7 (to 217) and TEXT Chapters 15 & 16
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
مبانی غربالگری بیماریها
PREMIER: Rate of hypertension at 18 months
Residual Risk After Statin Therapy:
Hammoud et al. Am J Nephrol 2016;44:  (DOI: / )
Cholesterol Management in HIV-infected and Uninfected Patients: The Veterans Aging Cohort Study Leaf, DA, Goulet J, Goetz MB, Oursler KA, Gilbert C, Frieberg.
Safety issues in the development of treatments for osteoarthritis: recommendations of the Safety Considerations Working Group  V. Strand, D.A. Bloch,
An example of the Lancet
Patient characteristics: American vs Canadian transplant patients
RUTHERFORD-2 Trial design: Patients with heterogeneous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) on statins were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 fashion to subcutaneous.
Volume 373, Issue 9672, Pages (April 2009)
C.2.10 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
C.2.8 Sample Questions.
Volume 72, Issue 7, Pages (October 2007)
TNT diabetes analysis: Baseline and final LDL cholesterol levels
Stratified analysis of the association between GDM and abdominal circumference (AC) >90th percentile at 28 wkGA. Stratified analysis of the association.
Survival benefits of DAA in patients with decompensated cirrhosis
Incidence of DM as a function of TyG index (white bars) or TG/HDL-C ratio (black bars). Incidence of DM as a function of TyG index (white bars) or TG/HDL-C.
Presentation transcript:

Table 1. Cluster 1 Patients Attaining Treatment Levels % Patients Attaining Treatment Levels 24 Weeks64 Weeks E/S + N † E/S † N†N† E/S + N † E/S † Cluster 1: LDL-C <100mg/dL and nonHDL-C <130mg/dL and apoB <90mg/dL Full cohort * * TG <200mg/dL TG ≥200mg/dL High risk w/o AVD * High risk w/AVD * DM * MetS/nonDM *7.1*7350* NonDM/nonMetS *8.4* Footnotes † Number of patients assessed for E/S+S, E/S and N at 24 weeks and E/S+N and E/S at 64 weeks respectively in: Full cohort (383, 205,163, 321, 182); High risk w/o AVD (56, 34, 25, 46, 29); High risk w/ AVD (45, 32, 18, 33, 27); DM (58, 30, 23, 49, 24); MetS/nonDM (146, 91, 56, 122, 82); NonDM/nonMetS (177, 83, 83, 148, 76); ‡suggested for high-risk patients; *95% CI for OR ratio for treatment comparison (E/S+N vs E/S or E/S+N vs N) excludes 1. Some variability in the results may be due to the small sample sizes in the subgroups. % attaining single treatment levels for LDL-C <70mg/dL, non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL and apoB <80mg/dL in the full cohort at 24 weeks were E/S+N (72.9, 78.8, 64.0%): E/S (49.5, 55.7, 32.2%); N (1.8, 5.4, 2.5%) and at 64 weeks were E/S+N (65.3, 75.3, 64.8%); E/S (38.2, 51.7, 35.7%). % attainment for LDL-C <100mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL and apoB <90mg/dL in the full cohort at 24 weeks were E/S+N (90.5, 90.0, 77.3%); E/S (92.5, 90.1, 54.6%); N (18.7, 28.9, 7.4%) and at 64 weeks were E/S+N (86.2, 86.2, 77.6%); E/S (86.0, 85.0, 57.7%)

Table 2. Cluster 2 Patients Attaining Treatment Levels % Patients Attaining Treatment Levels 24 Weeks64 Weeks E/S + N † E/S † N†N† E/S + N † E/S † Cluster 2: LDL-C <70mg/dL and nonHDL-C <100mg/dL and apoB <80mg/dL Full cohort *1.8* * TG <200mg/dL TG ≥200mg/dL High risk w/o AVD *2* High risk w/AVD * DM63.840*2.1* MetS/nonDM *3.6* * NonDM/nonMetS *1.2* * Footnotes † Number of patients assessed for E/S+S, E/S and N at 24 w33ks and E/S+N and E/S at 64 w33ks respectively in: Full cohort (383, 205,163, 321, 182); High risk w/o AVD (56, 34, 25, 46, 29); High risk w/ AVD (45, 32, 18, 33, 27); DM (58, 30, 23, 49, 24); MetS/nonDM (146, 91, 56, 122, 82); NonDM/nonMetS (177, 83, 83, 148, 76); ‡suggested for high-risk patients; *95% CI for OR ratio for treatment comparison (E/S+N vs E/S or E/S+N vs N) excludes 1. Some variability in the results may be due to the small sample sizes in the subgroups. % attaining single treatment levels for LDL-C <70mg/dL, non-HDL-C <100 mg/dL and apoB <80mg/dL in the full cohort at 24 weeks were E/S+N (72.9, 78.8, 64.0%): E/S (49.5, 55.7, 32.2%); N (1.8, 5.4, 2.5%) and at 64 weeks were E/S+N (65.3, 75.3, 64.8%); E/S (38.2, 51.7, 35.7%). % attainment for LDL-C <100mg/dL, non-HDL-C <130 mg/dL and apoB <90mg/dL in the full cohort at 24 weeks were E/S+N (90.5, 90.0, 77.3%); E/S (92.5, 90.1, 54.6%); N (18.7, 28.9, 7.4%) and at 64 weeks were E/S+N (86.2, 86.2, 77.6%); E/S (86.0, 85.0, 57.7%)