Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

SuperKEKB Lattice and Dynamic Aperture H. Koiso Apr. 20, 2005 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Nano-Beam Scheme for SuperKEKB Andrew Hutton Slides taken from talks by Haruyo Koiso, Yukiyoshi Ohnishi & Masafumi Tawada.
Ultra Low Vertical Emittance at the Australian Light Source Mark Boland on behalf of Rohan Dowd 1.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Experimental Plan for Achieving Low Emittance in CesrTA David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
1 Optics and IR design for SuperKEKB Y.Ohnishi 1/19-22, 2004 Super B Factory Workshop in Hawaii.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Ultra-Low Emittance Storage Ring David L. Rubin December 22, 2011.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Lattice simulation of lattice errors and optics corrections. November 1, 2007 Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Dynamic Aperture Study for the Ion Ring Lattice Options Min-Huey Wang, Yuri Nosochkov MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 Jefferson Lab, Newport News,
Low emittance tuning in ATF Damping Ring - Experience and plan Sendai GDE Meeting Kiyoshi Kubo.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
1 Alternative Bunch Compressor 30 th Sep KNU Eun-San Kim.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation T. Demma, S. Guiducci SuperB Workshop LAL, 17 February 09.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
Simulation for Lower emittance in ATF Damping Ring Kiyoshi Kubo Similar talk in DR WS in Frascati, May 2007 Most simulations were done several.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
Vertical Emittance at the Quantum Limit
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
ILC Z-pole Calibration Runs Main Linac performance
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance? -2
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
FCC-ee Lattice with Misalignments
H. Ghasem1,2 Y. PapaPhilippou2
The new 7BA design of BAPS
Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR
M. Tigner, R. Helms, M. Palmer, D. Rubin, D. Sagan Cornell University
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
The Proposed Conversion of CESR to an ILC Damping Ring Test Facility
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Low Emittance Tuning David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK December 19, 2007

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 2 Emittance and Lattice Errors The purpose of this study is to check a feasibility of the low emittance with optics corrections for the KEKB-LER. For the preparation of e-cloud study(?) Evaluate KEKB-LER lattice includes machine errors. magnet alignment errors(displacement and rotation) and field gradient errors. BPM accuracy should be checked. BPM error consists of alignment error + jitter error. In the case of KEKB, alignment errors is estimated to be ~40 m and a few m for the jitter error. (H.Fukuma, M. Masuzawa) BPM system is an averaged mode(not single-pass). Simulation study The errors are generated according to Gaussian distributions with random seed numbers in the simulation.

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 3 E (GeV)2.3  x (nm) 1.5 x y s pp 2.5x10 -4  z (mm) 4.3  s (ms) 75  x * (cm) 90  y * (cm) 3 KEKB-LER Lattice for ILC Damping Ring Study injection point IP Beam energy is changed from 3.5 to 2.3 GeV. wiggler Vc = 2 MV H. Koiso RF

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 4 2.5 Non-interleaved Sextupole Arc Cells -I' SD SF

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 5 Flexibility of Arc Cell Beam Energy = 2.3 GeV Momentum compaction  p Emittance (nm) 2.8 nm Contribution of wigglers is the same as the arc cells. Allowed region

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 6 Chromaticity Correction 54 sextupole families

Y. Ohnishi / KEK Simulation Study for Low Emittance Lattice at KEKB-LER Optics correction is performed to the lattice including machine errors to confirm the feasibility of the low emittance lattice. Especially, requirements for the BPM system... Single particle issue

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 8 Lattice Errors alignment error x (m) alignment error y (m) rotation error  (mrad) gradient error k/k Bending magnet x10 -4 Quadrupole magnet x10 -3 Sextupole magnet x10 -3 Multipole components and fringe field have been included in the model lattice. Following errors are produced with random numbers according to Gaussian. These numbers are one standard deviation(  ).

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 9 Optics Correction Correction of closed orbit distortion 454 BPMs 166 horizontal and 208 vertical steering magnets XY coupling correction measurement: vertical orbit response induced by a horizontal single kick due to a steering magnet. corrector: symmetric vertical local bumps at sextupole pairs(-I' connection) Dispersion correction measurement: orbit response changing rf frequency. corrector: asymmetric local bumps at sextupole pairs(-I' connection) Beta correction measurement: orbit response induced by a single kick due to a steering magnet. corrector: fudge factors to quadrupole magnet power supplies(families)

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 10 One of Results Before Optics Correction and After Optics corrections can achieve  y / x =0.2 %, where  x =1.5 nm. BPM accuracy of 3 m resolution(pulse-to-pulse jitter) and 40 m alignment error is enough to correct the lattice. COD correction only COD+XY+Dispersion+Beta correction  y (pm)  y /  (%) Error of BPMs:  jitter = 3  m,  align = 40  m 0.2% Each point means a different seed number to give machine errors. #samples : 100

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 11 BPM Resolution and Optics Correction  y /  x = 2% Black circle: COD correction only Red circle: COD+XY+Dispersion+Beta correction  y /  x = 0.2% Target emittance ratio BPM resolution (  m) Vertical emittance (pm) Jitter errors of BPM affects corrections of the lattice. BPM resolution is a few microns BPM resolution is a few microns BPM alignment error: 40  m #samples : 100

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 12 BPM Alignment and Optics Correction Blue circle: COD+XY+Dispersion+Beta correction  y /  x = 0.2% Target emittance ratio BPM alignment error (  m) Vertical Emittance (pm) Alignment errors of BPM does not affect corrections of the lattice. BPM alignment error is ~40 microns BPM resolution is 3  m. #samples : 100

Y. Ohnishi / KEK Dynamic Aperture Survey at KEKB-LER Low Emittance Lattice

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 14 Dynamic Aperture Horizontal aperture with J y = 0  p/p 0 (%) x0/xx0/x ←7.3 No error machine error after optics correction

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 15 Dynamic Aperture (cont'd) Vertical aperture with J x = 0  p/p 0 (%) y0/yy0/y ←1.2 No error machine error with optics correction

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 16 Dynamic Aperture for Injection Beam Horizontal aperture with J y /J x = 0.16 x0/xx0/x  p/p 0 (%) injection beam A x = 7.5x10 -6 m A y = 1.2x10 -6 m  x at injection = 120 m 77 mm

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 17 Intra-beam Scattering Emittance  x (nm) Particles/bunch ( x10 10 )  z (mm) Particles/bunch ( x10 10 ) Bunch Length  y /  x = 0.2 % Touschek lifetime ~ 130 min(  y /  x =0.2%, N=2x10 10 ) E = 2.3 GeV

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 18 Summary KEKB-LER (2.3 GeV): Emittance:  x = 1.5 nm,  y / x =0.2 % Requirements for the BPM system is: BPM resolution should be less than 20 m.  A few m is achieved at KEKB. BPM alignment error is not sensitive to the lattice after the optics correction.  Alignment error is estimated to be ~40 m. Dynamic aperture Dynamic aperture is enough for the injection beam. Touschek lifetime is estimated to be ~130 min (N=2x10 10,  x → 4.9 nm) from the dynamic aperture ( y / x =0.2%).

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 19 Backup Slides

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 20 Optics Corrections by using sextupoles (1) Sextupoles are located at arc sections and LCC(LER only). vertical bump xy coupling (+) vertical dispersion (-) induced by horizontal dispersion xy coupling (+) vertical dispersion (+) induced by horizontal dispersion vertical bump xy coupling (-) vertical dispersion (+) induced by horizontal dispersion cancel -I' vertical bump xy coupling corrector vertical dispersion corrector

Y. Ohnishi / KEK 21 Optics Corrections by using sextupoles (2) Sextupoles are located at arc sections and LCC(LER only). horizontal bump quadrupole element (+) horizontal dispersion (-) horizontal bump quadrupole element (+) horizontal dispersion (+) horizontal bump quadrupole element (-) horizontal dispersion (+) cancel -I' beta corrector horizontal dispersion corrector Not used