Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Advertisements

WVDE Online SB-IEP A System for Analyzing and Prioritizing Instruction for Students with Exceptionalities.
Depths of Knowledge and Reading
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Aligning Depth of Knowledge with the TEKS and the STAAR
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Understanding the Smarter BalanceD Math Summative Assessment
Power of Proficiency Scaling ATI Summer 2014
Common Core State Standards K-5 Mathematics Kitty Rutherford and Amy Scrinzi.
Michelle White, Executive Director Department of Mathematics and Science Office of Academics and Transformation Annie Klian, District Instructional Supervisor.
Building Common Assessments APRIL 2, Session Targets  This session will address: ◦The key factors to consider when developing common assessments.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge, Standards, and the New State Assessments (AMP)
TEACHING INFORMATIVE WRITING FROM SOURCES Chapter 6 Best Practices in Writing Instruction George E Newell Jennifer VanDerHeide Melissa Wilson.
Classroom Discussions: Math Discourse in Action
{ Mathematics Anna Demarinis.  The student understands and applies the concepts and procedures of mathematics  GLE  Students learn to solve many new.
The New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Alignment Study December 5, 2006.
Common Core Math Professional Development
© 2013 Boise State University1 What the Shifts in the Standards Mean for Learning and Instruction Michele Carney, PhD Spring 2014.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Functions A Close Look at Grade 9 Module.
Steve Williams DESE Fine Arts Consultant Presented at: Missouri Music Educators Association January 30,
Everett Public Schools DOK to Unit Planning LMS Department August 28, 2014.
LinearRelationships Jonathan Naka Intro to Algebra Unit Portfolio Presentation.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Pomona Unified School District Standard Practices for Data Analysis Silvia San Martin Teacher Specialist Research and Assessment.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Introduction  Teaching social studies as an interdisciplinary approach has resulted in increased instructional time at the Elementary level as teachers.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
Preparing to Cultivate 21 st Century Skills. Development of instruction and assessment that is rigorous and relevant. Measure progress in adding rigor.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Exploring Claim 2, 3, and 4 This material was developed for.
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
Designing Common Core Assessment Questions for Educators Creating Type II and Type III Assessments.
CURRICULUM CONSTRUCTION II AMANDA SKELTON & GINA NAAS.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) New Wisconsin Promise Conference Madison, Wisconsin January 14, 2009 Beth Schefelker, MTSMary Mooney, MTS.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Overview Criteria Item Examples.  Create a sense of “measured urgency” ◦ Timeline is not immediate, but close ◦ Urgency in you and your teachers ◦ Difference.
Page 1 Teaching with Depth: An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge by Karen Taylor
Unwrapping the Standards. The power standards are the fence posts. They provide the curricular focus and teachers need to dig deeper to assure student.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
Better Learning Through Structured Teaching Douglas Fisher www
Welcome Principals Please sit in groups of 3 2 All students graduate college and career ready Standards set expectations on path to college and career.
Facilitator: Debbie Schraeder, ESU#3. Resources/ Recognition Nebraska Department of Education Nebraska Department of Education Pages, links, PPTs ESU.
Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) Summative Assessment Framework 1.
DOK and 4th Grade Mathematics Smarter Balanced Assessment Questions
With great power comes great responsibility.
Shifting to a Standards-Based Mindset
Math Instructional Coaches Meeting 9/19/2013. Myth #1 If your lessons are engaging, you won’t have discipline problems.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
Assessing Mathematics Understanding what they understand.
Depth of Knowledge: Secondary Math Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Maria Gross.
Assessing Math Looking closer at PARCC Task Types 2.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
New Hope-Solebury School District. Develop a shared understanding of the concept of cognitive rigor Begin the conversation about Webbs’ Depth of Knowledge.
Linking Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment in Mathematics March 10, 2016 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Everett Public Schools Evergreen Middle School LMS Department August 28, 2014.
Assessing the Common Core Standards
Why DOK? The DOK level focuses on how deeply a student needs to understand the content.   Understanding the DOK level of the standard will help teachers.
Creating Common Assessments Part I: Item Development
Wayne Curriculum Conversations
Norman L Webb.
Developing Quality Assessments
Presentation transcript:

Quality Instruction The ♥ of the matter is the depth of knowledge

Three issues for Curriculum and Assessment –Alignment –Implementation –Interpretation

Alignment Is the district curriculum aligned to the Grade-Level Expectations (GLEs)? –Does the district curriculum have measurable goals and objectives? –Do the measurable goals and objectives aligned to the GLEs at the appropriate grade level?

Implementation Is the aligned district curriculum being used in the classroom? –Are the classroom objectives and district objectives aligned? –Do the formative and summative assessments used in the district’s classrooms assess the district curriculum’s measurable objectives?

Interpretation Is the classroom assessment of an objective the same as the intended district assessment of an objective? –Is the objective being interpreted at the classroom level as it was intended by the district? –Is the classroom assessment assessing what is actually being taught in the classroom?

Depth-of-Knowledge Measures the degree to which the knowledge elicited from students on assessments is as complex as what students are expected to know and do as stated in the curriculum/GLEs/Show-Me Standards. Developed by Norman Webb from the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

What is DOK? A common language for discussing complexity A tool for alignment A conversation starter A way to “tune” common assessments A part of reflective teaching Language used in 4 th cycle MSIP curriculum reviews

What is DOK not? A state mandate Anything new A silver bullet Based on verbs

Depth-of-Knowledge-Levels Descriptors Mathematics DOK Levels & Reading and Writing DOK Levels –Level 1 (Recall of Information) –Level 1 (Recall) –Level 2 (Skill/Concept) –Level 2 (Basic Reasoning) –Level 3 (Strategic Thinking) –Level 3 (Complex Reasoning) –Level 4 (Extended Thinking) –Level 4 (Extended Reasoning) The levels are loosely based on Blooms and other models of learning theory.

Depth-of-Knowledge-Levels Objectives Objective 1 –(Grade 8) Solve two-step linear equations and inequalities in one variable over the rational numbers, interpret the solution or solutions in the context from which they arose, and verify the reasonableness of results. –This objective is an example of Level 3. The expectation expressed in this objective is that students will not only solve a two-step linear equation, but will also interpret the solution and verify the results. This will require students to do some reasoning in order to interpret the solution and could be fairly complex depending on the context. If students were only required to solve linear equations and verify solutions, then the expectation would be Level 2.

Depth-of-Knowledge-Levels Objectives Objective 2 –Design a statistical experiment to study a problem and communicate the outcomes. –To plan a statistical experiment, a student must define the problem and develop a procedure for solving it. This involves the student identifying the correct statistical model, applying the model to data and communicating the outcome of the selected model. The student must interpret findings and make reasonable and rationed inferences from obtained data. This represents complex, multistep reasoning and reflects a Level 4 task.

Depth-of-Knowledge-Levels Objectives Objective 1 (R1F4) –Apply pre-reading strategies to aid comprehension Access prior knowledge Preview Predict Set a purpose for reading –This objective is an example of Level 2.

Depth-of-Knowledge-Levels Objectives Objective 2 (R3A3) –Locate and interpret key information in illustrations, title, chapter headings, table of contents, glossary, charts, diagrams, graphs, captions and maps to answer questions. –This objective is an example of Level 2. If the word “interpret” is removed this becomes a Level 1.

DOK and Assessment Formative Assessment Summative Assessment Using DOK to determine if curriculum is aligned, implemented, and interpreted correctly.

Go to: edu/WAT/index.aspx

Model Curriculum Unit 1. Assign DOK to the GLEs 2. Assign DOK to the formative and summative assessment items.

What are the implications of DOK for Instruction?

Depth-of-Knowledge-Levels Procedures School –Is there a good match between the curriculum objectives and what teachers are assessing? DOK of curriculum objectives DOK of summative assessment items Administrator –What is the DOK of the assessments in the building? –A DOK review of summative assessments in use will shed light on what the expectations in the building are and raise questions about alignment, implementation and interpretation of curriculum.

It is really all about classroom instruction.

Questions?

Walt Brown Michael Muenks