1 Data Analysis Retreat: May 16-18, 2012 Disposition Data Diversity Proficiencies Analysis School of Education Campbellsville University.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Integrating the NASP Practice Model Into Presentations: Resource Slides Referencing the NASP Practice Model in professional development presentations helps.

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools

The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.

NM ELD STANDARDS Revisited Principals’ Meeting February 23, 2010.

IVg IVc IVa Teachers know the ways in which learning takes place, and they know the appropriate levels of intellectual, physical, social, and emotional.

Frameworks for Assessment of Student Learning: Questions of Concept, Practice, and Detail Christine Siegel, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Psychology.

PATHWISE CLASSROOM OBSERVATION SYSTEM

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS TRAINING 2-Day Training for Phase I, II and III *This 2-Day training is to be replicated to meet.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?

Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.

Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)

Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.

Continuing Competence in Nursing

What should be the basis of

performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC

1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.

Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.

In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure. McPherson

Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,

Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)

Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.

Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,

TNE Program Assessment Creating the Culture and Practice of Performance Assessment.

Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.

Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address

Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.

What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.

Data Analysis Retreat: May 19-21, 2010 School of Education Campbellsville University.

CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.

PTEU Conceptual Framework Overview. Collaborative Development of Expertise in Teaching, Learning and Leadership Conceptual Framework Theme:

DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.

The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.

Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.

 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.

NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.

Briar Hill School Data Summary Fall Student Diversity: ESL, Special Education Based on 194 students % of Population Gifted 5% Other Mild/moderate.

STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.

FOUR DOMAINS Domain 4: Domain 1: Professional Planning & Responsibilities Preparation Domain 3: Domain 2: Instruction Classroom Environment.

Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.

Final Portfolio Presented by Renée M Crumley EdS School Library Media University of West Georgia, Fall 2010.

Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.

Teaching to Diversity in the Regular Classroom. Learners learn best when… “Engagement” (active processing) for learning happens when … Need for collaboration.

Initial Comparisons February, Crosswalk with SEPs InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards The Learning and Learning 1. Learner Development (11 standards)

Daretta L. Wilson EDU645: Learning & Assessment for the 21st Century Professor: Alan Belcher February 16, 2016.

Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics

Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning

NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS

Field Experiences and Clinical Practice

Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria

Comprehensive Planning

Culturally responsive teaching

Characteristic of Teachers

NJCU College of Education

california Standards for the Teaching Profession

Culturally responsive teaching

Professional Portfolio

Project-Based Learning Integrating 21st Century Skills

Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)

Mental Health Counseling and Behavioral Medicine Program

Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair

Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework

Presentation transcript:

1 Data Analysis Retreat: May 16-18, 2012 Disposition Data Diversity Proficiencies Analysis School of Education Campbellsville University

2 CAP 2: Admission Dispositions 2011 Highest Highest – (4b) Honest/Ethical 4.49 ( , ) – (2a) Respects others 4.35 ( , ) Lowest Lowest – (3b) Differentiation 3.44 – (3a) Sensitivity to Diversity 3.89 *4/6 evaluators rated 4b highest. 5/6 evaluators rated 3b lowest.

CAP 2: Admission Dispositions 2011 IECE Highest: – 4b Demonstrates ethical behavior 4.67 – 4a Conducts self with integrity 4.66 Lowest: – 3b Demonstrates differentiation

4 CAP 3 Disposition Means, 2011 High: 4b Fairness/ethical behavior 4.78 Low: 3b Differentiation 4.13

CAP 3 Diversity Proficiencies 2010 KTS 1b: 2.47 Connects content to life experiences of students. KTS 1d: 2.53 Guides students to understand content from different perspectives. KTS 2b: 2.42 Uses contextual data to design instruction relevant to students. KTS 3c: 2.79 Values & supports student diversity and addresses individual needs. KTS 4b: 2.47 Implements instruction based on diverse student needs and assessment data. KTS 6c: 2.26 Integrates student use of technology to meet diverse student needs. Spring, Fall 2011 KTS 1b: KTS 1d: KTS 2b: KTS 3c: KTS 4b: KTS 6c:

CAP 3: IECE Diversity Proficiencies 2010 IECE 1c: 2.71 Individualize curr., plans & assessment for ALL students IECE 1f: 2.79 Include knowledge and strategies of multiple disciplines IECE 1g: 2.93 Plan experiences/instruction…family strengths… IECE 2f: 2.85 Create/maintain culturally responsive environments… IECE 3b: 2.77 Implement instructional strategies that meet ind. needs… IECE 3e: 2.69 Implement culturally responsive learning experiences… IECE 3f: 2.71 Implement/support family-centered activities… IECE 4c: 2.77 Plan/impl. assess. strat. sensitive to …families’ cultures… IECE 4d: 2.69 Plan/impl. assess. strat. to involve children’s families… IECE 6b: 2.93 Demon. effective methods of commun.…value families IECE 6c: 3.00 Collaborate with families… IECE 6f: 2.79 Articulate ind. outcomes and unique needs of each child.. IECE 8b: 3.00 Indiv. interactions/act. sensitive to char. of families IECE 8e: 3.00 Respect/provide on-going support for families’ level of inv. IECE 9d: 2.85 Use technology to meet special needs of children 2011 Spring 11 Fall 11 Year 1c g f e f b d Overall

7 Diversity Proficiencies: KTS 2011 KTS CAP 4 Portfolio* Coop. Teacher Univ. Supervisor Video Evaluation Indicator 1b 2.50/ Connects content to life experiences 1d 2.53/ Guides students to understand content from various perspectives. 2b 2.63/ Uses contextual data to design instruction relevant to students. 3c 2.75/ Values & supports student diversity & addresses individual needs 4b 2.47/ Implements instruction based on diverse student needs and …. 5c 2.52/ Regularly integrates technology …meet diverse student needs.

8 TRACs 3 & 4: Dispositions 2011 CAP 5 TRAC 3: – Range – Low: 3, 4, 5: 4.00; High 1 & 2: 4.11 – TRAC 4: – Range – Low: 1: 3.80; High 2, 3, 4, – CAP 7 TRAC 3: NA TRAC 4: All 5s