Presenting: Units A1 and A2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Competence Assessment Assessment Documents Assessment strategy (SummitSkills) Assessment methodology (SQA) Assessment guidelines (SQA)
Advertisements

HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE SVQs Focus for 2008 Suzie Erasmuson Senior EV for Health and Social Care SVQs.
Presenting: Unit V1. Presenting: Unit V1 Who this presentation is suitable for? Internal verifier-candidates working towards Unit V1: ‘Conduct internal.
Qualifications Update: National 5 Music Qualifications Update: National 5 Music.
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
Head teacher Performance Management
Performance management guidance
Performance management guidance. Performance management Part C: Appraisers An introduction to the revised Performance Management Regulations January 2011.
Performance management guidance
This Coach Education Workforce Model is © of England Hockey Board, Scottish Hockey & Welsh Hockey. COACH EDUCATION WORKFORCE The Coach Education Workforce.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
SVQ in Food & Drink Operations External Verification Report.
Suzanne May, RVN Harper Adams University College.
Consistency of Assessment
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Performance management guidance
Geography CPD Presentation Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs National 3, 4 and 5.
 Increasing concerns about the nursing profession in the U.K.  Concern from NMC over the number of new registrants reported for fitness for practice.
Assessment Activities
Guidance for using the Edexcel Levels 2 and 3 NVQs in Health PowerPoint presentation This document is designed to be used when introducing the new Edexcel.
CHANGES TO THE LEVEL 4 CERTIFICATE
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
National Vocational Qualifications in the United Kingdom Author:Richard Leach Venue: Turku, Finland Date:14 th September 2007.
Diploma in Teaching in the Lifelong Learning Sector
Religious Moral and Philosophical Studies CPD Presentation.
ADEPT Framework
Assessed and Supported Year in Employment ( ASYE )
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Verification: Quality Assurance in Assessment Verification is the main quality assurance process associated with assessment systems and practice - whether.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
Ways for Improvement of Validity of Qualifications PHARE TVET RO2006/ Training and Advice for Further Development of the TVET.
Foundation Degrees Foundation Degree Forward Lichfield Centre The Friary Lichfield Staffs WS13 6QG — Tel: Fax: —
Successfully recording Continuing Professional Development.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
VCE VET Scored Assessment For assessors of VCE VET programs VCAA February / March 2008.
Review of Midwifery Supervision Workshop 20 th April 2015 ‘Revalidation’ Are you ready?
Sign-off Mentor (ReviewedJan 2011) (The NMC Standards to support learning and assessment in practice can be accessed from the main menu of the Placement.
Paramedic Science Mentor update. Practice Assessment Team Current Teaching and Assessing Qualifications Assessment Taxonomy Assessment Documents Assessment.
Consistency of Assessment (Validation) Webinar – Part 1 Renae Guthridge WA Training Institute (WATI)
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Assessment Validation. MORE THAN YOU IMAGINE ASQA (Australian Skills Quality Authority) New National Regulator ASQA as of 1 July, 2011.
1 Professional Discussion An Additional Method November 2007.
Introduction to Health and Social Care Diploma Levels 2 & 3.
Specialist Associate CESR Evaluation Day
Improve Own Learning and Performance. Progression from levels 1-3 Progression from levels 1-3 At all levels, candidates are required to show they can.
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
CERTIFICATE IN ASSESSING VOCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (CAVA) Unit 1: Understanding the principles and practices of assessment.
Aviation Ground Handling Trailblazer Assessment Activity consultation Aviation ground operative Aviation ground specialist Aviation operations manager.
CERTIFICATE IN ASSESSING VOCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT (CAVA) Unit 1: Understanding the principles and practices of assessment.
Recognition of Prior Learning. What is RPL? »Formal definition: RPL is a form of assessment that judges if a learner can evidence that they can meet the.
Presented by John Versluis What is Assessment? The Career and Technology Education and Training Framework.
Fitness and Conditioning
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Provide instruction.
External Verification Report 2014/15
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
Assessment brief Post graduate route.
INTRODUCING THE TOOLKIT L3 & L5
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
Physiotherapist Level 6 Integrated Degree Apprenticeship
Physiotherapist Level 6 Integrated Degree Apprenticeship
The Assessment Process
Recognition of Prior Learning
Education and Training Sector Update
OTLA Report Writing Training
Role of the Internal Verifier
Presentation transcript:

Presenting: Units A1 and A2

Who is this presentation for? Assessor-candidates working towards the Unit ‘Assess candidates using a range of methods’ (A1) or Unit ‘Assess candidates’ performance through observation’ (A2) OR Those assessors already holding D32 and/or D33 (as part of their CPD)

Terminology The slides in this presentation refer to the assessor and at other times they refer to the assessor-candidate. They should be taken to mean one of the same. There are a small number of slides towards the end of the presentation that refer to assessors and verifiers of the assessor or internal verifier-candidate. Where this is the case these text names have been written in bold. Why is it important that we know what current assessor and verifier units contain? Working in line - same practice, assessors emphasis may be different, conflict in centres? As all External Moderators will soon be working in line with V2, when new EV Report Forms come out Today for some getting their heads around the new units for the first time, for some confirmation of what they may already know. Whatever your stating point, your contributions will be valued at discussion time

Aims The information contained in the following slides should enable you to: Recognise where the assessors’ role naturally matches the evidence requirements of A1 and A2 Identify the elements that make up A1 and A2 and their evidence requirements Identify the Learning and Development Assessment Strategy requirements for assessing and verifying Units A1 and A2

Assessor and Verifier awards The A & V Units were developed by ENTO in consultation with employers, awarding bodies in the UK and practitioners They are the national standards for Assessment & Verification and form an integral part of the Learning & Development qualifications structure These qualifications are aimed at those responsible for work-based learning, assessment & verification

Selection of the appropriate A Unit (1) A1 — Assess candidates using a range of methods A2 — Assess candidates’ performance through observation The Unit selected by the assessor-candidate should reflect their existing or expected assessment practice, ie they will either assess using only observation and questioning or will tend to use a variety of methods

Selection of the appropriate A Unit (2) If a candidate holds A1, it incorporates Unit A2, so there is no need to work towards A2 Assessor-candidates should either do A1 OR A2

Assessment environment for Unit A1 & Unit A2 A1 and A2 are now single Unit awards in their own right They are work-based Units (meaning all evidence of assessor-candidate performance must be taken from their natural place of work (the ENTO have stipulated that simulation is not allowed) The candidates assessed by assessor-candidates must also be in their place of work

Assess candidates using a range of methods A1.1 Develops plans for assessment with the candidates A1.2 Judges evidence against standards & makes decisions A1.3 Gives feedback and support on assessment decisions and identifies and agrees the next steps in assessment A1.4 Contributes to the quality assurance process

Assess candidates’ performance through observation A2.1 Agree and review plans for assessing candidates’ performance A2.2 Assess candidates’ performance against the agreed standards A2.3 Assess candidates’ knowledge evidence against the agreed standards A2.4 Make an assessment decision and provide feedback

The Assessors’ Role (1) The assessor undertakes a number of key activities as part of their role such as: Candidate induction and explanation of their award Identification of any support needed Setting realistic goals and targets Planning assessments Assessing using a range of methods (A1) or only observation and a small amount of questioning (A2)

The Assessors’ Role (2) Providing constructive and timely feedback plus support and identification of further training Accurate recording of assessments and assessment decisions Reviewing progress with candidates Making final decisions on candidates’ competence

The Assessors’ Role (3) Contributing to their centre’s quality assurance procedures Maintaining their own occupational competencies Many of the activities just described have always been included in assessor qualifications. Some of these activities have been given a higher status in the A Units. We are now going to take a closer look at the assessor’s role in relation to each of the elements

Evidence requirements and the Assessors’ role (1) Developing plans for assessment with the candidate (A1.1 and A1.2) Judging evidence against standards & making decisions (Covering A1.2 and is split into two element for A2,observation A2.2, and questioning A2.3)

Evidence requirements and the Assessors’ role (2) Giving feedback and support on assessment decisions, identifying and agreeing the next steps in assessment (A1.3 and A2.4)

Evidence requirements and the Assessors’ role (3) Contributing to the quality assurance process (Covering all of A1.4 and is included in A2.4 criteria) Assessor meetings provide very good evidence of standardising assessment practice Keeping accurate and up to date assessment and verification records provide an essential audit trail of evidence

Requirements and the Assessors’ role — motivating An Assessor requirement that doesn’t appear in the standards, but is very important!

The Assessors’ role The effective Assessor plays many parts, which fit together to provide an all round support and assessment mechanism to promote non-discriminatory and effective assessment within the workplace

Structure of A Units Each Unit is broken down into 4 elements Each element contains Performance Criteria, Scope (previously Range) and Knowledge requirements (37 in all) are based on the complete Unit and not individual elements. Each Unit also has a set of Evidence Requirements We are about to look at each of these areas in more depth

Performance Criteria (1) Has been written using clear instructional language. Example criteria element A1.3: Give feedback at an appropriate time and place Give candidates feedback in a constructive way, which meets their needs and is appropriate to their level of confidence Clearly explain your assessment decision on whether candidates’ evidence of competence is good enough

Scope (previously Range) (1) The scope covers methods of assessment: Unit A1 all of following; A2 shown with * *Observation of candidate performance in the workplace *Asking candidates questions Taking account of past experiences/achievements (APL) Projects, tasks, assignments

Scope (previously Range) (2) Professional discussion between assessors and assessor-candidates Assessing the candidates’ report of their work (personal statement, reflective account) Using evidence from others, eg supervisors, peers (Witness Testimony)

Knowledge requirements Knowledge requirements for A1 encompass 37 points (35 for A2) Points cover the essential knowledge required by an assessor in order to perform effectively. Therefore, to achieve A1/2, knowledge should be recognised wherever possible in the performance of the assessor-candidate, through their work activities.

A1.1 Evidence Requirements (1) Three assessment plans; two different candidates Each plan must cover one full Unit and four different assessment methods (plan must include observation and an example where others will make a contribution to the assessment process) An explanation from the assessor-candidate regarding the methods they have selected Two written progress reviews for two candidates

A1.2 Evidence Requirements (3) Three assessment decision records for two different candidates (in A1.1) One record of explanation covering: how chosen methods were used/implemented/evaluated (min of four methods including observation) how assessor-candidate demonstrated competence for criteria c, d and g

A1.3 Evidence Requirements One observation by the assessor of the assessor-candidate providing feedback to one candidate planned for in A1.1 Two records of feedback from the assessor-candidate provided for the candidates planned for in A1.1 One record of explanation indicating how criteria a, d and f were addressed

A1.4 Evidence Requirements The assessment records for the different candidates planned for in A1.1 which have been used as part of the quality assurance process Written evidence of having contributed to internal standardisation (meetings) involving the review of at least two pieces of evidence for each of two different candidates A written statement from the person responsible for internal quality assurance confirming the assessor-candidates’ contribution to agreed quality assurance procedures

A2.1 Evidence Requirements (2) Three assessment plans covering two Units; two different candidates Each plan must indicate which aspects of competence will be assessed by observation and when and how observation will be conducted Plan should also show how safety, minimum disruption to work activities and unobtrusive assessment have been planned for Two written progress reviews for two candidates

A2.2 Evidence Requirements The observation records showing assessor-candidate decisions for three assessment plans (in A2.1) One record of explanation indicating: how observation of performance was used to demonstrate achievement of the standards how effectiveness of observation was evaluated in light of assessing candidates

A2.3 Evidence Requirements The knowledge evidence records showing assessor candidate’s decisions for 3 assessment plans (in A2.1) One record of explanation where the assessor-candidate: explains how questioning was used to assess the knowledge requirements of the standards evaluates the effectiveness of questioning in light of having assessed his/her candidates

A2.4 Evidence Requirements A min of one observation by the assessor of the assessor-candidate providing feedback to one candidate planned for in A2.1 Two records of feedback from the assessor-candidate provided for the candidates planned for in A2.1 Assessment records (covering candidates planned for in A2.1) which have been passed to the internal verifier A written statement from the person responsible for internal quality assurance

In summary (1) The assessor role has not changed dramatically with the introduction of A1/A2; activities such as planning, judging evidence, providing constructive feedback and support are still crucial to fulfilling the role. Good practice has been captured and incorporated into the standards

In summary (2) The language used to describe Performance Criteria and knowledge has been simplified and made more relevant to work based learning The evidence requirements are structured differently from the previous D Units and focus more on the duties/tasks that an assessor performs in the course of their work

The Assessment Strategy All centres offering delivery of the A & V Units must sign up and abide by the Learning and Development Assessment Strategy, which includes: Occupational Competence of Assessors and Internal Verifiers Independent assessment (quality control) Ongoing updating of knowledge and skills (CPD)

Occupational competence (1) The Assessment Strategy for Learning and Development states: Assessors of the A and V Units must have a sound, up-to date, working knowledge and experience of the principles and practices specified in the standards they are assessing and must hold the relevant D or A and/or V Units

Occupational competence (2) Assessors assessing in all other subject areas, ie Hospitality, Care, Construction who currently have the D Units or equivalent do not have to attain the A1 or A2 Units, but they should aim to update their knowledge and working practices in line with A1 Unit standards The following slides relate to assessors and internal verifiers of the A and V Units

Assessor for A1/A2 candidates: I have been a qualified and practising assessor for at least one year within the last two years OR I could have been a qualified experienced trainer of assessors for at least one year I have a sound working knowledge of A1/2 and the Assessment Strategy I have undertaken at least two updating activities in the past year

Internal Verifier of A1/A2 Candidates: I am already a qualified practising assessor and internal verifier I have been an assessor for D32/A2 and/or D33/A1 (similar standards would also be acceptable) for at least one year within the last two years I have a sound working knowledge of A1/2 and the Assessment Strategy I have undertaken at least two updating activities in the past year

Independent Assessment (1) Introduced by ENTO to strengthen quality assurance (Guidance on independent assessment can be found in the Learning and Development Assessment Strategy) Requires the assessor-candidate to present a balance of evidence which must include a substantive component which has been assessed by someone who is independent of the assessor-candidate, ie not his/her primary assessor or internal verifier for the A1 or A2 Unit

Independent Assessment (2) ENTO have given the following as an example of a substantive piece of outcome evidence for the Independent Assessor to assess: For A1 or A2, an Assessment Plan

The Independent Assessor Should be occupationally competent and qualified (a competent job-holder) Must not be the candidate- assessor’s primary assessor or internal verifier May be employed by the same centre or by another approved centre Should feature in Assessment Plans

Updating of knowledge & skills (CPD) Assessors should demonstrate Continuing Professional Development within the last year involving at least two of the following activities: Work Placement Job Sharing Technical skill update training Attending courses Studying for learning and development Units Study related to job role Collaborative working with Awarding Bodies Examining Qualification development work Other appropriate occupational activity as agreed with the Internal Verifier

Who is responsible for the CPD process? The centre is responsible for including arrangements for CPD in their Internal Verification Strategy. CPD should at least partially be planned in advance. All assessors are responsible for managing, maintaining and recording their own CPD External Moderators are responsible for monitoring CPD activity within centres.

Any questions?