Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Readiness of Forward Muon Arms for W Detection Itaru Nakagawa For the PHENIX Muon Trigger Upgrade Collaboration 1.
Advertisements

Post Run13 MuTR/MuTrig Maintenance 1. Cathode Cable in mis-contact : South Station-1 Oct-5, Gap-2 2.
Report ~first collision Kotaro Kijima 2010/01/25 Local lab meeting.
1 Run 9 PHENIX Goals and Performance John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory June 4, 2009.
MuTRG for Run12 RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1. Run12 Schedule 14 Cryoweeks -> Mid Jan. ~ End of April GeV pp (2+3 weeks) GeV pp (1+6 weeks)?
MuTr/MuTrig Performance of Run13 RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
ADTX Threshold Scan RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1. Run13 ADTX Threshold Scan March 3, 2013 MUID1D HV=Run12 Nominal Setting MuTrig e-Log entry=#
Frank Geurts Rice University.  Time-of-Flight in STAR ◦ start & stop detectors in Run 9  Time-of-Flight Calibration ◦ upVPD ◦ Barrel TOF ◦ preliminary.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
MUID Status: General Detector Health In addition to two disabled HV chains there are four other chains (out of a total of 600) that are largely or totally.
Optical Alignment System (OASys) Masters Thesis of Yuki Ikeda Rikkyo University Presented by Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC 1.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
Run10 Preparation Status and Issues Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC.
09/12/2009ALICE TOF General meeting 1 Online Controls Andrea Alici INFN and Universtity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ALICE TOF General Meeting CERN building.
MuTr HV Optimization RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Time Meeting PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
PHENIX Status, 2/22/11 VTX commissioning on beam Local polarimeter in service 9.6% in blue, -16.6% Residual transverse component for longitudinal beam.
Andrew Glenn 4/21/02 Commissioning and Performance of the. Muon Identifier Andrew Glenn (University of Tennessee), for the PHENIX collaboration April APS.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
November 18, 2008 John Haggerty 1 PHENIX In Run 9 John Haggerty Brookhaven National Laboratory.
South SG1 Trigger High Rate Sanghwa Park, Katsuro Nakamura, Yoshimitsu Imazu, and Itaru Nakagawa 1.
South SG1 Trigger High Rate Sanghwa Park, Katsuro Nakamura, Yoshimitsu Imazu, and Itaru Nakagawa 1.
MuTR/MuTrig Readiness for Run13 Itaru Nakagawa on Behalf of MuTrig/MuTr Group 1.
1 MuTRG-FEE Upgrade Status RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Takao Sakaguchi, BNL Run-11 PHENIX Run Coordinator PHENIX Run-11 Report Sakaguchi, RHIC retreat 1 RHIC retreat version.
FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
MuTr Shutdown Work Rusty Towell for And JUNE 22, 2004 at the Muon Physics and Forward Upgrades Workshop.
Run15 pp Achievement and pAu status Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
Introduction to High Momentum Trigger in PHENIX Muon Arms RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 中川格 1.
PHENIX Run8 Summary d+Au was fantastic! - x30 over Run3 baseline for future A+A new level of precision on intrinsic Cold Nuclear Matter physics now p+p.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
1 South Arm Installation Plan Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC.
18 March 2002 All Experimenters’ Meeting Alan L. Stone Louisiana Tech University 1 DØ Status: 03/11 – 03/18 Week integrated luminosity –1.1 pb -1 delivered.
MuID LL1 Study (update) 09/02/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade Meeting.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
High Multiplicity Trigger Operation Status RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa On behalf of Toru Nagashima, Aaron Key, SeYoung Han, Shoichi Hasegawa 1.
Pixel DQM Status R.Casagrande, P.Merkel, J.Zablocki (Purdue University) D.Duggan, D.Hidas, K.Rose (Rutgers University) L.Wehrli (ETH Zuerich) A.York (University.
First measurement and future prospects for measurements of single spin asymmetries in W production with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC Young Jin Kim for.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of September 9 to September 16 D0 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 4.0pb.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
R&D for Muon Trigger Upgrade Naohito Saito (Kyoto/RIKEN/RBRC)
1 Onsite Status Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC. 2 Schedule.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
Forward Trigger Upgrade and AuAu Pattern Recognition V. Cianciolo, D. Silvermyr Forward Upgrade Meeting August 18-19, 2004.
HBD Report Craig Woody BNL DC Meeting January 7, 2009.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
MuTrig-FEE Install Status RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Run11 MuTrig Performance RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
K. Barish UC Riverside 7 Oct Spin PHYSICS at PHENIX with a Central Arm Trigger Kenneth N. Barish For the PHENIX Collaboration UC Riverside DNP’2000,
06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop1 Level-1 Triggers for Run-5 Outline –Vertex Triggers : BBC, ZDC (not discussed here) BBC will have ability.
Muon Arm Physics Program Past, Present + Future Patrick L. McGaughey Los Alamos National Laboratory Santa Fe June 17, 2003.
Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
1 Installation Status Remaining Issues RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Onsite Report Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC. Schedule.
MuTrg/Mutr Optimization Yoshi-mitsu Imazu. ● Mutr Lv1 timing scan Adjustment of Lv1 timing Online/Offline shape cut values ● Mutrg threshold scan → Better.
Study of polarized sea quark distributions in polarized pp collisions at sqrt(s)=500GeV with PHENIX Oct. 10, 2008 Tsutomu Mibe (KEK) for the PHENIX collaboration.
PHENIX Plan for Run13 Kieran Boyle RSC 01/11/20131.
RPC production and performance Chong Kim Korea university RHIC spin workshop, Seoul National Univ.
Analysis Meeting, November 9-11, 2003 Manuel Calderón de la Barca Sánchez Heavy Flavor Working Group Heavy Flavor in ‘04: Prospects for J/ . Heavy.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
Muon Trigger Performance Run12 PP510GeV Sanghwa Park (SNU/RIKEN)
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
Preparation for Run10 RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa. TLD badges (to be replaced every two weeks) Location of dosimeters in MuTr.S St.1 TK361 TK362 TK363 TK364.
FVTX High Multiplicity Trigger for Run15
RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Presentation transcript:

Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1

MuTrig-FEE Parameters FunctionOptions DiscriminatorLEDCFD Threshold0 ~ 100 mV (40,60mV) Gap LOGICOR AND 2 of 33 of 3 LL1 Width1 ~ 7 (3) St1 St2 St3 2 of 3 AND 3 of 3 AND No MuTRG-FEE MuTR Non-Stereo Gaps MuTR Non-Stereo Gaps 2

MuTrig-FEE Operation FebruaryMarchApril OR, Eff=97% AND2, Eff=97% 2/28 4/184/18 4/184/18 3/6 3/17 Thresholds are tuned to set efficiency~97% channel-by-channel. 3

STABILITY 4

LV North Snapshot Jan.10 !

Shut off LV Cooling water Pressure tuning Cooling water Pressure tuning Lost St3, Oct4 Chs-1, Brd-1 2/400 ADTX boards disabled through Run11 N.St3, Oct4, Gap2 N.St3, Oct4, Chs-1, Brd-1 2/400 ADTX boards disabled through Run11 N.St3, Oct4, Gap2 N.St3, Oct4, Chs-1, Brd-1

MuTrig-FEE Error Handling shift crews can find errors through online monitor – most of errors can be solved with Reset(“Download”) or Initialization(“Feed”) 7 MuTRG-MRG + DCMIF Data Collecting Module online monitor error information is sent to DAQ through data stream. error information is sent to DAQ through data stream. online monitor notices the error. online monitor notices the error. Katsuro Nakamura

Errors in Electronics South armNorth arm DCMIF0 DCMIF2 DCMIF3 DCMIF2 DCMIF1 DCMIF0 DCMIF1 frequent failure especially for two ADTX boards Y-axis: Channel X-axis: Run numbers Errors OK! developed by K. Nakamura Stability Monitored by Sanghwa Park (SNU) North St-3, Oct.6 All “PHYSICS” data

 Total 419 PHYSICS runs for pp collision  Total 90 errors observed during PHYSICS data taking ArmDCMIFMRG_CHBad runs South DCMIF0MRG_CH64 DCMIF1MRG_CH52 DCMIF2MRG_CH147 DCMIF3No bad runs North DCMIF0MRG_CH51 DCMIF1No bad runs DCMIF2 MRG_CH01 MRG_CH732 DCMIF3MRG_CH63 Errors in Electronics ~ 11.2 % of total data ~ 7.6 % of total data Most likely frequent errors are : beam clock counter mismatch, bad data format from ADTX

Error Log 10 status log output Thanks to Ed Desmond Ed Desmond developed status log system – read status through VME – automatically processed at the end of each run – log error information + parameter values It’s very helpful to investigate the errors and recall the parameter setting Error analysis to be done To be dumped to DB for QA -> Spin Festa

Noise level (Fake hit rate) Fake hit rate [Hz] Run number - Trigger entry threshold set by 10k → No statistical issues in the plot - Noise level is negligibly small to form significant accidental coincidence triggers. AuAu Run starts Fake hit rate is sampled from abort gap

Noise level (Fake hit rate) St1 St2 St3 South arm North arm Maintenance this shutdown Maintenance this shutdown

Non-enough timing resolution of MuTr Based on trigger timing study → MuTr hit signal(with extended clock width) RPC hit signal (good timing resolution) Trigger timing OR logic

Trigger timing acceptable range Run number Clock [1 clock=106 ns]  Trigger width setting : 3  stable overall  Hardware failures or inadequate delay tune can introduce a sloppy timing

Trigger timing St1 St2 St3 Octant 1~8 Same graph for all octants of North arm

Trigger efficiency - North Oct7Oct5Oct8Oct6 Oct1Oct2Oct3Oct4 Trigger entries threshold: >100

Trigger efficiency – South AuAu Run starts Oct1Oct2Oct3Oct4 Oct5Oct6Oct7Oct8 Trigger entries threshold: >100 Efficiency (%)

Operation/Stability Summary Disabled ADTX – North St-3, Oct-3, Gap-2 – North St-3, Oct-3, Chs-1, Brd-1 Frequent Errors – Two ADTX boards in South and North (one each) High Fake Rates – South St-1, Oct-3, Gap-2 – North St-1, Oct-1, Gap-3 – North St-1, Oct-8, Gap-1 – North St-3, Oct-1, Gap-2 18

Rejection Performance 19

MUID Rejection Performance 20

21 MUID Rejection Power 3/17~ South Tunnel Shield 3/2~ North Tunnel Shield Background Condition Improved! The very Last Fill The very Last Fill

SG1 Raw Trigger Rates 22 OR AND2

23 Liveitme:0.75 ~ 0.8 PHENIX 2kHz Bandwidth

North and South 24 OR -> AND2 didn’t earn much rejection power to SG1

OR vs. AND2 Logic 25 OR From Yoshinori Fukao’s Run9 Analysis AND2 OR.vs AND2 supposed to be non-trivial trade off between efficiency and RP.

Summary SG1 trigger has been stably operated thru Run11. Only minor issues are encountered. North Rates.vs South Rates needs to be understood. OR / AND2 RP looks inconsistent with Run9 expectation. Timing alignment between Stations before signals are sent to LL1 26

backups 27

LL1 Efficiencies ADTX MuTr MRG LL1 DCMIF DCM GL1 Trigger Identical hit information Identical hit information Josh Perry’s Online Monitor LL1 boards developed by U.Iowa 28