DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat Integrated Test Process Darlene Mosser-Kerner Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

Effective Contract Management Planning
DT&E Cmte - Walking The Line with Title 10 1 Beth Wilson Industry Co-Chair NDIA System Engineering Division, DT&E Committee Test Architect, Raytheon Company.
Integrated Product Team (IPT) Process Training
NDIA SE Division Meeting February 12, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Status and Plans February 2014 Beth Wilson, Raytheon Steve Scukanec,
Test & Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) Overview
1 May 2009 ver. 5.5 Materiel Development Decision (MDD) MDA: Approves AoA Study Guidance Determines acquisition phase of entry Identifies initial review.
“Common Process for Developing Briefings for Major Decision Points” INSTRUCTIONS Provide Feedback via to: Lois Harper PEO C4I and Space
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
DoD Systems and Software Engineering A Strategy for Enhanced Systems Engineering Kristen Baldwin Acting Director, Systems and Software Engineering Office.
© 1998 Concept Five Technologies Enterprise Application Integration Capability Maturity Model.
1 Procurement Quality Assurance Use quality as the framework for process/continual improvement Use quality as the framework for process/continual improvement.
NDIA SE Division – Annual Planning Meeting December 11-12, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Status and Plans December 2013 Beth Wilson,
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
NDIA SE Division Meeting February 13, Developmental Test and Evaluation Committee Beth Wilson, Raytheon Steve Scukanec, Northrop Grumman Industry.
NATIONAL AGENCY FOR VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, BULGARIA The 4th meeting of the SEEVET-Net July, 2011 Chisinau, Moldova.
Collaboration to Meet Future T&E Needs ITEA 14 September Mr. Mike Crisp Deputy Director, Air Warfare Operational Test and Evaluation.
Copyright © The Open Group 2011 Your Name Your title 44 Montgomery Street Suite 960 San Francisco, CA USA Tel
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
UNCLASSIFIED Joint and Coalition Warfighting Mr. John Vinett March 2012 Technical Baseline Capability.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
UNCLASSIFIED DITSCAP Primer. UNCLASSIFIED 1/18/01DITSCAP Primer.PPT 2 DITSCAP* Authority ASD/C3I Memo, 19 Aug 92 –Develop Standardized C&A Process DODI.
© MCR, LLC MCR Proprietary - Distribution Limited Earned Value Management Application, Guidance, and Education Neil F. Albert President/CEO MCR, LLC
CHECKPOINTS OF THE PROCESS Three sequences of project checkpoints are used to synchronize stakeholder expectations throughout the lifecycle: 1)Major milestones,
Shift Left Feb 2013 Page-1 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A – Cleared for Open Publication by OSR on January 17 th, 2013 – SR case number 13-S-0851 Dr. Steven.
P1516.4: VV&A Overlay to the FEDEP 20 September 2007 Briefing for the VV&A Summit Simone Youngblood Simone Youngblood M&S CO VV&A Proponency Leader
LOG 101 Curriculum Review 16 Jul 04 Richard A. Andrews, CPL Course Manager.
Life Cycle Logistics.
Verification and Validation — An OSD Perspective — Fred Myers Deputy Director, Test Infrastructure Test Resource Management Center November 4, 2009.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Reliability Improvement Working Group (RIWG) Status Report Patrick Dallosta Performance Learning Director – Life Cycle Logistics (Sustainment) LCL FIPT.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of: 02 Mar 051 Partnering with Industry on System Safety & MIL-STD-882D.
1 1 Defense Acquisition Guidebook Progress Update March 27, 2012.
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006.
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Life Cycle Cost Savings by Improving Reliability Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director, Operational Test and Evaluation January 15, 2009.
USJFCOM 27 Jul EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Col David Brown, USAF JFIIT Commander UNCLASSIFIED Joint Fires Integration and Interoperability Team (JFIIT)
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
1 Systems Engineering Initiatives 26 June 2007 Dr. Don Gelosh Sr. Systems Engineering Consultant OSD(AT&L)/SSE/ED.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Information Requirements
LOG 200 Curriculum Review 15 Apr 2011 Curriculum Review LOG 200 Intermediate Acquisition Logistics Presented to the Life Cycle Logistics (LCL) Functional.
LOG 101 Curriculum Review 28 Jun 02 Richard A. Andrews, CPL Course Manager.
ICOTE Meeting October, Chief Developmental Tester Project Status for ICOTE October 2014 Brendan Rhatigan – Lockheed Martin.
Discussion Topics for Exploring OMG UPDM Way-ahead
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Life Cycle Logistics.
DT&E Strategy and the Developmental Evaluation Framework (DEF) Concept & Program Implementation 5 June 2014.
Lesson Objectives Assess the major requirements management activities during the acquisition process from Milestone B to Initial Operational Capability.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Revision reflects an evolution, not a revolution
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Cumulative IOT&E Results Through FY 2008
Importance of T&E Connotations
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Test and Evaluation Considerations
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Information Required for Milestone and Decision Reviews
13 November 2018.
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR)
Perspectives on Transforming DT and OT Industry-Government Roundtable
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Presentation transcript:

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat Integrated Test Process Darlene Mosser-Kerner Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems & Software Engineering Jun 9, 2008 Industrial Committee on Program Management

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 2 Background IT is mandated by policy but not well defined DoDI states that T&E is integrated but does not provide a definition  DoDI para – “Development and demonstration are aided by the use of simulation-based acquisition and test and evaluation integrated into an efficient continuum…”  DoDI Enclosure 5 – The PM…“shall coordinate DT&E, OT&E, LFT&E, family-of-systems interoperability testing, information assurance testing, and M&S activities, into an efficient continuum, closely integrated with requirements definition…” Services requested OSD clarify definition IT

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 3 Background cont. Recent Study Findings Defense Science Board Task Force on DT&E  “Implementation of integrated test concepts has been allowed to evolve on an ad-hoc basis. The time has come to pursue more consistency in integrated test planning and execution.”  DoDI is “ambiguous and misleading because it is not focused on integrating developmental and operational testing. Instead, it clouds the meaning by adding other factors such as Modeling and Simulation (M&S) and requirements definition into the concept.”

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 4 Background cont. Recent Study Findings NDIA Systems Engineering Division DT&E Committee White Paper (in draft)  “Finding 3: Integrated ‘Test’ is not consistently implemented in the acquisition process across the different services. This is especially true in the System Development & Demonstration (SDD) Phase. A standard definition and consistent implementation of Integrated Test must be established in DoDI ”

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 5 AT&L-DOT&E Memo: T&E Policy Revisions Dec 22, 2007  “Developmental and operational test activities shall be integrated and seamless throughout the systems life cycle.”  “To maximize efficiency of the T&E process and more effectively integrate developmental and operational T&E, evaluations shall take into account all available and relevant data and information from contractor and government sources.” Mandates Services incorporate Integrated Test processes into T&E strategies

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 6 DUSD(A&T) - DOT&E Memo Feb 15, 2008 Directed the establishment of a working group to implement several DSB recommendations including an Integrated Test process Specific Task:  Implement mandated Integrated DT and OT, including the sharing and access to all appropriate data (contractor and government) and conduct T&E in an operationally representative environment as early as possible

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 77 Integrated Test Implementation Impediments To Full Implementation: Lack Common Understanding - Definition Lack Of Guidance - Updating DAG and TEMP Content Culture Change - Leadership Needs To Engage

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 8 DT&E Current Actions DUSD(A&T) and DOT&E memo (with Service coordination) establishes common definition of IT as: “The collaborative planning and collaborative execution of test phases and events to provide shared data in support of independent analysis, evaluation and reporting by all stakeholders particularly the developmental (both contractor and government) and operational test and evaluation communities.” Provides for shared data but independent analysis and evaluation Infuses operational relevance into DT&E Provides operational testers early insight during system design Working group co-chaired by DD, DT&E and DOT&E established to develop implementation guidance  To be included in the next Defense Acquisition Guidebook update  Incorporating T&E in Acquisition Contracts Guidebook

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 99 Revised TEMP Progress Influence And Leverage Surveyed 20 TEMPs And Found Three Candidate Improvement Areas Modeling And Simulation Critical Technical Parameter Process And Definition Operational Relevance In DT&E Review Of Other Activities The ICOTE TEMP Format And Pilot Program Briefed By Dr. Hutchison The JTEM Briefed Air Force Briefed T&E Initiatives DSB And NDIA SE/DT&E White Paper Content and new format reduced TEMP from 5 to 3 Parts with about a 50% reduction in number of sections Evaluation Framework Relational Crosswalk Of Requirements: KPP – COI – MOS – MOE – CTP Test Case Using Existing Program Mission Oriented Context Integrate Test Planning

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 10 Integrated Test Culture Change - Leadership Needs To Engage Contracts That Reflect Integrated Test As Well As Sharing Of All Relevant Data Acceptance Of Government Involvement Early Transparency At All Levels Of Testing Re-enforce Integrated Testing Not Just Concurrent Testing Recognize Inherent Government DT&E Community’s Role

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 11 Back-up

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 12 Revised TEMP Concept Part I Introduction Part II T&E Strategy Part III Resources Brief mission description paragraph Brief Threat Assessment Brief system description paragraph Reference authoritative source documents Brief evaluation approach w/COIs Describe T&E management, (Do not state standard operating roles and practices of organizations) The philosophy recognizes a T&E continuum Evaluation Framework - System maturation (Include CTPs) - Mission-Oriented Context - Title 10 Evals (IOT&E, LF) Integrated Test Planning (CT, DT, OT, LFT, M&S) Overarching schedule that includes sequencing of T&E activities, phases, synchronized w/ Acq Strat Technical / Operational Issue Xwalk in TEMP annex Future Testing Direct linkage of requirements, test phases, and resources, within the guidance of an evaluation strategy What, Why, Who How, When Resources required Include in para form or table: Test articles needed/event Special equip/ instr costs Target / expendable costs Threat representation costs Manpower needs M&S costs Some numbers will be Estimates, but real $$ should match test phases, and evaluation requirements Include Joint requirements throughout As of May 29

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 13 DT&E – From Concept to Combat 13 Current Current vs Draft Outline PART I: SYSTEM INTRODUCTION  Mission Description  System Description  System Threat Assessment  Measures of Effectiveness and Suitability  Critical Technical Parameters PART II: INTEGRATED TEST PROGRAM SUMMARY  Integrated Test Program Schedule  Management Draft PART I: INTRODUCTION 1.1. Mission Description Sys Threat Assessment 1.2. System Description Program Background Key Capabilities (KPPs/KSAs) Key Interfaces (OV-1) Unique Characteristics 1.3. Evaluation Approach 1.4. T&E Management

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 14 DT&E – From Concept to Combat 14 Current Current vs Draft Outline PART III: DEVELOPMENT TEST AND EVALUATION OUTLINE  Development Test and Evaluation Overview  Future Developmental Test and Evaluation Limitations PART IV OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION OUTLINE  Operational Test and Evaluation Overview  Critical Operational Issues  Future Operational Test and Evaluation Limitations  Live Fire Test and Evaluation Draft PART II: T&E STRATEGY 2.1. Introduction 2.2 Evaluation Framework System maturation Capabilities & Limitations CTPs & Certifications Mission-Oriented Evaluation Context Op Effectiveness (COI / MOE) Op Suitability (COI / MOS) Statutory Evals (Initial Op, Live Fire) Mission capability comparison 2.3 Integrated Test Planning CT, DT Objectives LFT Objectives OT Objectives 2.4 Integrated Test Program Schedule 2.5 M&S 2.6 Future Testing Evaluation Crosswalk Matrix (Annex)

DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat 15 DT&E – From Concept to Combat 15 Current Current vs Draft Outline Draft PART III: RESOURCE SUMMARY 3.1 Test Articles 3.2 Test Sites and Instrumentation 3.3 Test Support Equipment 3.4 Threat Representation 3.5 Test Targets and Expendables 3.6 Operational Force Test Support 3.7 Simulations, Models, and Test Beds 3.8 Special Requirements 3.9 Test and Evaluation Funding Requirements 3.10 Manpower/Personnel Training PART V TEST AND EVALUATION RESOURCE SUMMARY  Test Articles  Test Sites and Instrumentation  Test Support Equipment  Threat Representation  Test Targets and Expendables  Operational Force Test Support  Simulations, Models, and Test Beds  Special Requirements  Test and Evaluation Funding Requirements  Manpower/Personnel Training