1st Meeting of the partnership 18 November 2009, Brussels INTERREG IVC Capitalisation projects Overview and guidelines for their preparation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process
Advertisements

1 Brussels, 18 October 2007 Erwin Siweris INTERREG IIIC/IVC JTS Lille, France.
The Committee of the Regions A political assembly of the European Union, representing local and regional government.
EU PSI Re-use Directive Review Completed – What next? Chris Corbin Independent researcher on Information Policy GI2009 Symposium, Dresden,14 th May 2009.
We’re here for you. “European Exchange of Best Practice in Arson Investigation and Prevention” European exchange of best practice in arson investigation.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Murcia, 27 Nov EU INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION PROGRAMME: INTERREG IVC Introduction to programme & application process Elena del Rey Dirección General.
Info Day - Promoting FP7 – Theme 1 HealthFeb. 14th, 2007, Bucharest Building on the success of SMEs go Life Sciences SMEs go Health.
Erasmus Thematic Network Sanne Hirs, Project coordinator Faculty of Law, Utrecht University.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer Interreg Europe Secretariat 24 April.
URBACT INFODAY IRELAND TOWARDS URBACT III Maynooth, 05 February 2015.
URBACT INFODAY FINLAND TOWARDS URBACT III Helsinki, 05 November 2014.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe National Info Day 12 May 2015, Paris Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer.
Anglia Ruskin University European Preparatory Visits Grants Scheme.
The URBACT II Programme General Presentation Vilnius, 20 January 2011.
Delegations IV KAM Prague 3rd to 7th September 2014.
Participation of the Slovak Universities on the 7 FP by Prof. Daniel Kluvanec Constantine Philosopher University in Nitra Bratislava 6/12/2005.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 LESSONS FROM THE THEMATIC EVALUATION OF THE TERRITORIAL EMPLOYMENT PACTS Veronica Gaffey, DG Regional.
Project Cycle Management for International Development Cooperation: Applied Presentation of the course Teacher Pietro Celotti Università degli Studi di.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
INTERREG IIIC/IVC Tartu, 24 April 2007CLOE Conference1 Interregional cooperation CLOE Conference – Regional Innovation Strategies for Cluster Internationalisation.
7 November 2006VI Eurosai Training Event - Prague1 Auditing EU funds – National SAI experiences Jan van den Bos – Netherlands Court of Audit.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
1 9 November 2007 – Torino Silke Brocks Project Officer INTERREG IIIC/IVC JTS Lille, France European Interregional Cooperation as part of the Cohesion.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
2008LIFE presentation LIFE+ call for proposals.
ICHNOS Plus Opening Conference Cagliari, 11 Dicembre 2008.
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 SMEs in FP6 New Activities Supporting Successful SME Participation in Life.
EUROSAI Professional Standards – Goal Team 2 Brief introduction Cristina Breden Mária Kysucká Vilnius, September 2012.
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
© Enterprise Europe Network South West 2009 The Eurostars Programme Kenny Legg R&D Funding for the Environmental Sector – 29 June 2010 European Commission.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation ESF Technical Working Group Luxembourg, 2 December
26 May 2011 EFFMIS Workshop Athens, Greece Project Overview EFFMIS is an INTERREG IVC Capitalisation project, financed by the European Union's Regional.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
Bureau for International Research and Technology Cooperation Herlitschka 1 Warsaw FP6 Launch Conference - 26 Nov Small and Medium Enterprises -
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels 17 March 2009 “Regions for Economic Change” Michael Latsch DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR REGIONAL POLICY “Thematic.
Filippo Compagni – European Policy and External Funding Manager European and External Funding Unit Powys County Council I-SPEED Information Society Policies.
EVALUATION HELPDESK Quality assessment of Evaluation Plans Evaluation Network Meeting 5-6 November 2015.
GROW Conference 20 June 2007 Silke Brocks Project Officer JTS INTERREG IIIC West, Lille (F) Main achievements of the INTERREG IIIC programme Insight into.
Implementation of the European code of conduct on partnership Findings of a survey by ETUC, BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME Structured dialogue 12 November 2014.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
11 Copyright Source Text EU Government Barometer Assessing progress on the FLEGT Action Plan commitments and EUTR across the EU 27 Beatrix Richards, Head.
Interregional Conference Pécs 19 th of October 2010.
INTERREG IIIC/IVC Treviso, 22 May 2007BRISE Conference1 Territorial Cooperation Objective: From INTERREG IIIC to the new IVC Programme INTERREG IIIC project.
URBACT INFODAYS PORTUGAL TOWARDS URBACT III Lisbon 21st January 2015.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
European LEADER Association for Rural Development
Introduction to INTERREG IVC: main features & 1st call results
EAPN ExCo Pauline Geoghegan, EAPN EY 2010 Coordinator,
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Support to National Helpdesks
Responses were received from:
CLOE: A successful pilot project
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
EuropeAid F3 Roberto Ridolfi, Head of Unit F3
State of play of OP negotiations and OP implementation
Enterprise and Industry Directorate General
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
Role-play on EU decision-making
State of play of OP negotiations
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
REPORTING ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
ESF FINANCIAL EXECUTION ESF Technical Working Group Meeting June 2018
Complex Challenges, Innovative Cities
Presentation transcript:

1st Meeting of the partnership 18 November 2009, Brussels INTERREG IVC Capitalisation projects Overview and guidelines for their preparation

About INTERREG IVC Main objective  to improve the effectiveness of regional development policies  2 calls for proposals so far  115 approved projects, including 13 capitalisation projects  65% of available ERDF allocated (=185M€) => on average, 1.6M€ ERDF per project  Next call only for capitalisation projects: deadline for submission = beginning of March 2010 with 15M€ allocated

Types of projects under INTERREG IVC 1. Regional Initiative Projects Exchange of experience and good practice, development of tools and instruments of regional policies 2. Capitalisation Projects, including Fast Track Projects Capitalisation projects: optimise results achieved, transfer of good practices identified into mainstream programmes Fast Track projects: Specific European Commission assistance and expertise offered to certain capitalisation projects with reference to the “Regions for Economic Change (RFEC)” Initiative.

Type 2 ‘Capitalisation Projects’ Fast Track Projects

Focus on Fast Track Projects Fast Track projects are Capitalisation Projects which benefit from additional expertise from the European Commission in order to contribute to the Regions for Economic Change initiative. The Commission will provide this additional expertise at its own costs In order to earmark projects for additional assistance, the Commission will assess the Capitalisation Project applications according to a certain number of questions. There is no specific applications to Fast Track Projects (FTP). The approval of projects and their designation as FTP will be the subject of separate and independent processes.

Regional Initiative Projects (Type 1) Capitalisation Projects (Type 2) PurposeExchange, dissemination and transfer of experience. Possible development of new approaches if based on the exchange of experience Transfer of good practices into mainstream programmes Involvement of MA /intermediate body designated to carry out MA tasks Not requiredCompulsory EC supportNoYes, for Fast Track Projects Recommend number of partners Depends in general on the intensity of cooperation proposed. Large partnerships are possible in light networking projects but a limited number of partners is recommended for projects with a higher intensity of cooperation. In mini-programmes, the number of partners must not exceed 8. No recommendation on number of partners involved but recommendation in terms of the number of countries represented in the project: Minimum recommended number of countries represented: 6 Maximum recommended number of countries represented: 10 Recommend duration36 months24 months Recommend budgetMin ERDF: EUR 500,000 Max ERDF: EUR 5 million Min ERDF: EUR 300,000 Max ERDF: EUR 3 million BeneficiariesPublic authorities and bodies governed by public law (as defined in section 2.3.3) Public authorities and bodies governed by public law Overview of the main characteristics of the two types of intervention

Co-financing rates 75% ERDF Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, UK 85% ERDF Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, Malta, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia

Content - Project activities Component 1: Management and coordination Component 2: Communication and dissemination Component 3: Exchange of experience NOTA: As Capitalisation projects focus on the transfer of regional development good practices into mainstream EU Structural Funds programmes, there will not be an opportunity for them to add components to the three already pre-defined components. Therefore, all content related activities for Capitalisation Projects must be grouped under component 3.

Guidelines for capitalisation projects Key features identified by INTERREG IVC JTS in its brochure published in November 2009 : 1)PARTNERSHIP 2)GOOD PRACTICE 3)TRANSFER PROCESS 4)ACTION PLAN

Key feature n°1 CORE ACTORS – PARTNERSHIP  Managing Authorities are the core actors of Capitalisation projects as the success of any policy implementation depends mainly on them (or the intermediate bodies carrying out some or all of their tasks).  Often, the partnership will be wider, including other policy makers such as: Relevant members of the monitoring committee of the regional OP Best practices owners.

Key feature n°1 CORE ACTORS – PARTNERSHIP Policy-makers and other relevant bodies responsible for policy delivery, known as ‘deep delegations’ should naturally be involved in the project, especially in all events organised at local, regional and international level. Deep delegation refers to the wider stakeholders that each partner needs to have on board to ensure successful implementation of the good practice(s) transferred.

Key feature n°1 CORE ACTORS – PARTNERSHIP Deep delegation Only costs of partners listed in the application form can be reimbursed. In order to cover the expenses of the deep delegations, it is highly recommended to include the organisations involved as partners in the application form (AF). This allows them to receive ERDF funding. If they are not officially listed in the AF, it means that:  either they participate at their own costs  or are involved and budgeted as “external experts” with the condition that their costs will be fully paid and thus definitively borne by one of the official partners.

Key feature n°1 CORE ACTORS – PARTNERSHIP  Wide geographical coverage is essential.  Necessity to have a good mix of less and more advanced regions. Especially the involvement of new MS should be carefully considered.  It is also very important to carefully select partners that share an interest or expertise in a precise field of competence.

Key feature n°2 GOOD PRACTICE  The starting point of every Capitalisation project is a pool of good practices, which have already been identified and successfully tested by the partners.  The good practices can result from any successful policy experience at the local, regional, national or even European level.

Key feature n°2 GOOD PRACTICE What is a good practice? => an initiative (e.g. methodologies, projects, processes, techniques) undertaken in one of the programme’s thematic priorities which has already proved successful and which has the potential to be transferred to a different geographic area.

Key feature n°2 GOOD PRACTICE Towards TRANSFERABILITY => It is crucial when selecting good practices to check as early as possible whether they can feasibly be transferred to the partner’s regional OP.

Key feature n°3 MAIN ACTIVITY => TRANSFER  As the good practices are already identified in the regions, the focus of Capitalisation project activities will be on preparing their transfer into regional OPs, BUT implemention stage is not financed by INTERREG IVC.  The projects use typical tools for exchange of experience such as seminars, study visits, workshops, staff exchange, and so on.  It is also important to disseminate the findings widely beyond the partnership of the project.

Key feature n°3 MAIN ACTIVITY => TRANSFER The transfer process usually consists of three key milestones: 1)selection, 2)adaptation, 3)commitment.

Key feature n°3 MAIN ACTIVITY => TRANSFER 1)Selection Regions have to express their interest on which good practices they would like to see implemented in their territory. Ideally this first step should be initiated already during the project’s preparation. Method: Organisation of a meeting where each region presents its good practices.

Key feature n°3 MAIN ACTIVITY => TRANSFER 2) Adaptation The proposed practices need to be analysed to see why it was successful in a specific context and how it should be adapted to fit within the context of the recipient region(s) = ‘transfer roadmap’. Method : A smaller working group is created within the project between the donor region and the recipient region(s). The involvement of experts and practitioners are often necessary to ensure the successful transfer. Study visits are generally a decisive step in order to gain firsthand experience on the good practice and to discuss relevant issues with the staff involved in the implementation.

Key feature n°3 MAIN ACTIVITY => TRANSFER 3) Commitment Endorsement of the transferred practices by the recipient region(s). This is carried out through the finalisation of a binding action plan by the recipient region, specifying how these good practices will be implemented under its OP. => Necessity to ensure the commitment of the local relevant stakeholders: e.g., they can be invited to the main interregional events. A number of local feedback meetings may be also necessary to raise their awareness.

Key feature n°4 MAIN RESULT – ACTION PLAN  The main result of Capitalisation projects is considered to be the development of an ’action plan’ for all participating regions.  These plans specify how the good practices will be transferred and implemented under the regional OPs.  Each action plan will be signed by the respective Managing Authority and relevant regional stakeholders.

Key feature n°4 MAIN RESULT – ACTION PLAN The action plan is the main result of the project and should be signed by the Managing Authority. Minimum content of this strategic document:  Definition and description of good practice(s) to be transferred; what form they will take and how their implementation will be evaluated.  Names and roles of the main stakeholders in the region that will need to be involved in the implementation process.  Identification of the relevant priority and measure concerned in the regional operational programme, along with the budget required to fund the implementation.  Details on how the implementation will take place.

Key feature n°4 MAIN RESULT – ACTION PLAN NOTA:  It should also be noted that the action plan does not guarantee implementation of a practice within a particular region.  It will be subject to the rules governing allocation of the regional funds, such as calls for projects or decision by a monitoring committee.

Thank you for your attention PASCAL CHAZAUD - Consultant External assistance to NIVERLAN