Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Research Ethics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Is it Research?. Is It Research? 2 Elements –The project involves a systematic investigation –The design (meaning goal, purpose, or intent) of the investigation.
Advertisements

Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) September 2012 Dr. Jill Singleton-Jackson, Chair.
Ethics in Field Research Philip Verwimp 27 February, 2014.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
BHS Methods in Behavioral Sciences I May 28, 2003 Chapter 14 (Ray) Ethics.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Human Research and Ethics Dr Michèle de Courcy Chair, Faculty of Education HEAG University of Melbourne.
Obtaining Informed Consent: 1. Elements Of Informed Consent 2. Essential Information For Prospective Participants 3. Obligation for investigators.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education Canada2-1 Chapter 2: Child Development 2.1 Doing Child-Development Research 2.2 Child-Development Research and Family.
Research Ethics Levels of Measurement. Ethical Issues Include: Anonymity – researcher does not know who participated or is not able to match the response.
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Ethics in Research The Ethical Standards of the American Psychological Association (2002 Ethics code, to be effective June 1,
THE ETHICAL CONDUCT OF RESEARCH Chapter 4. HISTORY OF ETHICAL PROTECTIONS The Nuremberg Code The Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP), United.
Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Ethics in Business Research
Research Ethics Western University Non-Medical Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer
Business and Management Research
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) October 2013 Dr. Carlin J. Miller, Chair.
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
Human Research Ethics and Obtaining Ethics Approval
Northeastern University IRB Division of Research Integrity Application process takes 2-8 weeks.
University of Western Sydney Comments on your HREC Application.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
© 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Ethics and Research Chapter Four.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Psychology Departmental Research Ethics Board (Psych-REB) October, 2007 Dr. Pascual-Leone, Chair.
Chapter 18 Ethical Precautions in Music Therapy Research.
Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,
Human Subject Research View from the IRB Anthony J. Filipovitch Minnesota State University Mankato.
Human Subjects Protections Research Ethics. Basic Assumptions about How Research Should be Conducted Subjects should be protected from harm. Subjects.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
IRB Applications Ten Common Mistakes. 1. Failing to attach documents properly.
Researching your contemporary issue From How to Write an Effective Special Study Dodson, Jarvis & Melhuish.
 Data Ethics Reinaldo Villasml Victoria Period 4.
5-6-1 Unit 6: Ethical considerations After completing this unit, you should be able to: Understand the basic ethical principles of working with.
Research Review Application Process. Required research approval All MSA 699 students are required to obtain research approval prior to collecting data.
Ethics in Business Research
Research Ethics PPAL February, 2011 Part 2.
TRAINING COURSE. Course Objectives 1.Know how to handle a suspected case 2.Know how to care for a recognized trafficked person referred to you Session.
Informed Consent Process Patrick Herbison, MEd, CIP Research Compliance Manager Office of Human Research (OHR)
Procedures and Guidelines
Ethics Some Approaches.  Students will not undertake any research project on children (under 16)  Students will not normally research on individuals.
Psychology Subject Pool Department of Psychology Syracuse University.
How to Navigate IRB Paperwork.
Psychology Subject Pool
How to Navigate IRB Paperwork.
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
© 2016 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Human Subjects and Ethics Review
Dr. Niamh Lenahan November 2016
How to Navigate IRB Paperwork.
Ethics lecture To publish research in psychology must first be approved be a board or committee at the institution you are working at. Institutional Review.
How to Navigate IRB Paperwork.
Human Participants Research
Valdosta State University
Multijurisdictional FAQs (Workshop Stream 3)
Presentation transcript:

Canadian English LING 202, Fall 2007 Dr. Tony Pi Research Ethics

Important! Conduct yourselves with professionalism. You are representing Queen’s University in public. Do not do anything that would reflect negatively on the institution.

Research Ethics Guidelines Individualized Course Research Projects - Research of this type involves course projects requiring data collection from human participants. The specific projects conducted by students must conform to clearly specified procedural guidelines developed by the instructor. Thus, although some variations in projects may exist among students, the projects have limiting parameters set on them with respect to what procedures are permissible. For example, a course instructor might assign an interview project in which the general topic of the interview and the types of people who can be interviewed are specified. Each student can then develop unique questions as long as they meet the general guidelines. Alternatively, a course instructor might allow students to design studies, but set very specific limits on the procedural features of the projects (e.g., no deception permitted, no socially sensitive topics, anonymity required).

Ethics Documents –Below is a link to the guidelines for graduate and faculty researchers at Queen's. –Points 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 are relevant even for researchers at the undergraduate level. PLEASE READ. –RECRUITMENT OF PARTICIPANTS –ASSESSMENT OF RISKS –BENEFITS –PRIVACY –INFORMED CONSENT

Ethics Documents 2 Course-based research that will be approved at the Unit REB level if the research does NOT involve: * more than minimal risk as defined by the Tri-Council Policy Statement * vulnerable participants; * personal, sensitive or incriminating topics or questions which could put the participants or the researcher(s) at risk; * serious deception; * manipulation of the behaviour of participants beyond the range of “normal” classroom activity or daily life; * physically invasive contact with the research participants. * Aboriginal peoples and certain issues involving aboriginal peoples.

Participants –Do not conduct any surveys on private property or places like malls, as you need prior permission to do so. It is also likely to get you arrested. Yes, a student was once arrested for asking people about the word ‘fuck’ in the Eaton Centre. –Personal contacts are best. Ask friends and family to fill out questionnaires when possible, and ask them for contacts that may be interested in participating. –If you are dealing with sensitive issues, research in the public domain is strongly recommended, as opposed to interviews or questionnaires..

Cover Page –Make sure you state the purpose of your study on the front page. Do not deceive your participants. –Ensure anonymity. –Always say on the cover page that they have an option not to participate if they find the subject matter sensitive. –Provide your contact information so they can get the results of the study should they so wish this is to ensure that they can verify that the results are anonymous and that no deception was involved –Consent needed (see next page)

Consent Forms (Cover Page) –Below is a sample consent form for research subjects, which covers the things the board worries about, such as –1) whether the subject understands the general purpose of the study –2) whether the subject understands that they do not have to participate in the study and they may decide to stop at any time –3) whether the subject has been given the names and contact info for the researchers and also for the researchers' supervisor so that the subject can follow up or ask questions later if desired –4) whether the subject who has been offered a summary of the final results of the survey or study (usually subjects supply their address address if they want to find out how the survey turned out)