Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 1 Premarketing Risk Assessment: Considerations for Data Analysis and Data Presentation Ellis F. Unger, M.D. Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trial.
Advertisements

Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Study Designs in Epidemiologic
Estimation and Reporting of Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare.
1.A 33 year old female patient admitted to the ICU with confirmed pulmonary embolism. It was noted that she had elevated serum troponin level. Does this.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
Effectiveness Evaluation for Therapeutic Drugs for Non-Food Animals
T-PA in Treatment of Acute Stroke: What We Know From NINDS 2004 vs 2000 Sidney Starkman, MD Departments of Emergency Medicine and Neurology, UCLA UCLA.
Postmarketing Risk Assessment of Drug Products Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
1 Lotronex ® (alosetron HCl) Tablets Risk-Benefit Issues Victor F. C. Raczkowski, M.D. Director, Division of Gastrointestinal and Coagulation Drug Products.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
An Update on NSAID Labeling and Data Review DSaRM Advisory Committee February 10, 2006 Sharon Hertz, M.D. Deputy Director Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia,
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Published in Circulation 2005 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis Demosthenes.
Study Designs Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /4/20151.
Postmarketing Safety Assessment of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Pamidronate & Zoledronic Acid Division of Drug Risk Evaluation Office of Drug Safety FDA Carol.
1 Kepivance™ (Palifermin) Basis for Approval and Pediatric Studies Kepivance™ (Amgen) Approved 12/15/04 Joseph E. Gootenberg, M.D. Office of Oncology Drug.
Nonclinical Perspective on Initiating Phase 1 Studies for Small Molecular Weight Compounds John K. Leighton, PH.D., DABT Supervisory Pharmacologist Division.
Adverse Event/Unanticipated Problems Policy and Procedures November 2007.
Clinical Pharmacy Part 2
Investigational Drugs in the hospital. + What is Investigational Drug? Investigational or experimental drugs are new drugs that have not yet been approved.
Study Designs in Epidemiologic
Research Study Design. Objective- To devise a study method that will clearly answer the study question with the least amount of time, energy, cost, and.
CLAIMS STRUCTURE FOR SLE Jeffrey Siegel, M.D. Arthritis Advisory Committee September 29, 2003.
CTD, Safety Tanja Braakman Genzyme Europe BV Pharmacovigilance Department.
Placebo-Controls in Short-Term Clinical Trials of Hypertension Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Cardiology Duke University.
1Presentation Name Pre-Marketing Safety Assessment: The Safety Review Guidance Armando Oliva, M.D. Associate Director for Policy Office of New Drugs.
Monthly Journal article review: Vimmi Kang PGY 2
Risk Management in premarketing phase Anshu Vashishtha MD PhD (in individual capacity employer : Watson Pharmaceuticals)
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
1 Lotronex Postmarketing Experience Ann Corken Mackey, R.Ph., M.P.H. Allen Brinker, M.D., M.S. Zili Li, M.D., M.P.H., formerly of ODS Office of Drug Safety.
VIOXX ™ Gastrointestinal Outcome Research (VIGOR) Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting February 8, 2001 Lourdes Villalba, M.D. DAAODP, CDER, FDA.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee May 18-19, Overview of Drug Safety Challenges Gerald J. Dal Pan, MD, MHS Director Division of.
Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science Meeting April Quantitative risk analysis using exposure-response.
Interpreting observational studies of cardiovascular risk of NSAIDs. Richard Platt, MD, MS Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care HMO Research.
History of Pediatric Labeling
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
RELEVANCERELEVANCE Is the objective of the article on harm similar to your clinical dilemma? Yes, the article’s objective is similar to the clinical dilemma.
Good Pharmacovigilance Practices
Enrollment and Monitoring Procedures for NCI Supported Clinical Trials Barry Anderson, MD, PhD Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program National Cancer Institute.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
1 Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Questions June 24, 2008 Ira Krefting, MD.
Signal identification and development I.Ralph Edwards.
1 Statistical Review of the Observational Studies of Aprotinin Safety Part II: The i3 Drug Safety Study CRDAC and DSaRM Meeting September 12, 2007 P. Chris.
Effect of Rosiglitazone on the Risk of Myocardial Infarction And Death from Cardiovascular Causes Alternative Interpretations of the Evidence George A.
Advisory Committee for Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs March 7, 2006 Question 1: 1.Has Biogen demonstrated natalizumab’s efficacy on reduced.
Types of Studies. Aim of epidemiological studies To determine distribution of disease To examine determinants of a disease To judge whether a given exposure.
1 Pulminiq™ Cyclosporine Inhalation Solution Pulmonary Drug Advisory Committee Meeting June 6, 2005 Statistical Evaluation Statistical Evaluation Jyoti.
Questions to Committee about Potential Cancer Risk with Use of Topical Immunosuppressants (Calcineurin Inhibitors) Question 1: Messages about Risk A. Based.
1 Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh. 2 Biopharmaceutics Biopharmaceutics is the science that examines this interrelationship of the physicochemical.
Macugen (pegaptanib sodium injection) Advisory Committee Meeting August 27, 2004 Jennifer D. Harris, MD Medical Officer Division of Anti-Inflammatory,
Medical Technology and Practice Patterns Institute 4733 Bethesda Ave., Suite #510 Bethesda, MD Phone: Fax: Comparison of.
Methodological Issues in Implantable Medical Device(IMDs) Studies Abdallah ABOUIHIA Senior Statistician, Medtronic.
Risk Factors for Linezolid-Associated Thrombocytopenia in Adult Patients Cristina Gervasoni Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Milano.
Table 1. Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MORE) – observational studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic diseases Tatyana Shamliyan.
CHEST 2013; 144(3): R3 김유진 / Prof. 장나은. Introduction 2  Cardiovascular diseases  common, serious comorbid conditions in patients with COPD cardiac.
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
Methods to Adjust Doses Based on Exposure-Response Information Points to Consider Richard Lalonde Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Pfizer.
Methodological quality assessment of observational studies Nicole Vogelzangs Department of Psychiatry & EMGO + institute.
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Pharmacovigilance in clinical trials
Safety of the Subject Cena Jones-Bitterman, MPP, CIP, CCRP
Biopharmaceutics Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
Ramy Abdelrahman, MD Division of Pediatric and Maternal Health (DPMH)
Interpreting Epidemiologic Results.
Eugenio Andraca-Carrera
Presentation transcript:

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 1 Premarketing Risk Assessment: Considerations for Data Analysis and Data Presentation Ellis F. Unger, M.D. Division of Clinical Trial Design and Analysis Office of Therapeutics Research and Review Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 2 Considerations for Data Analysis and Data Presentation Many aspects of these topics addressed in: “Guideline for the Format and Content of the Clinical and Statistical Sections of an Application” (1988) “Guideline for the Format and Content of the Clinical and Statistical Sections of an Application” (1988) “ICH guideline for industry E3 Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports” (ICH-E3, 1995) “ICH guideline for industry E3 Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports” (ICH-E3, 1995)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 3 Issues for Discussion Grouping of adverse events Grouping of adverse events Temporal relations between adverse events and Temporal relations between adverse events and product exposure product exposure Analyses of dose effects Analyses of dose effects Data pooling Data pooling Missing safety data Missing safety data

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 4 Coding and Grouping of Adverse Events MedDRA or other coding dictionary should be used consistently throughout clinical development program, with adverse events examined as coded MedDRA or other coding dictionary should be used consistently throughout clinical development program, with adverse events examined as coded Specific adverse effects or toxicities (those with constellation of symptoms and signs; those with common pathophysiological bases) may merit analyses of grouped terms Specific adverse effects or toxicities (those with constellation of symptoms and signs; those with common pathophysiological bases) may merit analyses of grouped terms

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 5 Coding of Adverse Events Utility of Combining Related Terms: Amplification of weak safety signals: Linking terms by pathophysiologic mechanism Linking terms by pathophysiologic mechanism Linking symptoms, signs, and lab abnormalities Linking symptoms, signs, and lab abnormalities Example: Ischemic events - arterial thrombosis/occlusion, embolism, claudication, ischemic necrosis, gangrene, intestinal ischemia, pulmonary embolism, acute MI Ischemic events - arterial thrombosis/occlusion, embolism, claudication, ischemic necrosis, gangrene, intestinal ischemia, pulmonary embolism, acute MI

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 6 Coding of Adverse Events Downside of Combining Related Terms: Potential to mask serious, unusual events with less serious, more common events: e.g., toxic megacolon masked by constipation e.g., toxic megacolon masked by constipation

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 7 Coding of Adverse Events Division of One Event into Many Terms: Potential to decrease apparent incidence of an adverse event: e.g., including pedal edema, generalized edema, and peripheral edema as separate terms will decrease the apparent incidence of fluid retention e.g., including pedal edema, generalized edema, and peripheral edema as separate terms will decrease the apparent incidence of fluid retention

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 8 Coding of Adverse Events Whenever possible, we recommend that the sponsor prospectively group adverse event terms and develop case definitions in consultation with FDA. We recognize that some groupings can only be constructed after the safety data are obtained.

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 9 Temporal Associations Between Adverse Events and Product Exposure Time to Event Analyses are Appropriate for: Clinically important events that occur on a delayed basis, e.g., progression of disability, development of cardiac toxicity, need for surgical intervention, malignancy Clinically important events that occur on a delayed basis, e.g., progression of disability, development of cardiac toxicity, need for surgical intervention, malignancy Adverse events that occur at initiation of treatment but diminish in frequency over time Adverse events that occur at initiation of treatment but diminish in frequency over time

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 10 Time-to-Event Analyses of Adverse Events Suggested Methods: Descriptions of risk as a function of duration of exposure or time since initial exposure (i.e., life table analyses for cumulative incidence) Assessment of risk within discrete time intervals over the observation period (i.e., a hazard rate curve) to illustrate the change in risk over time

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 11 Time to First Malignancy: Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Adalimumab (Abbott - Arthritis Advisory Committee Meeting; 3/4/03) (n=2468)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 12 Flu-Like Symptoms vs. Time (Interferon  -1b)

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 13 Analyses of Adverse Events by Dose The relationship between adverse events and exposure may help determine whether an event is actually related to the product and, if so, the magnitude of the risk.

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 14 Adverse Events by Dose: Methods of Analysis Adverse events as a function of administered dose (especially for dose-ranging studies, or development programs that evaluate >1 dose) Adverse events as a function of administered dose (especially for dose-ranging studies, or development programs that evaluate >1 dose) Adverse events as a function of weight- or body surface area-adjusted dose Adverse events as a function of weight- or body surface area-adjusted dose Adverse events as a function of cumulative dose received prior to event Adverse events as a function of cumulative dose received prior to event Adverse events as a function of drug plasma concentration Adverse events as a function of drug plasma concentration

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 15 Tenecteplase in Acute MI: Intracranial Hemorrhage by Weight-Adjusted Dose Absence of dose-response

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 16 Darbepoetin alfa vs. Epoetin alfa for Anemia of Chronic Renal Failure: Dyspnea/Tachypnea by Total Weight- Adjusted Dose Administered in the 4 Weeks Preceding Event Presence of apparent dose-response

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 17 Absence of dose-response Darbepoetin alfa vs. Epoetin alfa for Anemia of Chronic Renal Failure: Back Pain by Total Weight-Adjusted Dose Administered in the 4 Weeks Preceding Event

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 18 Stepped Dosing Algorithm (Incremental dosing Based on Age, Weight, or BSA) Cut points are necessarily arbitrary. Cut points are necessarily arbitrary. Important to make a specific effort to examine safety (and efficacy) at doses just above and below the cut points. Important to make a specific effort to examine safety (and efficacy) at doses just above and below the cut points.

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 19 Stepped Dosing Algorithm: Tenecteplase (Thrombolytic Agent) in Acute MI Tenecteplase dose

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 20 Tenecteplase in Acute MI: Subject Weight Distribution in Phase 3 Study (ASSENT II) = weight ending in “0” n = 9028

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 21 Tenecteplase in Acute MI: Rounding Weight to the Nearest 10 kg Increases Dose Tenecteplase dose

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 22 Tenecteplase in Acute MI: Intracranial Hemorrhage by Last Digit of Estimated Weight (Patients with no recorded weight, n=3861) Similar frequency of intracranial hemorrhage

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 23 Role of Data Pooling in Risk Assessment Pooling is actually a meta-analysis of individual patient data (i.e., retrospectively combining patient-level data from different clinical studies to assess a safety outcome of interest).

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 24 Used Appropriately, Pooled Analyses Can: Facilitate detection of relatively rare events Facilitate detection of relatively rare events Enhance the power to detect a statistical association Enhance the power to detect a statistical association Aid interpretation of chance findings in individual studies Aid interpretation of chance findings in individual studies Provide more reliable estimates of the magnitude and constancy of risk over time Provide more reliable estimates of the magnitude and constancy of risk over time

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 25 Characteristics of Valid Pooled Analyses: Phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies excluded Phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies excluded Risk of safety outcome of interest is expressed in person-years, or a time-to- event analysis is conducted Risk of safety outcome of interest is expressed in person-years, or a time-to- event analysis is conducted Pooled patient population is relatively homogeneous Pooled patient population is relatively homogeneous Studies use similar methods of adverse event ascertainment Studies use similar methods of adverse event ascertainment

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 26 Data Pooling: Interpretation of Negative Results A negative result from a pooled analysis does not prove absence of risk. A negative result from a pooled analysis does not prove absence of risk. Negative results should be interpreted in the context of the potential limitations of the analysis. Negative results should be interpreted in the context of the potential limitations of the analysis. Ensure that the previously mentioned principles have been appropriately considered in the analysis. Ensure that the previously mentioned principles have been appropriately considered in the analysis.

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 27 What is the Role of Subgroup Analysis in the Safety Assessment? Subgroup analyses are critical to the overall risk-benefit assessment, and should be addressed in NDA/BLA submissions in detail: Demographics Demographics Baseline disease status Baseline disease status Concomitant illness Concomitant illness Concomitant therapy Concomitant therapy

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 28 How Can the Analyses of Missing Safety Data be Most Informative? FDA would be interested in public comment on ways this issue affects risk assessment and/or unique methods that could be used to address the challenge that missing data presents.

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 29 Important Aspects of Data Presentation (1) Relationship of exposure time to the development of the adverse event Relationship of exposure time to the development of the adverse event Summary of adverse event rates using a range of more restrictive to less restrictive definitions (e.g., myocardial infarction versus myocardial ischemia) Summary of adverse event rates using a range of more restrictive to less restrictive definitions (e.g., myocardial infarction versus myocardial ischemia) Summary of the distribution of important demographic variables across the pooled data Summary of the distribution of important demographic variables across the pooled data

Risk Assessment Public Meeting - 4/9/03 30 Important Aspects of Data Presentation (2) Where complete case report forms are called for [21 CFR ], hospital records, autopsy reports, biopsy reports, and radiological reports should also be included, where applicable Where complete case report forms are called for [21 CFR ], hospital records, autopsy reports, biopsy reports, and radiological reports should also be included, where applicable Assuring that narrative summaries include important supplementary data (e.g., pertinent lab data, ECG data, biopsy data), as previously articulated in guidance