Less than 10% of star formation in z~0.6 massive galaxies is directly triggered by galaxy mergers Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evolution of the comoving infrared energy density up to z~1 * Emeric Le Floch, Casey Papovich, Eiichi Egami, George Rieke & the MIPS team (Steward Observatory,
Advertisements

Star formation histories and environment Bianca M. Poggianti INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova WE ARE ALL AFTER THE BIG PICTURE: 1)To what extent,
Malaysia 2009 Sugata Kaviraj Oxford/UCL Collaborators: Sukyoung Yi, Kevin Schawinski, Eric Gawiser, Pieter van Dokkum, Richard Ellis Malaysia 2009 Early-type.
CDFS SA12 SA15 Morphologies & Star Formation Histories of Massive Galaxies at z > 1.3 P. McCarthy & The GDDS Team Venice 2006.
HWR Princeton, 2005 III. The Growth of Galaxy Disks and the Evolution of Galaxy Sizes Observed galaxies occupy a small fraction of possible structural.
Galaxy Mergers: major/minor wet/dry Hans-Walter Rix MPIA, Heidelberg … which galaxies are most shaped by mergers? … when do mergers matter for the SFR?
Daniel Ceverino (HU) Potsdam, 2009 Avishai Dekel (HU), Reem Sari(HU), Tobias Goerdt(HU), Anatoly Klypin (NMSU) High-Redshift Clumpy Disks & Bulges in Cosmological.
High Redshift Starbursts Mauro Giavalisco Space Telescope Science Institute and the GOODS team STScI/ESO/ST-ECF/JPL/SSC/Gemini/Boston U./U. Ariz./U. Fla./U.
Multi-wavelength Observations of Galaxies at z>~2 Mauro Giavalisco (UMass) + The GOODS Team + The COSMOS Team.
Interpreting stellar populations in a cosmological context rachel somerville MPIA with thanks to the GOODS & GEMS teams, S. Faber, B. Allgood, J. Primack,
The extremely high gas content of galaxy UGC8802 Chang Rui-xiang Hou Jin-liang Shen Shi-yin.
Quenched and Quenching Galaxies at Low to High Redshifts S.M. Faber & UCSC and CANDELS collaborators Dekel60 Fest December 13, 2011 M31: UV GALEX.
Ultra-Deep galaxy surveys with the early build-up of galaxies Olivier Le Fèvre With the DIORAMAS team (F, IT, CH, SP)
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
1 Mechanisms of Galaxy Evolution Things that happen to galaxies… Galaxy merging Things that happen to galaxies… Galaxy merging.
Kevin Bundy, Caltech The Mass Assembly History of Field Galaxies: Detection of an Evolving Mass Limit for Star-Forming Galaxies Kevin Bundy R. S. Ellis,
Venice 06 Star Formation in the Cosmic Web Hervé Aussel, AIM Dave Sanders, Mara Salvato, Olivier Ilbert, David Frayer, Jason Surace, Nick Scoville, and.
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS Mass determination Kauffmann et al. determined masses using SDSS spectra (Hdelta & D4000) Comparison with our determination: Relative.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
Eight billion years of galaxy evolution Eric Bell Borch, Zheng, Wolf, Papovich, Le Floc’h, & COMBO-17, MIPS, and GEMS teams Venice
Downsizing & Galaxy Formation 2 nd Mitchell Symposium - April 2006 P. McCarthy OCIW Gemini Deep Deep Survey Team.
SFR and COSMOS Bahram Mobasher + the COSMOS Team.
Measuring the clustering of galaxies in COSMOS Measuring the clustering of galaxies in COSMOS Olivier Le Fèvre, LAM Why ? Why ? How ? correlation function.
CCAT survey of the GEMS Legacy field in ECDF-S Shardha Jogee (UT Austin)
Cambridge, September 9th 2004 Spitzer discovery of luminous infrared galaxies at 1
Galaxies at High Redshift and Reionization Bunker, A., Stanway, E., Ellis, R., Lacy, M., McMahon, R., Eyles, L., Stark D., Chiu, K. 2009, ASP Conference.
Establishing the Connection Between Quenching and AGN MGCT II November, 2006 Kevin Bundy (U. of Toronto) Caltech/Palomar: R. Ellis, C. Conselice Chandra:
Galactic Metamorphoses: Role of Structure Christopher J. Conselice.
The assembly of stellar mass during the last 10 Gyr: VVDS results B.Garilli on behalf of the VVDS consortium 1 topic, 4 approaches, concordant results.
Obscured AGN in the (z)COSMOS survey AGN9, Ferrara, May Angela Bongiorno Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY AND.
Renzini Ringberg The cosmic star formation rate from the FDF and the Goods-S Fields R.P. Saglia – MPE reporting work of/with R. Bender, N.
The Gas Properties of Galaxies on and off of a Star-Forming Sequence David Schiminovich + GALEX Science Team Columbia University.
Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution Meg Urry Yale University.
1 Ringberg Castle Workshop on AGN Physics, AGN hosts at 0.05
Conference “Summary” Alice Shapley (Princeton). Overview Multitude of new observational, multi-wavelength results on massive galaxies from z~0 to z>5:
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
Galaxy Growth: The role of environment Simone Weinmann (MPA Garching) Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann, Frank van den Bosch, Anna Pasquali, Dan McIntosh,
Martin et al. Goal-determine the evolution of the IRX and extinction and relate to evolution of star formation rate as a function of stellar mass.
1 On star-formation compactness & bulges: the ALMA view  IR (z~2) =  IR (z~0) x 6  IR (z~4) =  IR (z~0) x 12  IR (z) =  IR (z~0) x (1+z) 2.5 vs 
Berkeley, 16 th – 18 th May 2004Wide-Field Imaging from Space Weak lensing with GEMS Galaxy Evolution from Morphologies and SEDS Catherine Heymans Max-Planck-Institute.
Elizabeth J. McGrath, Aurora Y. Kesseli, Arjen van der Wel, Eric Bell, Guillermo Barro and the CANDELS Collaboration QUIESCENT DISKS IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE.
“Nature and Descendants of Sub-mm and Lyman-break Galaxies in Lambda-CDM” Juan Esteban González Collaborators: Cedric Lacey, Carlton Baugh, Carlos Frenk,
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini Roman Young Researchers Meeting 2009 July 21.
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
Weak Gravitational Flexion from HST GEMS and STAGES Barnaby Rowe with David Bacon (Portsmouth), Andy Taylor (Edinburgh), Catherine Heymans (U.B.C.), Richard.
A multi-band view on the evolution of starburst merging galaxies A multi-band view on the evolution of starburst merging galaxies Yiping Wang (王益萍) Purple.
Gas Accretion and Secular Processes 1  How much mass assembled in mergers?  How much through gas accretion and secular evolution? Keres et al 2005, Dekel.
GEMS Collaboration Meeting Baltimore, Jan 20-21, 2003 What do we want to accomplish?  Get to know each other  Take stock of our status quo –Data, software.
The Star Formation- Density Relation …and the Cluster Abell 901/2 in COMBO-17 Christian Wolf (Oxford) Eric Bell, Anna Gallazzi, Klaus Meisenheimer (MPIA.
How do galaxies accrete their mass? Quiescent and star - forming massive galaxies at high z Paola Santini THE ORIGIN OF GALAXIES: LESSONS FROM THE DISTANT.
Obscured Star Formation in Small Galaxies out to z
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-2: Evolution of Luminosity Functions of Galaxies Seminar: Lily et al. 1995, ApJ, 455, 108 Lecture: 2011/12/12.
SWIRE view on the "Passive Universe": Studying the evolutionary mass function and clustering of galaxies with the SIRTF Wide-Area IR Extragalactic Survey.
Red-Sequence Galaxies with young stars and dust The cluster A901/902 seen with COMBO-17 Christian Wolf (Oxford) Meghan E. Gray (Nottingham) Klaus Meisenheimer.
How are galaxies influenced by their environment? rachel somerville STScI Predictions & insights from hierarchical models with thanks to Eric Bell the.
Constraints on a Universal IMF1 from the Entire Stellar Population2,3
The Galaxies and Cosmos Explorer Tool Mary Kay Hemenway, Shardha Jogee, Sarah Miller, Aaron Smith, Achal Augustine, and Dan Lester (University of Texas.
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
Star Formation and Accretion: Systems experience periods of activity on the first passage of the galaxies, where tidal tails and morphological disturbances.
9 Gyr of massive galaxy evolution Bell (MPIA), Wolf (Oxford), Papovich (Arizona), McIntosh (UMass), and the COMBO-17, GEMS and MIPS teams Baltimore 27.
The Mass-Dependent Role of Galaxy Mergers Kevin Bundy (UC Berkeley) Hubble Symposium March, 2009 Masataka Fukugita, Richard Ellis, Tom Targett Sirio Belli,
Maracalagonis, 24/05/ Semi-Analytic Modeling of Galaxy Formation PhD student: Elena Ricciardelli Supervisor: prof. Alberto Franceschini.
QSO host galaxy properties from GEMS and COSMOS from z=0 to 3
A Survey of Starburst Galaxies An effort to help understand the starburst phenomenon and its importance to galaxy evolution Megan Sosey & Duilia deMello.
Sugata Kaviraj Hertfordshire Based on: Kaviraj 2014, MN, 440, 2944
Quasars: old black holes with young stars (?)
Aday Robaina Rapisarda (Yes, two surnames)
Dissecting Disk Galaxies in COSMOS
Specific Star Formation Rates to z=1.5
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-3: Stellar mass function of galaxies Seminar: Perez-Gonzalez et al. 2008, ApJ, 675, 234 Lecture: 2012/01/16.
Presentation transcript:

Less than 10% of star formation in z~0.6 massive galaxies is directly triggered by galaxy mergers Aday R. Robaina & Eric Bell, Ros Skelton, Dan McIntosh, Rachel Somerville, Ramin Skibba + GEMS & STAGES teams Kuala Lumpur, April 1st, 2009

Le Fèvre et al. (2000) Madau et al. (1996) Back in the late 90´s… …it was believed that the evolution of the merger rate could drive the decrease of the SFR density

Bell et al Star formation in major galaxy mergers < 35% (Hammer et al. 04, Bell et al.05, Wolf et al. 05) How enhanced is the SFR by major galaxy interactions? What fraction of the SFR is directly triggered by major galaxy interactions? Galaxy mergers dont drive the evolution in the CSFH, but… How much do they contribute to the stellar-mass growth?

The sample: COMBO-17 redshifts, colors and stellar masses (ECDFS+A901/2 ~0.5 sqdeg) GEMS and STAGES HST/ACS morphologies Spitzer/MIPS deep 24 μm Stellar-mass cut = M, 0.4<z<0.8 The method: SFR-weighted 2-point correlation functions Visual morphologies

Our weighted 2-point correlation function in a nutshell Two subsamples defined Star forming galaxies (blue and/or 24 μm detected) All galaxies Mass ratio between 1:4 and 1:1 Weights used : Either SFR of SSFR Enhancement: W(r P ) Weighted correlation function w(r P ) unweighted correlation function

SF-SF autocorrelation Pairing up star forming galaxies with star forming galaxies

SF-All cross-correlation Pairing up star forming galaxies with all galaxies

Extremely close pairs: Merger remnants:

Enhancement SFR / M * Selected as a pair Morphologically selected Clear enhancement out to 40 kpc Weak enhancement (ε=1.5-2) on average respect to pairs of isolated galaxies SFR-weighted enhancement agrees within 20% with the SFR/M * weighted

Comparing with previous results SFR/M * -weighted SF-All cross-correlation Excellent agreement with Li et al. (2008) at z=0.1 within 40 kpc Excellent agreement with Lin et al. (2007) at z=1 SFR (or SFR/M * ) enhancement seems to scale with the pre-existing (quiescent) SFR This work, z = 0.6 SDSS, z = 0.1

Dominated by isolated disks Increasing interaction fraction Then... galaxy mergers dont trigger intense bursts of star formation? Actually they do: Process of interaction up to 2.5 Gyr Intense burst ~ 100 Myr (Di Matteo et al. 2007, Cox et al. 2008)

Nothing new under the sun... Barton et al. (2000), Barton et al. (2003), Lambas et al. (2003), Alonso et al. (2004), Lin et al. (2007), Barton et al. (2007), Li et al. (2008), Ellison et al. (2008), Jogee et al. (2009)... Major interactions mildly enhance the star formation activity Interacting systems host < 35% of the SFR density Amount of dissipation crucial to understand the properties of present day massive galaxies. Galaxy mergers stop star formation. Do they deplete the cold gas or something different is going on? We need to know the amount of extra dissipation directly triggered by major mergers.

A recipe for directly-triggered SFR Ingredients: Averaged SFR enhancement (ε) Number of galaxies undergoing interactions (N gal f pair, proj ) (from unweighted 2-point correlation function) Averaged SFR in galaxy pairs ( SFR typical,pair 2 × SFR gal ) Total SFR in merger remnants (SFR rem,tot ) Number of remnants Directly triggered SFR = 8±3%

Confronting the theory and putting in context When considering all stages and all kinds of interactions, major mergers only trigger small enhancements in the SF activity ( ε = ) Di Matteo et al. (2007), Cox et al. (2008): ε = on average during Gyr of the interaction Not in conflict with the idea that the strongest starbursts are triggered by major mergers Only a modest fraction (~8%) of the SFR is directly triggered by major mergers and interactions. Using mock catalogues from Somerville et al. (2008): Triggered fraction= 7% Enhancement independent from pre-existing level of SFR/gas fraction Di Matteo (2009): Enhancement independent from gas fraction

Conclusions: SFR (and SFR/M * ) in 0.4<z<0.8 massive galaxies enhanced by a factor of due to major mergers Enhancement scales with the pre-existing (non-bursty) SFR Directly triggered SFR fraction ~ 8% Star formation triggered by major mergers does not significantly impact the growth of stellar mass at z<1

Noeske et al Khochfar % of the stars in classic bulges and ellipticals of M * > M sun have to be formed in quiescent mode M quiesc /M burst