Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Complex Web of Galaxy Formation Richard Bower Andreea Font, Ian McCarthy, Andrew Benson & the GALFORM team Using semi-analytic models to create a holistic.
Advertisements

Star formation histories and environment Bianca M. Poggianti INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova WE ARE ALL AFTER THE BIG PICTURE: 1)To what extent,
Conference Introduction Duncan Forbes Swinburne University.
Astronomical Solutions to Galactic Dark Matter Will Sutherland Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge.
1 Black Holes in the Early Universe Accretion and Feedback Geoff Bicknell & Alex Wagner Research School of Astronomy & Astrophysics Australian National.
Galaxy Mergers: major/minor wet/dry Hans-Walter Rix MPIA, Heidelberg … which galaxies are most shaped by mergers? … when do mergers matter for the SFR?
The Thick Disks of Spiral Galaxies as Relics from Gas-Rich, Turbulent, Clumpy Disks at High Redshifts Frédéric Bournaud, Bruce G. Elmegreen, and Marie.
Filippo Fraternali (Bologna University)3D - Munich - 12/06/08 Extra-planar gas at low and high z Extra-planar gas at low and high redshifts Filippo Fraternali.
Low-frequency radio maps for the REXCESS cluster sample S.R. Heidenreich, University of Southampton In collaboration with J.H. Croston, University of Southampton;
Formation and cosmic evolution of massive black holes
18 July Monte Carlo Markov Chain Parameter Estimation in Semi-Analytic Models Bruno Henriques Peter Thomas Sussex Survey Science Centre.
AGN in hierarchical galaxy formation models Nikos Fanidakis and C.M. Baugh, R.G. Bower, S. Cole, C. Done, C. S. Frenk Accretion and ejection in AGN, Como,
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
Life Before the Fall: Group Galaxy Evolution Prior to Cluster Assembly Anthony Gonzalez (Florida) Kim-Vy Tran (CfA) Michelle Conbere (Florida) Dennis Zaritsky.
Gabriella De Lucia, November 1,Tucson MPA The emergence of the red-sequence Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik A Workshop on Massive.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 4; April
Probing DM Halo Shapes Using Satellite Galaxy Kinematics Jeremy Bailin (Swinburne) Chris Power, Brad Gibson (Swinburne), Peder Norberg (ETH), Dennis Zaritsky.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation Section 4: Semi-Analytic Models of Galaxy Formation Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
THE MODERATELY LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE OF QUASARS
What Does Clustering Tell Us About the Buildup of the Red Sequence Tinker & Wetzel 2009 Presented by Brandon Patel.
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
Luminosity & color of galaxies in clusters sarah m. hansen university of chicago with erin s. sheldon (nyu) risa h. wechsler (stanford)
Clustering of QSOs and X-ray AGN at z=1 Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona October 2007 Collaborators: Jeff Newman, Joe Hennawi, Marc Davis,
Evolution of Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics University of Waterloo.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
Cosmological formation of elliptical galaxies * Thorsten Naab & Jeremiah P. Ostriker (Munich, Princeton) T.Naab (USM), P. Johannson (USM), J.P. Ostriker.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Cosmic Structures: Challenges for Astro-Statistics Ofer Lahav Department of Physics and Astronomy University College London * Data compression – e.g. P(k)
Gravitational Waves from Massive Black-Hole Binaries Stuart Wyithe (U. Melb) NGC 6420.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Satellite Galaxies (Observation) Open Questions No answers Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The dark universe SFB – Transregio Bonn – Munich - Heidelberg.
Understanding formation of galaxies from their environments Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory.
After decoupling, overdense regions collapse IF Collapse timefor all sizes. More small ripples than large waves. --> Universe dominated by globular clusters.
Galaxy Growth: The role of environment Simone Weinmann (MPA Garching) Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann, Frank van den Bosch, Anna Pasquali, Dan McIntosh,
The coordinated growth of stars, haloes and large-scale structure since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Evolution of Groups and Clusters " Richard Bower, ICC, Durham " With thanks to the collaborators that have shaped my views Mike Balogh, Dave Wilman,
Clusters at low redshift University of Durham University of Waterloo (Canada) University of Durham Michael Balogh.
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs Lan Wang Collaborators: Guinevere Kauffmann (MPA) Cheng Li (MPA/SHAO, USTC) Gabriella.
MOS Scientific Applications Michael Balogh University of Durham.
Galaxy and Quasar Clustering at z=1 Alison Coil University of Arizona April 2007.
The Co-evolution of Galaxies and Dark Matter Halos Charlie Conroy (Princeton University) with Andrey Kravtsov, Risa Wechsler, Martin White, & Shirley Ho.
すばるが見た遠方銀河団 distant clusters of galaxies: take a closer look Masayuki Tanaka (University of Tokyo) Tadayuki Kodama (NAOJ) + PISCES team picture credits:
MNRAS, submitted. Galaxy evolution Evolution in global properties reasonably well established What drives this evolution? How does it depend on environment?
Driving Downsizing with groups of galaxies Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Modelling the Stellar Populations of The Milky Way and Andromeda Collaborators: Theory:Observations: Kathryn Johnston (Columbia) Annette Ferguson (Edinburgh)
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
Galaxy groups Driving galaxy evolution since z=1 Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Xiaohu Yang ( 杨小虎 ) Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Partner group of MPA Collaborators: H.J. Mo (UMass), F.C. van den Bosch (MPIA), A. Pasquali (MPiA),
Models & Observations galaxy clusters Gabriella De Lucia Max-Planck Institut für Astrophysik Ringberg - October 28, 2005.
Evolution of galaxies and dark matter halos Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Main Collaborators: Chunyan Jiang ( 姜春艳), Cheng Li (李成), Donghai.
Semi-analytical model of galaxy formation Xi Kang Purple Mountain Observatory, CAS.
Mass and environment quenching  (Peng et al 2010, 2012) from Peng et al (2012) centrals satellites Two “separable effects” Mass-quenching: Depends on.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Speaker: Dave Wilman (MPE) Collaborators: Mike Balogh (Waterloo), George Hau, Richard Bower (Durham); John Mulchaey, Gus Oemler (Carnegie); Ray Carlberg.
Interpreting the relationship between galaxy luminosity, color, and environment. Andreas Berlind (NYU, CCPP) SPH predictions: Michael Blanton (NYU) David.
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
ZCOSMOS 10k: The role of group environment on the morphological transformation of galaxies Katarina Kovač 1 and the zCOSMOS team* *The zCOSMOS team comprises.
Preventing Star and Galaxy Formation Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Galaxy Evolution in Groups and Clusters Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
Galaxy evolution in z=1 groups The Gemini GEEC2 survey Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo.
The Mass-Dependent Role of Galaxy Mergers Kevin Bundy (UC Berkeley) Hubble Symposium March, 2009 Masataka Fukugita, Richard Ellis, Tom Targett Sirio Belli,
The role of environment on galaxy evolution University of Durham Michael Balogh University of Waterloo (Canada)
盘状星系的颜色和颜色梯度 常 瑞 香 (上海天文台 ) 合作者:沈世银 刘成则 侯金良 邵正义 颜色 - 星等关系 颜色梯度 盘状星系的演化模型.
Clustering properties and environment of AGN
The Evolving Luminosity Function of Red Galaxies
An Analytic Approach to Assess Galaxy Projection Along A Line of Sight
Modeling the dependence of galaxy clustering on stellar mass and SEDs
Presentation transcript:

Galaxy groups Michael Balogh Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Waterloo

Outline 1.Where do groups fit in the hierarchy? 2.Group selection methods 3.Properties of galaxies in groups 4.Theoretical challenges

What is a group? ~few L* galaxies M halo ~ x10 13 ( <500 km/s) At higher masses, galaxy population seems to be weakly dependent on halo mass Physically associated – but not necessarily virialized

Buildup of structure Most galaxies today are in groups Abundance evolves strongly Fraction of galaxies in groups (N>6) increases by about a factor 3 since z=1 Knobel et al. (2009)

Satellites/Centrals Nice idea Which one is the central galaxy? Not surprisingly: data show little difference between correlations of satellite/central galaxies

Satellites/Centrals Nice idea Which one is the central galaxy?

Satellites/Centrals Nice idea Which one is the central galaxy? Not surprisingly: data show little difference between correlations of satellite/central galaxies Halo mass Weinmann et al. (2006)

Cluster growth via groups Clusters grow via: Major mergers between clusters Accretion of groups Accretion of isolated galaxies Low-mass clusters may accrete much of their mass directly from the field Berrier et al. (2008)

Cluster growth via groups M= clusters accrete 35% of galaxies via groups For Coma-like clusters, fraction is 50%. McGee et al. (2009), using Font et al. (2008) model

Pre-processing Importance of groups also depends on how long these galaxies reside in group environment. And main progenitor was itself a group at some point. Use processed galaxies as tracer of accretion histories. Assume galaxies transform T Gyr after first accretion into a halo >M.

Slow truncation Without preprocessing: not only would groups be field-like, but clusters would show much more scatter Fraction of processed galaxies Halo mass McGee et al. (2009)

Slow truncation And z evolution would be rapid Fraction of processed galaxies Halo mass McGee et al. (2009)

Group preprocessing Slow timescale, low mass threshold predicts: Tight red sequence at z=0 Weak dependence on halo mass Moderate evolution: negligible red fraction by z=1.5 (also: Ellingson et al. 2001) Halo mass McGee et al. (2009)

Massive galaxies in clusters will be red even if environment is only driver. McGee et al. (2009)

Group Selection Methods Redshift surveys X-ray Photometric surveys

Redshift surveys 2dFGRS/SDSS/6dF >4500 sq degrees >5000 groups with z<0.1 CNOC2 1.5 sq degrees 200 groups 0.2<z<0.55 Extensive follow-up of ~30 groups zCOSMOS 1.7 sq degree 800 groups 0.1<z<1 DEEP II 1 sq degree 899 groups with 2 or more members 0.7<z<1.4

X-ray selection: low-z ROSAT able to detect nearby systems with ~100 km/s or greater Zabludoff & Mulchaey (1998) Osmond & Ponman (2004) Rasmussen et al. (2008) Mulchaey & Zabludoff (1998)

X-ray selection: higher z XMM-LSS (~10 ks) Willis et al. (2005) Mulchaey et al. (2007); Jeltema et al. (2007, 2008) Nine X-ray groups at 0.2<z<0.6, from ROSAT DCS These probe low-mass cluster regime, but not true groups Mulchaey et al. (2006)

X-ray selection: higher z CNOC2 fields : Chandra and XMM data – combined depth equivalent to 469 ksec ( Chandra ) c.f. ~160 ks in COSMOS z=0.4 See also Knobel et al. (2009) Finoguenov et al. (in prep)

Photometric selection McConnachie et al. (2008) use SDSS to detect 7400 compact groups, photometrically. Attempt to correct for contamination using simulations

Photometric selection RCS: not effective in the group regime Completeness trusted down to ~300 km/s. Gilbank et al. (2007)

Group properties

SDSS groups Weak correlation with halo mass for clusters Evidence for larger blue fractions in groups Bamford et al. (2009)

For satellite galaxies, a nearly equally strong dependence on halo mass and stellar mass is seen. Kimm et al Groups and clusters Also Weinmann et al. 2006, Pasquali et al. 2009

Properties of X-ray groups Spiral fraction in X-ray groups correlates with, T x X-ray bright groups tend to be spiral-poor (e.g. Brough et al. 2006) Significant scatter in early fraction (Mulchaey & Zabludoff 1998) HI deficiency independent of X-ray properties in compact groups (Rasmussen et al. 2008) Osmond & Ponman (2004)

Groups at z=0.5 At fixed stellar mass, groups have fewer blue galaxies than the field Balogh et al. (2009)

Groups at z=0.5 At fixed stellar mass, groups have fewer blue galaxies than the field Balogh et al. (2009)

Groups and clusters at z=0.5 Galaxies show a halo-mass dependence: Red fractions of groups intermediate between cluster and field environments Balogh et al. (2009)

Low-sfr galaxies Mounting evidence that there may be a transition population of dust-reddened, low-sfr galaxies found in intermediate environments STAGES supercluster: Wolf et al. (2008); Gallazzi et al. (2008) SDSS: Skibba et al. (2008); Bamford et al. (2008) Virgo: Crowl & Kenney (2008); Hughes et al. (2009) HCGs: Johnson et al. (2007); Gallagher et al. (2008)

Theoretical challenges

Rapid strangulation Compare z=0.5 group galaxy colour distribution with models Narrow range of NIR luminosity Simple models overpredict the red fraction (but actually do a pretty good job) The blue galaxies are near the group halo – but not actually subhaloes Balogh et al. (2009)

Slow strangulation Models which slow the rate of transformation Destroys distinct bimodality Maybe only a fraction of group galaxies should be affected; orbit-dependent? Puzzle: strangulation should be slow for low- mass galaxies (e.g. Haines, Rasmussen)… why so quick in GALFORM? Balogh et al. (2009)

Halo mass is King(?) Galaxy properties at z=0 depend almost equally on stellar mass and halo mass SFR/SN/AGN/gas accretion rate are the kings advisors Theorists have worked hard to make models that work, assuming they correlate primarily with halo mass. Does success in matching the luminosity function under this assumption mean we know whats going on? Or have we just given the emperor a new set of clothes?

Conclusions/Future Directions Robust samples of groups at 0<z<1 now routinely available All require good mock catalogues to account for contamination, selection effects Need more precise measures of SFH Dust-obscured star formation SF on long vs short timescales Need to find source of scatter in group properties Lx-M residuals? Concentration? Dynamics? Associated large-scale structure?