Solution Properties of antibodies: Purity Conformation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Advertisements

AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Chemical Quantities or
Athlete or Machine? Presented by Dominic Nolan. The Royal Academy of Engineering.
Karunya Kandimalla, Ph.D
Worksheets.
Generative Design in Civil Engineering Using Cellular Automata Rafal Kicinger June 16, 2006.
HKCEE Chemistry Volumetric Analysis &
Development of analytical bond- order potentials for the Be-C-W-H system C. Björkas, N. Juslin, K. Vörtler, H. Timkó, K. Nordlund Department of Physics,
Measuring Engine Performance page 91
1 When you see… Find the zeros You think…. 2 To find the zeros...
Chemical Quantities or
Hydrodynamic Techniques
Intrinsic Viscosity of Macromolecular Solutions
AUC and DLS probes for protein aggregation
Polygon Scan Conversion – 11b
1 00/XXXX © Crown copyright Carol Roadnight, Peter Clark Met Office, JCMM Halliwell Representing convection in convective scale NWP models : An idealised.
1 A B C
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA LÍNEA DE INVESTIGACIÓN DE PERCEPCIÓN ARTIFICIAL Y RECONOCIMIENTO DE PATRONES - GRUPO DE COMPUTACIÓN CIENTÍFICA A CAMERA CALIBRATION.
Maths Trail. How many hanging baskets are there in the garden? 1.
Computer vision: models, learning and inference
Introduction to Light Scattering A bulk analytical technique
Warm-Up Pick up: A Giancoli book Far back left cabinet 1 of each paper at the front 3 Equation Sheets 1 Kinematics Multiple Choice 1 Kinematics Free Response.
K4.2  : 95% in mouse  : 60% in human IMMUNOGLOBULIN CLASSES.
PS-5 Test Review. Questions 1 & 2 Distance – 60m/ magnitude only Displacement 10 m east/ magnitude and direction.
Subtraction: Adding UP
1 Lab 17-1 ONLINE LESSON. 2 If viewing this lesson in Powerpoint Use down or up arrows to navigate.
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
PSSA Preparation.
Select a time to count down from the clock above
16. Magnetic brakes ”When a strong magnet falls down a non ferromagnetic metal tube, it will experience a retarding force. Investigate the phenomenon.”
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
Analytical Ultracentrifugation
Ch 24 pages Lecture 8 – Viscosity of Macromolecular Solutions.
School of Biosciences “Global” Hydrodynamic Analysis of the Molecular Flexibility of Konjac Glucomannans Gordon Morris.
Analytical Ultracentrifugation Mücke N et al.: Molecular and Biophysical Characterization of Assembly-Starter Units of Human Vimentin. J Mol Biol
Sedementation When particles are forced through a solution, they experience resistance to movement which depends on properties of the particle such as.
Marc Mansfield Stevens Institute Eunhee Kang (Stevens doctoral student) Jack F. Douglas Polymers Division, NIST Zeno Site- Website Providing a Computational.
Dr Gihan Gawish 1. Hydrodynamic methods  Common experimental manipulations in biochemistry  centrifugation, dialysis and filtration are strongly influenced.
Ch 24 pages Lecture 7 – Diffusion and Molecular Shape and Size.
Sedimentation etc Topic 3 Part 1 Biophysics. General Principles f v F (like mg) Sphere: f 0 = 6  R Other particle: get r = f/ f 0 and f = r f 0 Example.
Ch 24 pages Lecture 10 – Ultracentrifugation/Sedimentation.
Sedimentaion.
7. Lecture SS 2005Optimization, Energy Landscapes, Protein Folding1 V7: Diffusional association of proteins and Brownian dynamics simulations Brownian.
Ch 24 pages Lecture 11 – Equilibrium centrifugation.
Measuring the size and shape of macromolecules
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
AUC - Past & Present Stephen Harding. Thé Svedberg
Translational Diffusion: measuring the frictional force on the movement of a macromolecule in solution. A particle under the influence of a constant applied.
Kinetic Properties (see Chapter 2 in Shaw, pp ) Sedimentation and Creaming: Stokes’ Law Brownian Motion and Diffusion Osmotic Pressure Next lecture:
Biochemistry 412 Analytical & Preparative Protein Chemistry I 1 February 2005.
Sedimentation etc Topic 4 Part 1 Biophysics. Academic Geneolgy Going from before 1453 to me. Ostwald – 1909 Nobel Cech – 1989 Nobel.
Analytical Ultracentrifugation
Unit 13: Solutions & Equilibrium
Analytical & Preparative Protein Chemistry I
Biophysical Tools '02 - Sedimentation
Unit 13: Solutions & Equilibrium
Hydrodynamic Techniques
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Hydrodynamics Presented by Mr.Halavath Ramesh M.A,M.sc,B.ED,PGDCAQM,PGDCA,M.Phil,(P.HD)(UoH) University of Madras Dept.
Presentation transcript:

Solution Properties of antibodies: Purity Conformation

Text book representation of antibody structure:

Main tool: Analytical Ultracentrifuge

Sedimentation Velocity Sedimentation Equilibrium 2 types of AUC Experiment: Air Solvent Solution conc, c distance, r Rate of movement of boundary sed. coeff Centrifugal force conc, c distance, r Centrifugal force Diffusion s o 20,w 1S= sec STEADY STATE PATTERN FUNCTION ONLY OF MOL. WEIGHT PARAMETERS

Sedimentation Velocity Sedimentation Equilibrium 2 types of AUC Experiment: Air Solvent Solution conc, c distance, r Rate of movement of boundary sed. coeff Centrifugal force conc, c distance, r Centrifugal force Diffusion s o 20,w 1S= sec STEADY STATE PATTERN FUNCTION ONLY OF MOL. WEIGHT PARAMETERS

Solution Properties of antibodies: Purity

Ultracentrifuge Analysis: IgG4 preparation

Solution Properties of antibodies: Conformation – Crystallohydrodynamics

Single Ellipsoids wont do…

So use the bead model approximation … Developed by J. Garcia de la Torre and co-workers in Murcia Spain 2 computer programmes: HYDRO & SOLPRO (please refer to D2DBT7 notes – see the example for lactoglobulin octamers)

Conventional Bead model Bead-shell model

1 st demonstration that IgE is cusp shaped Davies, Harding, Glennie & Burton, 1990 Bead model, s=7.26 Svedbergs, R g = 6.8nm …by comparing hydrodynamic properties with those of hingeless mutant IgGMcg

Consistent with function…. Bead model, s=7.26 Svedbergs, R g = 6.8nm High Affinity Receptor

Consistent with function…. High Affinity Receptor

Conventional Bead model Bead-shell model Better approach is is to use shell models!

Bead-shell model: Human IgG1 Crystal structure of domains + solution data for domains + solution data for intact antibody = solution structure for intact antibody We call this approach Crystallohydrodynamics

Take Fab' domain crystal structure, and fit a surface ellipsoid…. PDB File: 1bbj 3.1Å Fitting algorithm: ELLIPSE (J.Thornton, S. Jones & coworkers) Ellipsoid semi-axes (a,b,c) = 56.7, 35.6, Ellipsoid axial ratios (a/b, b/c) = (1.60, 1.42) Hydrodynamic P function = 1.045: see d2dbt8 notes

Now take Fc domain crystal structure, and fit a surface ellipsoid…. Do the same for Fc PDB File: 1fc1 2.9Å

FabFc Now fit bead model to the ellipsoidal surface P(ellipsoid)=1.039 P(bead) = P(ellipsoid)=1.045 P(bead) = Use SOLPRO computer programme: Garcia de la Torre, Carrasco & Harding, Eur. Biophys. J Check the P values are OK

The TRANSLATIONAL FRICTIONAL RATIO f/f o (see d2dbt8 notes) f/f o =conformation parameter x hydration term f/f o = P x (1 + o vbar) 1/3 Can be measured from the diffusion coefficient or from the sedimentation coefficient f/f o = constant x {1/vbar 1/3 } x {1/ M 1/3 } x {1/D o 20,w } f/f o = constant x {1/vbar 1/3 } x (1-vbar. o ) x M 2/3 x {1/s o 20,w }

Experimental measurement of f/f o for IgGFab

Estimation of time-averaged hydration, app for the domains+whole antibody app ={[(f/f o )/P] 3 - 1} o vbar Fab' domain P(bead model) = f/f o (calculated from s o 20,w and M) = app = 0.51 g/g Fc domain P(bead model) = f/f o (calculated from s o 20,w and M) = app = 0.70 g/g Intact antibody = 2 Fab's + 1 Fc. Consensus hydration app ~ 0.59 g/g

we can now estimate P(experimental) for the intact antibody P(experimental) = f/f o x (1 + app o vbar) -1/3

P=1.107 P=1.112 P=1.118 P=1.121P=1.122P=1.143 IgGs: all these compact models give Ps lower than experimental …so we rule them out!

P = P = Models for IgG2 & IgG4. Experimental P= (IgG2) = (IgG4) Carrasco, Garcia de la Torre, Davis, Jones, Athwal, Walters Burton & Harding, Biophys. Chem. 2001

P=1.208 (Fab) 2 (Fab) 2 : P(experimental) =

P = P = Open models for IgG1 (with hinge) P(experimental) =

P=1.215P=1.194 P=1.172 A B C These are coplanar models for a mutant hingeless antibody, IgGMcg. P(experimental) =

UNIQUENESS PROBLEM: Although a particular model may give conformation parameter P in good agreement with the ultracentrifuge data, there may be other models which also give good agreement. This is the uniqueness or degeneracy problem. To deal with this we need other hydrodynamic data: Intrinsic viscosity [ ] – viscosity increment Radius of gyration R g – Mittelbach factor G And work is ongoing in the NCMH in conjunction with other laboratories