Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool. 902 METT assessments included in the global study A major data source.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The ENWORKS Partnership: A winning formula for effecting change in business.

Advertisements

Welcome to Freedonia Bringing the Real World of Health Care Planning to Life through Scenario-based Learning and Assessment Lorraine Dardis, ICH, UCL 23.

Business Improvement Review Knowledge Understanding Action.

Second Meeting of the Reflection Year on World Heritage Periodic Reporting: 2-3 March 2006 Linking management effectiveness evaluation and periodic reporting:

Results Based Management at the GEF. Presentation Overview 1.GEF Results Based Management 2.GEF Project Results 3.GEF Portfolio Results 4.Tracking Tools.

Child Protection Rapid Assessment Tool

A Policy Perspective Aligning indicators to strategies and targets Dr Sarah Webster Head of UK Biodiversity Policy Unit.

World Heritage Committee, Thirtieth Session, Vilnius, Lithuania Tracking Management Effectiveness in Multiple Sites Sue Stolton, Equilibrium, UK.

OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.

Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.

CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.

Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.

Organizational Project Management Maturity: Roadmap to Success

Keeping track of learning through review, target setting and action planning e-Profiles – supporting personal development learning and information, advice.

Using Technology to Help Students with College Planning Meredith Felt COUN 511.

Regional Coordinators Meeting September 28-30, 2009 Washington DC Data Quality Assessment Framework for the ICP and Checklist Nada Hamadeh Statistics Officer.

Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.

LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs.

Types of evaluation examine different aspects of performance Resources (Inputs) ActivitiesOutputs Short-Term Outcomes Intermediate Outcomes (through customers)

WWF's Forests for Life Programme: Presentation to WPC, 12/09/03 Country and Institutional Portfolio Assessments Common issues and ways forward… Leonardo.

HERA Higher Education Role Analysis ITSS Conference HIGHER EDUCATION ROLE ANALYSIS Sarah Haworth John Dickson.

WWF – World Bank Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool What is Management Effectiveness Evaluation? Sue Stolton.

Mainstreaming the METT Bailey Evans Conservation International.

The Why, What, When & How The Why, What, When & How Midori Paxton & Doley Tshering Regional Technical Adviser Ecosystems and Biodiversity CBPF-MSL Programme.

Software Evaluation Criteria Automated Assignment Applications RSCoyner 10/8/04.

The Enhancing Our Heritage Toolkit Sue Stolton, Equilibrium Research, UK.

Management Effectiveness Training Seminar: Europarc 2008 Management effectiveness assessments – a tool for maintaining high standards in protected area.

Communications support for the Vodafone EMF community Pre-read for EMF Leader Workshop, 8 April 2008 Dianne Sullivan & Ros Young.

OECD/INFE Tools for evaluating financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD Policy Analyst OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD Trust.

INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE Preparing Component Programmes January 2011.

Once in ten years:....inspired..... inspirational.....

UNDP Project Document and GEF CEO Endorsement Request Document Midori Paxton & Doley Tshering Regional Technical Advisers Ecosystems and Biodiversity Energy.

National Standards Evaluation Associates To understand key principles that should guide decisions regarding National Standards. To model a process.

The importance of training and awareness Hanns Kirchmeir, E.C.O. Institute for Ecology In Cooperation with: Federal Agricultural Research and Education.

1 Courseware guide TRAIN TO COMPETE Training to update competences, useful to the automotive industry staff.

Tracking national portfolios and assessing results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Western and Central Africa Dakar, May 2007.

Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan

Assessment of management effectiveness in MPAs in the Western Indian Ocean Nyawira Muthiga and Sue Wells for IUCN-EARO with Kenya Wildlife Service Tanzania.

1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,

TRANSLATION MEMORY TECHNOLOGY

WORLD BANK / WWF ALLIANCE FOR FOREST CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE Reporting Progress in Protected Areas - a Tracking Tool Leonardo Lacerda, WWF International.

PBIS Assessment Benchmarks for Advanced Tiers 2.5 Information & Instructions.

Management Effectiveness and Quality Criteria in European Protected Areas: April 2008 World Heritage Convention and the Assessment of Management Effectiveness.

Design and introduction of the Qualification Development Methodology David Tournay – Key Expert.

Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Principles, criteria and methods Part 2 Quality management Produced in Collaboration between.

The Access Initiative and the Partnership for Principle 10 World Resources Institute Nathalie Eddy.

Optimising results of protected area management efforts – a capacity building workshop Sportsman’s Arms Hotel, Kenya 27 th Nov – 1st Dec.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

~MPA Scorecard ~ Assessing and Reporting on MPA Management Effectiveness Marco V. Cerezo (FUNDAECO) Barbara Reveles (SEMARNAT) Wil Mehia (TIDE) Marea E.

Developing a standardised assessment system for natural World Heritage sites The Enhancing our Heritage Project Sue Stolton, Equilibrium Consultants.

GEF Familiarization Seminar January 17 – 19, 2012 Mark Zimsky, Biodiversity Coordinator Senior Biodiversity Specialist, Global Environment Facility GEF-5.

1 Choosing from alternative approaches for assessing management effectiveness Prepared by Graeme Worboys *1, Dan Salzer *2, Marc Hockings *3 and Richard.

Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: the KwaZulu-Natal Experience Khulani Mkhize Chief Executive Officer Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife.

THE TRAINING AND ASSESSMENT TOOLKIT: A GUIDE TO ACCURACY UEL MENTOR TRAINING 3 JULY 2015.

-Traditional-Old Fashioned Way of Testing -1920’s-30’s-known as “new” scientific method.

Revised OSDV Tools and Processes LFA PSM expert workshop 28-30January 2014.

BTEC Unit 6 Outcome measures. Objectives To evaluate some outcome measurement forms To identify ways of measuring outcomes effectively To design an outcome.

Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.

2 |2 | Overview of the presentation What is disability? What is the global situation for persons with disabilities? What is accessibility? What is ICT.

Neil Burgess, Fiona Danks, Dilys Roe, Phil Franks

Competence Pack Guide to Assessment.

"INTER-AMERICAN BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION NETWORK (IABIN)"

Evaluation Styles Logic Model Generic Social Developmental

NOAA-NOS International Programs Office

Assessment Form for Periodic Reporting

Competence Pack Guide to Assessment.

Workshop Plenary Maintaining Protected Areas for Now and the Future

Assessment of current management plan (EoH Tool 5)

The Biodiversity and Protected Areas Management (BIOPAMA) Programme

Presentation transcript:

Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool

902 METT assessments included in the global study A major data source

METT Management Effectiveness Tacking Tool Developed to assess WWF/WB Alliance target of improving management in 75 million ha of forest PAs Assesses to all elements of the WCPA Framework

METT Objectives Track improvements in management Harmonise reporting for multiple sites Provides useful information for site managers Quick and easy to complete Site-based expert knowledge Easily understood by non- specialists

METT Development Developed over two years Drafts field tested Independent review and field test in Asia Two ‘rounds’ of use before revision Developed over two year period including independent review and field testing Two applications by WWF before revision in 2007: –Clearer guidance –Standardised threat list –Questions revised to cover all terrestrial biomes

Datasheets: contextual information including objectives and threats Questionnaire: 4 alternative text answers to 30 question plus score to summarise progress Text fields: recording justification for assessment, sources used and steps to be taken to improve the management issue What is the METT?

IssueCriteriaScoreComments/ Explanation Next steps 24. Visitor facilities Are visitor facilities adequate? Outputs There are no visitor facilities and services despite an identified need 0 Visitor facilities and services are inappropriate for current levels of visitation 1 Visitor facilities and services are adequate for current levels of visitation but could be improved 2 Visitor facilities and services are excellent for current levels of visitation 3

METT Database – Namibia style

Self-assessment system Ideally completed by protected area managers with a team of staff and other stakeholders Short and quick to complete Repeat assessments provide trends in effectiveness and aid adaptive management Using the METT

Multiple choice allows for some complexity of response Enables more consistent analysis of answers over time Next steps section helps guide adaptive management Questions are specifically linked to achievement of objectives Standardised language easy to translate METT Strengths

Not an independent assessment Questions are not weighted Limited evaluation of outputs and outcomes Generic (general not specific) multiple choice questions not always easily applicable in diverse situations METT Limitations

From measuring one project’s targets to many uses Major global data set of PA effectiveness information Used in WWF’s PA portfolio; World Bank’s PA portfolio; GEF PA funded projects Used in all PAs in China, Namibia, Central Africa etc Adapted for MPAs How has it been used?