History of Phosphorus in North Carolina Dr. Eugene Kamprath Professor Emeritus North Carolina Statue University SERA 6 Meeting June 20, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Soil Testing in Tomatoes
Advertisements

Soil Phosphorus Tests in the North-Central Region Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
 To determine the efficiency of Ox, M3 and M1 extractants for Fe and Al extractions from Bh and Bt horizons, which in turn will help in predicting the.
Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13,
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Agronomic Value of Nutrients in Biosolids Randall Warden A & L Great Lakes Laboratories Fort Wayne, IN Quality Analyses for Informed Decisions.
PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE BY SILAGE CORN IN SOUTHERN IDAHO Amber Moore, Steve Hines, Brad Brown, Mario de Haro Marti, Christi Falen, Mireille Chahine, Tianna Fife,
Phosphorus and Potassium. How is P managed? Key to managing soil and fertilizer P: Knowledge of whether or not the level of soil solution P is adequate.
Corn Yield Response to Starter P Fertilizer and ‘Avail’ P Fertilizer Enhancer Ron Gehl Sheri Cahill Deanna Osmond Dept. of Soil Science NC State University.
R.W. Heiniger Vernon G. James Center North Carolina State University.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
Effect of Long-term Cattle Manure Application on Soil Test Phosphorus, Organic Carbon and Winter Wheat Grain Yield Natasha Macnack, Peter Omara, Lawrence.
Experiences with PSNT in North Carolina David H. Hardy Soil Testing Section Agronomic Division- NCDA&CS.
An integrated study of nutrient leaching and greenhouse gas emissions Tyson Ochsner and Rodney Venterea Soil and Water Management Research Unit Agricultural.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
Glasgow Area Chamber of Commerce And Agriculture New Trends in Agriculture Glasgow, MT January, 12, 2011.
Fertility of Vinifera Grapes in NC SERA 2008 Meeting Fertility of Vinifera Grapes in NC SERA 2008 Meeting David H. Hardy and John Havlin NCDA&CS and NC.
Current Status of Soil Test Calibration in Mississippi Bobby R. Golden Delta Research and Extension Center
Wetland Soils Phosphorus Criteria Development V.D. Nair*, M.W. Clark, K.R. Reddy, and S.G. Haile Soil and Water Science Department, University of Florida,
Achievements - Products Sweet Sorghum Hybrids Biomass yield and Brix rate in sandy soil at Delhi, Ontario.
Modeling of Soil Nutrients – An Introduction to Logical Spreadsheeting Russell Yost Department of Tropical Plant and Soil Science, University of Hawai`i.
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
Soil and Plant Sampling and Analysis
Soil Testing Procedures for Biologically Based Systems Raymond C. Ward Ward Laboratories, Inc Kearney, Nebraska
Soil Buffering and Management of Acid Soils. pH pH = - log (H + ) If (H + ) = 1 x mol/L (H + ) = mol/L pH = - log (1 x ) pH = - (-3)
Thomas Obreza Soil and Water Science Dept. Univ. of Florida Soil Fertility and pH.
Soil Nitrogen Cycling & Budgeting
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
Soil Sampling and Nutrient Additions for Crop Production Edwin Ritchey Extension Soil Specialist UK-REC.
Overview of S Management & Related Usefulness of Soil Testing David H. Hardy Section-Chief, Soil Testing Agronomic Division, NCDA&CS SERA 6 Meeting June.
(commercial fertilizers)
Residue Biomass Removal and Potential Impact on Production and Environmental Quality Mahdi Al-Kaisi, Associate Professor Jose Guzman, Research Assistant.
Chapter SOIL AND FERTILIZER K.
Fertility Issues in Switchgrass Production Joint Meetings of SERA-ieg 6, NEC-17 and NCRA Nashville, Tennessee Donald Tyler University of Tennessee.
Phosphorus Nutrition of Cotton
Dr. Bob Lippert Soil Fertility Specialist Clemson University
Spatial Variability in Precision Agriculture What is it? What is it? – Precision n. The quality or state of being precise. Used or intended for precise.
Matt Ruark Dept. Soil Sci. CORN STOVER REMOVAL AND SOIL FERTILITY.
Forage Utilization and Grazing Management during a Drought Dennis Hancock, PhD. Extension Forage Agronomist Crop and Soil Sciences Dennis Hancock, PhD.
pH CEC due to organic matter (me/100g soil) 3% 1% 7% Organic matter level 5%
And Chuck Grantham Presents…. Reduced Inputs Increased Yields Higher Nutritional Value Improved Water Efficiency Less Plant Stress Improved Soil Health.
Precision Agriculture & GPS
Current N Fertilization
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Forage Utilization and Grazing Management during a Drought
Understanding Soil Test Results and Fertilizer Recommendations
Micronutrients Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin Zhang Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Gordon Johnson, Bill Raun, Hailin.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Soil Fertility Impacting Soil Health Ray Ward Ward Laboratories Inc. Kearney, NE “Guiding Producers.
Principles of Soil and Plant Testing December 2009 Eugenia Pena-Yewtukhiw and Jeff Skousen West Virginia University.
Management Practices and Nitrogen Availability for Organic Vegetables Grace (Guihua) Chen University of Maryland, Dept. of Entomology Contact:
Potassium Cycle, Fertilizer, and Organic K Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
Part 2: Answers to practical fertilizer management problems Fundamentals of Nutrient Management December 16-17, 2009 West Virginia University Extension.
Phosphorus Cycle, Fertilizer and Organic P Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
1 Alfredo Scheid Lopes Agronomist, MSc, PhD, Emeritus Professor, UFLA, Lavras, MG Technical Consultant of ANDA – São Paulo, SP Alfredo Scheid Lopes Agronomist,
CROP NUTRIENTS FOR EVER-INCREASING YIELDS: Are current fertilizer recommendations adequate? Gyles Randall Univ. of Minnesota, Waseca Fluid Fertilizer Forum,
Soil Acidity, Lime, and Phosphorous Brian Arnall Hailin Zhang Chad Godsey Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
John Kovar & Doug Karlen USDA-ARS
Spatial Variability in Precision Agriculture
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
Soil test results and how to use them
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Manure’s Fertility Value
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
C.C. Mitchell*, D.P. Delaney (Auburn Univ.) & K.S. Balkcom (USDA-ARS)
Presentation transcript:

History of Phosphorus in North Carolina Dr. Eugene Kamprath Professor Emeritus North Carolina Statue University SERA 6 Meeting June 20, 2011

North Carolina Soils Mountain, Piedmont, Coastal Plain

Norfolk- Coastal Plain Soil fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kandiudult Cecil / Georgeville- Piedmont Soils fine, kaolinitic, thermic Typic Kanhapludult

Phosphorus Soils initially low in P Cultivated soils – buildup of P Piedmont soils – High buffer capacity Coastal plain soils – Low buffer capacity

SoilFormP ----lbs/ac---- NorfolkAl-P188 Fe-P88 Ca-P68 Org-P132 GeorgevilleAl-P100 Fe-P333 Ca-P44 Org-P164 Forms of P in NC Soils

Yield (%) of Check Plots Compared to Fertilized Plots related to STP

Corn Yield Increase to 22 lbs P / acre- Coastal Plain Soils

Truog P- ppmP % Uptake from Days after Planting 29 Days86 Days102 Days % P 32 Studies with Corn P rate = 18 lbs / acre banded Nelson et al., 1948

Acid% P 32 Extracted Al-PFe-P HCL338 H 2 SO Effect of Anion on P Extraction Seatz, 1949, Ph.D Thesis, NCSU

Mehlich 1 (Double Acid) 0.05 N HCl N H 2 SO 4 Addition of SO4 increased extraction of P from Al and FePO 4 – (Seatz 1949 Ph.D. thesis- NCSU) Suitable for soils in the southeastern US Introduced in 1949

Critical M1P Levels for Cecil and Norfolk Soils

Critical M1P for Coastal Plain, Piedmont, and Mountain Soils

P Rate Needed to Change M1P as Influenced by Clay

Critical M1P Level 3 Piedmont Ultisols

Piedmont – P Relationships Al-P converted to Fe-P, rapid rate first 3 years after application M1-P highly correlated with Al-P Rapid decrease in M1-P first 2 years after application, followed by much slower rate of decrease M1-P critical level for wheat, 8 – 10 ppm Shelton, 1960 Ph.D Thesis, NCSU Shelton & Coleman, 1960

Residual P – Georgeville Soil Initial P Application (1956) M1P (1964) Corn Yield (1964) ---lbs/acre------ppm---Annual P- lb /acre bushels / acre Kamprath, 1967

Tidewater Research Station

P Management on Portsmouth Soil M1-P critical level for corn / soybean, 22 ppm – Long term study 1955 – 1985 Annual band application of 16 kg/ ha (equal to P removal in grain) maintained critical level No yield advantage to keeping soil test above critical level M1-P of 100 ppm supplies adequate P for 14 – 16 yrs. McCollum, 1991

Effect of P Application on Soil Solution P

100 % Phosphorus Saturation SoilM1PM3P ppm Coastal Plain sandy soils165(275) Piedmont clayey soils(335)470

Change in M1P in 3 Ulitsols 14-Year Cropping with 0 P Applied

Effect of P Rate on M1P

Mehlich 3 Extractant NH 4 F, HOAc, NH 4 NO 3, HNO 3, EDTA pH 2.5 Introduced in 1981 Extracts 1.5 – 2 times more P than M1P

Critical Levels Coastal Plain Greenhouse millet – NorfolkM1P = 31 ppm Field – Portsmouth cornM1P = 22 ppm – NorfolkcornM1P = 25 ppmM3P = 55 ppm – Portsmouth cornM3P = 43 ppm wheatM3P = 64 ppm soybeanM3P = 50 ppm – GoldsborosoybeanM3P = 40 ppm

Critical Levels Piedmont Greenhouse millet – Cecil M1P = 16 ppm – Cecil, Davidson, Georgeville M1P = 12 ppm Field – Davidson, corn & soybean M1P = 6 – 8 ppmM3P = 10 – 13 ppm – Georgeville Corn M1P = 8 ppm Wheat M1P = 8 ppm

P Management CP soil with initial M1P of 105 ppm after 14 years cropping had M1P of 60 ppm & M3P of 120 ppm – high soil test P CP soil with initial M1P of 50 ppm supplied adequate P for 13 years, 17 kg P/ha/yr harvested Piedmont soil with initial M1P of 10 ppm supplied adequate P for 12 years Annual P rate of 20 kg P/ha maintains critical level

M3P Soil Test Levels over Time Soil LevelTob.CornPastureTob.CornPastureTob.CornPasture % of samples High V. High

Effect of Clay Content on M3P

P Loss Assessment Tool (PLAT) Environmental regulation and P loss today Mehlich 3 P now used as an input for this Historical research and data important in making decisions about PLAT and P management today