Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gravitational Wave Astronomy Dr. Giles Hammond Institute for Gravitational Research SUPA, University of Glasgow Universität Jena, August 2010.
Advertisements

1 Detector characterization for burst searches by resonant detectors F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara for the IGEC2 Collaboration The 10th.
S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
GWDAW 11 - Potsdam, 19/12/ Coincidence analysis between periodic source candidates in C6 and C7 Virgo data C.Palomba (INFN Roma) for the Virgo Collaboration.
AURIGA-LIGO Activity F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara for the LIGO-AURIGA JWG 2nd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 24th and 25th, Palma de Mallorca,
LIGO- G Z Optimally Combining the Hanford Interferometer Strain Channels Albert Lazzarini LIGO Laboratory Caltech S. Bose, P. Fritschel, M. McHugh,
Adaptive Hough transform for the search of periodic sources P. Astone, S. Frasca, C. Palomba Universita` di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma Talk outline.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
G.A.Prodi - INFN and Università di Trento, Italy International Gravitational Event Collaboration igec.lnl.infn.it ALLEGRO group:ALLEGRO (LSU)
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
Results from TOBAs Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
STATUS of BAR DETECTORS G.A.Prodi - INFN and University of Trento International Gravitational Event Collaboration - 2 ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
Silvia Poggi - GW burst detection strategy in non-homogeneus networks Detection strategies for bursts in networks of non-homogeneus gravitational waves.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
Coincidences in gravitational wave experiments Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
1 Spectral filtering for CW searches S. D’Antonio *, S. Frasca %&, C. Palomba & * INFN Roma2 % Universita’ di Roma “La Sapienza” & INFN Roma Abstract:
First results by IGEC2 6 month of data of AURIGA-EXPLORER-NAUTILUS May 20 - Nov 15, 2005 IGEC2 was the only gw observatory in operation search for transient.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
ILIAS WP1 – Cascina IGEC – First experience using the data of 5 bar detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. – 1460.
Chapter 6. Effect of Noise on Analog Communication Systems
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
LIGO-G D Status of Stochastic Search with LIGO Vuk Mandic on behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration Caltech GWDAW-10, 12/15/05.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
LIGO-G D Upper Limits on the Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves from LIGO Vuk Mandic Einstein2005 Conference Paris, July
Dongxu Yang, Meng Cao Supervisor: Prabin.  Review of the Beamformer  Realization of the Beamforming Data Independent Beamforming Statistically Optimum.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Frasca on behalf of LSC-Virgo collaboration New York, June 23 rd, 2009.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
TAUP 2007, Sendai, September 12, 2007 IGEC2 COLLABORATION: A NETWORK OF RESONANT BAR DETECTORS SEARCHING FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Massimo Visco on behalf.
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
Status of the LIGO-AURIGA Joint Burst Analysis F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara on behalf of the AURIGA Collaboration and the LIGO Scientific.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
ARENA08 Roma June 2008 Francesco Simeone (Francesco Simeone INFN Roma) Beam-forming and matched filter techniques.
SEARCH FOR INSPIRALING BINARIES S. V. Dhurandhar IUCAA Pune, India.
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC 2 REPORT International Gravitational Events Collaboration ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
SC03 failed results delayed FDS: parameter space searches
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
P.Astone, S.D’Antonio, S.Frasca, C.Palomba
The VIRGO DATA ANALYSIS Fulvio Ricci
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Stochastic Background
Bounding the strength of a Stochastic GW Background in LIGO’s S3 Data
Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda M. Ando, K. Okada,
Targeted Searches using Q Pipeline
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Update on LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
Joint bar-IFO observations
Presentation transcript:

Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared for the ILIAS-GWA Meeting

The collaboration 3 groups involved:  AURIGA  ROG (Nautilus + Explorer)  Virgo Common frequency range: Hz Bandwidth: 5-30 Hz

The project Joint data analysis experiment between Virgo, Auriga, Explorer, Nautilus Detection of stochastic background signal Software injection of simulated data Analysis of real noise: 4 hours of simultaneous data for the first phase Exchange and preprocessing of data Signal simulation and injection  Gaussian, isotropic & non polarized model  Flat energy density power spectrum Detection  Standard cross correlation analysis Purpose: Steps:

Data exchange Purpose: test of independent procedures of data generation and exchange. Each member of the collaboration was asked to provide a small stream of data (4 hours) which was stored in a common repository in Bologna (CNAF). A continuous time series with the reconstructed strain observed by the detector A minimal data quality channel, which will consist in a simple boolean flag for each value of the time series (valid/not valid). Valid means that the data can be safely used for processing. Not valid means that the data cannot be trusted for reasons that does not have to be specified (independent vetoing procedure). Data content:

Signal injection A multiple stream of simulated stochastic background signals was generated, taking into account the real orientation and position of each detector. SNR=0,5,10,20. The signal is the one appropriate for a stationary, Gaussian and unpolarized stochastic background with a flat spectrum in The problem to solve: generate N continuous streams of Gaussian data with a known cross correlation array: NormalizationOverlap Reduction Function

Signal simulation: some details on the approach Generate streams with a flat spectrum in h but with the correct coherence: Square root of is obtained using SVD Vectorial filtering is implemented with Overlap and Add We know what is the correct padding to use in the flat case: Filter all the streams to obtain the correct power spectrum (in our case, )

Simulated data: a cross check Overlap reduction function reconstruction from simulated data

Detection (with standard cross correlation analysis) Minimum detectable energy density: DetectorReferenceForeseenImprovement Virgo (C5)1.0x x x10 -3 Auriga1.5x x x10 -1 Nautilus2.0x x x10 -2 Explorer2.0x x x10 -2

Expected outcomes Test of data analysis software Test of syncronization issues Research on methods to deal with noisy periods and dead times No ambitions of finding upper limits, at least in this first methodological study. But:

Future steps First phase of detection should be completed during this month Finalization of first phase foreseen for november Second phase: upper limit with longer stretches of data?