More than “Just a Number”: Assessment & Collaboration in a First Year Experience (FYE)/Information Literacy Program Indiana University Libraries Information.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Graduate Project Advisor Training. Project Basics What do you already know about the Graduate Project? –List everything you think you know about the project.
Advertisements

Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills 2012 HBCU Library Alliance Leadership Institute Presented By: Violene Williams, MLIS Reference Librarian James Herbert.
Information Literacy Demonstration – Partnership of Faculty and Library Gergana Georgieva Information Literacy Librarian August 25, 2008.
NWACC Library Instruction Program Teaching information literacy skills for academic success and lifelong learning.
Basic Skills and Career and Technical Education Lin Marelick & Valerie Carrigan August 11 & 13, 2008 BSI August Institute.
Welcome Learning Resources Center Online Orientation Cindy L. Halsey, MLIS Interim Head Librarian
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for your BTOP grant 1Measuring and Reporting Outcomes.
9TH NORTHUMBRIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT IN LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION SERVICES ANNIE DONAHUE – UNH MANCHESTER AUGUST 2011 Evaluating.
Automated Reference Assistance: Reference for a New Generation Denise Troll Covey Associate University Librarian Carnegie Mellon CNI Meeting – April 2002.
Information Literacy for a Freshman Engineering Studies Course Larry Schmidt Science/Engineering Librarian Charles W. Dolan H. T. Person Professor Department.
EPIC Online Publishing Use and Costs Evaluation Program: Summary Report.
Phillip R. Rosenkrantz, Ed.D., P.E. Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Department California State University, Pomona.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Its not just books and stories! My child + The school library = Success in the 21 st Century.
Ryerson University Online to Success. Beginnings Online to Success is a transition program created by Queen’s University. For 5 consecutive years Ryerson.
Information Literacy Adapted from a presentation by Anke Tonn Nicholls State University.
I am ready! A look at how career classes are preparing students for career success Katy Hinz, Program Coordinator, Office for Student Engagement. Career.
WELCOME! University Library Services. If you need help… & Tel IT helpline 24/7: +44 (0) Library Tel: +44.
KEEP CALM AND TRY AGAIN The Evolution of a Library Research Assignment 2013 Missouri Library Association Annual Conference.
A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR.
RPED 251 Dr. Phillip Bogle, Ph.D. Program Coordinator.
Google in the Classroom! What Next? MC 3 Teaching & Learning Conference 2006 James Bradley, MS.
Information Literacy Assessment with Art History Classes at Framingham State College Sandra Rothenberg Framingham State College
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
BACK TO THE BASICS: Library Instruction Redux. BRENT HUSHER MELISSA MUTH FU ZHU0 University of Missouri–Kansas.
September 17,  SAC Chair Responsibilities  Liaising with your liaison (and vice versa)  Avoiding SAC Chair Burnout  How to do stuff  Meetings,
TELL Delaware Frequently Asked Questions 2015 April, 2015.
The Integration of Embedded Librarians at Tuskegee University Juanita M. Roberts Director Library Services Ford Motor Company Library/Learning Resources.
Deborah Gentry, Instructional Development Center Randi Sutter, Library 14 th Annual Illinois Community College Assessment Fair.
This is what BC Students told us…
Developing Faculty-Librarian Partnership : Collaborative Initiative at Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane ( AUI ) Aziz El Hassani Hanane Kakrour Multimedia.
Plagiarism Instruction Online: Using an Interactive Information Literacy Tutorial to Assess Students’ Understanding of Academic Integrity Pamela A. Jackson.
Wartburg College What do First-Year Students Know About Information Literacy and When Do They Know It? IA/ACRL Panel, April 21, 2006.
Plagiarism: The Crime of Intellectual Kidnapping: An Interactive Information Competence Tutorial at San Jose State University Pamela A. Jackson Reference/Instruction.
The Required Library Component: Assessing First-Year Teaching in the Small Academic Library Susan von Daum Tholl, PhD, Director Diane Zydlewski, Head of.
Integrating Information Literacy Into the Classroom TLM Institute Technology & Information Literacy Mount Mary College May 30, 2002.
Learning Communities in the Community College San Jose City College.
University Library System, CUHK 1 The Librarian as Teacher: An Information Literacy E- Learning Package from The Chinese University of Hong Kong Library.
Group. “Your partner in developing future Lifelong Learners” UROWNE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Spring 2013 Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Take it Seriously… YOUR OPINION COUNTS!!!
Assignment Design I Katy Sullivan, Reference & Instruction Librarian Albin O. Kuhn Library & Gallery Spring 2004.
Assessment of Information Literacy Presented by Touro College Libraries Sara Tabaei, Information Literacy Director Bashe Simon, Director of Touro Libraries.
The Evolution of Instruction Assessment - the UGA Perspective Diana Hartle Deb Raftus Amy Watts.
One Shot? Make it Four!: Planning and Assessing a Multi-Session Information Literacy Experiment Maureen Williams Neumann University Aston, Pennsylvania.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
Charting Library Service Quality Sheri Downer Auburn University Libraries.
Welcome to the BAA/Fenway Library I am Kathy Lowe, the library director. Your teacher preparation or experience in other schools may not have given you.
Tastes Great, Less Filling: How to Design and Deliver Substantial Instruction to Large Enrollment Classes Without Being Overwhelmed STEPHANIE JH MCREYNOLDS.
The Evolution of Instruction Assessment - the UGA Perspective Diana Hartle Deb Raftus Amy Watts.
Mark Vargas, Library Director Anne Buchanan, Assistant Librarian Saint Xavier University Library Building and Strengthening Upper Level Research Skills.
Benchmarking Learning from Others ATP On-line Workshop Darla McCann Anoka-Ramsey Community College.
Supporting Students with Disabilities in Making the Transition to College Pascuala Herrera, M.Ed. Professor, Learning Specialist Debbie Franzen, M.Ed.
Finding solid information in a networked world Information Skills at Malone University.
1 Gathering Supporting Materials Chapter 6. 2 Research Inventory A list of types of information you have & types you want A list of types of information.
Starting From Scratch: Meaningful Integration of Information Literacy through Collaborative Course and Assignment Design Chris Sweet, Information Literacy.
PILR: PRE COLLEGE INFORMATION LITERACY RESEARCH Transforming Pedagogy and Curriculum with Information Literacy.
PNAIRP 2009 Portland, OR A New Web-Based Tool for Assessing the Student Experience in Learning Communities.
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Engagement Follow-up Resources
P.K. Nyame Library Ghana College of Surgeons and Physicians
What Does Your School Media Specialist Do?
Starting From Scratch: Meaningful Integration of Information Literacy through Collaborative Course and Assignment Design Chris Sweet, Information Literacy.
Presentation transcript:

More than “Just a Number”: Assessment & Collaboration in a First Year Experience (FYE)/Information Literacy Program Indiana University Libraries Information Literacy Colloquium August 3, 2012 Presenters: Hilary Writt Belinda Yff

Methods for successful faculty/librarian collaboration. The usefulness and relevance of selected evaluation tools. Some tools that can be used in assessing the outcomes of an IL program.

A decision was made to incorporate more information literacy skills into the College Success Skills course. (Louisville) 1999: Opening of the new Sullivan University Library. (Lexington) 2001: Move to a new campus/improvements to the Learning Resource Center.

Retention “The goal of FYE 101 is to “enhance student persistence… by addressing the academic, planning, and personal needs of students through group and individual guidance.” (Dr. Daniel, 2007) The goal of the library component is for students to effectively use library resources and conduct research so they can be successful in their future classes, leading up to graduation. Ideally, all 1 st quarter students take FYE 101: Information Literacy.

Librarians ‘subject experts.’ Assist faculty. Increase student recognition of library staff. Shows that the faculty value the library and information literacy. Makes implementation and assessment possible. Synergetic relationship that filters to other programs.

Meetings Mentoring & Liaisoning Web resources

Informal s Alert to recent website or database changes Schedule class visits or tours Clarify any questions Formal s Submit longitudinal data Deliver necessary start of quarter and end of quarter instructions Schedule campus meetings

Informal Formal All-campuses Present longitudinal data Discuss goals & objectives Introduce and evaluate future ideas (e.g. online testing, new assignments) Create time for faculty to share experiences Give updated materials to faculty for the quarter Revise assignments

Librarian liaisons with General Education faculty. – The Louisville and Lexington campuses have a dedicated FYE librarian who works with an FYE faculty coordinator. Partnership with new student mentor program. – Lexington librarian member of new student mentor committee – Student mentors visit FYE classes

Information literacy terms like: scholarly journals, invisible web, and Boolean operators Library handouts and worksheets Supplemental activities

Librarian participation in class Scavenger hunts/ Library visits Handouts/ Assignments

INVOLVEMENT Librarians invited as guest speakers. Orientation to library resources, instruction about databases, internet, library resources. ASSISTANCE Especially, for new instructors, librarians are resource persons. May teach the library (information literacy) component if needed. PARTICIPATION Create/participate in active learning activities. Examples: “Library Olympics,” Dewey Decimal Races, Database Jeopardy, Activity Supplements Folder, Were You Hoaxed? AVAILABILITY Students and faculty can always reach out and/or work with a librarian outside of class. Research “coupons.”

$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 “Other Databases” “Other Databases” ProQuest EBSCOhost Where to Go Where to Go GOODLUCK!GOODLUCK!

True or False? You cannot access the electronic databases off-campus. What is… False? “Where to Go” for $100

~~~~ FREE RESEARCH HELP~~~~ Present this coupon at the LRC Reference Desk to get free research assistance. NO EXPIRATION DATE ~~~~ FREE RESEARCH HELP~~~~ Present this coupon at the LRC Reference Desk to get free research assistance. NO EXPIRATION DATE ~~~~ FREE RESEARCH HELP~~~~ Present this coupon at the LRC Reference Desk to get free research assistance. NO EXPIRATION DATE

Students explore the library on their own and complete a worksheet. Individual Surviving the Library The Library Mystery Tour Group

Gain knowledge about the library, services, and resources. Lessen “fear” of the library. Complete a worksheet Introduce themselves to a library staff member Go to the different areas of the library

Welcome! How well do you know your library? Can you locate print information quickly? Or… is it a JUNGLE OUT THERE? Accuracy and speed count in… SURVIVING THE LIBRARY!

“The Disappearance of Chef Ally Gratin”

Developed from information literacy objectives and student needs. 2 different sets of assignments/exercises Available in print and online Recognized Information literacy standards Overall FYE 101 objectives Alternate between quarters Convenience of faculty/students Online version on library’s website

Collaboration on activities is not always successful. But… it’s important to try! Examples of ideas that did not “quite work out”: Group Wiki Activity Independent Study Groups Budgeting Component Beginning of Quarter Visits

Pre & Post Tests Objective Subjective Evaluation Surveys

Objective 1: Search abilities Objective 2: Ability to use evaluation guidelines Objective 3: Skill with the SUS website (catalog and DDC) Objective 4: Understanding differences between Internet, databases, and print Objective 5: Ability to identify popular and scholarly resources Objective 6: Ability to demonstrate proper usage of etiquette and protocol regarding plagiarism Each question is aligned with one of the six objectives Administered at the beginning and end of the quarter. Scores analyzed to determine improvement

Objective 1 Objective 2 Objective 3 Objective 4 Objective 5 Objective 6

Who? Input from faculty members Revisions made by librarians When? Tests evaluated each quarter Why? Information changed Keep the integrity of the test Questions with high-miss rates

Request Request to administer tests totally online and receive results in a timely manner. The online testing instrument must use resources already available. Experimentation Brainstorming with involved faculty, IT, and library staff. Initial decision to use Google Docs as the vehicle for administration. Results can be downloaded to a spreadsheet. Security of tests was an issue. Success!! Library has a subscription to Survey Monkey (a survey tool). Time limits and passwords can be set. Results can be compiled in a spreadsheet. Testing has been done for several quarters with minimal problems.

When: Administered each quarter following completion of the library component of FYE Who: All students in FYE (both on-campus and off- campus)

Presentation of IL component (was the information clear and organized?) Usefulness of information for future classes Classroom environment (freedom to ask questions, equipment and databases easy to use? Understanding of information prior to compared to after IL component Speed and time allowed for component Most helpful information gained and “what did you like the most?” Demographic questions (is this your first time to take the class, etc.?) Suggestions for improvements

Semi-annual meeting with FYE & Gen Ed Faculty/ Librarians Compile annual statistical report Test scores Student evaluation responses Continuous “tweaks” as needed Communication (formal and informal)

Yearly statistical report created. Report compared to previous statistics. Use ranking system (1 to 5) with many questions.

Example: Averages of the evaluation questions from

How are the FYE students and faculty doing? Evaluations Overall, students appear satisfied happy with the information literacy (library component): Average evaluation questions ranking of 4.31 from Fall 2010 to Summer 2011 (5 is the highest ranking) From 2000 to Fall 2010, the rankings ranged from 4.13 to 4.36.

How are the FYE students and faculty doing? Evaluations The majority of students feel that their knowledge of databases, internet, and print resources has improved following the library component. My understanding of the ELECTRONIC DATABASES PRIOR to the library component was... Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Fall Summer 2011 Above average 13.0% % Average 39.9% % Below average 47.2% % My understanding of ELECTRONIC DATABASES AFTER the library component was... Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Fall Summer 2011 Above average 47.6% % Average 50.0% % Below average 2.4%7 2.8%

How are the FYE students and faculty doing? Test Scores There is significant improvement from the pre-test to the post-test. Scores ranged from 61 to 66% (pre-test) and 80% to 85% (post-test) from Fall 2002 to Summer 2011.

Forcing students to use Sullivan's Library was very much informative for me. I had no idea of the options to retrieve info before this class. This was all new to me and I'm glad I ran into it. Some people (like me) are scared to use a computer. My fears are more at ease after this class. I believe the library component was just right for a 1st quarter student such as myself. We learned a lot and by having the handouts to go back and refer to in the future is a great help. This is my first year here at college. Everything I am learning is helping my education after twenty five years. Before this class, i didn’t know anything about any of the databases but now I do, and I have already started using them as resources for other projects. The class was perfect. My instructor made sure that I as well as others understood everything well. I feel that nothing should be taken away. Also, nothing really needs to be added. It's great, and I learned a lot more than I knew about the internet thanks to this class.

Continue to make assessment count! Continued evaluation leading to revision and improvement Continued communication and collaboration

Hilary Writt Belinda Yff