A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference of SDA By Jim Martz, Associate Superintendent of Schools, Illinois Conference.
Advertisements

District Accreditation
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
The work of the Visiting Committee Chair. Important Reminders for the Chair of a Visiting Committee: The Chair of a Visiting Committee plays a most important.
A Visiting Committee’s Work in the WCEA Process for Accreditation
Performance management guidance
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
World’s Largest Educational Community
A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools
School Improvement Plan 6 Main Areas
Campus Improvement Plans
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Periodic Department Review A System of Affirmation LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Periodic Program Review for Academics Affirming Excellence in Education LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing 1 Accreditation Overview.
Improving Student Learning 2012 CHAIR TRAINING. Introduction 2 The premise/purpose for the Visiting Committee is to provide validation, analysis and professional.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Improving Student Learning 2012 VISITING COMMITTEE TRAINING © 2013 WCEA.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Program School Improvement Plan Process.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Presented by the Faculty Affairs Office September 2013.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Inspire, Educate, and Protect the Students of California Commission on Teacher Credentialing Accreditation Overview.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
WASC For Charter Schools Dr. David Brown Executive Director Dr. Lee Duncan Associate Executive Director.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
The mission of the Codrington School is to empower all children and adults within the community to become internationally minded learners who embrace and.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Welcome The Mid-Cycle Evaluation Workshop. Background and History of MCE NWCCU emphasis on outcomes Review of Year Seven Self-Evaluations – Needing more.
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
National Quality Standards Framework
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
National Quality Standards Framework
Program Review Workshop
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

A Self Study Process for WCEA Catholic High Schools

Ensuring Educational Excellence is a new Self Study Protocol for use by Catholic High Schools. It has been piloted for two years by volunteer Catholic high schools from a number of (arch) dioceses that are members of WCEA. The purpose of the two-year pilot program was to obtain feedback and input from the “users.” We acknowledge their valuable assistance and thank them for their hard work. 2

3 The first part of the Self Study contains some introductory information and some tasks for the school to complete: 1.The Nature of Accreditation in WCEA (pages 4-5) 2.The E3 Self Study Format (page 5) 3.The Self Study Process (pages 5-6) (Written) 4.The E3 Meeting Process Form (PF) (page 7) (Written) 5.The Data Library (Pages 8-26) (Written) 6.The Standards of E3 (pages 27-29) 7.The Outline of E3 (pages 30-31)

The new E3 Self Study Protocol embraces SEVEN principles of Catholic high school Accreditation (page 4 of the SS): 1.The authenticity of a school’s Catholic identity; 2.The organizational efficacy of the school; 3.The excellence of its teaching and learning; 4.The vitality of the school’s co-curricular programs; 5.The school’s responsible stewardship of its material resources; 6.The school’s commitment to improvement; and 7. The integrity of the school’s process of self studying. 4

E3 requires schools to assess themselves (Chapter III) on each of FIVE categories of standards using the evidence found in the Data Library (Pages 8-26). The Categories of Standards are: (Pages 27-29): A.Catholic Identity; B.School Organization; C.Teaching and Learning; D.Student Support; and E. Material Stewardship. 5

1.The PURPOSE of this chapter is to provide the Leadership Team and the Visiting Committee an overview of the school (pages 32-34). 2.Items A-C consist of basic data and information about the school including the school’s address, form of governance, lists of personnel, etc. 3.Item D is a brief narrative of the history of the school. 4.Item E consists of the most significant developments of the school since the last accreditation visit presented in bullet format. 6

This chapter consists of the school’s Mission Statement, Philosophy Statement, and Integral Student Outcomes – ISOs (formerly known as ESLRs). (page 35). ISOs are essential attributes of an educated person. ISOs are about forming a person. As such, the emphasis is on the outcome of a Who (who the student will become) rather than a what (what the student will be able to do). ISOs are derived from the school’s mission and philosophy statements. In revising their ESLRs into ISOs, school should pay attention to creating rubrics to measure the degree to which integral student outcomes are realized. Schools should begin converting from ELSRs to ISOs and the various handbooks, etc. updated for the Accreditation Visit. 7

Chapter III Gathering Data (continued) NOTE: The Data Library is a collection of mostly statistical information about the school and its programs. It is not a narrative, not ‘findings,’ not a listing of key strengths or key growth areas. PLEASE NOTE: The school administration sends a digital copy of the Data Library to the Visiting Committee when it sends the copy of the Self Study to the Chair and committee members. Survey Data: For consistency of reporting, the guidelines for constructing surveys found on page 25 should be followed for every survey constructed by the school. Pages contain a listing of survey items found in various parts of the Data Library. 8

Data Gathering (pages 11-26) BOLD indicates a requirement of 3-years of data (generally in the form of a Table, e.g., #12 on page 11) [Items in brackets call for data from a survey constructed by the school]. Data gathering is not by ‘standard,’ but by category of standards. For example, the data gathered using the 34 data-gathering statements listed on pages may apply to one or more Catholic Identity Standards. 9

Practice Exercise for Data Library Gathering Data Gathering – Catholic Identity Review the 34 data-gathering statements on pages (allow about 5 minutes) Questions? Data Gathering – School Organization Review the 41 data-gathering statements on pages (allow about 10 minutes) Questions? Data Gathering – Teaching and Learning Review the 37 data-gathering statements on pages (allow about 15 minutes) Questions? Data Gathering – Student Support Standards Review the 36 data-gathering statements on pages (allow about 15 minutes) Questions? Data Gathering – Material Stewardship Review the 52 data-gathering statements on pages (allow about 10 minutes) Questions? 10

E3 – Survey Items Remember that the Data Library (DL) contains a number of survey items spread over the five area of the Standards of E3. The five areas are: A.Catholic Identity B.School Organization C.Teaching and Learning D.Student Support E.Material Stewardship Survey Items are organized by 11 specific groups (pages 25-26) 1.School 2.Administration 3.Teacher 4.Parent 5.Student 6.Alumni 7.Religion Department 8.Academic Departments 9.School Board 10.Diocesan Office 11. Support Staff 11

E3 – Survey Items (continued) The school is expected to create a survey relevant to the group being surveyed. The survey should be based on the items listed on pages and the corresponding Data-gathering statements found on pages Survey responses should be kept in a separate binder. Survey tabulations should be included in the Data Library. For example: the school needs to create a survey for Support Staff: According to the Item List on page 26, the survey is based on Standard B, #34 on page 15. Standard B #34 is “The perception of support staff concerning the degree of significance of their work in the overall accomplishment of the school’s mission.” The school designs one or more questions to address this perception. The survey response is on a scale a scale of 1-7 with 1 being to a minimal and 7 being to a great extent Extent. See page 25 for additional and important information on constructing survey questions. 12

13 After the Data Library the Self Study Protocol lists the Standards of Ensuring Educational Excellence (pages 27-29) On page 30 there is an outline of Ensuring Educational Excellence which follows through Page 31. It simply lists all that can be found in Ensuring Educational Excellence.

Key Questions for discussion and reflection: Takes place after the Data Library is completed. The appropriate Integral and Home Groups discuss the Key Questions for reflection and discussion found on pages Key Questions for reflection and discussion are listed by Standards in each category. Please NOTE: Key Questions are for reflection and discussion only. The Data Library is used as evidence for the answers to the Key `Questions. 14

E3 Chapter III – Findings (continued) Written Requirements: Written requirements are found at the end of each category (e.g. Category A – Catholic Identity): 1. After a thorough reflection and discussion/analysis of the Standards (based on the Key Questions), the school is to write an overall summary paragraph that reflects the school’s evaluation of itself vis a vis these Standards. 15

E3 Chapter III – Findings (continued) Written Requirements: Written requirements are found at the end of each Category: 2.In bullet format, the school should identify any key strengths within the school experience vis a vis these Standards. Include a brief rationale and citation (s) from the Data Library as evidence in support of each identification. 16

E3 Chapter III – Findings (continued) Written Requirements: Catholic Identity Standards – page 39 School Organization Standards—page 42 Teaching and Learning Standards – page 44 Student Support Standards – page 46 Material Stewardship Standards – page 50 17

E3 Chapter III – Findings (continued): Discerning Areas for Vital Growth: Before beginning the discernment process for identifying Areas for Vital Growth, it is recommended that the school create a list of all key growth areas. This list may facilitate the school to see all key growth areas in one place and assist the discernment process. NOTE: An Area for Vital Growth is a key growth area that must be addressed – and must be remedied – in order for the school to achieve and maintain its vitality. It is recommended that this discernment process needs to focus on the Standards for Catholic Identity and Teaching and Learning first. 18

E3 Chapter III – Findings (continued) Discerning Areas for Vital Growth (Page 51) Two or more key growth areas could be combined into a single Area for Vital Growth. The school should limit the number of Areas for Vital Growth (see # 5 on page 51) List all identified Area for Vital Growth in bullet format for inclusion in the Self Study. Please NOTE: Each Area for Vital Growth (see previous bullet) is addressed in the form of an action plan for improvement within the Educational Improvement Plan (EIP) (Chapter IV) 19

A.Implementation of the Prior Plan from the last Self Study. 1. The school includes a written summary of its accomplishment of each part of its revised Action Plan from the last Accreditation Visit. 2. Summarize each goal in a single paragraph. 3. Include the mid-term progress report if one was required as a result of the last Accreditation Visit. 4. Provide a one-paragraph summary of any goals added to the Action Plan since the last Visit. 20

E3 Chapter V – Educational Improvement Plan (continued) B.Current Educational Improvement Plan (EIP) 1. Construct an Action Plan for each Area for Vital Growth that the school has identified at the conclusion of Chapter IV. 2. All Action Plans should include at least the following: a. Identify the area for vital growth b. Identify the goal being addressed c. Write a rational for the plan (reference the Data Library) d. List the strategies being employed along with the acting agents, necessary resources, assessment of progress, reporting of progress, and a timeline for completion. 21

Area for Vital Growth _____________________________________________________________________________________ Goal of the Action Plan _____________________________________________________________________________________ Rationale for the Action Plan (Based on findings in Chapter IV with appropriate references to data from the Data library) _____________________________________________________________________________________ Action Steps: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Acting Agents: ______________________________________________________________________________________ Necessary Resources ______________________________________________________________________________________ Ways of Assessing Progress __________________________________________________________ Ways of Reporting Progress _______________________________________________________________________________________ Timeline for Completion _______________________________________________________________________________________ 22

23 The Accreditation Cycle to Ensure Educational Excellence Pages Explain the new Accreditation cycle and the various Accreditation Status Conditions for ongoing implementation of the EIP and any significant changes that may occur during the six-year cycle. Pages contain a Glossary for E3 that may be useful especially for the first time a school writes its Self Study. Recommendation: It is highly recommended that a school prepare the Data Library as soon as possible even if it is not in the accreditation year. In that way, the school merely has to update the DL at the time of the writing of the Self Study. The discussion questions are there to really encourage solid discussion on the topics BEFORE any writing occurs. Provide enough discussion time because out of that comes the analysis of the discussions which leads to the critical growth areas and the key strengths which are included in the written summary for each section. Finally: This is YOUR document. It should reflect the reality of your school.