1 Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox Gordana Dodig Crnkovic School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Sweden.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Advertisements

Dr Jim Briggs Masterliness Not got an MSc myself; BA DPhil; been teaching masters students for 18 years.
Mathematics in the MYP.
(IN)FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT August Are You… ASSESSMENT SAVVY? Skilled in gathering accurate information about students learning? Using it effectively.
1 Research Thinking and Writing Toolbox DVA403 Gordana Dodig Crnkovic School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Sweden
Interdisciplinary Teaching Malcolm Potts, Qatar University, February Assessment.
Seminar /workshop on cognitive attainment ppt Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Assessing APSS Students Learning.
Identifying Content and Specifying Behaviors
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
The IBCC Reflective Project
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
ICT TEACHERS` COMPETENCIES FOR THE KNOWLEDGE SOCIETY
Ryann Kramer EDU Prof. R. Moroney Summer 2010.
CDT403 Research Methodology in Natural Sciences and Engineering COURSE INTRODUCTION Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic School of Innovation, Design and Engineering,
Miss V Tatler Computer Science Subject Leader
CS 347: Operating Systems  In this course, we reason about effective performance of a computer system  The emphasis of this course is on –Concepts –Techniques.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
PERCENTAGE AS RELATIONAL SCHEME: PERCENTAGE CALCULATIONS LEARNING IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A.F. Díaz-Cárdenas, H.A. Díaz-Furlong, A. Díaz-Furlong, M.R. Sankey-García.
Dr. Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. PROJECT.
Planning Backward: Goals-Led Lesson Design Janice Gallagher May 3rd, 2011.
Math Practices (Part I) November 2, 2012 Maricela Rincon, Professional Development Specialist
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
STEM EDUCATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE USING SCIENCE, TECHOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND MATH Course Description: The 7th Grade STEM connections class introduces.
HU113: Technical Report Writing
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
IntroductionIntroduction Task Process Resources Evaluation Conclusion Teacher PageTaskProcessResourcesEvaluationConclusionTeacher Page.
Connections paper Route J – Religious Ethics with New Testament 2792 About the paper & exam questions.
Writing Instruction Across Content Areas CCL- May 8, 2015.
Unit Presentation Ruth Arce. “ A man paints with his brains and not with his hands” -Michelangelo.
Literacy is...  the quality or state of being literate, esp. the ability to read and write  An individual’s ability to construct, create, and communicate.
Easy-to-Understand Tables RIT Standards Key Ideas and Details #1 KindergartenGrade 1Grade 2 With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about.
HSC ENGINEERING STUDIES 2014 Mr Miller. Engineering in perspective…  Engineering is the designing (including planning, researching, calculating, modelling,
WXGE 6103 Digital Image Processing Semester 2, Session 2013/2014.
BUSINESS INFORMATICS descriptors presentation Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST) Linkoping.
Learning outcomes for BUSINESS INFORMATCIS Vladimir Radevski, PhD Associated Professor Faculty of Contemporary Sciences and Technologies (CST)
LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP 1 Start recording—title slide—1 of 3 Introducing the Next Generation Science Standards Originally presented by:
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
(EE429) First day Course Materials Assistant Prof. Dr. Anwar Hassan Selected Topics Communications.
Goals 1. To understand RIBTS To make meaning of assessment information scientist notebooks. 3. To understand scientist note-booking as a source.
Assessment 101: A Review of the Basics Jill Allison Kern, PhD Director of Assessment Christopher Newport University January 2013.
Math 105: Problem Solving in Mathematics
Essentials for Quality Gifted Education Making Middle Grades Work.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
ABOUT YOUR PAPER!. JUST FOR CLARITY... Write a paper about the article you sent to Dr. Cotter for approval.
Art Department Outline. The Department of Art at ISAS offers art training that emphasizes experimentation and encourages students to draw from many disciplines.
Ohio Technology Standards August 9, 2005 Why Standards in Technology? No Child Left Behind Technology Literacy requirement Computer and Multimedia Literacy.
Writing Describe a problem in education. What is the significance of this issue? What would you like to know about this problem? Who else is interested.
An Introduction to NETS*S Edmonds School District February 7, 2005.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
Demonstrate employability skills required by business and industry.  The following elements should be integrated throughout the content of this course.
Quick Write Reflection How will you implement the Engineering Design Process with your students in your classes?
Subject-specific content: A Generic scoring guide for information-based topics 4 The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the information.
Introduction to Content Standards Jacqueline E. Korengel, Ed.D.
Funded by the Library of Congress.
Search Engines: Ready, Set, Search! Jennifer Hey-Lewis Kenwood Academy, Chicago Public Schools IIT Research Mentor: Dr. Wai Gen Yee This material is based.
Course Overview Stephen M. Thebaut, Ph.D. University of Florida Software Engineering.
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT  COM 537 Week 1 Individual Assignment Integrated Diffusion Paper  COM 537 Week 1 DQ 1  COM 537 Week 1 DQ.
Information Literacy Requirement Charter Oak State College
Understanding Standards: Advanced Higher Event
AP computer science PRINCIPLES
Lecture 1: Introduction
Outcome Based Education
Investigating science
COMMUNICATOR Applies effective reading skills to acquire knowledge and broaden perspectives Employs active listening strategies to advance understanding.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PRACTICES
Technical Writing (AEEE299)
Project Generation Process
Presentation transcript:

1 Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox Gordana Dodig Crnkovic School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, Sweden

2 Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox The Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox course focuses on constructive aspects of research within computing. The main objective is to give a student an improved understanding of the state of the art techniques and tools essential for computational research thinking, modeling and problem solving, as well as academic writing and publication together with the basics of research ethics.

The course focuses on computational aspects of reasoning and model-building in constructive research. The main objective is to give a student an improved understanding and knowledge of the state of the art in computational thinking techniques and tools essential for contemporary research, from Software Engineering to Brain-inspired computing, and Cognitive computing. 3 Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox

The course includes academic writing and publication and essentials of ethics. As a result the student will be able to write a publishable research article that demonstrates the ability to use computational thinking and exhibits high standards of writing. 4 Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox

5 Learning objectives On successful completion of the course, student should be able to: -Identify and apply appropriate thinking tools from the state of the art computational thinking toolbox. -Understand and take into account the paradigm shift taking place within the field of Computing.

Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox 6 Learning objectives -Demonstrate understanding of the ideas presented in specialist lectures. -Improve skills in academic writing in English and publication. -Show an ability to use basic concepts of research ethics.

7 Course content The course deals with three main themes: - Scientific way of thinking in research, with computational thinking in focus - Writing and publication of academic research papers - Values and ethical considerations in research Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox

Examination –Lecture Notes, 2 credits, Grades A-F (3-5) –Take-home exam, 1.5 credits, Grades A-F (3-5) 8 Computational Thinking and Writing Research Toolbox

Lecture Notes –Approximately one page per lecture i.e. about 10 pages –Describes both the content of the lecture and your own reflections 9 Take-Home Exam –Read articles and answer questions –Your grade depends on your skills of argument

–In this course we have two groups, one at Mälardalen University, Sweden which have regular class meetings and guest lectures with course responsible Dr. Gordana Dodig Crnkovic. –At the University of Sofia, Bulgaria the class leader is Dr. Aleksandar Dimov. –For each lecture there will be one or several articles and a presentation on the course web page which is the basis for your study, and which you summarize on one page of your Notebook. 10 How we work in the classes at MDH and Sofia Uni

Grading Principles As the course title says, computational thinking and writing are our main focus. That implies that the grade will strongly depend on how much computational thinking and writing skills you show in your assignments. Basic level: (grade 3) is achieved when you show that you have read the content of the lectures and you can clearly explain what you have learned from it. 11

Grading Principles The highest level (grade 5) is reached when you are able to analyze the content, drive your own conclusions, see relationships and patterns, i.e. when you show thinking skills on a more general level than a reproduction/rearrangement of information. The grade 4 is a level in between when you show elements of both. 12

Grading Principles Missed deadlines imply lower grade if you do not have a very good reason for not submitting your work in time. Keep up with lectures – it becomes more difficult as time goes by to write the Course Notebook! All necessary course material will be found on this web page. Good luck! 13