ISO/TC211 Geographic information/Geomatics ISO 19115 Geographic Information - Metadata DaveDanko/Lou Reich/Yonsook Enloe CINTEX Subgroup Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spatial Data Infrastructure: Concepts and Components Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 6, 2006.
Advertisements

FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.
ISO/TC 211 Geographic information/Geomatics 1 Presented by Julie Binder Maitra At GSDI-7 Bangalore, India February 2004 नमस्ते ! Applying ISO/TC 211 Standards.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
CDC Environmental Public Health Tracking Metadata Subgroup Meeting Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, FGDC April 19, pm Eastern.
Oregon Spatial Data Library Partnership Metadata Training OU Knight Library Eugene, Oregon December 3, 2009 Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources.
1 ISO – Metadata Next Generation International consensus being built on structured metadata within a broader Geomatics Standard under ISO Technical.
Geospatial standards Beyond FGDC Geog 458: Map Sources and Errors March 3, 2006.
Esri UC 2014 | Technical Workshop | Leveraging Metadata Standards for Supporting Interoperability in ArcGIS Aleta Vienneau, David Danko.
NATIONAL STANDARDS OF RUSSIA ON DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS AS PROFILES OF ISO/TC211 INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS V.Aleksandrov, T.Maximova, A.Pogatchev,R.Iakovleva.
Status of US Implementation of ISO Metadata October 2005 Lynda Wayne US Federal Geographic Data Committee / GeoMaxim Sharon Shin US Federal Geographic.
1 TECO-WIS, 6-8 November 2006 TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE WMO INFORMATION SYSTEM Seoul, Republic of Korea, 6-8 November 2006 ISO 191xx series of geographic.
NOAA Metadata Update Ted Habermann. NOAA EDMC Documentation Directive This Procedural Directive establishes 1) a metadata content standard (International.
The US Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) ISO TC Harmonization Activities “Moving From a National Metadata Standard to an International.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
ISO/TC211 Geographic Information/Geomatics Implementing ISO Metadata David Danko Work Item 15—Project Leader
Coordination of geographic information and geographic information systems Metadata.
Oy Metadata Content j of Metadata. Discovery Access Understanding Levels of Metadata joy of Metadata Metadata Standards Why standards Which standards.
_________________________________________________________________________ CEOS/ISPRS Workshop on Rad/Geo Cal December 3, 2003 in Gulfport, MS, U.S.A. Wolfgang.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Geographic Metadata North American Profile Development for ISO Geographic Metadata.
A Liaison Report from ISO TC211 to CEOS WGISS Dr. Liping Di
Coastal GeoTools Charleston SC January 2003 Making Metadata Work for You Lynda Wayne FGDC Metadata Education Coordinator / GeoMaxim.
North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands.
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
ISO/TC 211 WG 5 Profiles and Functional Standards Presentation to 7th Plenary of ISO TC 211, Beijing, China, 24 September 19981/18 Presentation to ISO/TC.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
A Temporal Quiz ” I’m the beginning of the end. You see me twice in a week, but not in a day. Once in a year, but twice in a decade. What am I ?”
Page 1 LAITS Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology and Standards ISO & Status Liping Di Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology.
® GRDC Hydrologic Metadata - core concepts - 5 th, WMO/OGC Hydrology DWG New York, CCNY, August 11 – 15, 2014 Irina Dornblut, GRDC of WMO at BfG Copyright.
Esri UC2013. Technical Workshop. Technical Workshop 2013 Esri International User Conference July 8–12, 2013 | San Diego, California Leveraging Metadata.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
GeoMAPP: Using Metadata to Help Preserve Geospatial Content Matt Peters, Utah’s Automated Geographic Reference Center Glen McAninch, Kentucky Department.
Are Standards Really Standards Any More? Mélanie F. Meaux NASA / GCMD In response to Wyn Cudlip with regards to an IDN profile of ISO …
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Introduction Module 4: ISO 19115/19139 Metadata.
The ISO TC211 Standard Project 19130: Sensor and Data Models for Imagery and Gridded Data Liping Di George Mason University Fairfax, VA, USA
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata
UNCLASSIFIED 1 Digital Geospatial Information Working Group (DGIWG) Jeffrey Bell – NGA Aeronautical Harmonization Working Group Chair Briefing to AIXM.
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Introduction Module 1: Introduction & Overview of the FGDC CSDGM.
Comparison of CEN, FGDC and ISO standards for metadata Ing. Jan Ruzicka Institute of Economics and Control Systems VŠB – Technical university Ostrava 17.
LADM Overview and Introduction Christiaan Lemmen Workshop LADM Québec City, Québec, Canada November 4th 2009.
Why Standardize Metadata?. Why Have a Standard? Think for a moment how hard it would be to… … bake a cake without standard units of measurement. … put.
Sneak Preview: Sneak Preview: The New US Geospatial Metadata Standard GeoMaxim Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Lynda Wayne, GISP Sharon Shin.
Slide 1 SDTSSDTS FGDC CWG SDTS Revision Project ANSI INCITS L1 Project to Update SDTS FGDC CWG September 2, 2003.
1 The FGDC Standards Program Presented by Julie Binder Maitra FGDC Standards Coordinator To Interagency Council on Standards Policy June 4, 2003.
ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 ESRI Education User Conference – July 6-8, 2001 Introducing ArcCatalog: Tools for Metadata and Data Management.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO and Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
Getting Familiar with Metadata Laurie Porth Rocky Mountain Research Station Audience: Scientists/researchers who have heard of metadata and now need to.
The Proliferation of Metadata Standards and the Evolution of NASA’s Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Standard for Uses in Earth Science Data Discovery.
A look to the past for the future- The North American Profile Sharon Shin Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee.
1 Preparing for the New Geospatial Metadata Horizon ESRI User Conference San Diego, CA ● July 9, 2003 Lynda Wayne Federal Geographic Data Committee GeoMaxim.
Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata Mandatory Legend Identification Information Data Quality Information Spatial Data Organization Information.
The North American Profile A journey begins Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Tribal College Forum Northwest Indian College August 19, 2009.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use INSPIRE Orthoimagery TWG Status Report Antonio Romeo ESRIN 15/02/2012.
North American Profile Briefing FGDC Coordination Group May 1, 2007 Sharon Shin, FGDC Metadata Coordinator.
Geog. 377: Introduction to GIS - Lecture 16 Overheads 1 5. Metadata 6. Summary of Database Creation 7. Data Standards 8. NSDI Topics Lecture 16: GIS Database.
Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation 5-1 At the conclusion of this module the participant will be able to List the seven.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
A Liaison Report from ISO TC211 to CEOS WGISS Dr. Liping Di
Laboratory on Geoinformatics and Cartography
CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, Feb.28  March 4, University of Tokyo, Japan
Application of Dublin Core and XML/RDF standards in the KIKERES
NORTH CAROLINA state and local government METADATA PROFILE
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Proposal of a Geographic Metadata Profile for WISE
Hans Dufourmont Eurostat Unit E4 – Structural Funds
Chapter 5.5 Metadata John Cima.
Presentation transcript:

ISO/TC211 Geographic information/Geomatics ISO Geographic Information - Metadata DaveDanko/Lou Reich/Yonsook Enloe CINTEX Subgroup Meeting

Briefing Agenda ISO Overview –Scope –Background –Schedule Version 3 Technical Overview –Basic Concepts –ISO Profiles Summary –Technical Summary –Potential Inpacts to CINTEX/CIP

Work Item 15-Metadata Scope...the schema required for describing geographic information and services....information about the identification, the extent, the quality, the spatial and temporal schema, spatial reference, and distribution of digital geographic data....applicable to the cataloguing of datasets, clearinghouse activities, and the full description of datasets for a wide range of geographic applications. …applicable to geographic datasets, dataset series, and individual geographic features and attributes...may be used for other forms of geographic data such as map, charts, textual documents

Background Who is involved –ISO/TC211 member nations –Liaisons Development history –Development cycles –National/regional/community standards

ISO Metadata Foundation Regional metadata standards –ANZLIC Working Group on Metadata: Core Metadata Elements Guidelines Draft 7, Australia and New Zealand Land Information Council, November 1995, Sydney. –the Canadian Directory Information Describing Digital Geo-referenced Data Sets, Canadian General Standards Board, July 1994, Ottawa. –Standard for Geographic Information - Metadata, European Committee for Standardisation (CEN), September 1996, Brussels. –Content Standard for Geospatial Metadata Federal Geographic Data Committee, June 8, 1994, Washington DC Other influential documents –Digital Geographic Information Exchange Standard (Digest), Version 1.2. Digital Geographic Information Working Group, January 1994, –IHO Transfer Standard for Digital Hydrographic Data, International Hydrographic Bureau, October 1995, Monaco –Spatial Data Transfer Standard (SDTS), US Department of Commerce, August 1992, Gaithersburg, MD –Application Profile for the Government Information Locator Service (GILS), US Department of Commerce, December 1994, Gaithersburg, MD –Cartographic materials: A manual of interpretation for AACR2, Anglo-American Committee on Cataloguing of Cartographic materials, 1982, Chicago –USMARC Format for Bibliographic Data, US Library of Congress, 1988, Washington, DC

Who is Involved 33 ISO TC211 Principle Member countries 14 Observing/Corresponding Member countries 10 Internal Liasons (other ISO committees) 14 External Liasons –CEOS is an External Liason

Primary Participants Australia Canada China Finland France Germany Japan Korea Malaysia Norway South Africa Spain Sweden United Kingdom United States DGIWG OGC –CEOS

Development Cycles Working Drafts –Version 1.0-March FGDC/CEN –Version 1.1-October 1996 –Version 1.2-December 1996 –Version 2.0-January IDEF1X-ER model, Full Imagery md –Version 2.1-June 1997 –Version 3.0-September Remove Full Imagery metadata –Version 3.1-December 1997 –Version 4.0-February 1998 Significant CIP based input Committee Drafts –Version 1.0-July Levels of conformance (962 comments) –Version 2.0-November UML Object Model (1422 comments) –Version 3.0-June Single comprehensive profile Actual metadata elements have remained generally consistent since WD 1.0

Schedule

ISO Committee Draft 3.0

ISO CD 3.0 Requirements Clause Metadata application –UML model defining how metadata applies to datasets, aggregate datasets, features and attributes Metadata packages –Metadata package and entity relationship Metadata datatypes –Extent, citation, and responsible party information Recommended core metadata for geographic datasets –Simple natural language short list of recommended metadata elements

ISO19115 CD3.0 Annexes Normative Metadata schemas –Abstract Object Model (UML) Data dictionary and code lists Extensions and profiles Abstract test suite Comprehensive dataset metadata application profile Informative Metadata Extension Methodology Metadata Implementation Hierarchical Levels of Metadata Implementation Examples

ISO CD 3.0 Geographic Metadata Packages Identification Information Resource Constraint Information Data Quality Information Maintenance Information Spatial Representation Information Reference System Information Content Information Portrayal Catalog Information Distribution Information Metadata Extension Information Application Schema Information Metadata Datatypes –Citation –Responsible Party - Extent - On-line Resource - Address

Metadata Application MD_Metadata > DS_Aggregate DS_DataSet DS_OtherAssociation DS_StereoMate DS_SeriesDS_Initiative GF_PropertyType GF_FeatureType FE_FeatureAttribute FE_Feature 0..* 1..* 0..* 1..* 0..* 1..*

Metadata Data Dictionary

DataTypes and CodeLists > CI_Citation :title :alternateTitle :date :edition :editionDate :identifier :identifierType :citedResponsibleParty :presentationForm :seriesName :issueIdentification :otherCitationDetails :collectiveTitle :page :ISBN :ISSN > MD_ProgressCode :completed :historicalArchive :obsolete :onGoing :planned :required :underDevelopment NameDomainCodeDefinition MD_ProgressCodeProgCodestatus of the resource completed001production has been completed historicalArchive002data has been stored offline obsolete003data is no longer relevant onGoing004data is continuously being... planned005fixed date has been established… required006data needs to be generated or... underDevelopment007data is currently in the process...

Recommended core metadata for geographic datasets WDataset title WDataset reference date WDataset responsible party WGeographic location of the dataset (by four coordinates or by geographic identifiers) WDataset language WDataset character set WDataset topic category :Scale of the dataset WAbstract describing the dataset :Dataset format name :Dataset format version :Additional extent information (vertical and temporal) :Spatial representation type :Reference system :Lineage statement :On-line resource :Metadata file identifier :Metadata standard name :Metadata standard version WMetadata language WMetadata character set WMetadata point of contact WMetadata time stamp W Mandatory In CIP element/attribute sets

Comprehensive dataset metadata profile Basic profile applicable to a broad range of information communities Defines complete range of metadata required to identify, evaluate, extract, employ and manage geographic datasets Defines a comprehensive metadata application schema (UML model) which provides an implementable profile Provides a XML DTD based on the application schema

Comprehensive metadata application schema

Comprehensive profile XML Encoding XML DTD XML Document 2 XML DTD XML Document XML Document 1 The Document Type Definition (DTD) defines the tags, constraints, attributes, structure, domains etc The XML document defines the content (the dataset metadata) The DTD can be located: –within the document –within the same folder/computer/server C:\My Documents\My Metadata.dtd –within the Internet

Comprehensive Profile Application ISO-Comprehensive Geographic Metadata.dtd DCW.xml Recommended Core Metadata Schiphol Environmental Impact data.xml Full comprehensive metadata comprised of over 300 metadata elements NATO Specific.dtd VMap 1-NL.xml NATO cataloging profile which includes ISO recommended core plus additional selected metadata elements. The NATO DTD defines NATO specific metadata and code lists North Sea Soundings.xml only 12 mandatory metadata elements

Proposed Implementations US FGDC –Edition 3 will be a profile of ISO ANZLIC –developing ISO compliant ANZLIC profile Saudi Arabia –Ar-Riyadh Development Authority developed draft profile of ISO NATO –STANAG 7148 Catalog Metadata for Geographic Information (under development)

Summary ISO development –based on a solid foundation of national, regional, and information community standards –has broad global participation –has gone through formal development cycles ISO Standard –based on a harmonized object model –designed to fill a broad range of requirements –extensive use of codelists -language interoperability –recommended core with a full comprehensive profile Metadata that is absolutely essential for all aspects of spatial data handling –Locate –Evaluate –Extract –Employ Metadata in a global standard –Allows expanded networks –Provides a common understanding –Global Interoperability Metadata: the foundation for a Global Spatial Data Infrastructure

Impact to CINTEX/CIP Formal review of next version Discuss creation of a CIP/CEOS Profile Do we need a CIP 3 or a CIP 2.5 Alignment of Code lists and Keywords