178.307 Markets, Firms and Consumers Lecture 9- The Consumer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UTILITY MAXIMIZATION AND CHOICE
Advertisements

BUYER BEHAVIOUR INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy
Chapter 3 Preferences Choose the “best” thing one can “afford” Start with consumption bundles (a complete list of the goods that is involved in consumer’s.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Chapter 14 Consumer Decision Making I: The Process Consumer Behaviour Canadian Edition Schiffman/Kanuk/Das.
Consumer Decision Making
Tastes/Preferences Indifference Curves.
1 Industrial Organization Product Differentiation Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Summer semester Week 12.
Part 4 The Theory of Demand
Chapter 21 - Consumer Choice
Chapter 10 JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING: HIGH CONSUMER EFFORT
Economics D10-1: Lecture 4 Classical Demand Theory: Preference-based approach to consumer behavior (MWG 3)
Decision Making II: Alternative Evaluation and Choice
Utility.
Chapter Three Preferences.
Theory of Consumer Behavior
Chapter Three Preferences. Rationality in Economics u Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set.
Marketing Management 4. Czinkota and Kotabe: Understanding the Buyer.
Chapter 16 Consumer Decision Making and Beyond
Consumer Decision Making
Schedule of Classes September, 3 September, 10 September, 17 – in-class#1 September, 19 – in-class#2 September, 24 – in-class#3 (open books) September,
Preferences. Preference Relation The consumer strictly prefers bundle X to bundle Y: The consumer is indifferent between X and Y:
Chapter 5: Theory of Consumer Behavior
Consumer preferences and utility Modelling consumer preferences.
How much are you willing to pay?.    Price is defined as the value placed on the goods or services being exchanged PRICE:
Copyright  2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Consumer Behaviour 5e by Quester, Neal, Pettigrew, Grimmer, Davis & Hawkins Slides prepared by.
Theory of Consumer Behavior
Lecture # 2 Review Go over Homework Sets #1 & #2 Consumer Behavior APPLIED ECONOMICS FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT.
Review of the previous lecture A consumer’s budget constraint shows the possible combinations of different goods he can buy given his income and the prices.
LABOR SUPPLY I. Consumer theory II. Labor supply by individuals III. What happens when wages change IV. Elasticity of labor supply.
Thinking. So what is ‘thinking’? In a general sense, thinking is the intentional use of cognitive capabilities for some purpose. –Recall some kind of.
Review Demand curve, consumer surplus Price elasticity of demand.
The Theory of Individual Behavior. Overview I. Consumer Behavior n Indifference Curve Analysis n Consumer Preference Ordering II. Constraints n The Budget.
How People make Decisions
1 Copyright © 2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Consumer Decision Making I: The Process. What Would a Pet Owner Need to Know in Order to Make a Decision About Buying Pet Insurance? 2 Copyright 2010.
Alternative Evaluation and Selection Process
Chapter 7 Consumer Decision Making. Sample Consumption Decisions Buy or not buy? Buy car or go on a cruise? Buy sedan or coupe? Buy Toyota or Volvo? Buy.
Factors that Influence Consumer Behavior
Rationality in Economics Behavioral Postulate: A decisionmaker always chooses its most preferred alternative from its set of available alternatives. So.
Fundamentals of Microeconomics
1 Preferences Molly W. Dahl Georgetown University Econ 101 – Spring 2009.
Each day involves decisions about how to allocate scarce money and resources. As we balance competing demands and desires, we make the choices that define.
Lecture by: Jacinto Fabiosa Fall 2005 Consumer Choice.
BUS 525: Managerial Economics Lecture 4 The Theory of Individual Behavior.
Chapter 5 Evaluating and Selecting Alternatives
Recall: Consumer behavior Why are we interested? –New good in the market. What price should be charged? How much more for a premium brand? –Subsidy program:
QUIZ FOUR The Consumer Theory. 1.According to the principle of diminishing marginal utility: A. The more of a good a consumer consumes the lower her total.
 This will explain how consumers allocate their income over many goods.  This looks at individual’s decision making when faced with limited income and.
PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS Chapter 6 Consumer Choices PowerPoint Image Slideshow.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Theory of Consumer Behavior.
Course: Microeconomics Text: Varian’s Intermediate Microeconomics
Consumer Decision Making
Chapter 3 Preferences Intermediate Microeconomics:
Consumer Behavior MKTG 302-PSYC 335 Decision Making (2)
Chp. 12 & 13 (CB) With Duane Weaver
Consumer Decision Making and Beyond
Chapter 5 Theory of Consumer Behavior
Theory of Consumer Behavior
Theory of Consumer Behavior
Chapter Three Preferences.
Chapter 5.
Review of the previous lecture
ECONOMY FOR REAL ESTATE (BPE 33902)
Chapter 12 Decision Making II: Alternative Evaluation and Choice
Theory of Consumer Behavior
Chapter 3 Preferences.
Chapter 5: Theory of Consumer Behavior
Chapter 5: Theory of Consumer Behavior
DEV 501: THE THEORY OF CONSUMER CHOICE
Presentation transcript:

Markets, Firms and Consumers Lecture 9- The Consumer

Quote Tough guys don’t do math. Tough guys fry chicken for a living. – Jaime Escalante – From the movie Stand and Deliver (1988).

Reading Earl, P. Economics and Psychology: A SurveyEconomics and Psychology: A Survey

In the 1990s Nintendo’s N64 gaming console lost massive marketshare to the Sony Playstation The N64 was the (technically) better console What motivated consumer’s to switch?

Introduction Overview – Revision of the Neoclassical Model – The Lancaster Model – The Behavioural Approach This lecture considers the important interaction between the firm and their consumers. Emphasis is on understanding how consumer’s make choices.

The Neoclassical Model If preferences are – Complete (any 2 goods can be compared) – Reflexive (any commodity is at least as good as itself) – Transitive (if A preferred to B and B preferred to C, A must be preferred to C). – Continuity, strict convexity, monotonic, free disposal.

..then It is easy to model the consumer’s utility function We can logically show that demand is a function of prices and income Problems – Smooth substitutions don’t occur – Consumption may be not be continuous (e.g. lexicographic). – Why would new goods enter the market?

Lancaster’s Model Lancaster treated goods as combinations of attributes. The household functions like a firm. If transformation technology fixed If attributes have to be combined in a linear fashion then… The model can be easily represented in Cartesian space.

Analysis New goods can be represented as extra rays. Price changes will change the length of the ray. Quality improvements will also change length of ray We can show “jumps” in consumer behaviour. Proliferation of attributes in a good understandable. We can answer why Nintendo lost market share…

Behavioural Perspective Consumers use heuristics (simplifying procedures) to purchase a good. Rules are retained so long as they lead to satisfactory results. Simplification necessary because of limited processing ability. Miller’s rule Cognitive skills Theorists distinguish deliberative choices from routine behaviour. Such decision processes may have little to do with impact of choice!

How do consumers actually make choices? Consumers can be conceived as having certain aspirations. Characteristics of goods are tested against these aspirations. Compensatory heuristics permit good achievement in one characteristic to compensate for a poor achievement in another.

Compensatory Heuristics I Additive Differences – Take a rival pair of prodcuts – Value their diffferences – Use victor as a new reference point – Continue until one good selected Unweighted Averaging – Score goods for each test characteristic – Determine which has the highest total or average – Note that unweighting is a poor method.

Compensatory Heuristics II Polymorphous Procedure – Define series of aspirational tests – Rank each good in terms of the number of tests passed – Does not take into account the margin of success/failure.

Non-Compensatory Heuristics Non-compensatory procedures are unforgiving if a good fails a particular aspirational test This suggests that substitution effects are actually weak.

Non-Compensatory Heuristics I Disjunctive Rule – Choose the product that scores the best in respect of one characteristic. – Either very ‘low involvement’ or that preferred by a fanatic… Conjunctive Rule – Set aspirational targets for each characteristic – Reject any that fail to meet any targets, regardless of margin.

Non-compensatory Heuristics II Elimination by aspects – Compare goods against a single aspirational level. – Eliminate any that fail – Tests goods against another aspirational target until choice is made Lexicographic Rule – Characteristics are ranked in order of priority – Use lower priorities only if multiple goods meet first priority.

Non-compensatory Heuristics III Characteristic Filtering – Set aspirational targets for each characteristic – All products that pass the first test, can take the second etc. Target 1 1st Priority Target 2 2nd Priority A B C D E

Summary Characteristic Filtering: D & E are 1 st equal, B next, then A, then C. Conjunctive Rule: D & E are 1 st equal, A,B & C are equal Naïve Lexicographic: E 1 st, B 2 nd, D 3 rd, A 4 th, C 5 th. Hybrid rules can also be used.