Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Advertisements

1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.
MICE the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Emilio Radicioni, INFN EPS-HEP Aachen 2003.
Design and First Results of a Cosmic Ray Telescope For Use In Testing a Focusing DIRC M. P. Belhorn University of Cincinnati The BELLE group at the University.
1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
1 EMCal simulations MICE Video Conference Rikard Sandström Geneva University e MeV.
SLIDE Beam measurements using the MICE TOF counters Analysis meeting, 23 September 2008 Mark Rayner.
30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.
Analysis Meeting – – Slide 1 Beam momentum measurement using TOFs: progress report Analysis Meeting, February 2008 Mark Rayner.
Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
1 PID Detectors & Emittance Resolution Chris Rogers Rutherford Appleton Laboratory MICE CM17.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Global Particle Identification Software Requirements Steve Kahn Mice Collaboration Meeting 31 March 2004.
Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.
1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.
March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.
MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Downstream e-  identification 1. Questions raised by the Committee 2. Particle tracking in stray magnetic field 3. Cerenkov and calorimeter sizes 4. Preliminary.
1 Downstream PID update - How cooling section affects TOF measurement Rikard Sandström PID phone conference
Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.
1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.
Progress and plans on PID simulation and reconstruction Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university St. Kliment Ohridski.
28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.
Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.
Mark Rayner, Analysis workshop 4 September ‘08: Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing, slide 1 Use of TOFs for Beam measurement & RF phasing Analysis.
RF background simulations MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.
27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk2 24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk3 CKOV – Threshold Cherenkov detectors (aerogel) TOF – Three Time.
A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
1 Calorimeter in G4MICE Berkeley 10 Feb 2005 Rikard Sandström Geneva University.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Mark Rayner 14/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Emittance measurement using the TOFs The question: can we use position measurements.
ECAL PID1 Particle identification in ECAL Yuri Kharlov, Alexander Artamonov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.
PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
Progress on F  with the KLOE experiment (untagged) Federico Nguyen Università Roma TRE February 27 th 2006.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
RF background, update on analysis Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Analysis phone conference, October 30, 2007.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Calorimeter design & simulations for Stage I Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE PID phone conference
TOF Emittance Pion Emittance Measurement with the TOFs? Mark Rayner 11 December 2008.
1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.
2005/07/12 (Tue)8th ACFA Full simulator study of muon detector and calorimeter 8th ACFA Workshop at Daegu, Korea 2005/07/12 (Tue) Hiroaki.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
1 The Scintillation Tile Hodoscope (SciTil) ● Motivation ● Event timing/ event building/ software trigger ● Conversion detection ● Charged particle TOF.
“Performance test of a lead glass
TOF Software and Analysis Tools
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Presentation transcript:

Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice2 TOF Detector Geometry Status TOF planes: Positions have been upgraded: TOF0 is placed after Q6. TOF1 is placed after Q9. TOF2 position has been changed to have the correct relative position relative to the other downstream detectors. Transverse sizes: TOF0,1,2 are all 48  48 cm. Segmentation: All stations are 2 planes arranged orthogonal to each other. TOF0,1,2 have 8 slabs in each plane. NO OVERLAP. TOF0 environment: Low field: g; High rate: 2.5 MHz. TOF1,2 environment: High field: 1-2 kg; Medium rate 0.5 MHz

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice3 TOF Implementation A particle traversing the TOF scintillator will deposit energy. The number of optical photons produced is proportional to the deposited energy. The number of photons is attenuated traveling through the scintillator. atten =1.4 m. The transit time through the scintillator is delayed by an exponentially distributed time with a decay constant  decay =1.8 ns. The rise time of the arrival time of the optical photons at each PMT is smeared with the PMT jitter time.  = 80 ps for the fast PMT at TOF0.  =175 ps for fine-mesh tubes used for high fields at TOF1,2. There is a gaussian amplitude resolution applied to the ADC counts. Also there is a truncation error for the finite number of bits representing the ADC counts.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice4 What Have We Simulated? We have generated two samples: Sample of 20K events starting just upstream of TOF0.  x =5 cm;  x’ =2 mr. Few of these events make it down the entire channel, however this sample is minimally biased. Sample of 20K events that start at z=2000 This sample gives sufficient statistics at the downstream PID detectors. The decay electron sample is enhanced by decreasing the decay length by a factor of 10. We want to keep the proper decay electron energy distribution. We want to correct for having no upstream detector. We need enough events in our sample.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice5 Muon Economics The above table shows the true number of muons at each detector station. The input beam is larger than the acceptance of the detector channel so there are large losses expected between Tof0 and Tof1. Electrons have E>2.5 MeV in order to suppress the background from knock-on electrons. The initial beam has 33% electron beam contamination.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice6 Transit Time for Upstream Tof Planes Transit time between Tof0 and Tof1 Quad fields are currently ignored Pions and muons can be distinguished

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice7 Transit Time through Detector Channel Transit time between Tof1 and Tof2 (at opposite ends of tracker). The arc length variations because of different P T make the transit time less effective for distinguishing particle ID.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice8 Cherenkov Systems Upstream Ckov C 6 F 14 radiator with n= PMTs 2 on top, 2 on bottom. Threshold cherenkov: 0.7 MeV for electrons 140 MeV for muons 190 MeV for pions Downstream Ckov Aerogel with n= PMTs on 12-sided polygon. Typically on electrons visible since pion threshold is > 500 MeV. Requires TOF coincidence.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice9 Ckov1 as a Threshold Detector   Note: According to Kevin Tilley’s Talk this morning, we expect the muon beam to have a momentum of ~241 MeV at the Ckov1 radiator!

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice10 Photon Generation in the Cherenkov Detectors For each track that crosses the radiator with a velocity above threshold a number of photons are generated proportional to the deposited energy. We currently do not use the Cherenkov photon facility in Geant4. There is some question as to how well it works with reflective surfaces. Imaginary photons are generated in a cone (at the č angle) around the particle direction. Since all mirrors are at 45º w.r.t. the beam direction, we can position the PMTs on an imaginary plane. The č photons that intercept the PMT circles are “seen”.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice11 Efficiency of Ckov1 The histograms show: Photons generated. Photons seen in PMTs Event-by-event efficiency.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice12 Ckov2 Efficiency The histograms show: Photons generated. Photons seen in PMTs Event-by-event efficiency. From downstream electron sample

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice13 Ckov2 Efficiency from Electron Contamination in Beam that Traversed the whole channel

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice14 Ckov1: Momentum for Different Species Caveat: Different species have same KE, not the same momentum!

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice15 Č Photons Generated by Track Traversing Radiator (for Ckov1) KE of tracks is MeV. Unfortunately that means: P  =200 MeV/c P  =219 MeV/c P e =121 MeV/c In order for Ckov1 to be effective, momentum must be less than 190 MeV/c

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice16 EM Calorimeter Rikard Sandstrőm has taken over the management of the EM calorimeter. He has completely rewritten the package. The following plots were made with the previous version. Most of the previous studies have only made use of the longitudinal shape. The transverse shape difference between electrons and muons could be effective in particle identification.

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice17 EmCal: E 1 vs. E 1 /E Tot Muons Electron Sample

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice18 Baricentric Variable All Layers 3 Layers 2 Layers

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice19 Baricentric Z vs. Momentum for Muons and Decay Electrons Stopping  Muons Decay ElectronsMomentum Z baricentric

Feb 10, 2005S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4Mice20 Ckov II Selection Criteria The Ckov II Detector Response currently does not have sufficient information to properly produce a decision based on the measurements. The following procedure was used: Require a Tof II signature or the selection is indeterminate. If the track crossing the Ckov radiator has  >0.98 (the electron threshold) and the Ckov II – Tof II time difference is between ns, then it is an electron. Else if the energy is greater than 75 MeV it is a muon. Else it is indeterminate.