Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct. 1 2007, Univ.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Probing CP violation in neutrino oscillations with neutrino telescopes Kfir Blum, Yosef Nir, Eli Waxman arXiv: [hep-ph]
Advertisements

Sergio Palomares-Ruiz June 22, 2005 Super-NO A Based on O. Mena, SPR and S. Pascoli hep-ph/ a long-baseline neutrino experiment with two off-axis.
Neutrino Oscillation Physics at a Neutrino Factory Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB.
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
Degeneracy and Correlation in Neutrino Oscillation Parameters Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
Measuring CP violating phase from long baseline neutrino experiments Naotoshi Okamura (YITP, Kyoto Univ.) ICFP2005 Oct. 07, NCU.
November 19, 2005 Sergio Palomares-Ruiz Physics of Atmospheric Neutrinos: Perspectives for the Future Topical Workshop on Physics at Henderson DUSEL Fort.
Phenomenology of  13  13 half-day meeting Oxford, UK September 24, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
How Will We See Leptonic CP Violation? D. Casper University of California, Irvine.
Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
Toyota National College of Technology A.Takamura Collaboration with K.Kimura and T.Yoshikawa GLoBES 2007 Measuring the Leptonic CP Phase in Oscillations.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Summary of WG1 – Phenomenological issues Osamu Yasuda (TMU)
LBL neutrinos; looking forward to the future Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Probing the Octant of  23 with very long baseline neutrino oscillation experiments G.-L. Lin National Chiao-Tung U. Taiwan CYCU Oct Work done.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University Model independent analysis of New Physics interactions and implications for long baseline experiments INTERNATIONAL.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Road Map of Future Neutrino Physics A personal view Ken Peach Round Table discussion at the 6 th NuFACT Workshop Osaka, Japan 26 th July – 1 st August.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
JHF-Kamioka Neutrino Oscillation Experiment using JHF 50 GeV PS Y.Itow ICRR,Univ.of Tokyo Jul27,2002 Jul27,2002 ICHEP02 Amsterdam Introduction Facility.
1 The JHF-Kamioka Neutrino experiment 1.Introduction 2.Overview of the experiment 3.Physics sensitivity in Phase-I 4.Physics sensitivity in Phase-II 5.Summary.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
If  13 is large, then what ? Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
1 Neutrino Phenomenology Boris Kayser Scottish Summer School August 11,
Towards precision lepton flavour physics. Some reflections… have brought us many clues for a deeper understanding in the SM and continue to do so: They.
Working Group 1 Summary: D. Casper * M. Lindner K. Nakamura Oscillation Physics (mostly) - Part 3 -
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
Degeneracy and strategies of LBL Osamu Yasuda Tokyo Metropolitan University NuFACT04 workshop July 28, 2004 at Osaka Univ.
Neutrino factory physics reach … and impact of detector performance 2 nd ISS Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan January 24, 2006 Walter Winter Institute for Advanced.
Optimization of a neutrino factory oscillation experiment 3 rd ISS Meeting Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK April 25-27, 2006 Walter Winter Institute.
Getting the most in neutrino oscillation experiments Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Super Beams, Beta Beams and Neutrino Factories (a dangerous trip to Terra Incognita) J.J. Gómez-Cadenas IFIC/U. Valencia Original results presented in.
Measuring Earth Matter Density and Testing MSW Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
NUFACT’06 Summary of working group 1 Neutrino Oscillations Experiments Mark Messier Indiana University August 30, 2006.
The quest for  13 : Parameter space and performance indicators Proton Driver General Meeting At Fermilab April 27, 2005 Walter Winter Institute for Advanced.
Measuring  13 with Reactors Stuart Freedman HEPAP July 24, 2003 Bethesda Reactor Detector 1Detector 2 d2d2 d1d1.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
Water Cherenkov detector - brief status report - Kenji Kaneyuki Research Center for Cosmic Neutrinos, ICRR, Univ. of Tokyo.
Future neutrino oscillation experiments J.J. Gómez-Cadenas U. Valencia/KEK Original results presented in this talk based on work done in collaboration.
1 Study of physics impacts of putting a far detector in Korea with GLoBES - work in progress - Eun-Ju Jeon Seoul National University Nov. 18, 2005 International.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
Optimization of a neutrino factory for large  13 Golden 07 IFIC, Valencia June 28, 2007 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
Neutrino physics: The future Gabriela Barenboim TAU04.
Complementarity of Terrestrial Neutrino Experiments in Searching for  13 Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli P.M., F. Terranova Phys. Lett. B 563 (2003)
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
September 24, 2007 Walter Winter
LBL Oscillation H. Minakata (Tokyo Metropolitan U.)
SOLAR ATMOSPHERE NEUTRINOS
Report of the T2KK Workshop
Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)
Neutrino telescopes and possible solutions to ambiguities in neutrinos
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
T2KK Sensitivity of Resolving q23 Octant Degeneracy
T2KK (without reactor) solves 8-fold degeneracy
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Toward realistic evaluation of the T2KK physics potential
Presentation transcript:

Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ. of Tokyo, Hongo Sin Kyu Kang Seoul National University of Technology

Determination of    Relatively large   opens the possibility to observe generic 3-flavor effects including CP violation and mass hierarchy.    << 1 hint for some flavor symmetry Why is it so interesting ? the key parameter for next generation of neutrino oscillation experiments.

How to measure  13 Reactors: Disappearance ( e  x ) Use reactors as a source of e ( ~3.5 MeV) with a detector 1-2 kms away and look for non-1/r 2 behavior of the e rate Reactor experiments provide the only clean measurement of sin 2 2   : no matter effects, no CP violation, no correlation with other parameters. sin 2 (2  13 )  m 2 13 sin 2 (2  12 )  m 2 12 Negligible for

Accelerators: Appearance (   e ) Use fairly pure, accelerator produced  beam with a detector traveling a long distance from the source and look for the appearance of e events T2K: = 0.7 GeV, L = 295 km NO A: = 2.3 GeV, L = 810 km But, the probability P depends on several parameters which may be correlated with  

T2K experiment  JPARC : 40 GeV PS 0.75 MW for phase I 4 MW for phase II  ~2.5° off axis with respect to SK  Peak energy : ~700 MeV  ~2,200 nm interactions/yr at SK for OA 2.5° GOALS : (i) measure  13 ( e appearance ) (ii)  23 &  m² 23 (  disappearance)

High statistics by a high intense beam Tune E at the oscillation maximum Narrow band beam to reduce BG Sub-GeV beam for Water Cherenkov 0.75MW JHF 50GeV-PS Off-Axis beam Super-Kamiokande To achieve the goals 4MW Super JHF Hyper-Kamiokande

T2K Sensitivity Reach Hayato, 2004

But, measuring by appearance channel suffers from degeneracies  Intrinsic ( ,  13 )- degeneracy : (Burguet-Castell et al, 2001) (also: Barger, Marfatia, Whisnant, 2001)  sgn(  m 2 13 )-degeneracy : (Minakata, Nunokawa, 2001)  (  23,  /2-  23 )- degeneracy : (Fogli, Lisi, 1996)

Intrinsic ( ,  13 )-degeneracy The parameters ( ,  13 ) can give the same probabilities as another pair of parameters (  ,    ) for fixed values of the other parameters Ambiguity reduces to ( ,  -  )

sgn(  m 2 13 )-degeneracy There are also parameters (      ) with that give the same probabilities (P & P) with  m 2 13 <0  m 2 13 >0

(  23,  /2-  23 )- degeneracy It is sin 2 2  23 determined by  survival measurement, So  23 can not distinguished from  /2-  23 Yasuda 03

Altogether 8-fold degeneracy

Breaking of degeneracies combining information from detectors at different baselines using additional oscillation chanels ( e   ) spectral information (wideband beam) adding information on  13 from a reactor experiment adding information from atmospheric neutrino experiments  several possibilities to resolve the degeneracies are known:

Breaking neutrino parameter degeneracy at T2KK

There are two merits of measuring T2K beam in Korea (Hagiwara et al.) (a) The contribution from become large. It is useful to determine the sign of (b) The correlation between CP phase and  13 in Korea is different from SK.

T2KK solves 8-fold degeneracy (Kajita et al., 06)

Impact of astrophysical neutrinos

Detection of astrophysical neutrinos telescope Icecube O(km) long muon tracks

   →  produce long muon tracks Good angular resolution, but limited energy resolution  e → e produce EM showers Good energy resolution, poor angular momentum   →  →   produce double-bang’ events at high energy. One shower when  is produced, another when it decays:  spectra in AGN range ( eV) IceCube will distinguish   e,  based on the event characteristics:

Flavor composition of astrophysical neutrino sources       e   e p, He...  , K   e   e L=10-30 km L=up to km p, He...  , K   e   e L=10-30 km L=up to km  Flavor ratio: (  e :  :  )  Neutron beam source: (1:0:0) ~ TeV. HE proton be converted to a HE neutron (p +  → n +  + ). Neutrinos are produced from the neutron decays. (1:0.4:0.4) at telescope  Pion beam source: (1:2:0) ~ PeV (  + → … → e + +  + e +  ). The four leptons share equally the energy of the pion. (1:1:1) at telescope  Muon damped source: (0:1:0) from pion decays with muon absorption. dN/dE ~E-2, eg., from GRB, ~ GeV

Oscillating probability over a very long travel: P(  → , x) = ∑|U  m | 2 |U  m | 2 + m  m’ ∑ Re(U  m U  m’ U  m’ U  m ) cos(  m 2 x/2p) + m  m’ ∑ Im(U  m U  m’ U  m’ U  m ) sin(  m 2 x/2p) =   - 2 m<m’ ∑ Re(U  m U  m’ U  m’ U  m ) The predicted flavor composition at the earth depends on the mixing parameters including CP phase and CP-even part of the mixng only. –No dependence on  m 2 –Use R ≡    e    for astrophysical sources Averaged out !

R neutron beam = P e   / (P ee +P e  ) ~  13 cos  CP, ( to the first order in  13 ) R muon damped = P  / (P  e +P  ) ~  13 cos  CP W. Winter, 2006

R pion beam = (2P  +P e  ) / (2P  e +P ee +2P  +P e  ) ~  13 cos  CP P  e ~ 2  13 2 ± 0.09  13 sin  CP : terr. neutrino beam

Can we obtain useful information on oscilaltion parameters from measuring R ? Very difficult due to low statistics and no spectral information But, complementary to the one of Reactor exp. and neutrino beams. (Winter,06) Best-fit

Combining reactor experiment with astrophysical neutrios Assume that reactor exp. (double chooz) measures Sin 2 2  13 and astrophys. source is able to provide the information on a similar time scale as the reactor exp. (Winter,06)

Impact on mass hierarchy Astrophysical source may help mass hierarchy measurement at superbeam: 20% prec. good thanks to the fact that mass hierarchy sensitivity is affected by the correlations with  cp and sin 2 2  13

Impact on (  23,  /2-  23 )- degeneracy Astrophysical source may help to resolve it

Summary T2K is next generation neutrino LBL experiment and will measure  13 through appearance     e channel Measuring  13 will suffer from parameter degeneracy (8-fold) Astrophysical neutrinos with high energy are complementary to resolve degeneracy.

Appearance channels:  e  Complicated, but all interesting information there:  13,  CP, mass hierarchy (via A) (Cervera et al. 2000; Freund, Huber, Lindner, 2000; Freund, 2001)

Astrophysical neutrino sources produce certain flavor ratios of neutrinos ( e :  :  ): Neutron decays: (1:0:0) Muon damped sources: (0:1:0) Pion decays: (1:2:0) These ratios are changed through averaged neutrino oscillations: Only CP-conserving effects remaining ~ cos  CP Measure muon track to shower ratio at neutrino telescope: R =   /(  e   ) (conservative, since in future also flavors!?) Astrophysical sources