Site Locations Shaded area = Counties that do not drain into the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Basin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program Nutrient Special Study Update Report – May 16, 2007 Roy Darville.
Advertisements

West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.
Enhancing Water Quality in MARACOOS Kevin Sellner Executive Director Chesapeake Research Consortium 15 December 2011 Sorry I could not attend!
The Chemical Water Quality of Lake Nipissing Andrew Paterson Dorset Environmental Science Centre Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch.
Effects of Conservation Tillage Systems on Dissolved Phosphorus Dr. David Baker Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio November 15, 2012 Davenport, IA.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Anna Mathis, VA Program Coordinator RiverTrends: Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring.
Report Generation and Issue
Paul Bireta December 4, 2012 The Impact of Large Storm Events on Nutrient Loadings in Texas Rivers 1.
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Developing a Nutrient Management Plan for the Napa River Watershed Group Members Vinod Kella  Rebecca Kwaan  Luke Montague Linsey Shariq  Peng Wang.
SUSANNA SCOTT MIAMI UNIVERSITY Ecosystem Metabolism: Response to Storm Events.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Status Report on Catoctin Creek - A Scenic River Darrell Schwalm Loudoun Watershed Watch.
WHY IS THE RHODE RIVER SO MUDDY? BY KWADWO OMARI (INTERN: PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY LAB)
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
Using GIS For Middle School Lessons About Streams and Watersheds.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
David Ward Loudoun Watershed Watch/Loudoun Wildlife Conservancy July 27, 2009.
Compliance Monitoring─Ensuring Effective Results Jim Younk Idaho Power Company.
NSF - CREST Center for the Integrated Study of Coastal Ecosystem Processes and Dynamics in the Mid-Atlantic Region Sub – Theme #1 Land Use and Climate.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Ecosystems Climate and Land-Use Change Water Natural Hazards Core Science Systems Energy and Minerals, and Environmental Health U.S. Geological Survey.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessing Watershed Scale Responses to BMP Implementation - Fairfax County, VA - John Jastram Hydrologist.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
EMODNET Chemistry 2 Steering Group Rome (Italy), January 2014 WP 1 : DATA COLLECTION AND METADATA COMPILATION IN ATLANTIC SEA.
Albemarle County Public Schools Camp Albemarle Field Trip Preparation Watershed Experience.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Aqua Case Mussel culture area- Chalastra Thessaloniki Exercise Environmental Impacts of mussel farming o n water quality. Amalia Moriki, Sofia Galinou-Mitsoudi,
nitrogen in the bay The Chesapeake Bay Foundation says that nitrogen is the most serious pollution problem in the bay. Nitrogen was the only measure.
Lake Whatcom Tributary Monitoring – Phase II Summary Whatcom County Department of Public Works April 26 | 2013.
Contacts StreamchemDB Long-term goals Interested in databases? Adding sites and data Consensus on metadata and terminology Saving the nation’s long- term.
History and Progress of DEQ’s Mercury Programs Albert E. Hindrichs.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Pennsylvania’s Chesapeake Bay Non-Tidal Network Water Quality Stations 2011 Monitoring Update.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
QA/QC Assessment of Lay Monitoring in Rhode Island Elizabeth M. Herron, Linda T. Green & Arthur J. Gold URI Watershed Watch University of Rhode Island.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Particles, your health & your lungs. Why care about air pollution? Sonoma County air is clean compared to other areas, but SF air blows here Sonoma County.
Dennis Demcheck, Scott Mize, & Stan Skrobialowski USGS Louisiana Water Science Center In cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers June 13, 2008.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Non-tidal network monitoring update for calendar year 2011 Non-tidal Monitoring Workgroup 8 February 2011 Bill Romano MD Dept. of Natural Resources Photograph.
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
WLRD Science Seminar Sammamish River Water Quality Model Status Report November 19, 2002.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Answering the Question: Why? Factors Affecting Change in Water Quality Exceptional challenge to explain “why” Poor quality of pollution source information.
Friends of the Shenandoah River Mission A non-profit, scientific organization dedicated to the preservation and restoration of the aquatic environment.
What is the System-Wide Monitoring Program (SWMP) and What Can It Do For You?
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Birnamwood LID Project Update Nick Russo Team Leader-Environmental Services Architecture & Engineering Division Harris County Public Infrastructure.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Current EFR synthesis database design Sites Site web sites Contacts Site disclaimers & agreements Status of data Basins Disturbances Disturbance details.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Technical Support in Engineering Construction Phase of Craney Island Eastward Expansion Mac Sisson, Harry Wang, Jian Shen, Albert Kuo, and Wenping Gong.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Citizens Advisory Council
What’s in Your Watershed? Fall and Virgil Creeks
Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Larkin Creek Phase II Project
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project S
Defining and Targeting High Flows
West Virginia CBP Non-tidal Network: 2006 Status Update
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Site Locations Shaded area = Counties that do not drain into the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Basin

Primary Sites 19 sites (5 RIM, 14 RIM2) 16 sampled by USGS only 3 sampled DEQ interval/USGS storm events All sites collected via CBP methods

RIM Primary Site Analytical Parameters Total Nitrogen Particulate Nitrogen Total Dissolved Nitrogen Dissolved Nitrate-Nitrite Dissolved Nitrite Dissolved Nitrate Dissolved Ammonium Dissolved Organic Carbon Particulate Inorganic Carbon Particulate Organic Carbon Total Suspended Sediment Conc. (USGS KY Sed. Lab) % Fine Particles <0.062 um (USGS KY Sed. Lab) Total Phosphorus Dissolved Orthophosphorus Total Dissolved Phosphorus Particulate Phosphorus Particulate Inorganic Phos. Dissolved Silica Total Suspended Solids Fixed Suspended Solids Volatile Suspended Solids Lab Turbidity Chlorophyll a

RIM2 Primary Site Analytical Parameters Total Nitrogen Total Nitrate-Nitrite Total Ammonium Total Phosphorus Dissolved Orthophosphorus Total Suspended Solids Fixed Suspended Solids Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (DEQ samples only) Total Suspended Sediment Concentration & Fine Particles <0.062 um (Storm events only)

Secondary Sites Total Nitrogen Total Nitrate-Nitrite Total Ammonium Total Phosphorus Dissolved Orthophosphorus Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen Total Suspended Solids Fixed Suspended Solids  16 Secondary Sites (Sampled BY DEQ Only) Parameters collected:

Sample Collection Summaries for Primary Sites CY2011 WaterbodyDEQ Sta IDGAGESourceInterval Interval expectedStorm Storm expectedQA/QCTotalMethod Appomattox2-APP USGS HIV James2-JMS USGS HIV Mattaponi8-MPN USGS HIV Pamunkey8-PMK USGS HIV Rappahannock3-RPP USGS HIV NF Shenandoah1BNFS USGS HIV SF Shenandoah1BSSF USGS HIV Rapidan3-RAP USGS HIV James River at Richmond2-JMS USGS HIV James River at Blue Ridge2-JMS DEQ/SCRO HIV James River at Blue Ridge2-JMS USGS007829HIV North Anna River8-NAR USGS HIV Chickahominey River2-CHK USGS HIV Smith Creek1BSMT USGS HIV Sampled as Primary 2011 (New Site or Secondary Site moved to Primary status) Difficult Run1ADIF USGS HIV Dragon Swamp7-DRN USGS333317HIV Accotink Creek1AACO USGS0033 3HIV Accotink Creek1AACO DEQ/NRO12 00 HIV S.F. Quantico Creek1ASOQ USGS333317HIV Muddy Creek1BMDD USGS333317HIV Rivanna River2-RVN USGS HIV Rivanna River2-RVN DEQ/VRO HIV Totals CY

Sample Collection Summaries for Secondary Sites WaterbodyDEQ Sta IDGAGESourceIntervalExpected Storm Targeted Storm ExpectedQA/QCTotalMethodComments Catoctin Cr.1ACAX DEQ/NRO IntegratedHIV Shenandoah R.1BSSF DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV South River1BSTH DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV Appomattox R.2-APP DEQ/SCRO IntegratedHIV Back Creek2-BCC DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV Bullpasture R.2-BLP DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV Calfpasture R.2-CFP DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV Deep Cr.2-DPC DEQ/PRO IntegratedHIV Mechums River2-MCM DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV Maury River2-MRY DEQ/VRO IntegratedHIV Piney River2-PNY DEQ/VRO 0Integrated Site dropped for Rivanna River. Rapidan River3-RAP DEQ/NRO IntegratedHIV Robinson River3-ROB DEQ/NRO IntegratedHIV Rappahannock R.3-RPP DEQ/NRO IntegratedHIV Little River8-LTL DEQ/PRO IntegratedHIV Mattaponi River8-MPN DEQ/NRO IntegratedHIV Po River8-POR DEQ/NRO IntegratedHIV Totals CY

Non-tidal Network Sampling Changes Since Primary sites initiated. 2 Secondary sites, Accotink Creek and the Rivanna River, changed from secondary sites to primary sites. Implemented Equal Width Depth Integrated sampling on remaining 3 secondary sites.

2012 Challenges DEQ Staffing level reductions in several regional offices. Not hiring field staff replacements. Decreased funding/staff will result in a reduction of gages VADEQ will be able to maintain. New gage required at proposed new network site (primary). Upgrade 4 stations from secondary to primary site. As we expand our NTNW the coordination of storm targeted sampling of the small watersheds may pose significant challenges due to their flashy nature and the need to mobilize quickly.

Funding Sources Existing State funding level seems mostly stable (staff attrition and general “hiring freeze” at DEQ is problem) Hopeful for increased funding from EPA beginning 7/1/ new network station (primary station) Upgrade 4 secondary sites to primary Possible increased future USGS Joint funding for program enhancements