© 2012 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. PGE Schedules 7 & 32 Portfolio Time-of-Use Portfolio Options Committee Meeting February 18, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Focus on Pepcos Washington, DC Residential Smart Meter Pilot Program Presented By Steve Sunderhauf July 14, 2009.
Advertisements

APPA Business & Financial September Time of Use and EZ-3 Price Plans A Presentation to APPA Business & Financial Conference Savannah, GA September.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Electrical Systems.  This section discusses: –How utilities charge for electricity –How to calculate the avoided cost of electricity –How to use utility.
Utah Cost of Service and Rate Design Task Force Seasonality in Costs and Loads Maurice Brubaker June 15, 2005 Salt Lake City, Utah.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Save the Date Winter Concert KG2-G5 Ballet 10:30 AM – 11:30 AM Monday, December 22, 2014 Save the Date Winter Concert KG2-G5 Ballet 10:30 AM – 11:30 AM.
The Regulatory Assistance Project 110 B Water St. Hallowell, Maine USA Tel: Fax: State Street, Suite 3 Montpelier, Vermont.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
February 23, 2006Karen Herter, LBL/CEC/UCB-ERG 1 /29 Temperature Effects on Residential Electric Price Response Karen Herter February 23, 2006.
Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.
Real-time Pricing for Illinois Consumers Anthony Star Community Energy Cooperative Demand Response Coordinating Committee Webinar December 15, 2006.
Utility Rates Electric, Natural Gas, and Water. Electric Utility Different Utility Business Models – “IOU” – Investor Owned Utility Ultimately responsible.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
1 PG&E’s Operating Experience with TVP Rates Best Practices and Lessons Learned in Time-Variant Pricing R Residential Rate Workshop Gregory B.
Utility Analysis. Baseline Electricity Analysis  Understanding and documenting current energy use is called developing a baseline. Developing a baseline:
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
1 City Light Rate Design- Review Presentation to Review Panel January 2013.
RETAIL RATE REVISIONS August 1, 2015 Presented By:
Herbert E. Hirschfeld, P.E. and Joseph S. Lopes Applied Energy Group, Inc. Metering America 2005 April 13, 2005 Submetering Case Studies with Load Management.
Environmental Science Mr. Hartley. What the heck is a kilowatt hour? Before we see how much electricity costs, we have to understand how it's measured.
Time of Use Rates Lessons Learned After One Year.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SCE – Lessons Learned from Pricing Experiences July 31, 2014.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
1 Putting things in Perspective I&M Plan Workshop July 9, 2008 or, “Why bother with your Natural Gas Engine?”
Vehicle-Grid Integration (VGI) © 2011San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved.
© 2009 AirAdvice, Inc. Energy Benchmarking The On-Ramp to Delivering Energy Services.
1 Professor Paul Simshauser Chief Economist On the Inequity Flat Rate Tariffs December 2014.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
PG&E Partnering With San Joaquin County San Joaquin County Energy Summit.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
March 25, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
James Strapp Associate Partner, IBM Business Consulting Services Potential Smart Metering Issues for Ontario Residential Customers.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
Estimating the Annual Microeconomic Benefits of Vehicle-to-Grid Services in New York City Gerad M. Freeman M.S. Candidate in Alternative Energy.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
The Impact of Retail Rate Structure on the Economics of Commercial Photovoltaic Systems in California Ryan Wiser, Andrew Mills, Galen Barbose & William.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting January 17, 2006.
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Using Energy Wisely Section Your Hydro (Energy) Bill.
Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
2015 ElectriCities Advanced Meter School. Rate Design Goals The two primary goals of rate design are to (a)provide rates that lead to utility revenues.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
An Alternate to Alternative Energy microE 3,LLC Copyrighted, 2013, microE3,LLC Robert S Donaldson.
Electricity Cost Problems- Formulas. Example Questions Electricity Costs 14.7 cents/kWh. If my total bill is $38.22, how many kWh were used? G Rate =
Hawai’i Over 77,000 PV systems interconnected or approved statewide. 17% of customers 500+ MW of PV installed Oahu: 32% of single family homes have.
NON-RESIDENTIAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT HCDE, Facilitator and DRF Industries, LLC Consultants Energy Education, Energy Cost, TDU Charges, & Demand Reduction.
City of East Point Electric Vehicle Rate Chau Nguyen, ECG
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting February 16, 2005.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
SCE Green Rate and Community Renewables Programs 2016.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well
Preliminary Electricity Rate and Time of Use Rate Scenarios
It’s a Matter of Time: Analyzing the Effects of Dynamic Rate Designs on Low-Income and Senior Electricity Consumers.
ESMEC-ET Electric Supply Portfolio Report
Impact of Dynamic Pricing on AMR
Cost of Electricity & Energy Usage Energy Use Recall: Measured in Watts (W) Electrical power is the rate at which electrical energy is produced.
Presentation transcript:

© 2012 Portland General Electric. All rights reserved. PGE Schedules 7 & 32 Portfolio Time-of-Use Portfolio Options Committee Meeting February 18, 2014 Subhead about the topic Date etc. Presented by: any additional information here

2 10/16/2015 Portfolio TOU Pricing Schedules 7 Residential and 32 Small Non-residential voluntary TOU are considered the market-based rates specified in OAR (4).  The energy charge has three peak periods, on-, mid- and off-peak.  The peak periods are differentiated by winter and summer periods as follows:  The on-peak periods generally correspond to when PGE experiences peak loads.  The off-peak periods are standard wholesale market definitions.  The energy prices are structured so that the on-peak price is three times higher than the off-peak price.  Schedule 7 and 32 TOU pricing is based on average class peak percentages for the three peak periods. Winter (Nov-Apr)TimeDays On-peak6 AM to 10 AM 5 PM to 8 PM M-F Mid-peak10 AM to 5 PM 8 PM to 10 PM 6 AM to 10 PM M-F Saturday Off-peak10 PM to 6 AM 6 AM to 10 PM All days Sundays and Holidays Summer (May-Oct)TimeDays On-peak3 PM to 8 PMM-F Mid-peak6 AM to 3 PM 8 PM to 10 PM 6 AM to 10 PM M-F Saturday Off-peak10 PM to 6 AM 6 AM to 10 PM All days Sundays and Holidays

3 10/16/2015 Portfolio TOU Pricing Schedule 7 cents/ kWhSchedule 32 cents/kWh Peak Period EnergyWith T&DPeak PeriodEnergyWith T&D First 5,000 kWh With T&D Over 5,000 kWh On-peak On-peak Mid-peak Mid-peak Off-peak Off-peak First 1,000 kWh Block Adjustment (0.722)

4 10/16/2015 Portfolio TOU Customer Profiles  The average Schedule 7 TOU customer consumes approximately 30% more than the average residential customer.  The average Schedule 32 TOU customer consumes more than 3 ½ times the average small non-residential customer.  The average Schedule 7 customer on TOU for the entirety of 2013 saved $126 or approximately 8% during 2013 relative to standard service. Approximately 94% reduced their bill during this period.  The average Schedule 32 customer on TOU for the entirety of 2013 saved $333 or approximately 6% during 2013 relative to standard service. Approximately 93% reduced their bill during this period.  Although PGE has not marketed TOU, customer participation levels as a percent of class total have grown slightly since 2006.

5 10/16/2015 Portfolio TOU Participation (December figures) Schedule Sch 7 TOU1,6711,8151,8411,8851,8282,1482,3312,355 Sch 32 TOU TOU Totals1,8021,9292,0332,1122,0592,3972,5992,628 Residential696,779706,444712,554715,458719,031720,269733,426740,172 Sm. Non-residential81,14982,60883,61085,09386,19186,97886,77185,893 Sch 7 TOU Pct.0.24%0.26% 0.25%0.30%0.32% Sch 32 TOU Pct.0.16%0.14%0.23%0.27% 0.29%0.31%0.32%

6 10/16/2015 Questions