Conservation Assessment and Management Plan/ Prioritization (C.A.M.P. ) A methodology for Rapid Assessment of Conservation Status.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A2 Unit 4A Geography fieldwork investigation Candidates taking Unit 4A have, in section A, the opportunity to extend an area of the subject content into.
Advertisements

Landscape Level Conservation Planning for prioritizing conservation action in Mozambique Bruno Nhancale, PhD Conservation Science workshop, 21 st April.
IPCC Products, Procedures and Processes Amsterdam, 14 May 2010 Dr. Renate Christ, Secretary of the IPCC.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
The Species Information Service mobilising the information power of the IUCN/SSC network.
The IUCN Red List categories Dr. Esko Hyvärinen Senior Environmental Adviser Ministry of the Environment, Finland Syktyvkar, Republic of Komi, Russia,
458 Estimating Extinction Risk (the IUCN criteria) Fish 458; Lecture 24.
Manual on Disability Statistics Central Statistics Office Ministry of Statistics & PI Government of India New Delhi.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Reserves and National Parks Textbook chapter- Conservation of Biodiversity Textbook chapter- Conservation of Biodiversity.
The State of the World’s Forest Genetic Resources The Global Plan of Action FAO
Review of the KBA process in Indo-Burma First iteration of KBAs identified by BirdLife International in collaboration with the Bird Society of Thailand,
Factors of Extinction Why are some species more or less prone to extinction?
The 2010 Red List of Finnish species: the assessment work in practice Ilpo Mannerkoski Finnish Environment Institute Syktyvkar
Session 3C: Monitoring and Evaluation of C/DRR: Tools and Strategies
Mechanisms of Species Loss Fri. Feb. 11
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Prepared for the 3rd SBB telecon 20 Mar 2012 Michele Walters, BI-01 task coordinator.
® Tools for assessing and prioritizing species for intensive management.
Presented by James Atherton (Conservation Outcomes Manager, CI Pacific Islands Program) KBA Review and Lessons Learned Workshop Washington DC July 25-28,
Survey Priorities Discussion Group Participants: Wang Hao, Cristiano, Megan, Wiggy, Curtis, Simon, Henni, Kristen, Naamal, Matt, Lisa, Leeanne, Tom L.
The World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List Criteria are used to determine extinction risk and set numerical thresholds for qualification for three globally.
Division Of Early Warning And Assessment MODULE 5: PEER REVIEW.
Characterization, Inventory and Monitoring of trends in indigenous livestock Dr. E. D. Ilatsia D. N. Kamiti 23-Oct-15Animal Breeding and Genomics Group1.
Assessment of recommendations of the 5 past ACHR sessions 26 th – 30 th Dulitha N. Fernando.
Regular process for global reporting and assessment of the state of the marine environment, including socio-economic aspects Guidance for Authors.
World Commission on Protected Areas 1300 members Commission on Education & Communication 600 members Commission on Environmental Economics & Social Policy.
S15: Supervision and review. Objective of supervision and review  To ensure that the audit is done efficiently and effectively so that the audit opinion.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
Photo: Terhi Ryttäri HELCOM Red List of Species and Biotopes Progress of the project HELCOM RED LIST Fishes 28 February-1 March 2012 Project Coordinator.
By: Dr. Sumaya Ahmed Zakieldeen Institute of Environmental Studies (U OF K) National Adaptation Plan Project (NAPP) workshop November.
Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Wildlife What causes some species to become rare or extinct? How does management of rare, threatened, & endangered species.
Strategic and Scientific Thinking about American Chestnut Recovery.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria Examples. THE IUCN CATEGORIES  A. Declining Population  B. Small Distribution and Decline or Fluctuation  C.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Lecture 10 More Innovation SE3821 Software Requirements and Specification Dr. Rob Hasker (based on slides by Dr. Brad Dennis)
Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (Vic).  This key piece of legislation provides for state-wide programs preventing further loss of habitat, maintenance.
Preparatory Groundwork For facilitators of a community assessment Programme Identify subject area Decide on date, time and place Decide on tools Identify.
CONSERVATION AND BIODIVERISTY. BIODIVERISITY EVOLUTION SPECIATION MUTATIONSNATURAL SELECTION GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION GENETIC DRIFT.
Expert Group Meeting on Enabling Measures for an Inclusive Green Economy in Africa September, 2014 Introduction to the breakout sessions.
MENA Codes Workshop Role and Tasks of the Project Manager Philip Armstrong March 2006.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Definitions of terms used in the IUCN Categories & Criteria Location.
Development of a process for setting Conservation Objectives Dr Rebecca Jeffrey Science and Biodiversity Section National Parks and Wildlife Service Ireland.
What is Social Accountability? “Social Accountability is an approach initiated by the community for collective responsibility of all stakeholders in ensuring.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch Incorporating Biodiversity into Trade-Related Integrated Assessments Presentation.
Expert Group Meeting on the Revision of the Handbook on the Management of Population and Housing Censuses New York, 14 – 17 December 2015 Overview of the.
Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Assessing status and trends of birds in the European Union: Reviewing methods and experience.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 587 Fall 2007.
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) risk of extinction The IUCN Red List assessment estimates risk of extinction What is the likelihood.
International Union for Conservation of Nature Conserving biodiversity Pioneering nature’s solutions to global challenges.
WHAT IS A RED LIST ASSESSMENT?
Sami Lala., Ahmed Amri and Nigel Maxted
RCN Development of an Online Database to Enhance the Conservation of SGCN Invertebrates in the Northeastern Region James W. Fetzner Jr. & John.
Public Health England – Our progress under the Sendai Framework
Supporting information IUCN Red List assessments
IUCN and Biodiversity Assessment
The IUCN Red List A brief introduction.
Reminder EU & European Red lists produced so far:
EUROPEAN HABITAT TYPES
WP 2: Align / synchronise progress reporting under both directives
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
The IUCN Red List.
Northern Quoll, Dasyurus hallucatus
Sylvia Barova Unit B.3 – Nature DG Environment, European Commission
Air Resource Specialists, Inc. July 23, 2004
Presentation transcript:

Conservation Assessment and Management Plan/ Prioritization (C.A.M.P. ) A methodology for Rapid Assessment of Conservation Status

Evolution of CAMP Workshops - Impetus Sir Peter Scott, Chairman, SSC, asked Dr. U. S. Seal, Chairman, CBSG to find a method of prioritizing species for zoo conservation. Early exercises Global level CAMPs for large taxon groups e.g. Primates, Antelopes of the world For plant species St. Helena’s Island CAMP Southern Indian Medicinal Plants CAMPs (4) Mexican Cactus CAMP Indian B.C.P.P. High altitude medicinal plants CAMP workshops for JMK & HP Medicinal plants CAMP workshops for AP & Maharashtra

CAMP Workshops Aid rapid assessment of conservation status and management prioritization through appraisal of available data on distribution, trends, habitat status, etc. with valuable inputs of experts (taxonomists, foresters, ecologists,...) based on their field observationsAid rapid assessment of conservation status and management prioritization through appraisal of available data on distribution, trends, habitat status, etc. with valuable inputs of experts (taxonomists, foresters, ecologists,...) based on their field observations Result in assignment of IUCN Red List categories to each of the assessed taxaResult in assignment of IUCN Red List categories to each of the assessed taxa Also record recommendations for research, management, information gathering, public awareness, and legislative activitiesAlso record recommendations for research, management, information gathering, public awareness, and legislative activities

MAIN FEATURES OF A CAMP WORKSHOP Experts (Field Botanists,Foresters, User group representatives, Knowledgeable local inhabitants etc.) are brought together for the workshop. Full 3 days exercise by all participants Accepted list of taxa, under assessment, divided into 4-5 sub-lists

4 - 5 Working groups formed with each one taking up a sub-list of 7 to 10 taxa. Each working group has a Facilitator and a Taxon Data sheet recorder. MAIN FEATURES OF A CAMP WORKSHOP

Each group prepares detailed compilation on assessment and recommendations, for each allotted Taxon based on the information generated by the group members. All working group assessments and recommendations are presented, reviewed, discussed and finalized for each Taxon in the plenary sessions. CAMP document is finalized after obtaining review/ comments, of participants and other experts, on the draft document. MAIN FEATURES OF A CAMP WORKSHOP

Decalepis hamiltonii WIGHT & ARN. (ASCLEPIADACEAE) Threat Status : Endangered (Globally)

MAP

Coscinium fenestratum (GAERTN.) COLEB. (MENISPERMACEAE) Threat Status : Critically Endangered (in KT, TN & KE)

MAP

Summary of results of 4 CAMP Workshops for Medicinal plants of Southern India (Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu) 1. A total of 110 taxa assessed (1995, 1996, 1997 and 1999) Habit-wise break up

2. 58 out of these are endemics and have been assigned Global RL status. Category-wise break up of Endemics

ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION (Based on the experiences of 6 Med. Plant CAMP Workshops) INeed for undertaking “Regional” assessments for well defined geographical units. Whereas Global assessment of threat status of Taxa contribute to the formulation of guidelines and policies for conservation, it is the “Regional” threat status which prompts conservation action in a geographical region. For non-endemic Taxa, occurring over a wider geo-graphical area, the rapid “Regional” assessment of threat status is the only way for initiating urgent Conservation Action.

IINeed for enlistment of “Experts” and ensuring their participation. Without the participation of “Experts” (field botanists,foresters, local knowledgeable persons) with sufficient experience of field observations, in the region under consideration, the appropriate assessments cannot be made. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION (Based on the experiences of 6 Med. Plant CAMP Workshops) IIIHow to select plant Taxa, for threat assessment, systematically? Generally the selection is subjective After the obvious / spectacular candidates have been selected it is difficult to select additional Taxa for assessment.

ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION (Based on the experiences of 6 Med. Plant CAMP Workshops) IV Need for refinement of CRITERIA for IUCN Red List Categories Problem of assessing “Population Reduction” over very long time period of 3 generations ( > 50 years for perennials). A large number of tree Taxa of tropics, especially those with narrow distribution, automatically qualify for threat status “Vulnerable” and above based on “Population Reduction” due to forest cover loss (exceeding 30 % over 50 years)

SUGGESTIONS FOR “REGIONAL” THREAT STATUS ASSESSMENTS I. (a) Need to follow internationally accepted standards for defining the geographical units for undertaking “Regional” assessments (following World Geographical Scheme for recording plant distributions by S. Hollis and R K Brummitt based on Plant Taxonomic Database Standards No.2, Version 1.0, Jan ‘92) (b) The “Regional” assessments need to be undertaken at the level of a “Basic recording unit” (more than one unit may be taken up at a time for threat assessment through a CAMP workshop.). In Indian context every State / UT / Island group corresponds to a basic recording unit.

SUGGESTIONS FOR “REGIONAL” THREAT STATUS ASSESSMENTS I. (c) In respect of non-endemic Taxa such “Regional” assessments, when pooled, can generate the “Global” assessment of threat status. II. Compilation of geographical unit-wise list of experts. III. Need for rigorous pre-CAMP data collection and compilation effort. Information on RANGE, DISTRIBUTION, EXTENT OF OCCURANCE (Global), TRADE (Quantities, Parts),HABITAT SPECIFICITY, FOREST COVER LOSS etc. needs to be collected and compiled from different sources by the organizers for undertaking a well informed CAMP workshop. Quantification of many of these parameters is essential through a pre-CAMP exercise. This helps “qualify” Taxa for assessment in a CAMP workshop.

Summing Up Comprehensive threat assessments need a large input of time and money. Use of rapid methods of assessment (CAMP process) is being advocated by Species Survival Commission (of IUCN) to guide timely conservation action. Need to urgently initiate rapid assessment process through CAMP Workshops for prioritized medicinal plants of each State