ESEC Conference Using the classification in the case of the LFS Bled, June 2006 Natasa Kozlevcar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Helsinki 8-11 th June, 2005 NIESR. –National accounts –Comparability –Expertise Information needed –Industry disaggregation –Backdating –INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION.
Advertisements

National Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics in Turkey Tuna KEMALİ 10 September 2013 Ankara.
January 30-February 1, 2013 Kingston, Jam aica The Statistical Institute of Jamaica.
Integrated Household Survey An overview and update Neil Bannister and Gareth Powell Social Survey Division ONS.
provide information Longitudinal Weights for the Production of Transitions and Flow Estimates Katrin Baumgartner Angelika Meraner Alexander.
IPA 2010 Project on Human Resources Development in Albania
Labour market statistics in Poland. Labour supply, labour demand employment, job vacancy, unemployment Current statistics How we collect the data Household.
An example of longitudinal LFS weights
ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics Labour Force Survey Division Unit “Methods for LFS data treatment” 5 th Workshop on LFS methodology Paris,
Green jobs pilot surveys in Albania
Estimation of unrecorded employment using administrative data Ágota Scharle Bálint Szabó Ministry of Finance Budapest.
Riku Salonen Regression composite estimation for the Finnish LFS from a practical perspective.
Understanding Population Trends and Processes: Links between internal migration, commuting and within household relationships Oliver Duke-Williams School.
ORC International Proprietary & Confidential Stress Awareness Month Survey Report April 7, 2015 EMBARGOED UNTIL 8:00 AM, April 13, 2015.
1 Active Population, Employment and Unemployment in Slovenia.
Chapter 8 Selecting Research Participants. DEFINING A POPULATION BY A RANDOM NUMBERS TABLE  TABLE 8.1  Partial Page of a Random Numbers Table  ____________________________________________________________________________.
5.10: Stratification after Selection of Sample – Post Stratification n Situations can arise in which we cannot place sampling units into their correct.
~ Draft version ~ 1 HOW TO CHOOSE THE NUMBER OF CALL ATTEMPTS IN A TELEPHONE SURVEY IN THE PRESENCE OF NONRESPONSE AND MEASUREMENT ERRORS Annica Isaksson.
Producing migration data using household surveys Experience of the Republic of Moldova UNECE Work Session on Migration Statistics, Geneva, October.
Patterns and trends in child obesity A presentation of the latest data on child obesity.
Estonian Labour Force Survey Ülle Pettai Leading Statistician Social Surveys Service Population and Social Statistics Department.
Estimating the Labour Force Trinidad and Tobago 28 th May 2014 Sterling Chadee Director of Statistics.
ICVS IN SLOVENIA Tatjana Škrbec. Content of presentation  Short history  Crime victim survey 2001 within SORS  Methodology and content of questionnaire.
International Republican Institute Survey of Macedonian Public Opinion June 6-15, 2015.
The Labour Force Survey Process- The Jamaican Experience CARICOM 2 nd High Level Advocacy Forum on Statistics Presented by: Carol Coy The Statistical Institute.
Measurement of labour migration in Ukraine Neverovska Lidiia, The State Statistics Service of Ukraine GenevaOctober 2012.
Intro Stats Lesson 1.3 B Objectives: SSBAT classify different ways to collect data. SSBAT distinguish between different sampling techniques. Standards:
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Estimation and Weighting, Part I.
Labour Force Survey By Munir Ahamd Aslam Director FBS Presentation on FBS – May, 2006.
Tanzania Disability Survey Key Results and Last Year GBS Review National Bureau of Statistics November 2009.
Chapter 13 Data Sources, Sampling, and Data Collection.
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Bled, 29 – 30 June 2006 Czech Statistical Office Prague, Czech.
Record matching for census purposes in the Netherlands Eric Schulte Nordholt Senior researcher and project leader of the Census Statistics Netherlands.
Monthly estimates from a practical perspective Experiences from Finnish LFS LFS Methodology Work Shop, Paris 2010 Kalle Sinivuori, Statistics Finland.
1 Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics PCBS Experience in Measuring Informal Sector 13-15/04/2008.
1-3 Data Collection and Sampling Techniques Surveys are the most common method of collecting data. Three methods of surveying are: 1) Telephone surveys.
Gerrit Bauer, Jean-Marie Jungblut, Walter Müller, Reinhard Pollak, Felix Weiss, Heike Wirth MZES, University of Mannheim, ZUMA ESeC Workshop on Application.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Roma, July 8-11, 2008 New Sampling Design of INSEE’s Labour Force Survey Sébastien Hallépée Vincent.
Operationalising and Validating ESEC Information Requirements and Potential Data Sources.
Questions? Contact Kantar Media Healthcare Research (609) Managed Care Readership Study Facts.
Usage of information and communication technologies in the Republic of Serbia, 2007.
Recent Mexican data sources in the study of international migration Seminar: The 2013 High-level Dialogue on International Migration and Development: Implications.
ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics Labour Force Survey Division Unit “Methods for LFS data treatment” European Conference on Quality in Official.
Conducting and Analysing Labour Force Surveys for Monitoring of the Labour Market, ِِ Amman November 2012 Challenges and Opportunities Labour Force.
1 GENDER ISSUES in Labour Household Surveys TURIN, 9-12 Dec.2008 AHMAD HUSSEIN CONSULTANT BASED ON DOCUMENTS PREPARED.
Application of the ESeC on data of the Dutch Labour Force Survey: a comparison between years Sue Westerman Roel Schaart Service Centre for the Classifications.
National design, fieldwork and data harmonization for Labour Force Survey Irena Svetin Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia September 2014.
IV. Inferential Statistics B. Confidence Intervals
Aspects of victim survey methodology: results from the inventory of victimisation surveys Jonathan Allen UK Home Office.
Estimation of preliminary unemployment rates by means of multiple imputation UN/ECE-Work Session on Data Editing Vienna, April 2008 Thomas Burg, Statistics.
The availability of Dutch census microdata Eric Schulte Nordholt Senior researcher and project leader of the Census Statistics Netherlands Division Social.
Structure of the Hungarian population in employment by ESeC Based on LFS and Census 2001 Elizabeth Lindner Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
Weighting Household Surveys By David F. Pearson, Ph.D., P.E. April 2007.
Improving of Household Sample Surveys Data Quality on Base of Statistical Matching Approaches Ganna Tereshchenko Institute for Demography and Social Research,
Application of ESeC in Estonian Social Surveys based on EU-SILC and LFS data Merle Paats Leading Statistician from the Social Statistics Department, Estonia.
New challenges for Social statistics, EurostatLuxemburg, 23 September 2008 New approach to migration statistics in Lithuania NEW APPROACH TO MIGRATION.
Internet data collection in the LFS Danish experiences Paris, April 2010.
1 Data Collection and Sampling Chapter Methods of Collecting Data The reliability and accuracy of the data affect the validity of the results.
Core variables in Estonian social surveys Merle Paats Statistics Estonia.
The hidden side of successful story – implication of wide use of administrative data sources at national statistical institutes Metka Zaletel, Irena Križman.
Rome, May 2014 Structural variables Weighting the Spanish annual subsample.
The survey was mailed to 6,401 households in the state of Maryland, randomly selected from within each of four regions.
ESSnet on the harmonisation and implementation of a European socio- economic classification Workpackage 2 – Expertise of the basic variables ___________________.
European Socio-Economic Classification: A Validation Exercise Figen Deviren Office for National Statistics.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 18 – Statistics Bilateral screening: Chapter.
CENSUS MICRODATA : THAILAND NATIONAL STATISTICAL OFFICE by PAKAMAS RATTANALANGKARN Thailand National Statistical Office.
Regression composite estimation for the Finnish LFS from a practical perspective Riku Salonen.
جمعیت –نمونه –روشهای نمونه گیری دکتر محسن عسکرشاهی دکترای آمار زيستی
نمونه گيري و انواع آن تدوین کننده : ملیکه سادات ابراهیمی
Social Research Methods MAN-10 Erlan Bakiev, Ph. D
Presentation transcript:

ESEC Conference Using the classification in the case of the LFS Bled, June 2006 Natasa Kozlevcar

Methodological explanations From April 1997 the LFS is a continuous survey, data are published quarterly Is a rotating panel survey (each household is interviewed five times) A stratified simple random sample is used (in the 2 nd quarter of 2005 the panel part of the sample included households, the new part 2.081)

Applying the ESEC in the LFS data We used data for second quarter 2005 Three steps: 1.Determining ISCO-88(COM) code 1.Determining the employment status 1.Using the ESEC derivation table

Classifying individuals into ESEC Only individuals who had determined the ISCO-88(COM) code We prepared: Basic distribution Distribution by sex Distribution by age Distribution by educational level

Distribution at the household level Reference person: – the same as already determined in the LFS, – dominant ESEC class Basic distribution at the household level is comparable to the distribution at the individual level

Distribution of the population at the individual level according to ESEC class, Slovenia, 2005, 2 nd quarter

Distribution of the population at the individual level according to ESEC class by sex, Slovenia, 2005, 2 nd quarter

Distribution of the population at the individual level according to educational level, per ESEC, Slovenia, 2005, 2 nd quarter

Distribution of the population at the individual level according to ESEC class by age group, Slovenia, 2005, 2 nd quarter ESEC classAge % years and over Total100 11,614,610,69,615,89,4 28,819,822,220,720,65,3 37,910,58,29,14,32,1 40,65,25,88,16,53,5 50,10,81,83,111,435,5 63,98,39,87,86,5- 717,29,17,86,35,1- 819,410,810,511,716,732,3 940,520,923,323,613,112

Distribution according to ESEC (individual l. – household l. – dominant class), Slovenia, 2005, 2 nd quarter