Georeferencing of Search Results based on Annoted Data and Geographic Information Systems by Giw Aalam MPI, Department 5, Databases and Information Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cybercartographic Atlas of Antarctica Contribution from Wuhan University, China Dongcheng, E., Nengcheng, C.
Advertisements

ISPRS WG II/3 Chongjun YANG Sept th 2003, Thailand Co-Chair of ISPRS WG II/3 IRSA/Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Tim Richards & WP3 Partners NEFIS Project Meeting WP3 Summary 28 – 30 June 2005, Ispra.
Forest Markup / Metadata Language FML
Z39.50 and the Web ZIG July 2000 Poul Henrik Jørgensen, Danish Bibliographic Centre,
Introduction to metadata for IDAH fellows Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Digital Library Program.
XPlanung 2nd HUNAGI Conference Plan4all workshop, March 3, 2011, Budapest Dr.-Ing. Kai-Uwe Krause.
Centrum voor Geo-informatie Metadata & clearinghouses Madrid, 22 December 2004 Joep Crompvoets Spatial Data Infrastructures.
Europe’s Information Society eContentplus OrléansWP6 1st Coordination and progress meeting Technical information OGC WMS – WFS – CSW.
Nov Copyright Galdos Systems Inc. November 2001 Geography Markup Language Enabling the Geo-spatial Web.
Semantic Web and Web Mining: Networking with Industry and Academia İsmail Hakkı Toroslu IST EVENT 2006.
University of the Aegean, Department of Geography The emerge of Semantic Geoportals Athanasis Nikolaos Konstantinos Kalabokidis Vaitis Michail Soulakellis.
Nov Copyright Galdos Systems Inc. November 2001 Impact of GML on Data Development.
University of Piraeus Department of Technology Education and Digital Systems Centre for Research and Technology - Hellas(C.E.R.T.H.) Informatics and Telematics.
Copyright © 2006, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc., All Rights Reserved. The OGC and Emergency Services: GML for Location Transport & Formats & Mapping.
Modelling the spatial data of Hellenic Cadastre and generating the geodatabase schema Aris Sismanidis ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI FACULTY OF ENGINEERING.
Improving Data Discovery in Metadata Repositories through Semantic Search Chad Berkley 1, Shawn Bowers 2, Matt Jones 1, Mark Schildhauer 1, Josh Madin.
1 Introduction to web mapping Dissemination of results, maps and figures ESTP course on Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Use of GIS for making statistics.
CONTI’2008, 5-6 June 2008, TIMISOARA 1 Towards a digital content management system Gheorghe Sebestyen-Pal, Tünde Bálint, Bogdan Moscaliuc, Agnes Sebestyen-Pal.
Arnold Bregt SDI from a technological perspective: Architecture.
ALKIS-ATKIS modelling using ISO standards Workshop “Standards in action” – Lisbon – Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Trierer.
Lecture 3: Geospatial Web Services From Web sites to Web services Geospatial Web service functions Web service types Interoperability and geospatial service.
Interoperability ERRA System.
16-1 The World Wide Web The Web An infrastructure of distributed information combined with software that uses networks as a vehicle to exchange that information.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
XML Overview. Chapter 8 © 2011 Pearson Education 2 Extensible Markup Language (XML) A text-based markup language (like HTML) A text-based markup language.
® Sponsored by In Location Alliance Coordination: architecture and use cases 95th OGC Technical Committee Andreas Wachter, ILA/Qualcomm George Percivall.
Geodata to Geoservices Design Issues for GI Infrastructures Josef Strobl Universität Salzburg Austrian Umbrella Organisation for Geographic Information.
Schema Translation – OS Mastermap, but not as we know it Eddie Curtis, Snowflake Software, Greg Byrom, Richie Fyall GeoData Management Group Ordnance Survey.
Web Feature Service – What and How? Ian Painter - Snowflake Software.
Environmental Monitoring: Database and Beyond Chengyang Zhang Computer Science Department University of North Texas.
Scalable Metadata Definition Frameworks Raymond Plante NCSA/NVO Toward an International Virtual Observatory How do we encourage a smooth evolution of metadata.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NWIS, STORET, and XML Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003 Kenneth J. Lanfear,
Spatial Databases: A Quick Tour Dr. David Briggs Professor & Researcher Computer Science Department Research Computer Group & ISIS University of Southern.
Extensible Markup Language (XML) Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a simple, very flexible text format derived from SGML (ISO 8879).ISO 8879 XML is a.
Geo-Semantics and Interoperability for Spatial Data and Technology Joshua Lieberman Traverse Technologies Inc. SOCoP Workshop, Mc Lean, VA, October 17,
RCDL Conference, Petrozavodsk, Russia Context-Based Retrieval in Digital Libraries: Approach and Technological Framework Kurt Sandkuhl, Alexander Smirnov,
19/10/20151 Semantic WEB Scientific Data Integration Vladimir Serebryakov Computing Centre of the Russian Academy of Science Proposal: SkTech.RC/IT/Madnick.
CLARIN for Linguists Portal & Searching for Resources Jan Odijk LOT Summerschool Nijmegen,
Developing “Geo” Ontology Layers for Web Query Faculty of Design & Technology Conference David George, Department of Computing.
Rupa Tiwari, CSci5980 Fall  Course Material Classification  GIS Encyclopedia Articles  Classification Diagram  Course – Encyclopedia Mapping.
A GeoSpatial Mapping Architecture
RSISIPL1 SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE (SOA) By Pavan By Pavan.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data Module 1 - Unit 2 The Semantic Web and Linked Data Concepts 1-1 Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot Training.
WEB SERVICE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGE (WSDL). Introduction  WSDL is an XML language that contains information about the interface semantics and ‘administrivia’
WIGOS Data model – standards introduction.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange Pilot Project Promoting Geospatial Data Exchange Between EPA and State Partners. April 25, 2007.
GoogleEarth Keyhole Markup Language (KML) Based on Extensible Markup Language (XML) KML files can come from Internet servers or files on your computer.
® Using (testing?) the HY_Features model, 95th OGC Technical Committee Boulder, Colorado USA Rob Atkinson 3 June 2015 Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Banaras Hindu University. A Course on Software Reuse by Design Patterns and Frameworks.
Knowledge Support for Modeling and Simulation Michal Ševčenko Czech Technical University in Prague.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM AuScope Grid Architecture “Where does your architecture fit in with the big picture?”
Introduction to metadata for IDAH fellows Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian Digital Library Program.
Semantics in Web Service Composition for Risk Management Michael Lutz European Commission – DG Joint Research Centre Ispra, Italy EcoTerm IV, Vienna,
COMPASS09 Annual Conference of Compass Informatics.
GeoSpatial Analysis UNICEF Security Advisors Workshop 20 October 2010.
STEWARD: A Spatio-Textual Document Search Engine for HUDUSER.ORG Prof. Hanan Samet Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park,
Smart Maps and Dumb Questions: A Geospatial Semantic Web Interoperability Experiment Joshua Lieberman Traverse Technologies, Inc. & Northrop Grumman Information.
SDI 4.0 Crowd-sourcing, Gov-sourcing Geographic Data via Open Geosynchronization Raj R. Singh Director, Interoperability Programs Open Geospatial Consortium.
XML 1. Chapter 8 © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall SAMPLE XML SCHEMA (XSD) 2 Schema is a record definition, analogous to the.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
Grid Services for Digital Archive Tao-Sheng Chen Academia Sinica Computing Centre
Advanced Applied IT for Business 2
Principles of GIS Fundamental database concepts Shaowen Wang
Wsdl.
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Introduction of Week 11 Return assignment 9-1 Collect assignment 10-1
Session 3: Information Modelling and Information Communities
Presentation transcript:

Georeferencing of Search Results based on Annoted Data and Geographic Information Systems by Giw Aalam MPI, Department 5, Databases and Information Systems

Motivation(1) „Whatever occurs, occurs in space and time.“ (Wegener 2000) –Navigation –Path of a hurricane –Market surveys –Environmental dynamics Increasing market for geospatial information

Motivation(2) Most georeferencing we encounter daily is in form of placenames: –~70% of text documents contain placename references (MetaCarta Inc. 2005) –49,69% out of 5Mio. libraray catalog records of the University of California contain >1 place related subject headings (Petras 2004)  Time and space reference potentially important to access documents and knowledge

Motivation(3) Most text oriented search engines heavily depend on recognizing weighted keywords –Cannot find relevant results for queries like „tropical fruit“ and „Bodensee“; e.g. an article about apricots from Mainau isle –Requires appropiate knowledge base (Thesauri/Ontology, Gazzetters/geospatial information)

Objective  Show potentials & problems of the usage of geodata / georeferenced data in the framework of information retrieval  Develop a prototype for a search engine, based on widespread available data and tools (Wikipedia, GoogleEarth)

Georeferencing(1) Translation between informal and formal representations of geographic locations –Informal reference e.g. used in discourse („Saarbrücken“, „the musicstore on Marktstraße“, …) –Formal representations are basis for mathematical calculations like distance, direction and spatial relationships in general (52° 31' N, 13° 25' O )

Georeferencing(2)

Annotation(1) Congruent, common understanding of geographic references important for consistent annotation –What should be annotated? –What is relevant? –What aspects of geodata should be described? –How? Context specific versus cross-context

Annotation(2) XML-based formats play an increasing role in the framework of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) for annotation/description and data exchange –Structured –Extensible; XML Schema comprises a binding determination of an information model expressed in a document-instance –Possible to work with heterogeneous data

Annotation(3) GML (Geography Markup Language) –Defined by the OGC (Open Geospatial Consortium) as a „standard“ format for modeling and exchange of spatial information –expected to be released as an international standard in 2007

Annotation(5) KML (Keyhole Markup Language) –Delevoped by Keyhole Corp. for the „EarthViewer“-Tool –Keyhole has been taken over by Google Inc. in 2004 –KML now used in connection with GoogleEarth –Visualisation of georeferenced data –Description of geometric figures, pictures and locations –Define view/perspective Examples later…

Infrastructure(1) 3-level architecture as considered by EU-initiative INSPIRE (Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe)

Infrastructure(2) Bottom level: (meta-)data sources –„Machinable“; read & interpret Medium level: (value-added) services –Independent from specific databases Top-Level: user-applications (GIS, browser, specialized services,…)  Requirement for common interfaces!

Visualisation(1) Context-specific representation / visualisation of results could effectively support the process of Data-Mining Geospatial coherence often deducible by use of adequate visualisation –Conformance between mental model and cognitive style often better than in a simple table-view.

Visualisation(2) Identification of a pump on „Broad Street“ as source of cholera epidemic; Dr. John Snow, 1854, London Example:

References(1) Wegener M, Fotheringham A., 2000, Spatial models and GIS: New Potential and New Models, London, Taylor & Francis Petras V., 2004, Statistical Analysis of Geographic and Language Clues in the MARC Record. Technical report for the „Going Places in the Catalog: Improved Geographical Access“ project, University of California, MetaCarta Inc. 2005, MetaCarta corporate brochure,

References(2) „INSPIRE Architecture and Standards Position Paper“, INSPIRE (Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe), European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Düren U., „XML, GML, NAS“, Landesvermessungsanstalt NRW /images/Vortraege_LDS_Kurs_40004_06/Dueren_LVermA_NRW/LDS_400 04_XML_GML_NAS.pdf /images/Vortraege_LDS_Kurs_40004_06/Dueren_LVermA_NRW/LDS_400 04_XML_GML_NAS.pdf W. Riekert, P. Treffler, 2000, „Georeferenzierung als Mittel zur Erschließung von Fachinformationen in Internet und Intranet“, 14. Int. Symposium Informatik im Umweltschutz