Molecular clocks and phylogenies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimating and using phylogenies
Advertisements

Classification of Organisms
D3.7 Evidence for evol part III jackie. Biochemical evidence provided by the universality of DNA and protein structures for the common ancestry of living.
Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution
Lecture 4: Phylogeny and the Tree of Life Campbell: Chapter 26
 Species evolve with significantly different morphological and behavioural traits due to genetic drift and other selective pressures.  Example – Homologous.
Tree of Life Chapter 26.
1 Chapter 25: Phylogeny and Systematics Valuable Information Can Be Derived From Classifying Organisms A parasitic flatworm, Schistosoma, causes a blood.
Phylogenetic Trees Systematics, the scientific study of the diversity of organisms, reveals the evolutionary relationships between organisms. Taxonomy,
Reconstructing and Using Phylogenies
Reconstructing and Using Phylogenies
Classification of Living Things. 2 Taxonomy: Distinguishing Species Distinguishing species on the basis of structure can be difficult  Members of the.
Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution
Systematics Study of the diversity of organisms to classify them and determine their evolutionary relationships Taxonomy: naming, identifying and classifying.
PHYLOGENY AND SYSTEMATICS
Chapter 26 – Phylogeny & the Tree of Life
BIOE 109 Summer 2009 Lecture 4- Part II Phylogenetic Inference.
Topic : Phylogenetic Reconstruction I. Systematics = Science of biological diversity. Systematics uses taxonomy to reflect phylogeny (evolutionary history).
 Fossil: Any non-living object obtained from the ground indicating the former presence of a living thing in a broad sense is a FOSSIL  Rock strata can.
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics
Chapter 3 Substitution Patterns Presented by: Adrian Padilla.
Give me some proof! Evidence for Evolution. 1. Studies of Fossils What are Fossils? –Fossils are any trace of dead organisms.
Classification and Systematics Tracing phylogeny is one of the main goals of systematics, the study of biological diversity in an evolutionary context.
Models of Molecular Evolution I Level 3 Molecular Evolution and Bioinformatics Jim Provan Page and Holmes: Sections 7.1 – 7.2.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture by Edward J. Zalisko PowerPoint Lectures for Campbell Biology: Concepts & Connections, Seventh Edition Reece, Taylor,
Ma.Luisa V. Cuaresma Biological Sciences Department Chapter 3 Evolution, Systematics and Phylogeny.
Warm-Up 1.Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. 2.What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to.
Systematics and the Phylogenetic Revolution Chapter 23.
Chapter 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Chapter 24: Molecular and Genomic Evolution CHAPTER 24 Molecular and Genomic Evolution.
25 Reconstructing and Using Phylogenies. 25 Phylogenetic Trees Steps in Reconstructing Phylogenies Reconstructing a Simple Phylogeny Biological Classification.
Phylogeny & the Tree of Life
PHYLOGENY AND THE TREE OF LIFE CH 26. I. Phylogenies show evolutionary relationships A. Binomial nomenclature: – Genus + species name Homo sapiens.
NEW TOPIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTION.
{ Early Earth and the Origin of Life Chapter 15.  The Earth formed 4.6 billion years ago  Earliest evidence for life on Earth  Comes from 3.5 billion-year-old.
Systematics and Phylogenetics Ch. 23.1, 23.2, 23.4, 23.5, and 23.7.
Ch. 26 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life. Opening Discussion: Is this basic “tree of life” a fact? If so, why? If not, what is it?
Phylogeny and Taxonomy. Phylogeny and Systematics The evolutionary history of a species or related species Reconstructing phylogeny is done using evidence.
 Phylogenetic trees and Cladograms are hypotheses. The only guarantee is that they will change as we gather and analyze more data. From Young and Strode.
Section 2: Modern Systematics
Systematics and Phylogenetic Revolution
Phylogeny & the Tree of Life
Classification of Organisms
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Section 2: Modern Systematics
In-Text Art, Ch. 16, p. 316 (1).
5.4 Cladistics.
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Biological Classification: The science of taxonomy
Biological Classification: The science of taxonomy
Part II: Evidence of Evolution.
What are the Patterns Of Nucleotide Substitution Within Coding and
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
D.5: Phylogeny and Systematics
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Chapter 25 Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Phylogeny and Systematics
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Phylogeny and the Tree of Life
Physical similarities are not always the result of close relationships.
TAXONOMY Early taxonomists classified all species as either plants or animals Later, five kingdoms were recognized: Monera (prokaryotes), Protista, Plantae,
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Warm-Up Contrast adaptive radiation vs. convergent evolution? Give an example of each. What is the correct sequence from the most comprehensive to least.
Evolution and Natural Selection
Evolution Biology Mrs. Johnson.
Presentation transcript:

Molecular clocks and phylogenies Genes and Evolution Molecular clocks and phylogenies Systematics A definition of taxonomy Phylogenies Characters and traits Homology and homoplasty Simple Phylogenies Molecular evolution Substitutions Synonymous and nonsynonymous Selection and neutral theory Molecular phylogenies Molecular clocks Adam Price

Defining Systematics and Taxonomy Systematics- the study of the diversity of organisms Taxonomy- the science of classification of organisms taxis = Greek to arrange, classify Why? Explains evolutionary relationships Intrinsically interested Underpins an understanding of biology- e.g. ecology, conservation Important in applications to human life

from Greek- phylon = tribe, race genesis = source Phylogeny- the history of descent of a group of organisms from a common ancestor from Greek- phylon = tribe, race genesis = source Conventionally represented by a phylogeneic tree Monkey Gorilla Chimpanzee Human Ferns Conifers Peas Rice

Phylogenic trees Phylogentic trees are based on comparison of traits individuals with common traits are placed together Character = a feature of the organisms (e.g. flower colour, height) Trait = one form of a character (blue flower colour, short height) Traits inherited from a common ancestor are termed homologous Traits that differs from the ancestor are termed derived Phylogenies are trees that best explain the distribution of homologous and derived traits in the organisms studied (the focal group).

Scoring traits to make a simple phylogeny

A simple phylogeny Relative evolutionary time Ancient events Hagfish Perch Salamander Lizard Crocodile Pigeon Mouse Chimpanzee Lungs Jaws Claws or nails Four-chambered heart Feathers Fur, mammary glands Relative evolutionary time Ancient events Recent events

Phylogenetic trees Outgroup Paraphyletic Polyphyletic Monophyletic Monophyletic taxa include all descendants of a common ancestor Paraphyletic taxa include some, but not all, descendants of a common ancestor Polyphyletic taxa includes members with more than one recent common ancestor Outgroup a lineage closely related to the focal group

The problem of homoplastic traits traits that appear similar but are not related through ancestry Convergent evolution- independent evolution of similar traits due to similar selection pressure (e.g. wings in birds and bats) Parallel evolution- independent evolution of common traits in organisms sharing distant relatives (e.g. patterns of butterfly wings). Evolutionary reversals- the loss of a derived trait (e.g. limbs of snakes, teeth of frogs).

Traits used in phylogenetics Morphology and developmental the importance of fossils Molecular Protein sequences Genetic markers DNA sequences

The advantages of molecular traits 1/ They directly reflect the underlying process of evolution- changes in the hereditary material 2/ There are a vast number of potential traits 3/ They can detect difference between very closely related organism (even those that show no phenotypic difference) 4/ They are not effected by the environment (unlike some morphological traits) 5/ Since mutations generally occur as random events with specific probabilities, the number of mutations can be used to calibrate evolutionary time (molecular clocks) Disadvantages ?

Transitions and Transversions in nucleotide substitutions Transitions replace a purine base with the other purine base, or a pyrimidine base with the other pyrimidine base Pyrimidines T  C C  T Purines A  G G  A Transversions replace a purine with a pyrimidine or vice versa T  A T  G C  A C  G A  T A  C G  T G  C A T C G Transition Transversion Transition mutations are about 2 x more common than transversions

Mutation in Coding vs Noncoding DNA A substantial part of the DNA of eukaryotes is noncoding- introns, repetitive sequences, pseudogenes Mutations in noncoding DNA do not generally effect phenotype and therefore are not subjected to selection Some mutations in coding regions do not change amino acid sequence because of the degenerate codon system Some mutations in coding regions change amino acid sequence to a similar type of amino acid, therefore having little or no effect on protein function

Substitutions in Coding regions Synonymous vs nonsynonymous substitutions Synonymous substitutions are those that do not change the amino acid that is specified by the gene CUU ----> CUC = Leucine -----> Leucine Nonsynonymous substitutions are those that change the amino acid chain specified There are various degrees of nonsynonymous mutations depending on there effect on protein function. When the mutation changes the amino acid to a similar type then function may be little effected. Some amino acids of proteins are more important than others- active sites for example. CUU ----> AUU = Leucine -----> Isoleucine

Substitutions in Coding regions Miss-sense substitutions Miss-sense substitutions are those that prematurely terminate the gene UAU ----> UAG = Tyrosine -----> Stop UUA ----> UAA = Leucine -----> Stop Generally rare since nearly always involved change in protein activity

Codon usage Second Letter First Letter

Synonymous mutations are more commonly fixed in evolution Nonsynonymous mutations

Different types of sequence evolve at different rates Fourfold degenerate sites Twofold degenerate sites Downstream regions Non-degenerate sites Animal mtDNA Upstream regions Pseudogenes Introns

Comparing amino acid sequences leu arg phe cys ser Sequence 1 Sequence 2 leu arg phe cys ser gap Sequence 1 Sequence 2 leu arg phe cys ser gap ile ala Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6

Comparing amino acid sequences leu arg phe cys ser gap ile ala Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5 Sequence 6 Sequence Number Differences Similarities

Cytochrome C- a highly conserved gene Hydrophobic side chains Acidic side chains Basic side chains

A molecular clock for Cytochrome c Angiosperms vs animals Yeast vs mould Insects vs vertebrates Mammals vs reptiles (per 100 residues) in cytochrome c Amino acid substitutions Birds vs reptiles Fish vs land vertebrates Amphibians vs birds and mammals Birds vs mammals Time since divergence (millions of years)

The Neutral Theory of molecular evolution Most mutations are either selectively neutral or nearly so. Thus, the genetic variation within species results from random genetic drift Consider population of size N with a neutral mutation rate at a locus of  mutations per gamete per generation No. of new mutations =  x 2N Probability of fixation by genetic drift = frequency, p = 1/2N Number of new mutations per generation that are likely to become fixed by genetic drift = no. of mutations x probability of fixation = 

Molecular clocks The rate of fixation of neutral mutations is equal to the neutral mutation rate Thus, sequences diverge in evolution at a constant rate Thus, the divergence between two sequences can be used to say when the two organisms diverged from each other But remember Not all mutations are neutral Not all loci change at the same rate Transitions are more common than transversions Rates are strictly based on generations (not years), and reproductive rates vary between species Therefore, all molecular clocks need calibrating

Calibration of -globin molecular clock Divergence of humans from other species based on -globin molecular clock calibrated on fossil evidence of divergence from cows Shark 600 Carp 500 Frog 400 Million years ago Chicken Alligator 300 200 Cow Quoll 100 Baboon Species Divergence based on molecular clock Divergence based on fossil record