A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits SRF performance has been rising every decade SRF installations for HEP (and other.
Advertisements

SRF Cryomodule Assembly Facility Plans Tug Arkan AAC, May 10-12, 2005.
1 Collaboration%20Meetings/SMTF%20Collaboration%20Meeting.
Advanced Energy Systems, Inc. FY 09 AES Phase I Crab Cavity SBIRs Michael Cole, Doug Holmes.
Industry and the ILC B Barish 16-Aug May-05ILC Consultations - Washington DC2 Why e + e - Collisions? elementary particles well-defined –energy,
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
ANL HWR Cryomodule Status Update 27 January 2015 Zachary Conway On behalf of the ANL Linac Development Group Argonne National Laboratory Physics Division.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
An SRF Single Cavity Horizontal Test Facility Tom Peterson, Fermilab May 10, 2005.
US Cavities Status and Plan Mark Champion 01 October 2009.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
ANL-FNAL Collaboration Meeting: Superconducting RF ANL: Mike Kelly, Scott Gerbick, Bill Boettinger (NE) FNAL Collaborators: Kerry Ewald, Cristian Boffo,
Superconducting Cavities Development at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Dmitri Denisov DIET Federation Roundtable, Washington DC, April
Shekhar Mishra, Fermilab Mark J. Oreglia, Univ. of Chicago
ATLAS Intensity and Efficiency Upgrade ATLAS USERS MEETING Speaker: Mike Kelly Physics Division May 15, 2014.
Americas S0 Plan in USA Shekhar Mishra Fermilab/GDE US Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS.
F Status and Plans for SRF Facility Sergei Nagaitsev May 18, 2007.
E. Doyle 7/20/06 rev 9/13/06 1 / 16RF Coupler Assembly Facility SLAC TTF3 Coupler Assembly Facility Specifications Based on TESLA facility built at LAL,
Update on SRF Activities at Argonne Mike Kelly, Peter Ostroumov, Mark Kedzie, Scott Gerbick (PHY) Tom Reid, Ryan Murphy (HEP) Thomas Proslier, Jeff Klug,
Status of cavity fabrication facility at KEK H. Hayano, KEK Cavity Industrialization Study at KEK Superconducting RF Cavity Technology and Industrialization.
STF EP, VT commissioning by FNAL AES001 H. Hayano, KEK
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
SRF Plans at ANL & FNAL Bob Kephart ILC Program Director, Fermilab ANL-FNAL-U of C Collaboration Meeting Oct 12, 2009.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
SRF Test Infrastructure in Europe W. Weingarten with O. Brunner, S. Calatroni, B. Vullierme (CERN) and R. Eichhorn, E. Elsen, D. Gardès, J. Knobloch, G.
January 25, 2002David Finley to FARDOG using Harry Carter’s Slides Slide 1 Update to FARDOG: Technical Division Xband Activities Fermilab NLC Activities.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal Shekhar Mishra (Hasan Padamsee, John Mammosser, Mike Kelly) For the WBS 9 Collaboration.
Advanced Energy Systems, Inc. Prototype Cavity Fabrication & Test Presented by Ilan Ben-Zvi, BNL for Michael Cole, AES.
Americas Region: T4CM Status and Plans H. Carter TD SRF Dev. Dept. July 14, 2006.
Status of U.S. Cavity & Cryomodule Industrialization Bob Kephart LCWS10/GDE Beijing, March, 2010.
Revised SPL-study work-plan W. Weingarten 3 May 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program Manager Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
SRF Processing at ANL: Progress and Plans ANL: Mike Kelly, Scott Gerbick FNAL: Dan Olis, Allan Rowe Speaker: Mike Kelly November 17, 2008.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
Americas Cavity Specification C.M. Ginsburg (Fermilab) On behalf of the Fermilab cavity crew October 20, 2010.
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
ILC Americas Cavity and Cryomodule R&D Shekhar Mishra ILC Program Fermilab Talk presented at DOE Annual Program Review Breakout Sessions – Wednesday, May.
F Fermilab ANL/FNAL SCPF EP/HPR Processing Status and Plan Allan Rowe TD/SRFDD.
CRAB for HL-LHC KEK activity 2010DEC Yoshiyuki MORITA.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Proton Driver Resources & Schedule (R&D Plan) Rich Stanek May 10, 2005.
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Mark Champion 17 June 2008.
U.S. Plan for Cavity Production Bob Kephart ALCPG09/GDE Sep 30, 2009.
Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Global Design Effort CFS EDR Kick-Off Mtg, FNAL Aug 22 – 24, CFS EDR FNAL Kick-Off Planning.
Argonne Accelerator Institute Activites Rod Gerig Argonne May 18, 2007 Presentation to the Fermilab-Argonne Directors’ Collaboration Meeting.
Status of Project X Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Winter Meeting - March 1, 2011.
High power RF tests places at CERN O. Brunner, CERN 4th SPL Collaboration Meeting jointly with ESS.
High Intensity Neutrino Source Program Overview for CD Controls Management Meeting Bob Webber October 6, 2006.
1 Hasan Padamsee Cornell University Technical Goals of the Collaboration, U.S. SRF Infrastructure & Deliverables.
UK X-FEL National Laboratory Perspective Susan Smith STFC ASTeC IoP PAB/STFC Workshop Towards a UK XFEL 16 th February 2016.
Status of TTF3 Coupler Assembly Program November 26, 2007 Jeff Tice.
Centrifugal Barrel Polishing at Fermilab (Tuesday, December 6th at 10:20) Tesla Technology Collaboration IHEP, Beijing December 5 th -8 th, 2011.
Cavity Processing for 
Update on S0 Work in the Americas Region Camille Ginsburg (FNAL) 2 June 2009 Slides/Info from: Zack Conway (Cornell) Rongli Geng (JLab) Genfa Wu, Dmitri.
1 Project X Workshop November 21-22, 2008 Richard York Chris Compton Walter Hartung Xiaoyu Wu Michigan State University.
SRF Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Fermilab. Overview Charge: Does the laboratory make effective use of collaboration and existing SRF capabilities at other.
N. Dhanaraj 1 Single Cell Program - Status Single Cell Program - Status March 1, 2007 Thursday.
SRF Test Facilities – Functions and Costs Alexander Romanenko Test Facilities Review 17 Mar 2015.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Jefferson.
SRF Advances for ATLAS and Other 
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Status and plans for the 3.9 GHz section of XFEL
ILC R&D Board Meeting: SRF Cavities Status and Plans
Energy (ILC) and Intensity (Project X) SRF Cavity Needs
ANL Proposal to Perform Electropolishing for the ILC
Prospect of Indo-US Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Joint ANL/FNAL Cavity Surface Processing Facility May 11, 2005 Speaker: Mike Kelly

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 2 Why Build a Joint Cavity Processing Facility? ANL Fermilab SMTF and International Linear Collider (ILC) 8 GeV Proton Injector Rare Isotope Accelerator 4 th Generation Light Source Beta~0.1 Beta=1  There has been a convergence of interest in the past decade between the low- and high-beta communities  (1) Techniques needed to achieve state-of-the-art are similar  (2) We are filling in the region between low- and high-beta with new cavity types Low and high-beta groups have operated independently

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 3 Participants: Fermilab Argonne (Physics Division) Design, Development, Operation Ken Shepard Michael Kelly Mark Kedzie Zachary Conway Joel Fuerst *Acknowledgment Kwang-Je Kim (ANL) Design and Development Cristian Boffo – Tech. Div. Gerry Davis – Tech. Div. Luciano Elementi – Tech. Div. Yuri Terechkine – Tech. Div. Dan Assell – Tech. Div. Dean Connelly – Tech. Div. Operation Allan Rowe – Acc. Div. Wade Muranyi – Acc. Div. Mike Heinz – Acc. Div. Mike Rauchmiller – Acc. Div. Marco Battisoni – Tech. Div.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 4 Fermilab BCP at the Joint Processing Facility 3 rd Harmonics Multi-cell TESLA 9-cell cavity Deflecting Mode  Fermilab’s BCP design is driven by the requirements to process the 1.3 GHz Tesla 9-cell cavities

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 5 ANL Prototype Cavities for RIA 0.1<  < MHz  =0.5 Triple-spoke 345 MHz  =0.62 Triple-spoke 115 MHz  =0.15 Quarter-wave 172 MHz  =0.24 Half-wave 345 MHz  =0.4 Double-spoke 325 MHz  =0.22 Single-spoke Spoke Cavities for the Fermilab Proton Driver

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 6 Background  Construction and operation is jointly funded by Argonne and Fermilab  Location: Argonne National Laboratory, Building 208, B101 (2000 ft 2 high-bay)  2005 is the final year of a 3 year construction phase  Capital cost: ~$1 million  ANL funding from the laboratory director’s discretionary funds (LDRD)  Fermilab funding from lab discretionary funds

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 7 (Processing of the rf surface is at the heart of cavity performance) A Joint ANL/FNAL Cavity Processing Facility  Buffered Chemical Polishing (BCP)  Electropolishing (EP)  Ultrasonic cleaning  Ultrapure high-pressure water rinsing  Cleanroom assembly of rf devices (single cavities, couplers) Can provide a valuable support facility for SMTF at Fermilab Comprehensive surface processing capability for SC cavities and related hardware using:

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 8 Layout, Design and Principal Areas  Two large sealed chemistry areas with a large air scrubber  Remotely controlled BCP and EP operations  A large clean anteroom (gowning & ultrasonic cleaning of hardware)  Two separate class 100 or better clean areas with a dedicated high pressure rinse capability

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 9 Layout: ANL/FNAL Cavity Processing Facility 60 feet ANL Chemistry Room Fermilab Chemistry Room Scrubber Anteroom Mezzanine ANL Cleanroom FNAL Cleanroom

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 10 Phase I: The Joint ANL/FNAL Chemistry Facility Chemical Processing Rooms Air Scrubber

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 11 Chemistry Room Hardware Installation of Cavity Etching Hood 3/25/05

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 12 Fermilab BCP Apparatus Fermilab BCP Control Panel 13 feet Cristian Boffo – Tech. Div. Luciano Elementi – Tech. Div. Yuri Terechkine – Tech. Div.

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 13 Facility Status: Chemistry Rooms  External structure complete (Fall 2004)  Internal hoods and ductwork largely complete  A preliminary test of a Fermi BCP apparatus complete; this hardware will be reassembled shortly at ANL  Memorandum of understanding to be drafted (May 2005) - Operations and maintenance of the facility  Safety documentation to be drafted and presented to ANL safety (May 2005). This will be done separately for each laboratory  A full ANL safety committee review of ANL operations summer 2005 followed by an ANL safety committee review of FNAL operations  Full chemistry room operations are planned for fall 2005 (by ANL) and for early 2006 (by FNAL)

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 14 Facility Status: Clean room, water system  Ultra pure DI water system contract will be awarded (May 2005)  Mezzanine and floor preparation out for bids; complete in June 2005  Clean room bid package is complete; potential contractors are identified  Clean room construction scheduled for August 2005

Pioneering Science and Technology Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy ACC Review May 10-12, 2005 Michael Kelly, ANL Physics Division 15 Summary comments: The new Joint Cavity Processing Facility will  Provide a state-of-the-art cavity processing capability for SMTF and several large projects requiring both beta=1 and reduced beta cavities  Expand and/or develop the technical expertise needed to produce high performance superconducting rf cavities  Provide for an interchange and collaboration between those working toward the ILC and other development groups