Carolina Neutrino Workshop 20041 Prospects for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source Vince Cianciolo, ORNL for the SNS Collaboration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SNS Spallation Neutrino Source 1 SNS layout GeV proton linear accelerator Accumulator ring Main target Stripping foil.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
MINOS sensitivity to dm2 and sin2 as a function of pots. MINOS sensitivity to theta13 as a function of pots Precision Neutrino Oscillation Physics with.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
A Muon Veto for the Ultra Cold Neutron Asymmetry Experiment Vince Bagnulo with Dr. Jeff Martin Electrons Ultra Cold Neutrons Cosmic Ray Muons Protons Pions.
Search for spontaneous muon emission from lead nuclei with OPERA bricks M. Giorgini, V. Popa Bologna Group OPERA Collaboration Meeting, LNGS, 19-22/05/2003.
Is B s 0 production by neutrino interactions interesting? Presented at the Super-B factory workshop as an alternative approach Nickolas Solomey 21 April.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
Directional Detectors and Digital Calorimeters Ed Norbeck and Yasar Onel University of Iowa For the 25 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics Big Sky,
Status of TACTIC: A detector for nuclear astrophysics Alison Laird University of York.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
The neutrons detection involves the use of gadolinium which has the largest thermal neutron capture cross section ever observed. The neutron capture on.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
10/24/2005Zelimir Djurcic-PANIC05-Santa Fe Zelimir Djurcic Physics Department Columbia University Backgrounds in Backgrounds in neutrino appearance signal.
A feasibility study for the detection of SuperNova explosions with an Undersea Neutrino Telescope A. Leisos, A. G. Tsirigotis, S. E. Tzamarias Physics.
1 Neutrino Possibilities at the SNS 2 Motivation For me as an experimentalist motivation is two fold On this workshop we have nice theory talks about.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
HARP for MiniBooNE Linda R. Coney Columbia University DPF 2004.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 SNS 2 Meeting Opening Remarks, Purpose Glenn R. Young Physics Division, ORNL August 28,
Using Reactor Anti-Neutrinos to Measure sin 2 2θ 13 Jonathan Link Columbia University Fermilab Long Range Planning Committee, Neutrino Session November.
Stellar Neutrino Studies at the Spallation Neutron Source (Oak Ridge) (SNS) 2 NuFact 03 - June 10 th Or study of neutrino nucleus cross sections at veeery.
SNS2 Workshop August 28-29, 2003 Richard Talaga, Argonne1 Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector Outline –OMNIS Experiment and Detectors.
-NUCLEUS INTERACTIONS OPEN QUESTIONS and FUTURE PROJECTS Cristina VOLPE Institut de Physique Nucléaire Orsay, France.
MiniBooNE Michel Sorel (Valencia U.) for the MiniBooNE Collaboration TAUP Conference September 2005 Zaragoza (Spain)
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #3 Wednesday, Jan. 22, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.How is neutrino beam produced? 2.Physics.
1 Neutrino-nucleus cross section measurements at the SNS Yu Efremenko 1.Supernovae and neutrinos  SNS overview 3.Potential instruments & physics reaction.
CTF at Gran Sasso (overview of the hardware) Richard Ford (SNOLAB) (who has not been in the collaboration since 2004) March 19 th 2010.
Neutrino-­nucleus (nucleon) Reaction Measurement by J-PARC MLF sterile neutrino search experiment (J-PARC P56) Takasumi Maruyama (KEK) for J-PARC P56 working.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
1 Performance and Physics with the CsI(Tl) Array at the Kuo-Sheng Reactor Neutrino Laboratory  Physics with CsI(Tl) detector  Period -2 configuration.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
Low Z Detector Simulations
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Febr.28-March 2, 2006N Nbar project at VEPP The project to measure the nucleon form factors at VEPP-2000 Workshop - e+e- collisions from phi to psi,
Status of MiniBooNE Short Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jonathan Link Columbia University International Conference on Flavor Physics October.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Cherenkov Tracking Calorimeters D. Casper University of California, Irvine.
May 26-27, 2005Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy1 KOPIO Beam Catcher Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U.) Contents –What is Beam Catcher? –Concept.
Monday, Mar. 3, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #12 Monday, Mar. 3, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Measurements 1.Atmospheric.
Summary of radiation shielding studies for MTA Muon production at the MiniBooNE target Igor Rakhno August 24, 2006.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Cristina VOLPE BETA-BEAMS The beta-beam concept The baseline scenario The physics potential Conclusions LOW ENERGY BETA-BEAMS A N D The idea Motivation.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Proton Driver Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab MAP Collaboration Meeting June 20, 2013.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
MiniBooNE: Status and Plans Outline Physics motivation Beamline performance Detector performance First look at the data Conclusions Fernanda G. Garcia,
PROJECT X PHYSICS STUDY WORKSHOP (PXPS 2012) Working Group on Time of Flight Conveners: Mike Albrow (FNAL) & Bob Wagner (ANL) New directions in fast timing:
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
Report (2) on JPARC/MLF-12B025 Gd(n,  ) experiment TIT, Jan.13, 2014 For MLF-12B025 Collaboration (Okayama and JAEA): Outline 1.Motivation.
Bubble Chamber A novel technique for measuring thermonuclear rates at low energies Rashi TalwarAPS April Meeting 2016.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
R. Tayloe, Indiana U. DNP06 1 A Search for  → e oscillations with MiniBooNE MiniBooNE does not yet have a result for the  → e oscillation search. The.
the s process: messages from stellar He burning
Calibration, Simulations, and “Remaining” Issues
Neutron Detection with MoNA LISA
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
Presentation transcript:

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Prospects for Neutrino Physics at the Spallation Neutron Source Vince Cianciolo, ORNL for the SNS Collaboration

Carolina Neutrino Workshop The Spallation Neutron Source Proton beam current:1 mA Proton beam energy:1 GeV Protons/pulse:~1.6  Pulse rate: 60 Hz Pulse length:380 ns (FWHM) Operating hours/year:5000 Proton target material: Mercury Neutrinos/pulse/flavor: ~1.6  Neutrino-target interactions/year:few thousand Neutrino! Repeat 60/sec.  x ~1000  LINAC: Accumulator Ring: A ++ -- ~99% ++   e e+e+ p

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Time Structure Decays with t 1/2 = t 1/2 = 26 ns  Next pulse arrives in 16,000,000 ns! Turning the detector on for only a few  s after each pulse reduces cosmic- ray background by ~ x2, km water-equivalent. Leaving the detector off for the first  s after a pulse effectively eliminates machine-related backgrounds. –Also eliminates clean neutral- current events. –Whether sufficient background rejection can be achieved w/o this cut (through shielding and detector techniques) is under study. Decays with t 1/2 = t 1/2 = 2.2  s 

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Energy Spectra Neutrino spectra at stopped-pion facilities have significant overlap with the spectra of neutrinos generated in a supernova explosion! SNS neutrino spectraSupernova neutrino spectra, 100 ms post-bounce

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Scientific Motivation Core-collapse supernovae. Neutrino detector calibration. Nuclear structure (complement to RIA). National Research Council Report by the Committee on the Physics of the Universe

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Core Collapse Supernovae Most spectacular explosions in the universe. (R. Hix) Birthplace of most “heavy” elements – we are stardust. The core of a supernova is so dense it is black to neutrinos. Since there are so many of them they play a crucial role in the explosion and the accompanying nucleosynthesis. Knowledge of A cross-sections for A<120 is crucial when attempting to make accurate supernova models.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Neutrino Detector Calibration Large-scale detectors exist or are proposed to measure supernovae neutrinos. In order to make full use of their data, calibrations of neutrino interactions in the detector materials are required. Integral cross-sections insufficient. –Differential cross-sections (vs. energy, angle) are crucial. –Neutral-current interactions also very important.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Nuclear Structure A cross section measurements provide important information to constrain nuclear structure models. Reasonable extrapolations away from measured nuclei can be made for ~  N<8,  P<8 (up to shell boundaries). The plot shows extrapolation regions relative to 8 of the ~36 feasible target materials. –Rather complete coverage in a few years!

Carolina Neutrino Workshop SNS Goal: Precision A Cross Section Measurements Build a facility that will allow a total cross section measurement with  <10% in one year.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Feasibility A suitable location has been identified. Floor-loading calculations have been performed. Total capacity = 545 tons. –Allows for 1 meter ceiling, ½ meter walls. –Together with SNS time structure, active veto provides sufficient rejection of cosmic-ray background. SNS management has provided encouraging response and is empanelling a review committee.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Bunker, Active Veto Active veto (  > 99%) required to reduce cosmic muons. Time structure plus passive shield reduces cosmogenic and machine- related neutron backgrounds sufficiently. –1m thick ceiling;½-m thick walls –4.5 x 4.5 x 6.5 m 3 total vol.  3.5 x 3.5 x 5.5 m 3 inside shield. Remaining volume large enough to house two 10-ton fiducial target/detectors. S Detector 1 20 t Detector 2 20 t Shielding Veto

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Segmented Detector Designed to handle metals or other solid targets. Targets – thin wall pipes, easily replaced. Active detector – straw gas tubes. Mass of the sensitive part of the detector is less than target mass. Reconstruct tracks and count # of fired tubes: –  E ~ 30% –   ~ 15 degrees Particle ID through e.g., # of fired tubes, track linearity, energy deposition. e

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Homogeneous Detector “Standard” technology –  Boone Suitable for transparent liquid targets, e.g., d, C, N, O, I, Br, Pb Light detection by PMT or PD ~38% PMT coverage allows for either scintillator or Cerenkov detection.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Timescale Commissioning could reasonably begin when machine power approaches design value (end of CY08).

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Collaboration Robust collaboration. –>30 members, more welcome! –Next collaboration meeting to be held June at ORNL. Assembled study report that discusses all elements of this talk in greater detail. –Will form the basis for input to the APS Neutrino Working Group –Copies available at back of room, on the web.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Conclusions The SNS provides a unique opportunity to study low- energy (10’s of MeV) A interactions. –Pulsed time structure. –Intensity. Building a A facility at the SNS is feasible. –Sufficient intensity. –Suitable location. –SNS Management encouragement. Addresses broad range of physics interests. –Understanding the supernova explosion mechanism. –Calibration of neutrino detectors. –Nuclear structure complementary to RIA.

Carolina Neutrino Workshop Neutrino oscillations at the SNS ORLAND Redux If MiniBoone confirms LSND result, the SNS would be a logical place to follow up. Low backgrounds due to absorption of the vast majority of e s in mercury target. If nSNS goes forward there will already be a near detector to quantify the remaining backgrounds. Very precise measurement of oscillation parameters possible.