Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council 31 July 2014 ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONS OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES KEY POINTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUDGET REVISION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UCLA Conference in Honor of Professor Armen Alchian May 6, 2006 Growth and Poverty Reduction in Armenia: Achievements and Challenges Enrique Gelbard, International.
Advertisements

Progress in Economic Reform in Syria Peter Young Adam Smith International Focus on Syria Conference 2007.
4.5 Government Economic Policy
FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY OF STATE GOVERNMENT Presentation Prepared for the Appropriations Committee and the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee by the.
Recent Developments in the Region and Macedonia Opening of the NBRM-WB PIC Alexander Tieman 16 December, 2010.
The Polish economy in 2002 Frigyes Ferdinand Heinz Research Office (London) Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd.
Revision of the macroeconomic projections for 2011 Dimitar Bogov Governor August, 2011.
Quarterly revision of the macroeconomic projections Quarterly revision of the macroeconomic projections Dimitar Bogov Governor January, 2013.
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council 27 October 2014 ASSESSMENT OF THE BILL AMENDING THE LAW ON THE 2014 BUDGET OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA.
ECONOMIC ISSUES 2014 FISCAL DEVELOPMENTS AND POLICY Ljubljana, July Lejla Fajić IMAD (In cooperation with: M. Bednaš, U. Brodar, G. Caprirolo, B.
Modernising government budget operations: Case studies from Europe Lewis Hawke World Bank The Exchange Abu Dhabi, UAE May 13-15, 2013.
NGUYEN THI HANH LE MA3N0221 VIETNAM’S ECONOMY. ECONOMIC OVERVIEW ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.
Key Policies Improving Business and Investment Climate Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić, MA.
The Russian Default of 1998 A case study of a currency crisis Francisco J. Campos, UMKC 10 November 2004.
C A U S E S International factors: -Increased Access to Capital at Low Interest Rates -Heavily borrow -Access to artificially cheap credit -Global finance.
Macroeconomic Policy and Floating Exchange Rates
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth: Lessons for Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
Fiscal Policy. The Government Budget Constraint The Arithmetic of Deficits and Debt –The budget deficit in year t equals: is the government debt at.
Proposed Fiscal Consolidation Measures Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council 30 May 2012.
Macroeconomic Outlook Trends and Challenges Igor Luksic Minister of Finance.
1998 Russian Crisis Group 8 Nery Lemus Wilmer Molina Omer Erinal Mollah Yerima.
ACTIVITIES OF SUPPORTING SMES DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM
Governmental Opportunities and Constraints
Tough choices ahead Illustrating the choices and trade-offs in the next spending review Kayte Lawton and Amna Silim September 2012.
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council May 23, 2013 BUDGET IMPLEMENTATION, ASSESSMENT OF GOVERNMENT’S MEASURES AND FISCAL COUNCIL’S PROPOSAL FOR PUBLIC FINANCES.
Capital Market Development in Montenegro Igor Luksic Minister of Finance.
Business Survey 2013 Belgrade November 13, Business Survey 2013.
L E A D E R S H I P  P R O B L E M SO L V I N G  V A L U E C R E A T I O N © Copyright Alvarez & Marsal Holdings, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Alvarez.
Pension Systems in Times of Financial Crises: Serbia
FINANCIAL AND REAL ECONOMY CRISIS AND STATE AID The case of Lithuania Jurgita Ratkeviciute Head of State Aid Division Competition Council.
Dr Odysseas Michaelides Auditor General of the Republic June 2014 The role of the SAIs in times of economic crisis Audit Office of the Republic of Cyprus.
Macro Economic Framework for Economic Growth Renzo Daviddi European Commission Liaison Office to Kosovo 8 June 2010.
Annual Meeting of INTOSAI Public Debt Working Group Nadi, Republic of Fiji Islands July 24-25, 2008 RECOMMENDATIONS ON XIX INCOSAI THEME 1 “MANAGEMENT,
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council June 17, 2015 FISCAL CONSOLIDATION IN 2015 AND MAIN CHALLENGES FOR REFORMS.
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
Vietnam Budget Reform over and Intentions over Content (3 parts): 1.Fiscal – budget reforms initiatives making important contribution.
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council July 4, 2013 ASSESSMENT OF BUDGET REBALANCE, STRUCTURAL REFORMS PROPOSAL AND FUTURE FISCAL TRENDS.
Fiscal Policy in 2008 Belgrade, November 12, 2007.
Annual Growth Survey What is the AGS? A communication, which sets out the economic and social priorities for the EU in 2013 Launches the next European.
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council November 26, 2013 EVALUATION OF THE DRAFT 2014 BUDGET AND FISCAL STRATEGY FOR
The Euro’s Growing Pains Antonio de Lecea European Union Delegation to the United States of America ________________________________________________________________________.
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council September 13, 2012 ASSESSMENT OF THE 2012 SUPPLEMENTARY BUDGET AND DRAFT LAWS INCLUDING FISCAL EFFECTS.
Economic Challenges in the Federated States of Micronesia International Monetary Fund October 2005.
Executive Office for Administration and Finance State House Rooms 373 & 272 Boston, MA FY2012 Budget Hearings Slide Presentation For The Executive.
Latvia: One Year into the IMF Program David Moore IMF Resident Representative in Latvia Latvijas Ekonomistu asociācija, March 5, 2010.
Eesti Pank Bank of Estonia Andres Sutt Estonian Economy - on the course for soft landing? October 25, 2007.
Dollarization on El Salvador Team Members Nixon Orellana Mike Scott.
The Economy How can we determine how the economy is doing overall? How does government try to help when things are not going well?
1 Brussels, Belgium, December 14-15, 2010 Policy Responses of the Western Balkans Countries to the Global Economic Crisis and Their Social and Labor Market.
Addressing the Medium- and Long- run Challenges: the Overall Policy Framework Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance Republic of Bulgaria May 2007.
IGCSE®/O Level Economics
Circular Flow Model and Economic Activity
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council December 8, 2015 ASSESSMENT OF THE DRAFT LAW ON BUDGET OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA FOR 2016.
Fiscal Policy Activities 30b by Advanced Placement Economics Teacher Resource Manual. National Council on Economic Education, New York, N.Y.
Financing the Government. Taxes and Revenue Progressive tax – the higher the income, the higher the rate Payroll taxes – taxes matched by employers Regressive.
MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN ( ) Date : 8/10/2010 Decision No : 2010/28.
Economic Challenges of Bulgaria Lecture at the Military Academy of Sofia, July 17, 2003 by Piritta Sorsa, IMF representative in Bulgaria.
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR DR. DANIELA BOBEVA BULGARIAN CONTEXT IN TEACHING INTERNATIONAL ECONOMY.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter 15: Fiscal Policy, Deficits, and Debt Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
FISCAL POLICY AND THE FEDERAL BUDGET. Key Concept: Government influences the economy by: Collecting Spending and Borrowing money.
A Report on the Status & Reforms of the Iranian Tax System.
Objective 1.02 Understand economic conditions 1 Understand the role of business in the global economy.
Choose a country and explain why they may have seen a rise in their fiscal deficit – create a short report on the country.
SWEDEN BY BEN DAVIDSON, EUGENE THONG, JESSIE YEUN, AMY CHIN AND JOSIE TUFF.
Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council June 20, 2016 FISCAL TRENDS IN 2016 CONSOLIDATION AND REFORM
BULGARIAN ECONOMY - OPPORTUNITIES AND PERSPECTIVES
Assessment of the Budget Proposal for 2018
YEAR 2011 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION
Demand Side Policies Fiscal Policy -1. Learning Outcomes -Explain the Government primarily earns revenue from taxes (direct & indirect). -Explain Government.
Bulgaria – Capital Budgeting And Fiscal Institutions
Presentation transcript:

Republic of Serbia Fiscal Council 31 July 2014 ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATIONS OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES KEY POINTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BUDGET REVISION AND MEDIUM-TERM FISCAL ADJUSTMENT:

Three pillars of fiscal consolidation 1.Reforms – adoption of laws that will lay the foundation for stable public finances in the medium term −Law on Pension and Disability Insurance, Law on Labour (economy, but also the basis for public enterprises and public administration), Law on Privatization (restructuring)… −Positive assessment, but the biggest challenge is yet to come (downsizing of employees), savings will not be made immediately 2.Bringing order in public and state-owned enterprises – the most difficult and uncertain −Huge problems: political (interest groups) and professional (redundant employees and their benefits, uncollected payment for services, inadequate prices, etc.) – there is still no adequate plan for addressing these issues −If this is not done, there will be an explosion of public expenditure and failure of consolidation 3.Establishing a sustainable level of budget expenditure −Suplementary budget: a step towards reducing the huge deficit and eliminating the biggest imbalances 2

Public and state-owned enterprises are the biggest problem Already incurred a large fiscal cost (1 billion euros annually) – And it keeps growing; unless reversed, it will make all savings useless Srbijagas – It has already spent the state funds equal to the value of Telekom and continues to generate losses – Network of problems – the problem is not only Srbijagas, but also Azotara, Petrohemija, MSK, city heating plants…that do not pay for gas EPS – Numerous problems, not only low prices but also redundant employees, poor payment collection, organisational fragmentation, losses in distribution (thefts)… beginning of liquidity problems, now the floods – new Srbijagas? – Other public enterprises have similar problems, but the operations of EPS are measured in hundreds of millions of euros, which is too much for public finances Serbian Railways – There is no progress for decades - huge government subsidies spent, the 19 th century train speed, project funds not withdrawn – Huge system (20,000 employees) with problems, together with EPS nearly 60,000 employees out of the total of 250,000 in all public and state-owned enterprises 3

High deficit in over 2.6 billion euros (8.3% of GDP) Projected deficit of 2.5 billion euros has been exceeded for about 150 million euros – Combined result of drop in revenues of about 400 million euros and decrease in expenditures of about 250 million euros Public revenue shortfall is primarily the result of changed macroeconomic environment (objectively) – Extremely low inflation (2% instead of expected 5% - lower public revenue), recession and larger drop in formal employment than projected – Missing and budgeted effects of combating grey economy (unrealistically planned) Public expenditures were under control – Finally stopped salary increase above indexation (there are savings) – positive – Inefficient execution of public investment – negative 4

Public debt at the end of the year over 70% of GDP In countries like Serbia – even a significantly lower level of public debt leads to a crisis – It is difficult to reverse the growth of public debt – it will reach 80% of GDP (even with substantial cuts) – Creditors can easily lose confidence - a crisis of public debt Large public debt is not the only risk – Annually over 5 billion euros (17% of GDP) needed to finance deficit and pay due debt – According to international standards – there is a risk of crisis with due payments of over 15% of GDP Stopping the growth of public debt share in GDP - fiscal consolidation – Investors need to see a credible plan for medium-term adjustment and stopping of public debt growth in order to continue lending money 5

Fiscal consolidation –2 billion euros of savings In order to stabilise the public debt by 2017, the deficit must be reduced to below 1 billion euros (from the current amount exceeding 2.6 billion euros) – However, some expenditures will be growing: payment of interests (as long as there is a growth of public debt) and public investment (currently insufficient) – Required savings of nearly 2 billion euros – Reforms and improvement of public finances are required, but "painful" cuts cannot be avoided (there are no easy solutions) Serbia’s credibility is low and adjustment of 2 billion euros is possible only in the medium term – New arrangements with the IMF required 6

Possible savings (million EUR) Time of full effectCurrent situationRisks Public and state-owned enterprises 400 – 500Next 3 to 4 yearsUnfavourable – problems are rapidly increasing instead of decreasing High – professional (plan and downsizing of employees, appropriate prices, collection of receivables, technical improvements and investment, etc.) and political (interest groups) Cutting salaries and pensions by 15% Pending political decisionLow – possible exemption from salary cuts for individual public sector categories Combating grey economy 300 – 350Next 2 to 3 yearsInitiated personnel changes in the Tax Administration, some positive effects are already noticeable: increased collection of contributions and excise tax on oil products, decreased revenue from cigarette excise taxes Moderate – presently on the right track, but major challenges still lie ahead Reforms (of earnings and employment, pension reforms, etc.) 300 – 400Next 2 to 3 years, longer for pension reform Adopted the reform Law on Pension and Disability Insurance; the central registry data are being prepared; beginning of the salary grade scale reform announced for autumn; there is no information about downsizing plans at the local level, in the sectors of health care, education, state administration, etc. Low – for pension reform Moderate – for salary grade scale High – for redundancies Total ≈ 1,900By 2017Unfavourable – trends of deficit, enhanced problems of public enterprises Favourable – still low interest rates, political environment The highest risk – bringing order in the business operations of public enterprises

Fiscal consolidation must be comprehensive It is futile to cut salaries and pensions without solving the issue of public and state- owned enterprises (∙∙∙∙∙). It is insufficient to solve the issue of public enterprises without cutting salaries and pensions (----); it is necessary to do both ( ─ ). In order to stabilise the public debt, it is necessary to reduce salaries and pensions by 15% smaller reduction of salaries and pensions would require additional adjustment measures, most probably further tax increase – an inferior measure 8

Fiscal consolidation and growth The major deficit adjustment (3% of GDP) in the first year of consolidation (2015) – Front-loading – Each successful fiscal consolidation has the biggest deficit reduction in the first year – Important for entire programme credibility - a smaller deficit makes the continued fiscal consolidation less risky - will be rewarded with confidence – Political economy – it’s now or never Strong deficit reduction leads to reduced economic activity, which can be mitigated – Fiscal consolidation of 3% of GDP would lead to a temporary drop of GDP by roughly 1% – If not mitigated = deflation and recession  failure of programme – It can be avoided with a broader package of fiscal and monetary policy measures to boost economic activity – Positive effect on economic growth from increased public investment (recovery after the flood), business environment (Law on Construction, etc.), attracting investors, perhaps considering fiscal and credit incentives 9

Public revenue in 2014 Revenue shortfall of about 50 billion dinars 30 to 35 billion objectively, due to changed economic circumstances – Inflation below the lower bound: 2-2.5% against the projected 5.5% – Greater drop in employment: 1.5% against the expected 0.7% – Economic recession, floods 20 billion dinars due to optimistic budgeting – Revenue from grey economy included in advance; however, measures have not been implemented in the first half of the year The 2013 trend of weakening tax discipline has been stopped – Efficiency of VAT collection unchanged compared to 2013 – Collection of payments for contribution partially improved – Pace of excise tax collection is extremely divergent 10

Excise tax revenue A large growth of excise tax collection recorded for oil products A large drop recorded for tobacco products 11 Oil products Tobacco

Combating grey economy One of conditions for fiscal consolidation and sustainable economic growth It is possible to increase revenue by 350 million euros by 2017 It requires a systemic approach and political support −Ad hoc measures implemented in 2013, attracting media attention, are not the right solution Some progress has already been made ​​, but substantial efforts are still needed −Personnel improvements, more efficient control system −Coordination of tax authorities, inspections, judiciary 12

State-owned enterprises Revenues are not sufficient even for salaries Illiquidity −Explosion of short-term debt and spillover to the state Failure to collect payment for supplied goods and covering debts of loss-generating enterprises Low sales prices of goods and services −Imposed social function High number of employees and mass of earnings −Number of employees, salaries, 13 th salary, bonuses, loans Public procurement −Possible savings Low investment −Lagging behind for decades Poor management, party management −Inappropriate selection of management, sponsorship, public procurement, incorrect accounting reports 13

Problem solving guidelines Professionally and politically challenging process: – Concurrent elimination of several problem sources (Srbijagas, EPS, etc.) – Problem diagnosis and awareness exist, we need consistent implementation – Reform of public enterprises affects interests and it is politically and socially challenging This has to be done: – Privatization; stop the practice of selling without collecting payment; price liberalisation; downsizing of employees and reducing salaries; greater investment and improvement of performance indicators; hard budget constraints; transparency; resolving the future status of enterprises in restructuring; corporate governance; centralised monitoring of the operations of enterprises 14