No Child Left Behind Sarah Ekbatani and Lisa Hansen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Margaret Werts, Ph.D. Appalachian State University.
Advertisements

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
Educational Policies Present Zachary Schrage.
George W. Bush Provides public school choice and services for students in failing schools as early as the fall of Integrate scientifically based.
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
Based on The Article by JOE FROST The Changing Culture of Childhood Maria Calderon.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
AYP: Are You Perfect? By: Jalynn Speck, Linda Oller, and Jill Polsley.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Education in America, Is the American Education System Leaving Children Behind?
No Child Left Behind State Communication Strategies KSA-Plus Communications July 2002 Prepared with support from a grant from the U.S. Department of Education.
Current Issues. Vocabulary No Child Left Behind (NCLB)Curriculum AccountabilitySilent Epidemic Standardized TestMagnet School Charter SchoolCapitalism.
Design a creative, career appropriate title page
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Jennifer Lloyd Una Elementary ESL LEGISLATION.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Title I Parent Information Session Applegate School Laura Donovan School.
Striving for Calm Federal Directions in Education The End of Reform?
High Stakes Testing Using Citywide Tests to Measure Student Learning High Stakes Testing Using Citywide Tests to Measure Student Learning P. Lewis P.S.
No Child Left Behind Act
Bob Mattila.  No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is an act that was passed in 2002 with the goal of - "An act to close the achievement gap with accountability,
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Jackson Elementary School Title I Information
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Fraser TEACH © 2011 McGraw- Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 Politics: What Is Its Place in Education?
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
A Study on No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) Hakan Aydin, Ali Eroglu, Nihat Celik, Kemal Kocak.
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Jill Daignault ED 613 Unit III Assignment.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to.
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6. Purpose of Understanding  If you don’t know where you are going, how will you know when you get there?  How.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
No Child Left Behind (Because where would we put them all?) (Because where would we put them all?)
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
Curriculum Planning CHAPTER 21 JANUARY 26. Standards  Federal Mandates  State Standards: Academic Standards | NDE  Local School District Welcome to.
Web Pedagogies Week 8: Systems Approach The No Child Left Behind Policy.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Ed Reform in Washington State 4.5, 4.6
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Demystifying and Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
What Parents Need to Know
Education and Accountability
What Parents Need to Know
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind Sarah Ekbatani and Lisa Hansen

Opening Statement

What is No Child Left Behind? January 8, Bush Improve education: –l–low socio-economic –m–minorities –l–limited English speakers –s–special needs Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Effects on Schools Funding Punishments Extreme  Charter school Pressure to make AYP Test prep Testing time Not graded, don’t try

Effects on the Arts, Especially Music FUNDING! Classroom time Curriculum  –n–non musical goals

New Gov outlook on NCLB- Duncan Wants to travel country Three key things: 1.Early childhood education 2.Better assessments 3.Teacher quality Different per state – Doesn’t make sense

New Gov outlook on NCLB- Obama /watch?v=SsVimwm6x Q4&feature=related

The Issue Is NCLB an effective piece of legislation?

Position 1 – Pro Good intentions Need accountability Incentive to do well Standardized testing – SATS/ACTS/AP Etc.

Position 2 - Anti Funding and Budget cuts – arts/sports/foreign language Test prep Proficiency rates No incentives Support, not punish Faculty jobs vs. test Knowledge vs. Creative Top students brought down

Position 3 – subject to change Our position Schools should improve Bipartisan support Original faulty, w/ improvements it could work Accountability, Sustainability, Flexibility

What does NCLB mean for us? Be creative “Thumb our noses at NCLB” or respect what it “imperfectly aspires to achieve.” (Walsh, 123) Skilled teachers Embrace, not resist

QUESTIONS?

Bib Public Law (2002) provided for Improving the academic achievement of the disadvantaged. Retrieved from Ramirez, E., & Clark, K. (2009, February 5). What Arne Duncan Thinks of No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from /05/what- arne-duncan-thinks-of-no-child-left-behind_print.htm Rebell, M., & Wolff, J. (2008). Moving every child ahead. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Smith, E. (2005). Raising standards in American schools: the case of No Child Left Behind. Journal of Education Policy, 20(4), Walsh, K. (2007). Becoming Part of the Solution, not part of the problem. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(2), Weinstein, A. (2006). Obama on No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from Wood, G. (2004). Many children left behind. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.