Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PORTFOLIO.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Implementation Guide for Teacher Evaluation
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Defining and Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Evaluation May 10, 2015.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Developing and Demonstrating Proficiency in Instructional Leadership 2015 MASBO Annual Institute Mary C. DeLai Superintendent, Wilmington Public Schools.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Tuesday, July 30
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
The Quality Review A Reflection.
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION New Regulation adopted on June 28, 2011.
Word Generation and Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation August 5, 2013 Presenter: Sophia Boyer Documents 1 and 2 adopted from Catherine.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 3 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
 Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute April 12 and 13, 2012.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 2: WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
TREND DATA In order to enhance the quality of feedback provided on our new forms and ensure inter-rater reliability and calibration, we developed “WALK-
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS DAY 1: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2012 Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation Introduction to Educator.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Supporting Effective Teaching: An Introduction to Educator Performance Evaluation.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR EVALUATORS Monday, Oct 7 Leveraging Evaluation to Support School Priorities & Increase Effectiveness.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Unpacking the Rubric for Educators Winter 2012.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Blackstone Innovation School Supervision and Evaluation SY September 10, 2013 Café nook 3:30-5:00.
Edison K8: Mapping Our Goals for the Year We will be familiar with the priority elements for the year’s work We will know the key levers for improving.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Objectives for today If we have done our job today, you will:
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
Supporting Effective Teaching through Educator Performance Evaluation: Goal-Writing Summer Institute 2012.
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Presentation transcript:

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Former Teacher Evaluation (8 Dimensions) 1.Equity and High Expectations 2.Professionalism 3.Safe, Respectful, Culturally Sensitive and Responsive Learning Communities 4.Partnership with Family and Community 5.Instructional Planning and Implementation: 6.Content Knowledge 7.Monitoring and Assessment of Progress 8.Reflection, Collaboration, and Personal Growth Rubric for Effective Teaching with 4 Standards New Teacher Evaluation (4 Standards) 1.*Curriculum, Planning & Assessment 2.*Teaching All Students 3.Family & Community Engagement 4.Professional Culture New Principal/Admin Evaluation (4 Standards) 1.*Instructional Leadership 2. Management and Operations 3.Family & Community Partnerships 4.Professional Culture

Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Teacher Rubric At-A-Glance Standard I: Curriculum, Planning, and Assessment Standard II: Teaching All Students Standard III: Family and Community Engagement Standard IV: Professional Culture A. Curriculum and Planning Indicator 1.Subject Matter Knowledge 2.Child and Adolescent Development 3.Rigorous Standards-Based Design 4.Well-Structured Lessons A. Instruction Indicator 1.Quality of Effort and Work 2.Student Engagement 3.Meeting Diverse Needs A. Engagement Indicator 1.Parent/Family Engagement A. Reflection Indicator 1.Reflective Practice 2.Goal Setting B. Professional Growth Indicator 1.Professional Learning and Growth B. Assessment Indicator 1.Variety of Assessment Methods 2.Adjustments to Practice B. Assessment Indicator 1.Safe Learning Environment 2.Collaborative Learning Environment 3.Student Motivation B. Assessment Indicator 1.Learning Expectations 2.Curriculum Support C. Collaboration Indicator 1.Professional Collaboration C. Analysis Indicator 1.Analysis and Conclusions 2.Sharing Conclusions With Colleagues 3.Sharing Conclusions With Students C. Analysis Indicator 1.Respects Differences 2.Maintains Respectful Environment C. Analysis Indicator 1.Two-Way Communication 2.Culturally Proficient Communication D. Decision-making Indicator 1.Decision-making E. Shared Responsibility Indicator 1.Shared Responsibility D. Expectations Indicator 1.Clear Expectations 2.High Expectations 3.Access to Knowledge F. Professional Responsibility Indicator 1.Judgment 2.Reliability and Responsibility

Indicator Element Standard

The Overall Rating 5 There are 4 standards ­ Teachers are assessed for proficiency in each standard Everyone sets 2 goals: ­ A goal for student learning tied to data ­ A goal for professional practice tied to rubric will help you accomplish your student learning goal

The Overall Rating 6 At least one SL and one PP goal Ratings on the Four Standards of the Rubric +

School-wide Analysis & Goal-Setting School-wide goals & priorities should guide the Five Step Evaluation System Cycle Self-Assessment Analysis, goal- setting & plan development Implementation of the plan Formative Assessment/Evaluation Summative Evaluation 7

Your Context 8 District District-level Data Trend District Priority Areas School School-level Data Trends WSIP and School Priority Areas Team Previous/current year Data Trends Areas of Strength/Growth Individual Student Data Areas of Strength/Growth

District priorities reflected in the teacher rubric: District PriorityElement of rubric Professional Growth and Evaluation Goal Setting (IV-A-2) Using Data to Differentiate Instruction Adjustments to Practice (I-B-2) Access to Knowledge (II-D-3) Increasing Academic Rigor Well-Structured Lessons (I-A-4) Engaging Families, Community and Partners Parent/Family Engagement (III-A-1) and Two- Way Communication (III-C-1) 9

Identify your priority elements for your school at least one in each of the 4 standards Identify the behaviors you expect to see with teachers Then, ask educators to: – Self-assess – Set goals – Focus on student outcomes – Note: If an educator is less than proficient, don’t look ONLY at these priorities 10 Getting started at your school

11 Example from the Edison

District priorities reflected in the administrator rubric: District PriorityElement of teacher rubricElement of admin rubric Professional Growth and Evaluation Goal Setting (IV-A-2) Educator Goals (I-D-1 ) Observation & Feedback (I- D-2) Using Data to Differentiate Instruction Adjustments to Practice (I-B-2) Access to Knowledge (II-D-3) Adjustments to Practice (I-C-2) Diverse Learners’ Needs (I-B-3) Increasing Academic Rigor Well-Structured Lessons (I-A-4) Lesson Development Support (I-A-2) Engaging Families, Community and Partners Parent/Family Engagement (III-A-1) Two-Way Communication (III-C-1) Parent/Family Engagement (III-A-1) Two-Way Communication (III-C-1) 12

Writing your own professional practice goal 13 Standard I: Instructional Leadership. The education leader promotes the learning and growth of all students and the success of all staff by cultivating a shared vision that makes powerful teaching and learning the central focus of schooling. Indicator I-A. Curriculum: Ensures that all teachers design effective and rigorous standards-based units of instruction consisting of well-structured lessons with measurable outcomes. I-A-2. Lesson Development Support Proficient: Supports educators to develop well-structured lessons with challenging, measurable objectives and appropriate student engagement strategies, pacing, sequence, activities, materials, technologies, and grouping.

Contract information Resources Webinar 14 Coming Soon

Resources, Support, Questions, and Feedback For more information, visit: ­ ­ questions, comments and feedback to: ­ MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) Evaluation Site: ­