MAMMA data analysis Marco Villa – CERN 3 rd May 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of Large-area GEM Detectors for a Forward Tracker at a Future Electron-Ion Collider Experiment Aiwu Zhang, Vallary Bhopatkar, Marcus Hohlmann Florida.
Advertisements

Behaviour of MicroMega chambers in magnetic field: analysis of H2 June data Outline: (0) Introduction (1) Data set used and noise filtering (2)Cluster.
Micro MEsh GASeous Detectors (MicroMegas)
1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Astrophysics working group - CERN March, 2004 Point source searches, Aart Heijboer 1 Point Source Searches with ANTARES Outline: reconstruction news event.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
Geant4 Simulation of Neutrons interaction with GEM-foil and gas Gabriele Croci, Matteo Alfonsi, Serge Duarte Pinto, Leszek Ropelewski, Marco Villa (CERN)
Performance of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
V.Patera – KLOE GM – Otranto – 10 June 2002 K  reconstruction status K + K - retracking features New vs Old : resolution New vs Old : efficiencies Conclusion.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
M. Bianco On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration
GEM basic test and R&D plan Takuya Yamamoto ( Saga Univ. )
CMS WEEK – MARCH06 REVIEW OF MB4 COMMISSIONING DATA Giorgia Mila
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Tracking & Ecal Positional/Angular Resolution Hakan Yilmaz.
1 Endcap C SCT Efficiency Calculation Update Nicholas Austin University of Liverpool Operations Meeting June 2007.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
The GEM activities at Tsinghua University Zhigang Xiao 1, Yan Huang 1, Rensheng Wang 1, Haiyan Gao 1,2 1 Department of Physics, Tsinghua University 2 Dept.
Louis Nicolas – LPHE-EPFL T-Alignment: Track Selection December 11, 2006 Track Selection for T-Alignment studies Louis Nicolas EPFL Monday Seminar December.
Studying the efficiency and the space resolution of resistive strips MicroMegas Marco Villa – CERN MAMMA meeting Tuesday, 13 th December 2011 CERN, Geneva.
RPC Timing Results with Final Splitters Gianpaolo Carlino INFN Napoli The Napoli RPC Group: M.Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G.C., R. de Asmundis, M. Della.
Marcel Vreeswijk (NIKHEF) B tagging, performance vertexing Neural Net studies tt event selection mass reconstruction in tt events conclusions B tagging.
 The zigzag readout board is divided into eight η-sectors; each sector has a length of ~12 cm and comprises 128 zigzag strips; zigzag strips run in radial.
A. SarratTPC jamboree, Aachen, 14/03/07 1 Full Monte Carlo of a TPC equipped with Micromegas Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia Motivation Simulation content.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Anatoli Romaniouk TRT Test manual Some important information p. 2-3Some important information p. 2-3 Noise studies p.4-7Noise studies p.4-7 Operation with.
FNAL Beam test results A. Zhang, V. Bhopatkar, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, M. Hohlmann HEP Group A, Florida Tech 2013/11/18.
Abstract Beam Test of a Large-area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System V. Bhopatkar, M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger,
Beam Test of a Large-Area GEM Detector Prototype for the Upgrade of the CMS Muon Endcap System Vallary Bhopatkar M. Hohlmann, M. Phipps, J. Twigger, A.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
Construction and beam test analysis of GE1/1 prototype III gaseous electron multiplier (GEM) detector V. BHOPATKAR, E. HANSEN, M. HOHLMANN, M. PHIPPS,
INSTR L.Shekhtman 1 Triple-GEM detectors for KEDR tagging system V.M.Aulchenko, A.V.Bobrov,A.E.Bondar, L.I.Shekhtman, E.V.Usov, V.N.Zhilich,
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 M2-M5 Efficiency and Timing checks on 7TeV beam data Alessia, Roberta R.Santacesaria, April 23 rd, Muon Operation
Zaragoza, 5 Julyl Construction of and experience with a 2.4 x 1 m² micromegas chambers Givi Sekhniaidze On behalf of the Micromegas community.
1 Light Yield results from the KEK tracker test using G4MICE M. Ellis Tracker Phone Meeting 25 th January 2006.
Study of Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Intrinsic Resolution Saša Fratina, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia for Belle SVD group.
1 S, Fedele, Student Presentations, 2004/08/04S Amazing Title Slide Reworking the CES Cluster Reconstruction Algorithm By: Steve Fedele Advisor: Pavel.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
NoV. 11, 2009 WP meeting 94 1 D. Attié, P. Colas, E. Ferrer-Ribas, A. Giganon, I. Giomataris, F. Jeanneau, P. Shune, M. Titov, W. Wang, S. Wu RD51 Collaboration.
LAV efficiency studies with photons T. Spadaro* *Frascati National Laboratory of INFN.
Calibration algorithm and detector monitoring - TPC Marian Ivanov.
Ghost Identification M. Needham EPFL. Outline Embedding data Matching study  2 /dof study.
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.
GLAST LAT Project LAT Instrument Analysis Meeting– Aug 29, 2005 Hiro Tajima, TKR Updates at SLAC 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: TKR Updates at SLAC Hiro.
Pattern recognition with the triplet method Fabrizio Cei INFN & University of Pisa MEG Meeting, Hakata October /10/20131 Fabrizio Cei.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
MICROMEGAS per l’upgrade delle Muon Chambers di ATLAS per SLHC Arizona, Athens (U, NTU, Demokritos), Brookhaven, CERN, Harvard, Istanbul (Bogaziçi, Doğuş),
New TRD (&TOF) tracking algorithm
Dept. of Physics and Space Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology
Tests of a MM octant prototype towards a Micromegas TPC Polarimeter
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
Updates on the Micromegas + GEM prototype
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Distributed Clustering for Online Event Reconstruction
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
HARPO Analysis.
Numerical simulations on single mask conical GEMs
Progress on the Single-Arm Compton Analysis
Current Status of the VTX analysis
Drift Chamber Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

MAMMA data analysis Marco Villa – CERN 3 rd May 2011

Outline Space resolution and clustering algorithm Ntuple cleaning and gain study 2

3

µM space resolution (reminder) R12, Ar:CO 2 85:15, ALTRO readout, 0  angle BAT tracks extrapolated to µM plane and matched to closest µM cluster (cog) Space resolution from gaussian fit over residual distributions Observations: Resolution larger than expected (~ 60 µm with 250 µm strip pitch) Side bumps at a distance ~ strip pitch 4

Residual distributions (zoom) 570 V mesh, 870 V drift600 V mesh, 900 V drift 5

Where do the bumps come from? Are the bumps related to inefficiencies? Are the bumps due to the pillar structure? Procedure: Build a graph containing all BAT tracks extrapolated to the µM plane Produce the same graph with BAT tracks which residual is in the main gaussian peak Repeat the exercise with the side bumps events All info from BAT; µM used for event selection 6

All BAT tracks V mesh, 870 V drift600 V mesh, 900 V drift

Main gaussian (low residual) events V mesh, 870 V drift600 V mesh, 900 V drift Cut on residuals:  180 µm

Side bumps (high residual) events V mesh, 870 V drift600 V mesh, 900 V drift Cut on residuals:  180 µm

Remarks… Uniform background of high residual events  main gaussian tails and scattering Pillar structure does show in all plots  inefficiencies and scattering High residual events concentrate around strip 36. This concentration is more evident at low voltages  ???  Look at those events one by one 10

Strip 36: this is what is happening 11

More remarks… Channel 36 appears to be dead… …however in many cases it works as expected  Most probably bad connection problem In such cases one should merge neighbouring clusters into one supercluster 12

13

high_gain/low_gain cleaning ALTRO ntuples contain information (Q, T) from both high gain and low gain channels Clean up the ntuple by picking up the most appropriate value, so that clustering and analysis codes will deal with univocal data high_gain/low_gain known a priori, but it is interesting to extract it from data 14

Gain scaling factor V mesh, 870 V drift600 V mesh, 900 V drift   0.002

Scaling factor channel by channel 16

Conclusions & outlooks Need for new clustering algorithm Gain scaling factor study completed Values compatible with expectations Scaling factor map will be used in the ntuple clean up process 17