Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications? John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202) 687-6972 Phoenix Center December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Dancing Bells and GoogleMan Once upon a time there were three Bells that dominated the story land of telecommunications.
Advertisements

FCC to keep in mind... In determining what UNEs to make available, must consider whether –Access to proprietary elements is necessary –Failure to provide.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,
John Windhausen, Telepoly Consulting Cathy Sloan, Computer and Communications Industry Association May 19, 2010.
The AT&T Divestiture: Was it Necessary? Was It a Success? Robert W. Crandall The Brookings Institution U.S. Department of Justice March 28, 2007.
POLICYMAKERS RUN AMOK WHAT’S A CLEC TO DO? POLICY & PRACTICE FOR THE NEW MARKET REALITIES November 20, 2002 Jon Canis Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
AOL Time Warner Ken Peffers UNLV October Before the Merger That's "C" for convergence, the buzzword of the year in the merger-happy days of 1999.
STATE OF ISRAEL MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS Fixed-Mobile Convergence Regulatory Point of View Daniel Rosenne Director General, Ministry of Communications,
Bundling, Differentiation, Alliances, and Mergers Johannes M. Bauer Michigan State University First Transatlantic Telecom Industry Forum Montpellier, November.
Richard T. Shin Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. John S. Ying University of Delaware and University of California, Irvine. Lecturer Chaowei Fan Illinois.
ECO 436 Industry Seminar Dr. David G. Loomis Illinois State University
Georgetown University. Natural Monopoly AC MC Potential Natural Monopolies: 1.Telecommunications 2.Water 3.Electicity Historically, regulated Quantity.
N ATIONAL T ECHNICAL U NIVERSITY OF A THENS Electrical & Computer Engineering School L IBERALISATION & R EGULATION IN THE E LECTRONIC C OMMUNICATIONS S.
Hands off the Internet... No Broadband Regulation! Jae Jung Adam Leader Deidra Ritcherson Steve Ringer.
Should Broadband Internet Services To The Home Offer Choice of ISP? Group E: *Brian Bohan *John Musacchio *Randi Thomas *Wanyu Tsai YES!
Interconnection in a Liberalized Network: California’s ISPs View Reciprocal Compensation Yale M. Braunstein School of Information Management & Systems.
1 End of Regulation? Jerry Hausman Professor of Economics MIT July 2005
Telecomm history and regulation MGT 825. Brief History of Telecommunications 1876: Alexander Graham Bell receives patent for the telephone. Bell speaks.
Network Competition Business Strategy, Industry Structure IS250 Spring 2010
1 University of Toronto Master of Engineering in Telecommunications Voice Over IP Industry Analysis Katherine Lam (Class of ) September 23, 2004.
Competing visions of the NII and the 1996 Act. Visions for a National Information Infrastructure –Who will build it? –Who will pay for it? –What role.
The Telecom Act, State Action, and the Realization and Prospects for Competition George S. Ford, PhD Chief Economist Phoenix Center
Network neutrality is the idea that all internet traffic should be treated equally. It does not matter who is downloading and what is being downloaded.
Chp. 3 – Industry Overview Traditional Telephone Companies & Cable TV Providers Mobile Providers Smaller Competitors Internet Based Competitors Why Governments.
Telecommunications The Transition to Competition.
Organizational Behavior Analysis: Verizon and AT&T
Organizational Behavior Analysis: Verizon and AT&T
© x8 Inc. (Nasdaq: EGHT) 1 The Next Generation of IP Communication Applications Bryan R. Martin January 24, 2007 Internet Telephony Conference &
Business Data Communications Standards and Laws. What are Standards? Documented agreements Technical specifications or other precise criteria to be used.
Wireless Communication Sprint Nextel Team members' name omitted on purpose New Horizons Wireless Communication Sprint Nextel.
Georgetown University The Georgetown Center for Business and Public Policy.
Making Residential Broadband Profitable The Challenge For WISPs Sandy Teger and David Waks Co-Founders, BroadbandHomeCentral.com Broadband Wireless World.
Testimony before the Florida House Committee on Utilities and Telecommunications Thomas M. Koutsky Co-Founder and Resident Scholar Phoenix Center March.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The FCC is a United States government agency and was established by the Communications Act of The FCC is.
Econ 100 Mar Increasing Market Competition: Deregulation & Incentive Regulation.
ITS 302 Purposes of the course –Review the history of US telecommunications as a case study –Examine the basics of regulation, especially as they apply.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Telephony & Satellite Technologies. Telecommunications Act of 1996 Removed entry barriers between local, long distance, and cable service providers Designed.
Some questions to consider Do we need regulation? Does history matter? Why is one-stop shopping important? Why didn’t the U.S. Telecom Act of 1996 work?
U.S. Government Telecommunications Market Complete Analysis of the Government Expenditures in Telecom “By creating specific products and services targeted.
FROM TRADITIONAL LANDLINE TO IP TELEPHONY: A POSSIBLE ANOTHER WAY Bill Levis Colorado Consumer Counsel June 10, 2013.
Georgetown University. Congruity and Incongruity in the Evolving Telecommunications Industry John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202)
Course overview INSS Telecommunications. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Inc1 - 2 Three Faces of Networking Fundamental concepts of networking.
Telecom Industry: History of the Future –RBOCs are big early winners gaining upto 20% market share in long distance while losing only 3-5% share in the.
Communication & Information Technology Telecommunications Policy.
Telecommunications Expenditures by Cable MSOs Supporting the “Holy Grail” “In order to provide the “Holy Grail” of voice, high-speed data, and content,
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.13-1 Natural Monopolies And Regulation.
1 Managing the Transition to IP-Based Public Phone Networks in the United States Joe Gillan CRNI November 22, 2013 Gillan Associates.
Covad Confidential Broadband Technology and Policy – A Service Provider Perspective Anjali Joshi EVP, Engineering July 2002.
McGraw-Hill©2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Chapter 8 Telephone and Cable TV Networks: Residential Connection to the Internet.
Forecasting Market Structure in U.S. Telecoms George S. Ford, PhD Chief Economist Phoenix Center.
Telecommunications The Transition to Competition.
ECON 100 Mar 10, 2008 Mergers, Natural Monopolies and Deregulation.
Andrea Forrest. -AT&T began in 1875 with founder Alexander Graham Bell’s invention of the telephone  -During the 1800’s, AT&T became a parent company.
Phoenix Center Panel “Lessons Learned from the States” Iowa Utilities Board Commissioner Elliott Smith.
1 1084_06F9_c3 © 1999, Cisco Systems, Inc. The Current State Of Telecommunications Dan Barker TNT Consulting Group.
Network Neutrality: An Internet operating principle which ensures that all online users are entitled to access Internet content of their choice; run online.
Industry Overview AT&T and the Bell System Post Divestiture Factors in the Emergence of Competition to the Bells The Vision of the Telecommunications Act.
U.S. Consumer Local and Long Distance Service Markets Bundling Local, Long Distance, and Enhanced Services Could Win More Customers "Bundling long distance.
Structural Problems & Firms’ Observed Conduct: Economic Prescriptions for Future Growth or “Is it the Long Run Yet?” John W. Mayo Georgetown University.
State of Kansas Senate Bill 350 Telecom Reform Bill Overview David Kerr AT&T Kansas.
Constructing An Effective Statutory & Regulatory Framework for Broadband Networks Phoenix Center Symposium December 1, 2005 Disclaimer: Views presented.
Mec1224 EETT: From Telecommunications to Electronic Communications Athens, 28 March 2005 “Investment and competition in electronic communications services.
Competition Policy for the new U.S. Telecoms Market: Background and Outline Howard A. Shelanski, U.C. Berkeley Nanterre, Paris X November 9, 2006.
Net Neutrality Gavin Baker Association of Information Technology Professionals, North Central Florida Chapter Gainesville, FL 13 November 2007.
ITS 602 Purposes of the course
Marsha Spellman, JD Regulatory Director, WST October 17, 2016
Wireline Post 1996 TC 310 May 20, 2008.
Telecom History.
Presentation transcript:

Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications? John W. Mayo Georgetown University (202) Phoenix Center December 16, 2004

The Optimism of 1996 “Opportunities abound” for both industry and consumers “Opportunities abound” for both industry and consumers –Commissioner Susan Ness “Catapult this country right into the Information Age” “Catapult this country right into the Information Age” –Commissioner Rachelle Chong “I can now confidently predict that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 will usher in an era of communications innovations that will shortly make our present arrangements as antiquated as the Guttenberg Press.” “I can now confidently predict that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 will usher in an era of communications innovations that will shortly make our present arrangements as antiquated as the Guttenberg Press.” –Senator Howard Baker

The Vision of the Post- Telecommunications Act Competition Pre-divestiture BOC Long lines Post-Divestiture BOC MCI AT&TMCIIXC Post-Act BOC LD BOC CLEC LD

The Reality of 2004 “Since Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996,the [RBOCs] have had three primary policy objectives: 1) long-distance entry in every state; 2) elimination of unbundling requirements…; and, 3) elimination of competitive entry strategies…. We believe the Bells have largely achieved these goals. …they face shrinking competition.” [Source: Legg-Mason, September 15, 2004 “Since Congress passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996,the [RBOCs] have had three primary policy objectives: 1) long-distance entry in every state; 2) elimination of unbundling requirements…; and, 3) elimination of competitive entry strategies…. We believe the Bells have largely achieved these goals. …they face shrinking competition.” [Source: Legg-Mason, September 15, 2004

Bankrupt and Discontinued Telephony Entrants

Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ.N) and Qwest Communications International Inc. (Q.N) said on Thursday they had seen large drops in new residential telephone lines grabbed by competitors since AT&T Corp. (T.N) announced a retreat from residential service in July…. Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ.N) and Qwest Communications International Inc. (Q.N) said on Thursday they had seen large drops in new residential telephone lines grabbed by competitors since AT&T Corp. (T.N) announced a retreat from residential service in July…. AT&T's decision stemmed from changes in those FCC rules that it said would lead to cost increases. Industry executives and analysts say AT&T's move and similar strategies by other Baby Bell competitors might allow the Bells to recapture most of the 17 million local lines that competitors now lease under federal rules, boosting earnings. (emphasis added) AT&T's decision stemmed from changes in those FCC rules that it said would lead to cost increases. Industry executives and analysts say AT&T's move and similar strategies by other Baby Bell competitors might allow the Bells to recapture most of the 17 million local lines that competitors now lease under federal rules, boosting earnings. (emphasis added) –Reuters -September 9, 2004

Can Technology Save Competition in Telecommunications? The Other “Reality” Telecommunications markets are all “perfectly contestable” and ILECs face robust competition from – Telecommunications markets are all “perfectly contestable” and ILECs face robust competition from – – Cable, Wireless, Power Lines, Internet (VOIP) Need to ask serious questions: – –Do Wireless and Landline compete in the same market? – –Are Power companies actually providing telephony? – –Can Cable offerings in California limit market power of Verizon in Washington DC? – – Does the broadband platform limit the extent of competition from VOIP? – –Should public policy be content with a duopoly platform for as far as the eye can see?

“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn’t be called research, would it?” Albert Einstein