Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OC & BC 0.5° (ton) Eric F. Vermote 1,2, Evan A. Ellicott 1, Tatyana Laypyonok 3, Oleg Dubovik 4, & Mian Chin 2 1 Department of Geography, University of.
Advertisements

Emissions in GEMS Data on emissions are needed for the 4 sub-systems GHG, GRG, AER and RAQ GEMS Project has dedicated tasks for emissions and surface fluxes.
EGU GA, Wien, April 2007 Kaiser et al., Fire, 1 Global Fire Emission Modelling for Atmospheric Composition and Land Cover Monitoring Johannes W. Kaiser,
Global Fire Emissions and Fire Effects on Biophysical Properties and the Associated Radiative Forcing Yufang Jin 1, James Randerson 1, G. R. van der Werf.
CO budget and variability over the U.S. using the WRF-Chem regional model Anne Boynard, Gabriele Pfister, David Edwards National Center for Atmospheric.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Quantitative Interpretation of Satellite and Surface Measurements of Aerosols over North America Aaron van Donkelaar M.Sc. Defense December, 2005.
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar 1, Randall Martin 1,2,
Page 1 OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, Finland, 24 – 27 June 2008M. Van Roozendael et al. On the usability of space nadir UV-visible observations for.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
Sylvia Generoso, Isabelle Bey Evaluation of aerosol and CO distributions from boreal fires in GEOS-Chem using satellite products Preliminary results using.
Menglin Jin Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Science University of Maryland, College park Observed Land Impacts on Clouds, Water Vapor, and Rainfall.
Interannual variability in CO2 fluxes derived from 64-region inversion of atmospheric CO2 data Prabir K. Patra*, Shamil Maksyutov*, Misa Ishizawa*, Takakiyo.
Detect and Simulate Vegetation, Surface Temperature, Rainfall and Aerosol Changes: From Global to Local Examples from EOS MODIS remote sensing Examples.
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
Aerosol Simulation Over North America Aaron Van Donkelaar April 2005.
Evaluation of GEOS-CHEM Aerosol Optical Thicknesses : comparisons to satellite data for 2003 S. Generoso & I. Bey LMCA, EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland Acknowledgements.
Aerosols and climate Rob Wood, Atmospheric Sciences.
Effects of Siberian forest fires on regional air quality and meteorology in May 2003 Rokjin J. Park with Daeok Youn, Jaein Jeong, Byung-Kwon Moon Seoul.
The Role of Aerosols in Climate Change Eleanor J. Highwood Department of Meteorology, With thanks to all the IPCC scientists, Keith Shine (Reading) and.
Effects of Tropical Deforestation on Tropospheric Chemistry: A 10-year Study using GEOS-Chem Prasad Kasibhatla, Duke University James Randerson and Yang.
Hauglustaine et al., IGAC, 19 Sep 2006 Forward and inverse modelling of atmospheric trace gas at LSCE P. Bousquet, I. Pison, P. Peylin, P. Ciais, D. Hauglustaine,
Satellite Remote Sensing of Surface Air Quality
Implementing Online Marine Organic Aerosol Emissions into GEOS-Chem Implementing Online Marine Organic Aerosol Emissions into GEOS-Chem NASA Ames Research.
ANTHROPOGENIC AND VOLCANIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE DECADAL VARIATIONS OF STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL Mian Chin, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Plus: Thomas Diehl,
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY: FROM AIR POLLUTION TO GLOBAL CHANGE AND BACK Daniel J. Jacob.
ECMWF's activities in atmospheric composition and climate monitoring
1 Use of Satellites in AQ Analysis and Emissions Improvement.
AERONET in the context of aerosol remote sensing from space and aerosol global modeling Stefan Kinne MPI-Meteorology, Hamburg Germany.
Application of Satellite Data to Particulate, Smoke and Dust Monitoring Spring 2015 ARSET - AQ Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training – Air Quality.
Global Simulation of the Indirect Aerosol Effect With the ECHAM5 GCM III LBA Scientific Conference Brasilia 28/07/2004 P. Stier (1), J. Feichter (1), S.
Global estimates of emissions from fires, Part 1: Emission estimates from fires in the Tropics and Subtropics, Guido R. van der Werf 1, James.
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada Sunling Gong Scientific Team: Tianliang Zhao, David Lavoue, Richard Leaitch,
Historical emissions a new inventory of emissions of gases and particles Claire GRANIER Service d’Aéronomie/IPSL, Paris CIRES/NOAA Earth System.
GOCART Model Study of Anthropogenic Aerosol Radiative Forcing Mian Chin NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Improved representation of boreal fire emissions for the ICARTT period S. Turquety, D. J. Jacob, J. A. Logan, R. M. Yevich, R. C. Hudman, F. Y. Leung,
Figure 1 – Image of Amazon Basin There is a very sharp increase in the atmospheric aerosol loading during the biomass burning season, that is observed.
Thanks to David Diner, David Nelson and Yang Chen (JPL) and Ralph Kahn (NASA/Goddard) Research funded by NSF and EPA Overview of the 2002 North American.
US Aerosols : Observation from Space, Climate Interactions Daniel J. Jacob and funding from NASA, EPRI, EPA with Easan E. Drury (now at NREL), Loretta.
Understanding the long-term variability of African dust as recorded in surface concentrations and TOMS observations Isabelle Chiapello (LOA, Lille, France)
Dust Modeling at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies Ron Miller, Susanne Bauer, Reha Cakmur, Jan Perlwitz, Peng Xian.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
On contribution of wild-land fires to atmospheric composition M.Prank 1, J. Hakkarainen 1, T. Ermakova 2, J.Soares 1, R.Vankevich 2, M.Sofiev 1 1 Finnish.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Synergy of MODIS Deep Blue and Operational Aerosol Products with MISR and SeaWiFS N. Christina Hsu and S.-C. Tsay, M. D. King, M.-J. Jeong NASA Goddard.
ESTIMATION OF SOLAR RADIATIVE IMPACT DUE TO BIOMASS BURNING OVER THE AFRICAN CONTINENT Y. Govaerts (1), G. Myhre (2), J. M. Haywood (3), T. K. Berntsen.
Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice
Observational Constraints on Aerosol Deposition and Optical Depth Mark Flanner 1 Phil Rasch 1 Jim Randerson 2 Joe McConnell 3 Tami Bond 4 1 NCAR 2 University.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
04/12/011 The contribution of Earth degassing to the atmospheric sulfur budget By Hans-F. Graf, Baerbel Langmann, Johann Feichter From Chemical Geology.
1 Using Satellite Data to Improve Operational Atmospheric Constituents Forecasting Capabilities Shobha Kondragunta, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Xiaoyang Zhang, UMD.
Dust aerosols in NU-WRF – background and current status Mian Chin, Dongchul Kim, Zhining Tao.
MOZART-2 The three-dimensional global Chemistry Transport Model MOZART-2 (Model of OZone And Related Tracers, Brasseur et al., 1998) has been developed.
AEROCOM AODs are systematically smaller than MODIS, with slightly larger/smaller differences in winter/summer. Aerosol optical properties are difficult.
Global Aerosol Forecasting System Applications to Houston/Costa Rica Aura Validation Experiments Arlindo da Silva Global Modeling and Assimilation Office,
Assimilation of Satellite Derived Aerosol Optical Depth Udaysankar Nair 1, Sundar A. Christopher 1,2 1 Earth System Science Center, University of Alabama.
Estimation of the contribution of mineral dust to the total aerosol depth: Particular focus on Atlantic Ocean G. Myhre, A. Grini, T.K. Berntsen, T.F. Berglen,
BACKGROUND AEROSOL IN THE UNITED STATES: NATURAL SOURCES AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION Daniel J. Jacob and Rokjin J. Park with support from EPRI, EPA/OAQPS.
The use of Satellite data for environmental exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. F RANCESCA DE ’D ONATO.
Retrieving sources of fine aerosols from MODIS/AERONET observations by inverting GOCART model INVERSION: Oleg Dubovik 1 Tatyana Lapyonok 1 Tatyana Lapyonok.
Eun-Su Yang and Sundar A. Christopher Earth System Science Center University of Alabama in Huntsville Shobha Kondragunta NOAA/NESDIS Improving Air Quality.
Mayurakshi Dutta Department of Atmospheric Sciences March 20, 2003
27-28/10/2005IGBP-QUEST Fire Fast Track Initiative Workshop Inverse Modeling of CO Emissions Results for Biomass Burning Gabrielle Pétron National Center.
Use of Near-Real-Time Data for the Global System
Satellite-derived global scale biomass burning products
N. Bousserez, R. V. Martin, L. N. Lamsal, J. Mao, R. Cohen, and B. R
evaluation with MOPITT satellite observations for the summer 2004
Aerosol Simulation Over North America
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2,
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada
Presentation transcript:

Using MODIS fire count data as an interim solution for estimating biomass burning emission of aerosols and trace gases Mian Chin, Tom Kucsera, Louis Giglio, Thomas Diehl NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, U.S.A.

Emission, emission, emission Emission is one of the most important factors that determines the amount of aerosols and trace gases in the atmosphere The quality of global model simulations critically depends on the accuracy of emissions used in the model

Emissions in the GOCART model for aerosol simulations (1) Fossil fuel/biofuel consumptions: Emit SO 2, BC, OC We currently use the IPCC 2000 emissions, based on energy use, population density, and technology We assume these emissions are relatively constant with some seasonal variations Volcanic/biogenic emissions: Volcanic emission of SO 2 based on the global volcanism database and TOMS SO 2 index Ocean emission of DMS from ocean using empirical relationship between the winds and DMS seawater concentrations Biogenic emission of OC based on global inventory

Emissions in the GOCART model for aerosol simulations (2) Dust and sea-salt emissions: We use empirical relationships between emission and meteorological conditions Dust emission is a function of surface type, surface wetness, and wind speed Sea-salt emissions is a function of wind speed Biomass burning emissions: We currently use the monthly averaged emission data based estimated based on the TRMM and ATSR fire data, MODIS burned area estimates, and dry mass burned (van der Werf et al., 2003, 2005) No daily variations is given

Challenges in estimating biomass burning emissions Biomass burning emission is highly variable with space and time It is difficult to use a “climatology” to model the biomass burning emission for a particular region at a certain time Only satellite data can provide global coverage of fire monitoring at real time, but converting the satellite fire data to biomass burning emission takes considerable efforts, making near real time simulation impossible These products are only available for monthly average which are not adequate for fires that last just a fraction of a month

Using MODIS fire counts for daily & near-real-time fire emission Here we explore the possibility of using MODIS fire counts (at 1-km 2 pixel resolution) to model daily biomass burning emissions of aerosols and trace gases as an “interim” solution This methods can be used in aerosol forecast for mission support, in which the near real time fire counts can be incorporated into the model

Mass of tracer i (M i ) emitted from fire: M i = A ∙ B ∙ C ∙ E i A = Area burned B = Biomass density (or fuel load) C = Completeness of burning (or burning efficiency) E i = Emission factor of tracer i Emission of aerosols and trace gases from fire Dry mass burned

Area burned (A) This is probably the most difficult quantity to determine on daily bases Currently we assume that each 1-km 2 MODIS fire pixel is filled with fire, such that the burned area within a model gridbox (1.25ºlong x 1ºlat or 2.5ºx2º) = total number of 1-km 2 fire pixel within the box Terra-MODIS fire counts

Biomass density (B) and Completeness of burning (C) Based on Hoelzemann et al., JGR 2004

Emission factors for tracers (E i ) Ecosystem- dependent Burning stage- dependent Also depending on temperature, moisture, etc. Large uncertainties Savana/ Grassland Tropical Forest Extratropical forest Biofuel Agriculture Residual BC 0.48± ± ± ± ±0.13 OC 3.4±1.45.2± – ± SO ± ± ± CO 65±20104±20107±3778±3192±84 CO ±951580±901569± ±951515±177 Emission factors (g tracer / kg dry matter) for selected tracers from Andreae and Merlet, GBC 2001:

Example: BC biomass burning emission used in the GOCART model BC biomass burning emission July (M BC = A∙B∙C∙E BC )

GOCART model simulation of aerosols Example: Total aerosol optical thickness at 550 nm, July (including biomass burning, anthropogenic, dust, and sea-salt emissions) Comprehensive evaluation with satellite and other data are in progress

GOCART model simulation of aerosols Total aerosol optical thickness at 550 nm, July 2004 (including biomass burning, anthropogenic, dust, and sea-salt emissions) Comprehensive evaluation with satellite and other data are in progress GOCARTMODIS

Comparison with AEORNET AOT over North America during INTEX-A AERONET Total Sulfate Dust OC BC Sea-salt

Future plan Using MODIS fire counts for daily emissions: Better estimates of area burned: Using the relationship between Terra-MODIS fire counts and area burned at different regions (Giglio et al., 2005) Using combined Terra- and Aqua-MODIS fire counts Better estimates of seasonal variations of dry mass burned: Linking MODIS fire counts to the monthly averaged dry mass burned estimates (van der Werf et al., 2005): Using aerosol emission derived from MODIS fire radiative energy and aerosol optical depth (Ichoku and Kaufman)

Acknowledgment MODIS fire team for fire counts data MODIS aerosol team for providing aerosol data (special thanks to Rob Levy) AERONET team Funding from NASA EOS

GOCART model simulation of aerosols (M i = A∙B∙C∙E i ) BC biomass burning emission July 2004 Example: MODIS fire counts and BC biomass burning emission, July MODIS (Terra) fire counts July 2004