doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 1 JTC1 SC September Closing Report 22 Sept 2011 Authors: Meeting document:

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 JTC1 SC agenda items Status of WAPI in SC6 Status of 802.1X/AE and security replacements Status of N-UHT (802.11ac replacement) Plan for 8802 standards Plan for next SC6 meeting Feb 2012 in Guangzhou Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 met in San Diego in June 2011 and will meet in Guangzhou, China in Feb 2012 SC6 has a F2F meeting every 9 months or so The last meeting was held on June 2011 in San Diego –All WGs met in San Diego — WG1: Physical and data link layers — WG7: Network and transport layers (also known as Future Network) — WG8: Directory — WG9: ASN.1 and registration The next meeting is in Guangzhou, China in February 2012 –Now confirmed for week of 20 Feb 2012 –Only two WGs are planning to meet — WG1: Physical and data link layers — WG7: Network and transport layers –The IEEE 802 will need to send a delegation again! — Please start planning to attend! Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 The WG has liaised various Sponsor Ballot drafts to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 Bruce Kraemer will send the red highlighted documents after Okinawa The WG told SC6 it will liaise ac as soon as it passes a LB will be submitted to SC6 when approved by the SASB – early 2012 Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 4 Task Group After SD After Hawaii After Dallas After LA After Sing. After Palm Sp After SanFran After Okinawa July 10Sept 10Nov 10Jan 11Mar 11May 11July 11Sept 11 TGae D5.0 TGaa D6.0 TGac TGmb--D6.0-D8.0--D10.0 TGs--D8.0-D10.0-Ratified- TGuD11.0-D13.0--Ratified-- TGvD13.0D Ratified-- TGzD12.0D Ratified--

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 There have been attempts to make progress on WAPI NP at a series of CRM teleconferences In San Diego, the US NB proposed that progress could be made on resolving the WAPI NP comments by teleconference IEEE objective is to expunge false commentary on security SC6 subsequently agreed to hold comment resolution meetings (The CRMs were held –10 Aug, 31 Aug, 15 Sept held so far, 21 Nov scheduled (probably last!) –US, UK, Switzerland, China, Korea and IEEE 802 have been represented –Convenor: Mr Seung Ok Lim (Korea) – also new WG1 Chair After the first two teleconference made little progress, it was decided to use as well –Hundreds of s resulted Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 The Chair would like to thanks various individuals for representing IEEE 802 at the CRMs Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 6 Bruce Kraemer Dan Harkins Dorothy Stanley Jodi Haaz Brian Weis 10 August Bruce Kraemer Dan Harkins Dorothy Stanley Jodi Haaz Brian Weis 31 August Bruce Kraemer Dan Harkins Dorothy Stanley Jodi Haaz 15 September

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 There will be one final CRM on 21 November... The CRM convenor stated that there will only be one more CRM –It will be held on 21 November – discussion is encouraged in the meantime The various parties are far apart... –Latest s are not very encouraging –China NB & Swiss NB technical experts do not seem to understand the implementation of functional entities defined by i –Swiss NB rep is continuing to asserting that all of i is insecure because it includes WEP and TKIP –US NB, UK NB and IEEE 802 reps appear to be aligned –SC6 Chair has stated, “Unless the allegations around 'serious security loopholes' in the NP are deleted and the NP form is revised, it's chair's position not to accept the DoC” Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 Other topics in SC6 China NB has proposed –An 802.1X/AE replacement –An security replacement –An ac replacement Withdrawal of a number of standards including the 8802 series – responsibility delegated to IEEE 802 to report back with definitive list in February 2012 Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /1341r0 Submission September 2011 The discussion in San Francisco decided to send 802 standards to ISO/IEC under certain conditions Summary from San Francisco 802 plenary meeting There was consensus that it was important for 802 to send standards to ISO/IEC for “registration” Need to guarantee that these will not be edited without the explicit agreement of the 802 owner An implementation plan will be further explored during the November plenary Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 9