Essentials of Machine Safety Standards in Perspective.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Safety Update This presentation covers Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC
Advertisements

Risk Assessment. Objectives By the end of this presentation you will know: What risk assessment is; Where the need for risk assessment comes from; and.
Nick Higginson Risk Assessment In The Workplace. Objectives By the end of this presentation you will know: What risk assessment is; Where the need for.
Integra Consult A/S Safety Assessment. Integra Consult A/S SAFETY ASSESSMENT Objective Objective –Demonstrate that an acceptable level of safety will.
Risk Management Introduction Risk Management Fundamentals
IEC – IEC Presentation G.M. International s.r.l
Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Tier 3 Approaches, Complex Models or Direct Measurements, in Greenhouse Gas Inventories Report of the.
MPSA Mission Statement The Machinery and Process Safety Assessment Group is comprised of safety professionals experienced in manufacturing and their related.
Risk Assessment.
Risk assessment of science experiments in Primary Schools Phillip Crisp and Eva Crisp.
1 Certification Chapter 14, Storey. 2 Topics  What is certification?  Various forms of certification  The process of system certification (the planning.
DIRC Workshop on Software Quality and the legal system 13 February 2004 Functional safety of electrical, electronic and programmable electronic safety-related.
1 Risk evaluation Risk treatment. 2 Risk Management Process Risk Management Process.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
Know Risk…Design Safety™ Industrial Machinery Safety Risk Assessment and Design Standards 18-May-11 © Compliance InSight Consulting Inc.
Important Changes in Health and Safety Law. Reform Initiatives Plan for improved service delivery by MBIE Plan for improved service delivery by MBIE.
Occupational Health, Safety & Environment Training OHS Responsibilities and Duty of Care.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Discretion and Judgement: HSE’s approach Mike Cross 3 June 2014.
2009 Mines Safety Roadshow Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented at the Mines Safety Roadshow held.
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Occupational Health & Safety
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Work Health and Safety (National Uniform Legislation) Act and Regulations NT WorkSafe Anna McGill.
OH&S Plant Regulations make Good Business Sense Robert Enchelmaier Capability By Design Peter Kohler Robert Enchelmaier.
What you will learn in this session 1.Sources of information about health & safety, including national legislation or guidance and local policies 2.Work.
SIPI61508 Soft computing based qualitative method for determination of SILs István Ajtonyi 1 – László Ormos 2 1 University of Miskolc, Institute of Electric.
Determining Controls for the Hazards Identified. Determining Controls Do all Controls need to be based on a Risk Assessments?
A European campaign on Risk Assessment Common errors in Risk Assessment.
Occupational Health and Safety. “The Safe Workplace” THE SAFE WORKPLACE Safe Systems of Work Consultation, research, feedback Training and experience.
Rules for Supporting Part 803 and Part 806 Decision Making Page 1 Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 9 Slide 1 Critical Systems Specification 1.
A guide to... Safe Systems of Work.
Essentials of Machine Safety Standards in Perspective Introduction.
Product & Technology Quality. Excellence. Support SIL Explanation 27.JAN 2006 Automation & Safety.
Over View of CENELC Standards for Signalling Applications
HEALTH AND SAFETY REFORM BILL
Safe Systems of Work. Legislation w HSWA Section 2 (2) (a): Provide and maintain plant and systems of work that are, so far as is reasonably practicable,
Introduction to SISTEMA. Schneider Electric 2 - Mac - Safety – March 2010 Introduction ●Introduction In Europe: ●Manufacturers are used to designing the.
Module N° 6 – SMS regulation
OSHA Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
Objectives By the end of this presentation you will know: What risk assessment is; Where the need for risk assessment comes from; and The principles behind.
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH: RISK ASSESSMENT 11/06/2016.
About Us! Rob StockhamBA IEng MIEE General Manager Moore Industries-Europe, Inc MemberIEE Honorary Secretary ISA England Institute of Directors DirectorThe.
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
Toolbox presentation: Approaches to hazard identification.
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
Risk Assessment OSHA 21/09/ WHAT IS RISK ASSESMENT? Risk Assessment is the process of determining the possibility of short and long term unfavorable.
Ranjan kumar Assistant Manager CCL,Ranchi
Presented by Kevin Williams
OH&S Plant Obligations make
MODELOS DE GESTIÓN DE CALIDAD
Risk Based Thinking in Health & Safety
Ensuring a safe workplace
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1136 on CSM Design Targets (CSM-DT)
Phillip Crisp and Eva Crisp
Quality Risk Management
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
RISK ASSESSMENT “Risk management tool, for a safe workplace”
BU IS GIG Chemical, Oil & Gas
BSBWHS304 Participate effectively in WHS communication and consultation processes.
Safe Systems of Work.
RISK ASSESSMENT AND METHOD STATEMENT
Standards Comparison: USA and Europe
Definitions Hazard- the potential of a substance, activity or process to cause harm. They can take many forms such as chemicals, electricity or the use.
Safety Instrumented Systems
Architectural and Engineering Approaches to Infection Control
Standards.
Staying legal: Machinery Safety and Visibility
SAFETY PERFORMANCE TARGETS
Presentation transcript:

Essentials of Machine Safety Standards in Perspective

Why Safety?

Legal Framework

AS 4360 Risk Management A Type AS 4024 Safety of Machinery AS Functional Safety EN954-1EN418EN294 IEC B Type AS60621 Safety of Machiner y AS61511 Process Safety AS61513 Oil & Gas AS1755 Conveyor s AS1219 Power Presses AS2939 Robot Cells C Type Australian Standards

Occupation Safety and Health Act supported by The General Duties Resolution of Issues Safety and Health Representatives Safety and Health Committees Enforcement of Act and Regulations Occupation Safety and Health Regulations and Set minimum requirements for specific hazards and work practices Reference to National Standards developed by NOSH Australian Standards developed by Standards Australia National Standard of Plant Guidance Material Codes of Practice Advisory Standards National Codes of Practice and National Standards developed by the NOHSC Australian Standards developed by Standards Australia Legal Framework

Safety - Acceptable Risk Level Risk 0 does not exist but it must be reduced up to an acceptable level Safety is the absence of risks which could cause injury or damage the health of persons. It’s one of the machine designer job to reduce all risks to a value lower than the acceptable risk.

“It is the control of the design and design- associated activity that leads to a responsibility as an obligation bearer, not their classification as a manufacturer, supplier, etc.” National Occupational Health and Safety Commision - Safe Design Project Report 2000 Safe Design

Hierarchy of Control Making it safe

Basic concepts According to the requirements of standard EN/ISO , the machine designer’s job is to reduce all risks to a value lower than the acceptable risk It gives guidelines for the selection and installation of devices which can be used to protect persons and identifies those measures that are implemented by the machine designer and those dependent on its user ●This standard recognises two sources of hazardous phenomena: ●moving parts of machines ●moving tools and/or workpieces

Reasonably Practicable How WorkSafe applies the law in relation to Reasonably Practicable WORKSAFE POSITION A GUIDELINE MADE UNDER SECTION 12 OF THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT 2004 (November 2007) In applying the concept of reasonably practicable, careful consideration must be given to each of the matters set out in section 20(2) of the Act. No one matter determines ‘what is (or was at a particular time) reasonably practicable in relation to ensuring health and safety’. The test involves a careful weighing up of each of the matters in the context of the circumstances and facts of the particular case with a clear presumption in favour of safety. Weighing up each of the matters in section 20(2) should be done in light of the following: a)Likelihood b)Degree of Harm c)What the person knows about the risk and ways of eliminating that risk d)Availability and suitability of ways to eliminate or reduce the risk e)Cost of eliminating or reducing the risk

NOTE: A risk assessment must never been a bill of materials or allow the controls selection to be driven by what the vendor has to offer. Risk Assessment

Machines are sources of potential risk and the Machinery Directive requires a risk assessment to ensure that any potential risk is reduced to less than the acceptable risk Risk assessment consists of a series of logic steps which make it possible to systematically analyse and evaluate machinery-related risks Risk assessment steps: –Identification of the potential hazard –Risk estimation –Risk evaluation EN/ISO => Performance Level (PL) EN/IEC => Safety Integrity Level (SIL) –Risk reduction Risk Assessment Principles

Risk Evaluation On the basis of the risk assessment, the designer has to define the safety related control system. To achieve that, the designer will chose one of the two standards appropriate to the application: –either standard EN/ISO , which defines performance levels (PL) –or standard EN/IEC 62061, which defines safety integrity levels (SIL) The table below gives relations between these two definitions To select the applicable standard, a common table in both standards gives indications: - (1) For designated architectures only d

Reliability - the ability of a system or component to perform its required functions under stated conditions for a specified period of time. [1] It is often reported as a probability.system [1]probability Probability is the likelihood or chance that something is the case or will happen.Probability

Change of Standards The qualitative approach of the EN is no longer sufficient for modern controls based on new technologies (Electronic and Programmable Electronic systems): –insufficient requirements for programmable products, –The reliability of the components is not taken into account, –too deterministic orientation (designated architectures). Standard EN ISO will totally replace the EN in November 2009, and will upgrade the qualitative approach by the new quantitative (probabilistic) approach and is consistent with safety standards in general. –At the moment both standards EN and EN/ISO are valid For complex machines using programmable systems for safety-related control, the sector specific standard EN/IEC has to be considered –EN/IEC based on EN/IEC 61508

Standard EN/IEC Specific to the machine sector within the framework of EN/IEC 61508: –gives rules for the integration of safety-related electrical, electronic and electronic programmable control systems (SRECS) –does not specify the operating requirements of non-electrical control components in machine (ex.: hydraulic, pneumatic) The probability of failure associated to the required SIL (Safety Integrity Level) depends on the frequency of usage of the safety function to be performed Safety of Machinery application EN/IEC 62061

Standard EN/ISO The Standard gives safety requirements for the design and integration of safety-related parts of control systems, including software design. The Risk Graph helps to determine the required PL (Performance Level) of each safety function –S - Severity of injury >S1 Slight injury >S2 Serious or permanent injury or death –F - Frequency and / or exposure to a hazard >F1 Seldom to less often and / or short time >F2 Frequent to continuous and / or long time –P - Possibility of avoiding the hazard or limiting the harm >P1 Possible under specific conditions >P2 Scarcely possible

Relationship Between Different Criteria Relationship between Categories, DC avg, MTTF d and PL *In several application the realisation of performance level c by category 1 may not be sufficient. In this case a higher category e.g. 2 or 3 should be chosen.