DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Streamgaging Task Force Final Report Advisory Committee on Water Information Herndon, Virginia April 3, 2002.
Advertisements

Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Governor’s State Water Law Review Committee Recommendations 1982: Implementation Update David G. Baize Bureau of Water.
0 James Kennedy, Ph.D., P.G. State Geologist Georgia Environmental Protection Division Georgia Comprehensive State-Wide Water Management Plan Assessment.
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
Why is Groundwater Important? Drinking water for nearly 50% of US 98% of rural domestic supplies 35% of public supplies 42% of irrigation for agriculture.
Bernie Engel Purdue University. Web-based DSS Tools Online Watershed DelineationOnline Watershed Delineation L-THIA & L-THIA LIDL-THIA & L-THIA LID Watershed.
Climate and Management Alternatives in Snake River Basin Nathan VanRheenen and Richard N. Palmer Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University.
Climate-Change Impacting Hydrologic Forecasting Reggina Cabrera NOAA/National Weather Service Eastern Region, Chief Hydrologic Services Division.
Getting the Big Picture How to Look at Your Watershed Indiana Watershed Planning Guide,
©2002 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University Great Lakes Protection Fund Project Restoring.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
Virginia’s Water Quantity Management. Quality – Quantity Relationship  Key concept: both are beneficial uses of available flow or supply  Water quality.
Integrating Historical and Realtime Monitoring Data into an Internet Based Watershed Information System for the Bear River Basin Jeff Horsburgh David Stevens,
Apalachicola/Chattahoochee/Flint Focus Area - USGS WaterSMART NIDIS SE Climate Forum Lake Lanier Islands, GA December 2, 2011.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies RegIS2: Regional Climate Change Impact & Response Studies
Integrated Water Management Modeling Framework in Nebraska Association of Western State Engineers Spring Workshop Salt Lake City, Utah June 9, 2015 Mahesh.
North Fork Shenandoah River Results Application For the State Drought Assessment Plan Jennifer L. Krstolic and Donald C. Hayes.
Columbia River Water Management Program (CRWMP) Review of Year One Upper Crab Creek Planning Unit Meeting April 17, 2007.
Characterization Report Module 2: Water Budget, Pressures and Impacts, Significant Water Management Issues, Monitoring, Characterization Report Characterization.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Upper Colorado River Basin spatial analysis of water demand Olga Wilhelmi Kevin Sampson Jennifer Boehnert Kathleen Miller NCAR, Boulder.
Georgia’s Water Plan June 17, /09/08 Page 2 Agenda Plan Development Plan Overview.
Understanding Instream Flow Incremental Methodology (IFIM) Joey Kleiner.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
ESET ALEMU WEST Consultants, Inc. Bellevue, Washington.
Senate Enrolled Act No. 369 Update Indiana’s Water Shortage Plan.
Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Monitoring in the Lake Michigan Basin Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council.
Collaborative climate impacts work in the Carolinas Greg Carbone Dept. of Geography University of South Carolina Shenandoah Valley.
Apalachicola River and Bay NIDIS System Development Workshop Breakout Session #1 April 27, 2010 Victor Murphy-NWS Southern Region.
Drought Response Plan Clarke County, Virginia Saving Water/Saving Money: Water Conservation in the Shenandoah Valley March 11, 2009 Alison Teetor Natural.
Drought and Water Supply Issues in. Water Supply Concerns Reduced supply - droughtIncreasing demand.
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R. Maidment, David G. Tarboton and Ayse Irmak GIS in Water Resources Fall 2009.
“America’s NOAA National Weather Service: Protecting Lives, Livelihoods, and A Way of Life” Water Resources Vision 2020 Deliver a broader suite of improved.
Streamflow Information in Texas David R. Maidment Director, Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin USGS Workshop, Fort Worth,
South Platte Decision Support System Colorado Water Conservation Board and Division of Water Resources.
Regional Integrated Science Projects - Opequon Creek/Shenandoah River Basins Agencies Involved – USGS Water, Geology, GIO/ Geography, and Biology Disciplines,
1 Critical Water Information for Floods to Droughts NOAA’s Hydrology Program January 4, 2006 Responsive to Natural Disasters Forecasts for Hazard Risk.
Development of a Geographic Framework for an Integrated Flood Modeling System Oscar Robayo Tim Whiteaker August 10, 2004 University of Texas at Austin.
BASINS 2.0 and The Trinity River Basin By Jóna Finndís Jónsdóttir.
1 Water Resources Management - DEQ’s Role in Water Supply - State Water Commission October 1, 2002.
Preserving Our Water Resources: New Directions in Water Supply Planning.
March 21, 2006 Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill 2860 Columbia River Basin – Water Supply Keith Holliday Watershed Lead Washington State Dept. of.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Update on A National Water Census * Part of the Initiative U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey.
2016 Columbia River Basin Long-Term Water Supply and Demand Forecast Dan Haller, PE
Adaptive Integrated Framework (AIF): a new methodology for managing impacts of multiple stressors in coastal ecosystems A bit more on AIF, project components.
How the Shenandoah Valley Science Consortium Happened From the Perspective of Richard Wertz, Executive Director of the Foundation for Earth Science October.
PROJECT PLAN: The Nature Conservancy Corps of Engineers ICPRB Presentation Potomac Watershed Roundtable January 9, 2009.
A Modeling Framework for Improved Agricultural Water Supply Forecasting George Leavesley, Colorado State University, Olaf David,
Water Quality Investigations How Does Land-Use Impact Water Quality? Mitigating Water Quality – Current Issues July 9, 2015 Jim Kipp, Associate Director.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Overview and Evaluation of the Current Hydrologic Data Network Scott Morlock USGS Indiana Water.
Business as Unusual Leveraging the Water Supply Planning Process to Create Economic Opportunity, Enhance Environmental Integrity and Increase Regulatory.
State Water Resources Plan October 28, Active monitoring and reporting of water resources Active SWCB Planning Efforts – Watershed plans.
Water Census Progress: DRB Focus Area Perspective Bob Tudor Deputy Director Delaware River Basin Commission.
Modeling with WEAP University of Utah Hydroinformatics - Fall 2015.
1 NOAA’s Integrated Water Forecasting Program Gary Carter Director, NWS Office of Hydrologic Development Manager, NOAA Integrated Water Forecasting Program.
Water Availability 1996 Texas drought –Governor Bush asks “how much water do we have? How much are we using? How much do we need?” -- Ooops. No good answers!
Development and Application of a Groundwater-Flow Model of the Atlantic Coastal Plain aquifers, Aiken County, South Carolina to Support Water Resource.
Ten Reasons to Use South Carolina’s Surface Water Quantity Models
National Hydro Data Programs
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources by David R
Flood Potential in Africa
Hydrologic Conditions: Surface and Ground Water Resources July 2012
Data Sources for GIS in Water Resources
Research on Climate Change on Water, including Natural Hazards Contribution to SSG discussions and science-policy interfacing Philippe QUEVAUVILLER European.
Presentation transcript:

DEQ Water Supply Planning Integrating Monitoring, Modeling, and Scientific Study with Adaptive Management and Planning

DEQ-WSP Research Goals  Projecting the impact of future water use on surface water availability, and subsequent impact on instream resources (1,3,4)  Determining the extent of hydrologic alteration as a result of past, present, and future water use patterns (1,3)  Integrating water supply planning with water quality implementation – TMDL (2,6,7) 1.Stream and groundwater flow interactions 2.Levels of GW pollution 3.GW budgets by local area 4.Underground watersheds in Karst areas 5.Deepwater reservoirs 6.Air quality & water quality 7.Soil quality, water retention, water quality

DEQ-WSP Research Goals, cont.  Modeling water use alternatives to minimize the impact of withdrawals on instream resources, and maximize the availability for on/off-stream beneficial uses (1,2,6,7)  Developing decision support systems to integrate monitoring, modeling and scientific investigation with water supply planning (All) In areas of significant impacts, to enhance/restore beneficial flow patterns (where possible) 1.Stream and groundwater flow interactions 2.Levels of GW pollution 3.GW budgets by local area 4.Underground watersheds in Karst areas 5.Deepwater reservoirs 6.Air quality & water quality 7.Soil quality, water retention, water quality

Current DEQ-WSP Research  VA USGS to perform low-flow analysis in un-gaged streams (follow on to recently completed study to characterize low/base flows in gaged watersheds)  DEQ groundwater characterization group is expanding GW monitoring network: Expanded real-time well monitoring sites (Bath and Shenandoah county sites added this year, Page county site pending) Developing updated spring location inventory (last update was in 1928) Adding selected springs to monitoring network All expanded monitoring data is integrated with USGS NWIS system  Developing online water use reporting and planning application for creation and evaluation of long-term regional and state-wide water supply plans  Design of DSS prototype based on “Stream Habitat Modeling to Support Water Management Decisions in the North Fork Shenandoah River, Virginia” (VT-FWS 2004)

Prototype DSS – North Fork

DSS Components  USGS Real-time and Historical data Stream gage flow Groundwater well level (from adjacent basin)  NOAA gridded precipitation (4 km 2 grid)  Model of habitat response to stream flow Fish guild approach: riffle, fast generalist, pool-run, and pool-cover fishes Conditions conducive to “nuisance” algal blooms Drought flow levels defined for normal, watch, warning, and emergency  Hydrologic models Land-use effects on flow DEQ point source discharge data (quantity and quality) VWUDS water withdrawal data  Web-based DSS interface GIS components for navigation, visualization and analysis Software libraries for data retrieval from USGS NWIS system, and NOAA gridded precipitation data Software framework for generating model data inputs, executing models, and returning model output to the decision support system

Perceived Data/Analysis Gaps  Need to develop tools that facilitate the application of previous scientific, monitoring and modeling data/models into usable decision support systems Short to mid-term forecasting of stream flows for drought management Need to develop greater data sharing protocols, to bring data such as aquatic resource surveys, and implementation/response monitoring to the level currently exhibited by USGS monitoring data Need to develop criteria for evaluating the uncertainties in the data and models informing the DSS, and their appropriate range of application  Understanding historical surface and groundwater use impacts on stream flows (what is a “pre-development” flow, and is it necessary to know this)  Better understanding of the magnitude of agricultural water use, and the consumptive nature of all uses in general  Impact of groundwater withdrawals on base flows (short term and long term)