Shivendra G. Tewari 1, Ranjan K. Pradhan 1,2, Jason N. Bazil 1,2, Amadou K.S. Camara 3, David F. Stowe 2,3, Daniel A. Beard 1,2, and Ranjan K. Dash 1,2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Essential Biochemistry Charlotte W. Pratt | Kathleen Cornely
Advertisements

CELLULAR RESPIRATION STATIONS Markley. STATION 1: OVERVIEW.
Overview of oxidative phosphorylation
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
CO 2 + H 2 O Photosynthesis (plants, algae, cyanobacteria) C 6 H 12 O 6 + O 2 Cellular Respiration (Eukaryotic cells) CO 2 + H 2 O.
Electron Transport and Oxidative Phosphorylation It all reduces down to water.
Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore Gao Qin.
Objectives Contrast the roles of glycolysis and aerobic respiration in cellular respiration. Relate aerobic respiration to the structure of a mitochondrion.
Biology 107 Cellular Respiration October 3, 2003.
© 2007 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Bioenergetics EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY Theory and Application to Fitness and Performance,
Biology 107 Cellular Respiration September 30, 2005.
Chapter 14 - Electron Transport and Oxidative Phosphorylation
Chapter 13 &14 Energy Generation in Mitochondria.
Chapter 14 (part 2) Oxidative phosphorylation. Proton Motive Force (  p ) PMF is the energy of the proton concentration gradient The chemical (  pH=
Oxidation of glucose and fatty acids to CO 2 Respiration involves the oxidation of glucose and other compounds to produce energy. C 6 H 12 O
Oxidative Phosphorylation. Definition It is the process whereby reducing equivalents produced during oxidative metabolism are used to reduce oxygen to.
Oxidative Phosphorylation and ATP 24.5 ATP Energy from Glucose Chapter 24 Metabolism and Energy Production.
Cellular Respiration Part 2 Glycolysis - Pages 93 to 95.
Cellular Respiration.
Key Area 1: Cellular respiration Glycolysis, Citric Acid Cycle, Electron Transport Chain Unit 2: Metabolism and Survival.
The Proton-Motive Force
Mitochondrial potassium transport: the role of the MitoK ATP WeiGuo
The Role of Electron Transport in Metabolism
Electron transport chain Cellular respiration is a series of reactions that: -are oxidations – loss of electrons -are also dehydrogenations lost electrons.
Objective: You will be able to compare and contrast the equations of respiration. Do Now: Read p. 221 What is the most important use of food?
Outer membrane inner membrane matrix red = respiratory chain proteins green = ATP synthases Figure 1. Location of enzymes involved in oxidative phosphorylation.
Electron Transport Chain (ETC) & Oxidative Phosphorylation COURSE TITLE: BIOCHEMISTRY 2 COURSE CODE: BCHT 202 PLACEMENT/YEAR/LEVEL: 2nd Year/Level 4, 2nd.
Mitochondrial Function Structure Citric acid cycle Electron transport Regulatory/modulatory signaling.
Chapter 7: Cellular Pathways That Harvest Chemical Energy Cellular Pathways That Harvest Chemical Energy Obtaining Energy and Electrons from GlucoseObtaining.
Pathways That Harvest Chemical Energy
Binding ADP + P i Synthesizing ATP Releasing ATP The binding-change mechanism or rotational catalysis (Paul Boyer, 1980s)‏ Each  subunit will take.
Respiration. Cellular respiration — glucose broken down, removal of hydrogen ions and electrons by dehydrogenase enzymes releasing ATP. The role of ATP.
After pyruvate is oxidized, the citric acid cycle completes the energy-yielding oxidation of organic molecules. Chapter 9, Section 3.
Cellular Respiration. What is Cellular Respiration? Cellular respiration is a catabolic pathway in which oxygen is consumed along with organic fuel. In.
Structure of a typical eukaryotic plasma membrane.
+ Cellular Respiration: the details Miss Tee
Chapters 3 and 7: Enzymes and Cellular Respiration.
Chapter 9 Cellular respiration: Harvesting Chemical energy
AP Biology Cellular Respiration – Glycolysis, Krebs Cycle, and ETC Part 2.
Electron Transport System & Chemiosmosis
OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION
School of Sciences, Lautoka Campus BIO509 Lecture 27: Respiration
Cellular Respiration and Fermentation
Energy Flow and Matter Cycling (Carbon)
Metabolism, cell respiration and photosynthesis
How do cells extract energy from glucose?
Cellular Respiration Harvesting Chemical Energy
Energy Using Stage of Glycolysis
Energy Generation in Mitochondria and Chloroplasts
Ranjan K. Pradhan, Daniel A. Beard, Ranjan K. Dash  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
5.7 Electron Transport Chain
Marko Vendelin, Maris Lemba, Valdur A. Saks  Biophysical Journal 
Oxidative Phosphorylation Results from Cellular Respiration
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages 1-13 (July 2000)
Ranjan K. Dash, Feng Qi, Daniel A. Beard  Biophysical Journal 
Key Area 2 Cell Respiration
Cellular Respiration Chapter 9
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Chemotrophic Energy Metabolism: Aerobic Respiration
Volume 113, Issue 7, Pages (October 2017)
Sonia Cortassa, Brian O'Rourke, Raimond L. Winslow, Miguel A. Aon 
Glycolytic and mitochondrial ATP production, the electron transport chain, and oxidative phosphorylation Glycolytic and mitochondrial ATP production, the.
Volume 105, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Electrogenic Partial Reactions of the Gastric H,K-ATPase
Ranjan K. Dash, Feng Qi, Daniel A. Beard  Biophysical Journal 
Jason N. Bazil, Daniel A. Beard, Kalyan C. Vinnakota 
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Presentation transcript:

Shivendra G. Tewari 1, Ranjan K. Pradhan 1,2, Jason N. Bazil 1,2, Amadou K.S. Camara 3, David F. Stowe 2,3, Daniel A. Beard 1,2, and Ranjan K. Dash 1,2 1 Biotechnology and Bioengineering Center, 2 Department of Physiology, and 3 Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI Characterization of Different Modes of Ca 2+ Uptake under Different Physiological Conditions in the Heart Mitochondria Model of Mitochondrial Bioenergetics and Ca 2+ Handling The model is developed from the Beard’s model of mitochondrial respiratory system and oxidative phosphorylation (1) to account for the dynamics of mitochondrial Na + -Ca 2+ cycle and interaction between extra-matrix Mg 2+ and Ca 2 (2, 3), and additional pathway (fCU) for mitochondrial Ca 2+ uptake. The Ca 2+ sequestration model consists of four types of buffering proteins : BP1, BP2, BP3 and BP4 in the matrix. The integrated model includes the reactions at complex I, III, IV, and F0F1 ATPase of the electron transport system; the substrate transporters (ANT and PHT), cation transporters (sCU, fCU, NCE, NHE, CHE, and KHE), and passive K + and H + permeations across the mitochondrial inner membrane; and the passive substrate transport fluxes of adenines and phosphates across the mitochondrial outer membrane. Both uniporters sCU and fCU are inhibited by extra-matrix Mg 2+. The flux through the TCA cycle producing NADH is expressed in terms of a phenomenological dehydrogenase flux. ANT: adenine nucleotide translocase, PHT: phosphate-hydrogen cotransporter, sCU: slow Ca 2+ uniporter, fCU: fast Ca 2+ uniporter, NCE: 3Na + /1Ca 2+ exchanger, NHE: Na + /H + exchanger, CHE: Ca 2+ /H + exchanger, and KHE: K + /H + exchanger. (1): Beard, PLoS Comput Biol 1(4): e36, 2005; (2): Dash and Beard, J Physiol 586(13): , 2008; (3): Pradhan et al., Biophysical J 101(9): , Kinetic Mechanism of Ca 2+ Influx via Ca 2+ Uniporter with Mg 2+ Inhibition The uniporter T is assumed to have two binding sites for both Ca 2+ on either side of the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) and two distinct binding sites for Mg 2+ on the cytoplasmic side of the IMM. (A) Two Ca 2+ ions from the cytoplasmic side cooperatively bind to the uniporter in two steps to form the complex T2Ca 2+ e which then undergoes conformal changes to form the complex 2Ca 2+ x T. This complex goes through the reverse process where it dissociates in two steps to form the unbound uniporter T and two Ca 2+ ions in the matrix side. (B) A linear mixed-type scheme for Mg 2+ inhibition of Ca 2+ influx via the uniporter. The Mg 2+ interacts with the Ca 2+ only in the cytoplasmic side of the IMM. There is no Mg 2+ binding to uniporter T from the matrix side of the IMM. But in the matrix side, Ca 2+ binding is symmetrical to that of the cytoplasmic side as shown in this figure. The transport of Ca 2+ via the uniporter is limited by the rate constants k i and k o which are dependent on  m, and modulated by extra-matrix free [Ca 2+ ], matrix free [Ca 2+ ] and extra-matrix free [Mg 2+ ].  The figure is reproduced from Pradhan et al., Biophysical J 101(9): , Abstract / Summary Cardiac mitochondria can act as a significant Ca 2+ sink and shape the cytosolic Ca 2+ signals affecting various cellular processes such as energy metabolism and excitation-contraction coupling. However, mitochondrial Ca 2+ uptake mechanisms under different (patho)physio- logical conditions are not well understood. Characterization of these mechanisms is crucial in developing a quantitative understanding of Ca 2+ signals in the heart. For this purpose, we performed Ca 2+ uptake experiments in isolated guinea pig heart mitochondria under different experimental concentrations of extra-matrix Mg 2+ and Ca 2+. The Na + free respiration buffer contained 1 mM EGTA with variable levels of Mg 2+ (0 mM–2 mM) and CaCl 2 (0.0 mM–0.6 mM) was added as a pulse after mitochondrial energization with substrate was pyruvic acid. Experimental data were analyzed using an integrated model of mitochondrial bioenergetics and cation handling. Our model analyses of the data reveal the existence of two Ca 2+ uniporters or Ca 2+ uptake pathways, namely a fast CU (fCU) and a slow CU (sCU), which exhibit contrasting differences in [Ca 2+ ] e and [Mg 2+ ] e sensitivities. fCU is a time-dependent high affinity Ca 2+ uniporter, while sCU is a time-independent low affinity Ca 2+ uniporter. Both uniporters are inhibited by extra-matrix Mg 2+. The binding affinity of fCU for Mg 2+ is higher as compared to that of sCU. This work was supported by NIH/R01-HL Matrix and Extra-matrix Free Ca 2+ Dynamics with Mg 2+ Inhibition Model Simulations of Fluxes through Two Types of Uniporter: sCU and fCU (A) (B) Comparison of model simulations to data on the dynamics of buffer (A) and matrix (B, C, D) free [Ca 2+ ] in the absence ([Mg 2+ ] e = 0) and presence of 0.5 and 1 mM Mg 2+ in Na + free buffer mediums. Adding CaCl 2 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.6 mM) caused a dose-dependent increase in [Ca 2+ ] m, consistent with the increase in [Ca 2+ ] e. Two different phase of uptake (slow and fast) were observed during and after adding CaCl 2. The slow phase of Ca 2+ uptake was through the low affinity Ca 2+ uniporter and the fast phase was through the high affinity Ca 2+ uniporter. Model accurately describes the data for all Mg 2+ levels and Mg 2+ reduces [Ca 2+ ] m. CaCl 2 was added at t = 120 s. TypeDefinitionValueUnits BP1 [B Ca,1 ]Total protein concentration30.0mM K Ca,1 Ca 2+ binding constant6.00µM n1n1 Number of binding sites1- BP2 [B Ca,2 ]Total protein concentration35.0mM K Ca,2 Ca 2+ binding constant5.9µM n2n2 Number of binding sites2- BP3 [B Ca,3 ]Total protein concentration40.0mM K Ca,3 Ca 2+ binding constant5.8µM n3n3 Number of binding sites3- BP4 [B Ca,4 ]Total protein concentration45.0mM K Ca,4 Ca 2+ binding constant5.7µM n4n4 Number of binding sites4- Ca 2+ Buffering Power (β Ca ) is a manifestation of the Ca 2+ sequestration system. For every Ca 2+ ion entering (or leaving) the mitochondria, only a fraction remain free. This can be written as: For highly buffered conditions, β Ca is large. Mathematically: Table 1. Buffering Model Parameters Ca 2+ Sequestration System in Mitochondrial Matrix Simulations of slow (time- independent) and fast (time- dependent) Ca 2+ uniporter fluxes for three levels of extra-matrix MgCl 2 and four levels of extra-matrix CaCl 2. NCE was inactivated. (A,B,C): Dynamics of slow, low affinity uniporter fluxes (sCU) in response to added CaCl 2 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.6 mM), in the absence (A) and presence of 0.5 mM MgCl 2 (B) and 1 mM MgCl 2 (C) added to the buffer medium. (D,E,F): Dynamics of fast, high affinity uniporter fluxes (sCU) in response to added CaCl 2 (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.6 mM), in the absence (A) and presence of 0.5 mM MgCl 2 (B) and 1 mM MgCl 2 (C) added to the buffer medium. In all the experiments and simulations, MgCl 2 was added at t = 0 s and CaCl 2 was added at t = 120 s. Ca 2+ fluxes by both the slow and fast uniporters were obser- ved to be inhibited by extra- matrix Mg 2+. In addition, the fast uniporter is slowly inactivating depending on the matrix free [Ca 2+ ]. Blue: 0 mM CaCl 2 Green: 0.25 mM CaCl 2 Red : 0.5 mM CaCl 2 Pink: 0.6 mM CaCl 2 (C) (A) (D) (B) (A)(D) (B) (E) (C) (F)