Online Class by Satyadhar Joshi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Scientific Method 6 easy steps.
Advertisements

Tool for Reading Comprehension: Graphic Organizers
Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Exam Technique PAPER TWO
Techniques for Solving Logic Puzzles. Logic Puzzles Logic puzzles operate using deductive logic. Logic puzzles operate using deductive logic. A well-designed.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Test the validity of this argument: Some lawyers are judges. Some judges are politicians. Therefore, some lawyers are politicians. A. Valid B. Invalid.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Lecture Notes for the GRE Analytical Writing Strategies Lesson #1 Analytical Writing Strategies.
General GRE Online Class By: Satyadhar Joshi Probability for GRE (Level 4-5) / Quantum CAT (Level 2) / GMAT
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
By Satyadhar Joshi May 2011 Online Class
LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.
1 Discrete Structures CS Johnnie Baker Comments on Early Term Test.
The SAT Critical Reading Section Continued: Passage-Based Questions
Chapter 3 Section 5 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Introduction to Venn Diagrams SP This is a Venn diagram for two terms. We can conceive of every element of S as being within the boundary of the S circle.
DETAILED ANALYSIS MOCK TEST 12 ( ). INTRODUCTION Mock Test 12 follows the pattern of Symbiosis Entrance Test (SET) wherein the students are subjected.
Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning. Objectives Use a Venn diagram to determine the validity of an argument. Complete a pattern with the most likely possible.
CH1 – 3 REVIEW Summary. CHAPTER 1: 1A RECOGNIZING FALLACIES KEY TERMS AND KEY IDEAS AND SKILLS  Key Terms  Logic  Argument – premises, conclusions.
+ Math Renewal Committee November 10, Introduction Welcome NCSD web page.
Logical Arguments. Strength 1.A useless argument is one in which the truth of the premisses has no effect at all on the truth of the conclusion. 2.A weak.
Detailed Analysis. Mock Test 8 follows the pattern of Symbiosis Entrance Test (SET) wherein the students are subjected to the same level of difficulty.
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
1 SheetCourse: Engineering Graphics 1504Memorial University of Newfoundland Engi 1504 – Graphics Lecture 5: Sectioning and Dimensioning l Sectioning an.
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
Venn Diagrams Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Sets & Valid Arguments Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Implications Truth Tables Converse, Inverse,
The construction of a formal argument
Preparing for the OCR Functional Skills Maths Assessment
Developing Questionnaires. What is a questionnaire? A group of printed questions that the respondent answers by him/herself A key assumption: the respondent.
Entry Task Write down your age Multiply it by 10 Add 8 to the product Double that answer and subtract 16 Divide the result by 20 Explain what you notice.
Chapter 17: Missing Premises and Conclusions. Enthymemes (p. 168) An enthymeme is an argument with an unstated premise or conclusion. There are systematic.
MOCK TEST 11 ( ) Detailed Analysis.  Mock Test 11 follows the CLAT pattern wherein the students are subjected to the same level of difficulty both.
Answering the Edexcel Impact of War Paper 7thth June 2011.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
SCRATCHING BENEATH THE SURFACE OF ‘ASIA’S WORLD CITY’
Pre-MYE Auto-Learning Module 4 of 4 Important Exam Tips.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Mental Ability Tests Dr. K. Mangayarkarasi Dept of Career Guidance & Extension, Bhrathiar University Coimabatore.
Discrete Structures MT217 Lecture 01. Course Objectives Express statements with the precision of formal logic Analyze arguments to test their validity.
Venn Diagram Technique for testing syllogisms
Deductive reasoning.
MOCK TEST 15 ( ) DETAILED ANALYSIS.
MOCK TEST 8 ( ) DETAILED ANALYSIS.
MOCK TEST 4 ( ) DETAILED ANALYSIS.
Venn Diagrams 1= s that are not p; 2= s that are p; 3= p that are not s S P.
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Session 8 Exam techniques
Strategies for Success
MAT 142 Lecture Video Series
MOCK TEST 1 ( ) DETAILED ANALYSIS.
Academic Communication Lesson 3
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Mock Test 5 ( ) Detailed Analysis.
MOCK TEST 10 ( ) DETAILED ANALYSIS.
Applied Discrete Mathematics Week 1: Logic
Making Sense of Arguments
(June 2011 Session; repeat possible in July also)
5 Categorical Syllogisms
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
LSAT EXAM Test Day Instructions.
Cut an interesting piece of fruit in half
3.5 Symbolic Arguments.
Presentation transcript:

Online Class by Satyadhar Joshi

 This class is will introduce with the subject of the overall series which is divided in 12 lectures.  We will be doing some theory and questions related to the areas.  This area is important for MBA entrance exams and we will cover it from very basics.  For details on the subject check out my website or me.  This lecture will be taken with help of guest lecturer so that we can add his valuable comments.  6 questions, 6 minutes, 4 minutes table + 2 min question  Reduce options to 50-50

 Follow me at Wiziq (best way)  Unfortunately, Adding Members not possible on Wiziq (over 1000 friends request which could cost me around 1200 USD, or 80 thousand rupee)  Follow me Twitter  me at 

 Sitting and Linear arrangement  Complex arrangement  Comparison of Ranks  Blood Relation  Family Tree  Condition and Grouping  Quant Analysis

 Be careful in reading which line first as lines are jumbled  Use _ & *  Carefully keep extra info in side place  Keep trace of the directions  Conversion of Table domain from words  Removing all dependencies on words

 Drawing of table and putting marks of cross and right in the table  Again use the same concepts as seen in the last page  Carefully select the marking of the table and don’t change the marking once you make it; although change it completely if you think you are wrong (first 30 seconds)  Don’t worry if you don’t get each aspect filled  Take the goods even from the half done questions  X Y axis

 Use of various symbols for comparison of various ranks  Graphics  Arrows  Between the lists concepts

 Basics Terminologies  21 basics relations  Use of only vs son  Use of + -  Use of tree structure with various arrows, = to, etc etc  Comparison of different arrows

 Study of condition  Condition of grouping

 Syllogism  Statement of Assumption  Statement and Conclusion  Passage and Conclusion  Statement and Argument  Statement and course of action

 Preposition (also known as premises): Categorical, Hypothetical and Disjunctive  Types of Categorical Preposition  Some vs all (universal vs particular)  Drawing the circular diagram  Hidden Preposition  Venn diagram  Inferences: Methods to draw inferences  Three statement Syllalogism

 Valid assumption  Recommendation  Assumptions are based on some knowledge and some bases which should be checked  If 1 is implicit, or 2 is, or both, or either, or neither or both

 A-e in the same ways  Carefully draw inferences

 Four important points to be considered  Weak vs. Strong

 Analytical and Logical Reasoning by B S Sijwali Arriahant Publication