Marián Krivda on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration The University of Birmingham TWEPP-13 conference 23-27 September 2013, Perugia, Italy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the CTP O.Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham April 23rd 2009.
Advertisements

StreamBlade SOE TM Initial StreamBlade TM Stream Offload Engine (SOE) Single Board Computer SOE-4-PCI Rev 1.2.
Ancillary firmware for the NSW Trigger Processor Lorne Levinson, Weizmann Institute for the NSW Trigger Processor Working Group NSW Electronics Design.
ESODAC Study for a new ESO Detector Array Controller.
ALICE Trigger System Features Overall layout Central Trigger Processor Local Trigger Unit Software Current status On behalf of ALICE collaboration:D. Evans,
Alice EMCAL Meeting, July 2nd EMCAL global trigger status: STU design progress Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
6 June 2002UK/HCAL common issues1 Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: UK commitments Trigger issues DAQ issues Readout electronics issues Many more.
Marián Krivda on behalf of the ALICE trigger group The University of Birmingham Triggering Discoveries in High Energy Physics 9-14 September 2013, Jammu,
28 June 2004 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR Martin Postranecky TIM OVERVIEW1 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR 28 June 2004 Physics & Astronomy HEP Electronics.
Straw electronics Straw Readout Board (SRB). Full SRB - IO Handling 16 covers – Input 16*2 links 400(320eff) Mbits/s Control – TTC – LEMO – VME Output.
Global Trigger H. Bergauer, K. Kastner, S. Kostner, A. Nentchev, B. Neuherz, N. Neumeister, M. Padrta, P. Porth, H. Rohringer, H. Sakulin, J. Strauss,
Huazhong Normal University (CCNU) Dong Wang.  Introduction to the Scalable Readout System  MRPC Readout Specification  Application of the SRS to CMB-MRPC.
TID and TS J. William Gu Data Acquisition 1.Trigger distribution scheme 2.TID development 3.TID in test setup 4.TS development.
Trigger Supervisor (TS) J. William Gu Data Acquisition Group 1.TS position in the system 2.First prototype TS 3.TS functions 4.TS test status.
DLS Digital Controller Tony Dobbing Head of Power Supplies Group.
11 CTP Training A.Jusko, M. Krivda and R.Lietava..
GBT Interface Card for a Linux Computer Carson Teale 1.
David Cussans, AIDA/CALICE DAQ Palaiseau, 10 Nov 2011 Trigger/Timing Logic Unit (TLU) for AIDA Beam-Test.
Status of Data Exchange Implementation in ALICE David Evans LEADE 26 th March 2007.
LECC2003 AmsterdamMatthias Müller A RobIn Prototype for a PCI-Bus based Atlas Readout-System B. Gorini, M. Joos, J. Petersen (CERN, Geneva) A. Kugel, R.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
1 CTP offline software status (Offline week) A.Jusko and R.Lietava.
ALICE Computing Model The ALICE raw data flow P. VANDE VYVRE – CERN/PH Computing Model WS – 09 Dec CERN.
Status of Global Trigger Global Muon Trigger Sept 2001 Vienna CMS-group presented by A.Taurok.
Frank Lemke DPG Frühjahrstagung 2010 Time synchronization and measurements of a hierarchical DAQ network DPG Conference Bonn 2010 Session: HK 70.3 University.
Muon Electronics Upgrade Present architecture Remarks Present scenario Alternative scenario 1 The Muon Group.
R. Fantechi. TDAQ commissioning Status report on Infrastructure at the experiment PC farm Run control Network …
Latest ideas in DAQ development for LHC B. Gorini - CERN 1.
The ALICE Central Trigger Processor (CTP) Upgrade Marian Krivda 1) and Jan Pospíšil 2) On behalf of ALICE collaboration 1) University of Birmingham, Birmingham,
12GeV Trigger Workshop Christopher Newport University 8 July 2009 R. Chris Cuevas Welcome! Workshop goals: 1.Review  Trigger requirements  Present hardware.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
Status of TRD Pre-trigger System K. Oyama, T. Krawutschke, A. Rausch, J. Stachel, P. von Walter, R. Schicker and M. Stockmeier for the T0, V0, and TRD.
TTC for NA62 Marian Krivda 1), Cristina Lazzeroni 1), Roman Lietava 1)2) 1) University of Birmingham, UK 2) Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia 3/1/20101.
A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb (II) 1. S-TFC on xTCA – Mapping TFC on Marseille hardware 2. ECS+TFC relay in FE Interface 3. Protocol and commands for FE/BE.
STAR Pixel Detector readout prototyping status. LBNL-IPHC-06/ LG22 Talk Outline Quick review of requirements and system design Status at last meeting.
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
Pierre VANDE VYVRE ALICE Online upgrade October 03, 2012 Offline Meeting, CERN.
Firmware Overview and Status Erno DAVID Wigner Research Center for Physics (HU) 26 January, 2016.
18/05/2000Richard Jacobsson1 - Readout Supervisor - Outline Readout Supervisor role and design philosophy Trigger distribution Throttling and buffer control.
Control for CTP and LTU boards in Run
ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR28 June 2004 TIM Requirements - John Lane1 ATLAS SCT/Pixel TIM FDR/PRR 28 June 2004 Physics & Astronomy HEP Electronics John.
General Tracker Meeting: Greg Iles4 December Status of the APV Emulator (APVE) First what whyhow –Reminder of what the APVE is, why we need it and.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory September 1999Fifth Workshop on Electronics for LHC Presented by S. Quinton.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
Sergio Vergara Limon, Guy Fest, September Electronics for High Energy Physics Experiments.
PC-based L0TP Status Report “on behalf of the Ferrara L0TP Group” Ilaria Neri University of Ferrara and INFN - Italy Ferrara, September 02, 2014.
The Data Handling Hybrid Igor Konorov TUM Physics Department E18.
The ALICE Data-Acquisition Read-out Receiver Card C. Soós et al. (for the ALICE collaboration) LECC September 2004, Boston.
E. Hazen1 MicroTCA for HCAL and CMS Review / Status E. Hazen - Boston University for the CMS Collaboration.
Eric Hazen1 Ethernet Readout With: E. Kearns, J. Raaf, S.X. Wu, others... Eric Hazen Boston University.
E. Hazen -- Upgrade Week1 AMC13 Project Status E. Hazen - Boston University for the CMS Collaboration.
Use of FPGA for dataflow Filippo Costa ALICE O2 CERN
AMC13 Project Status E. Hazen - Boston University
Status and Performance of the ALICE Trigger Electronics
AMC13 T1 Rev 2 Preliminary Design Review E. Hazen Boston University
E. Hazen - Back-End Report
AMC13 Status Report AMC13 Update.
Firmware Structure Alireza Kokabi Mohsen Khakzad Friday 9 October 2015
ALICE Trigger Upgrade CTP and LTU PRR
L0 processor for NA62 Marian Krivda 1) , Cristina Lazzeroni 1) , Roman Lietava 1)2) 1) University of Birmingham, UK 2) Comenius University, Bratislava,
MicroTCA Common Platform For CMS Working Group
Front-end electronic system for large area photomultipliers readout
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
Trigger system Marián Krivda (University of Birmingham)
M. Krivda for the ALICE trigger project, University of Birmingham, UK
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
TELL1 A common data acquisition board for LHCb
The Trigger Control System of the CMS Level-1 Trigger
Presentation transcript:

Marián Krivda on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration The University of Birmingham TWEPP-13 conference September 2013, Perugia, Italy

 Short overview of the present ALICE Central Trigger Processor (CTP)  Upgrade requirements for Run 2 ( ) ◦ LM level, new and faster than L0 trigger level ◦ Extension of classes ◦ Extension of clusters ◦ Second link to DAQ ◦ New CTP L0 board  Ideas for upgrade for Run3 ( ) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Central Trigger Processor (CTP): receives trigger detector inputs, makes decision  Local Trigger Unit (LTU): interface between CTP and readout detectors  Trigger and Time Control (TTC): transmits LHC clock and delivers trigger signals to detectors Due to short time for L0 latency the CTP is in the experimental cavern 6U VME boards L0, L1, L2 boards BUSY board FO boards INT board I2C board LVDS Trigger inputs Outputs are sent to Local Trigger Units (LTUs) where conversion to TTC format occurs 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 3 HW trigger levels:  L0inputs to CTP up to 800 ns, time for making decision 100 ns, time for delivery to detectors up to 300 ns, together is max. 1.2 μs from interaction;  L1inputs to CTP up to 6.1 μs; time for making decision 100 ns, together is max. 6.5 μs from interaction;  L2delivered to detectors 105 μs from interaction.  60 trigger inputs  L0 24; L1 24; L2 12  Additional L0 input multiplexer (CTP switch) 48:24 as separate el. module  Up to 24 detectors  6 independent clusters  50 classes  Interaction record - records full history of selected triggers conditions with 25 ns precision which enables real time, bunch by bunch luminosity monitoring and selecting clean events without other interaction at close time (past-future protection) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

Trigger Conditions:  Logical combination of trigger inputs: ◦ Any logical function of first 4 inputs ◦ AND of other inputs  Bunch Crossing (BC) mask: ◦ Defines which BC are inspected for interaction in the ORBIT ◦ Usually corresponds to LHC filling scheme  Internal trigger: ◦ BC downscale ◦ Random Trigger Cluster:  Group of detectors to be read out 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 New CTP level -> LM (instead of TRD pretrigger)  100 classes (instead 50)  8 physics clusters (instead 6)  New hardware – CTP L0 board 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 TRD requires signal to activate electronics before trigger arrival in order to keep power consumption in TRD and start tracking processing as soon as possible to provide L1 trigger contribution  Currently generated locally (pretrigger)  In run 2, faster electronics and re-routed cabling allows this function to be performed in the CTP  TIMING: Minimum-Bias inputs (T0, V0) can now arrive at CTP 425ns after interaction; decision back at TRD 900 ns (instead of 1200ns for L0 trigger) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

LM generated by CTP (global mode) L-1 trigger Inputs T0 V0 (LVDS signals) New L0 board LTU board TTCex board GTU L0,L1,L1m,L2m (optical signal) Protocol Conv. board TTC-A TTC-B TRD FEE TTCex board LM, L0, L1 (optical sig.) LM generated by PrC (standalone mode) BUSY CTP TRD 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB  Two trigger sequences for TRD  Global\Standalone mode

 Variety of trigger definitions and background control has consumed current 50 classes  Extension of the number of classes to 100, each defined in the same way as at present  Simple to implement at CTP (just scaling)  Simple to implement in offline  no restrictions on attributes e.g. bc masks  Consequences:  Increase trigger data in TTC channel B (50 bits longer)  Change of DAQ Common Data Header (CDH) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 ALICE has many detectors with very different readout speeds, so better grouping of detectors for different physics triggers minimise loss of luminosity  6 physics + 1 software cluster available now  Limited by number of links on backplane connections between L0/L1/2 and FO boards  Increasing number of clusters to 8 requires multiplexing on backplane  Consequences: ◦ Increased latency of CTP for L0 trigger by one BC ◦ Change in L2a trigger message 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 10G Ethernet  New interaction (INT) record -> send 48 trigger inputs with each BC when interaction occurred instead of many INT definitions  New format of INT (and also of CTP readout – now reduced - via old link) currently under discussion  Control of new L0 board possible in future 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Faster inputs from T0 and V0 -> new LM trigger level  Upgrade of firmware for L1,L2,FO, BUSY and INT boards  Completely new L0 board New L0 board 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 96 trigger inputs -> new type of connector for front panel (48 inputs for L0 + other possible trigger inputs)  New FPGA – Xilinx Kintex7  Bigger memory (DDR3 - 1GB)  Synchronized downscaling  CTP switch for L0 trigger inputs (48->24) inside FPGA  More counters i.e. for classes and clusters  New 10G link to DAQ from L0 board  New interaction record -> send 24/48 inputs with each interaction  Control of L0 board via 10G Ethernet (or other protocol) in future 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

L0 logic 96 trigger inputs VME logic Control (DCS) Ethernet IP core DAQ 1 GB DDR3 memory DMA Connections to other CTP boards via User defined pins on VME backplane LHC clock Standalone oscillator 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

Very limited space for 4 flat cables 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB Right angle connector for 6U VME board ( mm x mm)

 10 usable I/O banks ◦ 7 High Range (HR) banks –> support 1.35 – 3.3V standards ◦ 3 High Performance (HP) banks -> support 1.35 – 1.8 V standards 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 The Master SPI configuration mode supports reading from an SPI flash using a data bus up to four bits wide  Config. CLK generated by FPGA  Configuration bitstream length -> 91,548,896  MICRON - N25Q128 (128-Mbit 3 V, 4-data pins, serial flash memory with 108 MHz SPI bus interface 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 JTAG interface for prototyping and debugging  On-board JTAG configuration circuitry to enable configuration over USB  USB JTAG module (DIGILENT) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 LM: latency 0.8 µs, contribution from new detector Fast Interaction Trigger (FIT), and TOF detector for cosmic trigger  L0: latency 1.2us, possible contribution from EMCAL, PHOS, TOF, ACORDE ◦ No additional LM can be accepted between LM and L0 because TRD is BUSY for 17 BCs  L1: latency µs (fixed latency during data taking, but programmable in the given range), possible contribution from ZDC, EMCAL 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 ITS, TPC and Muon Chambers can work in continuous OR triggered mode, all other detectors need trigger  The default operation would be a readout of all detectors that are not busy upon a Minimum Bias (MB) interaction trigger, with ITS, TPC and MCH in continuous readout mode (each detector as separate cluster)  Cluster with more detectors still possible (for special cases and calibration) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Specific trigger issued by CTP at appropriate ORBIT/BC (detectors create “heartbeat events” sent via output links to DAQ)  Used by processing nodes for data segmentation  Reduces trigger data bandwidth  Carrying commands and specific synchronization information 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Proposal is to use GBT  Some detectors will keep TTC  CTP needs to serve both systems 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

LM01 board Detector 1 repeater Custom protocol (electrical trans.) FI/FO board 1 FI/FO board 2 GBT TTC Detector 2 Detector trigger inputs DAQ FI/FO board n /09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB Custom protocol (electrical trans.)

 CTP to be upgraded for Run 2 to implement fast interaction trigger (LM) for better efficiency data taking and give more trigger capabilities (extended classes & clusters)  A new L0 board is in progress, production expected in autumn 2013  Firmware development and testing in 2014  CTP proposal for Run 3 is in preparation  The upgraded CTP for Run 3 will be able to provide enough flexibility for all foreseen running scenario 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Currently TRD pre-trigger is generated even if CTP is busy i.e. TRD pre-trigger electronics doesn`t see CTP busy signal  In order to reduce the level of “wasted” pre-triggers currently generated by TRD pre-trigger, the pre- trigger electronics will be replaced by a new level (LM) of trigger logic, run at the CTP, which will be used to generate a wake-up signal to the TRD  Needs new faster inputs from T0, and VZERO  Needs relocation of T0 and VZERO electronics closer to CTP -> in progress  Needs re-cabling of T0, VZERO and TRD trigger cables -> in progress  Needs new L0 board 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

Right angle connector for 6U VME board ( mm x mm) 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB 96 LVDS trigger inputs (200 pins - 96 diff. pairs + 8 GND pins)

New L0 board Raspberry Pi (model B) USB hub Ethernet USB cable USB cable Broadcom BCM MHz ARM1176JZFS processor with FPU and Videocore 4 GPU GPU provides Open GL ES 2.0, hardware-accelerated OpenVG, and 1080p30 H.264 high-profile decode GPU is capable of 1Gpixel/s, 1.5Gtexel/s or 24GFLOPs with texture filtering and DMA infrastructure 512MB RAM Boots from SD card, running a version of Linux 2 x USB 2.0 sockets 10/100 BaseT Ethernet socket Price: £ /09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Two trigger sequences for TRD ◦ GTU receives standard TTC sequence ( L0 – L1 – L2 ) from LTU -> TTCex ◦ FEE receives custom trigger sequence ( LM – L0 – L1 ) from CTP -> Protocol Converter -> TTCex  Global\Standalone mode ◦ In global mode CTP generates LM trigger which is sent to Protocol Converter (PC) board ◦ In standalone mode PC board generates LM trigger which is sent to PULSER input on LTU board 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

LM trigger for TRD – FPGA logic  Delayed copy of LM trigger input will be provided at L0 time 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 2 links: ◦ L0 Class data ◦ L0 Class strobe  L0 Class data used on current CTP to transmit 50 class bits  L0 Class strobe used on current CTP to transmit “L0 inputs” (sent from INT board to DAQ after each L2a trigger)  New L0 board => “L0 inputs” sent to DAQ directly (after each L0 trigger)  L0 Class strobe can be used to transmit another 50 class bits 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

◦ Cluster strobe can start at even or odd slice of transmission ◦ 2 consecutive BCs x 7 links = 14 bits available ◦ STROBE + 9 data bits + 4 Hamming bits ◦ 8 clusters + 1 test cluster (sw triggers) + 4 Hamming bits CLST_1CLST_7 CLST_2CLST_8 CLST_3CLST_9 (T) CLST_4Hamming_1 CLST_5Hamming_2 CLST_6Hamming_3 STROBEHamming_ /09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

CLST_1_BCLST_7_B CLST_2_BCLST_8_B CLST_3_BCLST_9_B (T) CLST_4_BHamming_1 CLST_5_BHamming_2 CLST_6_BHamming_3 STROBEHamming_4  2 consecutive BCs x 7 links = 14 bits available  STROBE + 9 data bits + 4 Hamming bits  Consequences -> 1 BC delay for BUSY 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

◦ If no cluster BUSY => no cluster BUSY strobe active ◦ Cluster BUSY strobe can start at even or odd slice of transmission ◦ Always make OR from 2 consecutive BUSY signals in order not to miss BUSY during transmission (50 ns) ◦ 8 clusters BUSYs + 1 test cluster BUSY (sw triggers) + Hamming bits 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

L1 Data serial format Serial bit Data Sequence ListL1 Message WordBitWordBit 1Spare ClT RoC[4..1] ESR0915 8L1SwC L1Class[50..1] L1Class[ ] Spare /09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

change 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 Discussion with Alice DAQ group ongoing 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

DetectortypeMEBt RO PbPbMax. PbPb readout rate Max. pp and pPb readout rate ITSCont. / L0n.a. / ? 100 kHz400kHz TPCCont. / L1n.a. TRDLM/LM+L1no7-8 µs100 kHz TOFL1yes5 µs200 kHz400kHz EMC/PHOSL0+L1yes at L120 µs50 kHz HMPIDL0+L1??10 kHz MuIDL1yes<200 ns100 kHz400kHz MCHCont. / L1n.a. 100 kHz400kHz V0/T0L1yes5us200 kHz400kHz ZDCL1yes5 µs100kHz400kHz 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 In order to handle more L0 trigger inputs the L0 trigger input multiplexer 50:24 has been made from available Faninout boards 23-27/09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 At 100kHz interaction rate the present CTP deadtime of 1.5 µs would lead to 15% inefficiency, which is of course too much.  The deadtime must therefore be reduced below 100ns and additional “input FIFO” can eliminate the CTP deadtime (de-randomizing in addition the CTP must be able to accept more than one L0 before arrival of L1).  In this way the CTP is not responsible for any rejection of data, it will only depend on the detector capabilities what fraction triggers is rejected by their own Busy i.e. by their deadtime and buffering capabilities /09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB

 ITS Cont / L0  TPC Cont / L1  TRD LM/LM+L1  TOF L1  EMC/PHOS L0+L1  HMPID L0+L1  MuID L1  MCH Cont / L1  V0/T0 L1  ZDC L /09/2013Marian Krivda - UoB