Theory of Change. TOC is an overarching theoretical framework on “how and why something works” A theory of change explains a process to reach a long-

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 UN Coherence: High level monitoring and evaluation approach.
Advertisements

Theories of Change and Logic Modeling: Matching Means and Ends
Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Program Theory and Logic Models (1) CHSC 433 Module 2/Chapter 5 Part 1 L. Michele Issel, PhD UIC School of Public Health.
1 Identifying Performance Indicators The Value of Logic Models Brian Frevel January 2004.
1 Theories of Change and Logic Models: Telling Them Apart Heléne Clark Director, ActKnowledge Andrea A. Anderson Research.
Theory of Change, Impact Monitoring, and Most Significant Change EWB-UK Away Weekend – March 23, 2013.
Guide to Project Proposals. Presentation overview Introduction and rationale Project goals and purpose Lit review and theoretical framework Methods Intended.
Program Evaluation. Lecture Overview  Program evaluation and program development  Logic of program evaluation (Program theory)  Four-Step Model  Comprehensive.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
RBM in the context of Operations and Programme and Project Management Material of the Technical Assistance Unit (TAU)
Session Four: M&E System for AfT bankable projects UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring.
The Lumina Center Grantseeking Workshop Series Presents Outcomes & Evaluations April 20, 2006.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Problem Identification
Action Writing Action Statements Writing action statements is the first step in the second (action) stage of the public health nutrition (PHN) intervention.
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
1 Minority SA/HIV Initiative MAI Training SPF Step 3 – Planning Presented By: Tracy Johnson, CSAP’s Central CAPT Janer Hernandez, CSAP’s Northeast CAPT.
Presented By: Tracy Johnson, Central CAPT
Refining a Theory of Change 1 Barbara Reed & Dan Houston November 2014.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Step 2. Describe Program Logic Models & Outcome Measurement
1 Types of Evaluation. 2 Different types of evaluation Needs assessment Process evaluation Impact evaluation Cost-benefit analysis.
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Theories of Change and Logic Models: Telling Them Apart
Nine steps of a good project planning
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
(c) 2014 Michael Sikes, Ph.D. Theory of Change: Bridging Ideas, Actions, and Results Michael Sikes, Ph.D. (805)
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Utilising a Theory of Change approach to Achieve Adaptive Co-Management Anna Evely, Ioan Fazey, Xavier Lambin and Michelle Pinard Universities of Aberdeen.
Program Evaluation and Logic Models
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Overview of the State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP)
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Introduction to Evaluation. Objectives Introduce the five categories of evaluation that can be used to plan and assess ACSM activities. Demonstrate how.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
MOD 6050 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND FUND RAISING TOPIC – PROPOSAL WRITING AND FUNDRAISING (WK 6 &8) LECTURER: DR. G. O. K’AOL.
Policymaking and evidence: how can we improve the fit? Sonia Sodha Head of Policy & Strategy The Social Research Unit at Dartington Using evidence to improve.
Assessment/Evaluation 1) Determine Desired Outcomes 2) Determine Activities to achieve outcome 3) Determine Indicators to measure whether you are making.
Prepared by the North Dakota State Data Center July HNDECA and ECCS Evaluation Dr. Richard Rathge Professor and Director North Dakota State Data.
Development Hypothesis or Theory of Change M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
Nancy L. Weaver, PhD, MPH Department of Community Health School of Public Health Saint Louis University 16 July 2010 LOGIC MODEL FUNDAMENTALS.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Logic Models: Laying the Groundwork for a Comprehensive Evaluation Office of Special Education Programs Courtney Brown, Ph.D. Center for Evaluation & Education.
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
Adrienne DiTommaso, MPA, CNCS Office of Research and Evaluation
Theory of Change Models Outcomes-Based Program Design Models.
Section B 8 Mark questions Comparison of Key People who improved Public Health Comparison of how much progress was made in different time periods Comparison.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Logic Models: The Pathway Model.
Logic Model, Monitoring, Tracking and Evaluation Evaluation (Section T4-2)
Evaluation and Implementation 21 October 2015 PUBH 535.
Planning for Continuous School Improvement
Theory of Change Articulating your project’s design theory.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Developing a Program Logic. What is a Program Logic? A program logic is like a roadmap for a project that sets out how a project will achieve its desired.
Development stage Identifying/developing theory Session III 1 st July –
Section C 8 Mark questions Comparison of Key People who improved Surgery and Anatomy Comparison of how much progress was made in different time periods.
Stages of Research and Development
Building an ENI CBC project
M&E Workshop for Full Proposal
Nursing Process Applied to Community Health Nursing
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Assignment 2 The final assignment requires you to develop a hypothetical health promotion intervention in the format of a grant proposal. This will involve:
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Regulated Health Professions Network Evaluation Framework
Presentation transcript:

Theory of Change

TOC is an overarching theoretical framework on “how and why something works” A theory of change explains a process to reach a long- term goal and provides a pathway to change from starting point to final outcome TOC is a process to gain stakeholders opinion and create consensus in the development of intervention

What are the elements of the ToC ImpactThe real world change you are trying to affect. The program may contribute towards achieving this impact, and not achieve it solely on its own. Long term outcomeThe final outcome the program is able to change on its own. PreconditionsWork backwards in logical steps that need to happen if the next preconditions or outcome is to be achieved. AssumptionsThe uncertainties to be tested through formative research or implementation – often barriers. RationaleThe justification or existing evidence that suggests that one precondition will logically lead to the next IndicatorsThings you can measure and document to determine whether you are making progress towards, or have achieved, each intermediate outcome. Interventions/ key activities What needs to be done to move from one outcome to the next. The different components of the program. Ceiling of accountability Line often drawn between impact and long term outcome.

Example ToC: Fruit consumption by children Children want to eat fruit Fruit is available In households Increased fruit consumption by children under 16 in households Increased fruit consumption by children under 16 in neighbourhood Rationale: Research shows that increasing availability of fruit in households increases consumption Assumption: Fruit is available when children are hungry Indicator: Amount of fruit consumed in households /week by children under 16 Intervention: increase positive image of fruit amongst children

PCAF ToC more like this?

TOC Process Step one: Determining long-term outcome Step two: Developing pathway to change through pre-conditions Step three: Defining interventions Step four: Describing assumptions and indicators

ToC and research

ToC to be used as framework for evaluation and research