Land Development Transport Investment Accessibili ty The Role of Transportation Investments in Shaping Land Development Robert Cervero UC Berkeley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module 7 STATION AREA PLANNING. Module 7 Station Area Planning Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed.
Advertisements

Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
SV-ITS PROGRAM: Silicon Valley Smart Corridor Project Overview
8 2008, Jeffrey Dorfman The Economics of Growth, Sprawl and Land Use Decisions Jeffrey H. Dorfman The University of Georgia.
Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study -- Benefit Assessment Presented by: Jack Lettiere, Commissioner New Jersey Department of Transportation Presented to:
Southern California Association of Governments Where Will Our Children Live? Darin Chidsey Member Relations Officer Growth, Change and Rising Prices.
Smart Growth Makes Money: Transit Oriented Development.
Presentation to MAHRA Strategies for Connecting Transportation and Affordable Housing: The Prince George’s County Perspective Wednesday, May 21, 2014 Eric.
Equitable Transit Oriented Development the Denver perspective.
Economic Development Benefit/Cost Transit Slides.
Announcements – Nov. 27, 2006 Exam III results are in. We will hand out error sheets on Wednesday. Student evaluation forms (ICES) Wednesday. Extra Credit.
Over-Parking of Silicon Valley TODs – Transit Agency Perspective Robert Swierk, AICP Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Putting Parking In Its.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Incorporating Greenhouse Gas Considerations in RTP Modeling Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers CTC Work Group Meeting on RTP Guidelines June 28, 2007.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
THE COSTS OF SUBURBAN SPRAWL AND URBAN DECAY. What is Suburban Sprawl? Sprawl is unsustainable development that wastes tax dollars, destroys farmland.
Station Development Update Melissa DuMond, Director of Planning and Integration April 29, 2015.
VISION FOR A KEARNY TOD February 27, 2008 Rob Lane Regional Plan Association.
High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Comprehensive.
Rail Transit’s Value-Added & the Commons Jennifer Kenyan PA 395 Common Assets January 29,2008.
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.
Making cities productive and liveable: economic principles for urban development. Tony Venables Dept of Economics University of Oxford.
WalkSanDiego, created 1998 Move San Diego, created 2004 Merged Staff 18 Board Members $1,040,000 Annual Budget.
1. 2 VIA Long Range Plan  Vision for High-Capacity Transit across VIA service area by 2035  From extensive public and stakeholder input  Prioritization.
WHAT THE HAPPENED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA!? Steve Andrews Senior Policy Advisor Mayor’s Office of Economic Development City of Los.
Part II: Case Studies 1.Arlington, VA: Transit-oriented Development Boosts Economy County-wide. 2.Portland, OR: Streetcar Increases Investment and Redevelopment.
Smart Growth / Smart Energy Toolkit Transit-Oriented Development Transit-Oriented Development TOD Smart Growth / Smart Energy Toolkit Making it Happen.
New Partners for Smart Growth January 27, 2006 Steve Kinsey Supervisor, Marin County Commissioner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Smart Growth.
Land Use Benefit/Cost Transit Slides. Development – Sprawl – Traffic – Roads An Important Local Issue In America  “What do you think is the most important.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
QGET -- Scenarios Analysis Quality Growth Efficiency ToolsNovember 14, 1998 November 15, 1999 Strategy Analysis Prepared for: Envision Utah Prepared by:
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
Beyond the Environment: Socio- Economic Sustainability & Meaningful Community Input in Land Use Decisions Sarah Muller March 7 th, 2008.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
NGA Center for Best Practices: Policy Academy on Land Use and Transportation Planning State of Illinois Team Lynne Padovan—Governor’s Office Randy Blankenhorn—IDOT.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Estimating Residential Infill Capacity: A Bay Area Application John D. Landis Department of City & Regional Planning UC Berkeley for Caltrans Horizons.
Transit Impact Evaluation: Context Types: –Predictive (ex ante) vs. Evaluative (ex post) –Inter-modal vs. No-Build (counterfactual) Challenge: Attribution.
1.Identify regional strategic areas for infill and investment 2.Develop “complete communities” 3.Develop nodes on a corridor 4.Plan for a changing demand.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? February 2005 Public Meeting on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
Smart Growth in the Central Valley Steve Pinkerton – City Manager City of Manteca CALAFCO Annual Conference October 30, 2009.
Dialog for Gateway Futures : A Progress Report Dr. Brian Deal University of Illinois.
Hiawatha Transit Corridor Evaluation June 15, 2005 Mark Fuhrmann Todd Graham.
Local Government and Suburbanization Local issues local government growth and sprawl smart growth.
Impacts of the Hiawatha Light Rail Line on Commercial and Industrial Property Values in Minneapolis Kate Ko and Xinyu (Jason) Cao Hennepin-University Partnership.
Prop 1B: Infrastructure Bonds 2007 Bay Area Vendor Fair Oakland, CA May 24,2007 Bay Area Transportation:
Transit Orientated Development HENNEPIN COUNTY Housing, Community Works & Transit NACCED September 20, 2011.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Resolution 3434 Transit-Oriented Development Policy Interim Evaluation September 7, 2006 MTC Elderly and Disabled Advisory Committee.
Cornelius Candidate Projects For Funding Total Candidate Projects$ 22 million –Rail Improvements ($10 million) –Local CIP Projects NC-115 upgrades ($ 1.9.
BUILDING MIXED-INCOME COMMUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT
Growth Management Legislative Discussion April 3, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion April 3, 2012.
SPRAWL What is Sprawl?. SPRAWL is…  Ask ten people, you’ll probably get 10 different answers  Random unplanned growth  Inadequate access to housing,
URBAN SPRAWL AND ENERGY INDEPENDENCE by Shauna L. Fleming Energy Law Spring 2007.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
Form & Function of Metropolitan America WALKABLE URBAN DRIVABLE SUB-URBAN WALKUPS: (Walkable Urban Places) DRVABLE EDGE CITIES WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS.
Smart Growth and Community Development: The Necessary Connection Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy Bruce Katz, Director The Brookings Institution.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
Economic Framework. Charlotte Metro Area 36th most populated Metropolitan Area in U.S. (2005) Mecklenburg County accounts for about 50% of Metro population.
Regional Roads Committee
Managing the spatial economy: the view from Victoria and Australia
Statewide Community Infrastructure Program (SCIP)
The Economics of Regional Growth
Presentation transcript:

Land Development Transport Investment Accessibili ty The Role of Transportation Investments in Shaping Land Development Robert Cervero UC Berkeley

Five Points (“Truths”?) 1) 1)Regionally, impacts are mainly Redistributive.  Highways:   California County Investments (Boarnet)   Beltway Studies

Highway Investments & Economic Productivity: Output in California Counties:

Beltways: Intra-Metropolitan Impacts  Regional: The Beltway Study (Payne-Maxie, 1980) – –No effect on regional growth rates – –Modest effect on retail sales differentials between CBDs and suburbs  Hartgen (1999):  Hartgen (1999): Non beltway cities (Charlotte, Nashville) have economically performed as well as beltway cities  Economic Development Research Group (1999):  Economic Development Research Group (1999): Review of bypasses in small & medium size cities: net effect is relatively small (neither devastating or savior of area)

2 nd Point 2) 2)Growth is a Prerequisite for “Big” Land Use Changes (i.e., has to be something to redistribute).  Transit (New Growth Nodes):  Transit (New Growth Nodes): Arlington County’s Metrorail  Transit (Redevelopment):  Transit (Redevelopment): New Jersey (Jersey City; Commuter Rail Towns)

Arlington County Office-Retail Development Trends : : 26,550 housing units/25.5 million sq. ft. commercial space added Corridors:Corridors: 52% of County tax base on 11% of land area Density: Density: Suburban standards would require 7 times area

The Ridership Payoff 39% of employed-residents rail-commute 39% of employed-residents rail-commute 37% of office workers rail-commute 37% of office workers rail-commute Balanced Development = Balanced Flows Balanced Development = Balanced Flows ~ 2/3 access by “non-motorized transport” ~ 2/3 access by “non-motorized transport”

LRT Redevelopment: Jersey City’s Hudson-Bergen Line

3 rd Point 3) 3)Timing/Congestion Levels Matter  Transit:  Transit: Santa Clara County’s Land-Value Premiuims  Highways:   California: Freeway Expansions Induce Big Land Use Changes   Ohio: Road investment have little impact

2000 Expanded, mature system Economic Boom/Congestion TOD:   4,500 Housing Units   9+ million sq. ft. of commercial space Cervero Study: Appreciable Capitalization benefits Santa Clara County LRT 1991 New, minimal system Recession/Little Congestion Landis Study: No capitalization benefit for housing

Transit Proximity & Value-Added: Santa Clara Valley, (24 % ) (103 % ) (28 % ) (17 % ) COMMERCIAL PARCELS RESIDENTIAL PARCELS

Land Use: Elasticities Elasticities No. Years Lagged Coefficient Residential Single- Family Multi- Family Non- Residential Office Retail-- Industrial Other %  in Share of County Building Permits %  in Share of County Building Permits %  in Freeway Lane-Mile Capacity %  in Freeway Lane-Mile Capacity Building Activity – Freeway Expansion Elasticities 24 California Freeway Segments:

Land-Use Shifts Behavioral Shifts Absorbed:InducedDemand Preserved Absorbed: External Factors What Happens to Added Road Capacity in 5-8 Years? California’s Experiences

Road improvements weakly correlated with growth Road projects generally follow growth Akron Ohio: Changes in Population & Road Improvements, Major Growth Areas

4 th Point 4) 4)Given Growth, Proactive Planning is Key to Leveraging “Smart Growth” Outcomes  Transit: San Diego   “Tiajuana Corridor”: No Growth, Little Planning, No Impacts   Mission Valley Corridor: Substantial Growth, Proactivism, Big Impacts

San Diego Rail Stations MF Housing Commercial SAN DIEGO TROLLEY & COASTER’s VALUE-ADDED

5 th Point 5) 5)Finance Connection: Value Capture – Makes Sense in Theory, Hard in Practice  Happens:   Indirectly: Property Tax Intake   More directly: Joint Development   Most directly: Benefit Assessment

Los Angeles: Mixed Experiences Multi-Family Housing Premium/Discount Benefit Assessment Benefit Assessment 9% of funds to retire Red Line Capital Bonds

Fiscal Policy Lessons? fiscal consequence – smart growth (e.g., TOD) reduce costly sprawlTransport investments, under the right conditions, are potentially powerful tools to shape growth: fiscal consequence – smart growth (e.g., TOD) reduce costly sprawl congested urban settings, commercial usesGovernments can and should participate in the value-added by transportation infrastructure, under right conditions – congested urban settings, commercial uses Benefit Assessment Joint Development Land-Banking/Co-Development